Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1996
By Róbinson Rojas Sandford.- MODERNIZATION THEORY AND THE PACIFIC (OR VIOLENT) TRANSITION TO INDUSTRIAL CAPITALISM Modernization theory is the historical product of three main events in the post-World War Two era: 1) the rise of the United States as a superpower to contain the growth of the international communist movement. For this, the United States financed the industrialization of Western Europe ( Marshall plan), the industrialization of South Korea and Taiwan, and the reconstruction of Japan. 2) the growth of a united worldwide communist movement led from Moscow and later on also from Beijing (with Soviet Union, People's Republic of China, Vietnam and Cuba as hot points). 3) the process of de-colonisation in Africa and Asia as an outcome of the disintegration of the former European colonial empires. By and large, including Latin American states which decolonised themselves between 1804 and 1844, the new nation-states were in a search for a model of development. Thus, the United Sates political and economic elites encouraged their social scientist to study the new nation-states, to devise ways of promoting capitalist economic development and political stability, defined as "social order", SO AS TO AVOID LOSING THE OLD AND NEW STATES TO THE SOVIET SOCIALIST BLOC. United States political scientists, economists, sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, and demographers teamed up and started publishing since the early 1950s. They adopted a) an EVOLUTIONARY THEORY, and b) a FUNCTIONALIST THEORY
Modernization theory is a theory used to explain the process of modernization within societies. The theory looks at the internal factors of a country while assuming that, with assistance, "traditional" countries can be brought to development in the same manner more developed countries have. Modernization theory attempts to identify the social variables which contribute to social progress and development of societies, and seeks to explain the process of social evolution. Modernization theory is subject to criticism originating among socialist and free-market ideologies, world-systems theorists, globalization theory and dependency theory among others. Modernization theory not only stresses the process of change but also the responses to that change. It also looks at internal dynamics while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The following are the modernization theories for development.
Modernization theory and dependency theory are the two most apparent post-colonial interpretations of and approaches to development. The two contrasting theories do not share similar outlooks on development, which makes their differences of major importance. The
The modern theory of development originated from the Enlightenment era to explain the process of modernization within societies which draws on ideas from the classical era (Guoyuan, 2018). It is the progressive transition from a 'pre-modern' or 'traditional' to a 'modern' society that originated from the ideas of German sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920). It provided the basis for the modernization paradigm developed by sociologist Talcott Parsons. The theory looks at the internal factors of a country while assuming that "traditional" countries can bring development in the similar way of developed countries. Modernization theory was a dominant model in the social sciences between 1950s and 1960s and then started to fall its popularity. After that again it gained attention again later in 1991 but remains a controversial issue (Knobl, 2003). Post-development theory is one of the most controversial thought in contemporary development studies (Matthews, 2010). This post-structural critique of institutional developments is known as post-development theory. The Post-Development Perspective became popular in the 1990s. Theorists within this perspective are critical of Western models of development, arguing that development was always unjust, that it never worked, and that developing countries should find their own pathways to development (Nustad, 2004). This theory has contributed not only to development studies but also to broader discussions about the so-called Third World and the future of postmodern world (Matthews, 2010). Post-development is a reaction to the tragedies of development and criticizes the idea of development and development as means to relieving people of the ‘Third World’ of their suffering (Dasgupta, 1985). Post-development theory reject the past development theory and practice and claim that development initiatives did more harm than good. Hence it initiated the need for “alternatives to development” (Matthews, 2010).
Research Starters Modernization Theory Modernization theory exemplifies a functionalist approach to inequality and focuses on the transition from "traditional" to "modern" society; it became an interdisciplinary (drawing on economics, political science, sociology, psychology, and history) approach to development and flourished in the 1950s and 1960s. Modernization theorists argued that modernization is inevitable, irreversible, and that the transformation from traditional to modern societies will occur in a linear way. Change can be achieved through the "diffusion" of modern economic and political institutions, technology, and culture through foreign investment and aid, and through education and mass media. Diffusion—or spread—of capital, technological innovations, and cultural traditions from developed to underdeveloped countries, is the mechanism that enables modernization. Modernization theory was widely criticized by the neo-Marxists, dependency theorists, and world-systems researchers and was largely discredited in the 1970s.
Development paradigms/Discourse , 2014
The name and concept of development is a bone of contention for many scholars on the globe, mainly following the Second World War. Consequently, the modernization, dependency and multiplicity paradigms were emerged having different approaches to development. Lamentably, the first two paradigms were believed did not bring the desired development if not at all. Due to this, they were exposed to many critiques. In contrast, the recent one multiplicity paradigm seems more acceptable. However, no model is free from critique. Since, the field has not experienced a linear evolution in which new approaches superseded and replaced previous ones; there is still a possibility to using such models today. Therefore, this paper rigorously assessed the different characteristics of modernization, dependency, and multiplicity paradigms.
El Taller de la Historia 04, 2024
Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 3/2024, pp.20-23, 2024
Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva, 2007
Psychology, Crime & Law, 2015
Trauma Violence & Abuse, 2024
AİLE İLİŞKİLERİ BAĞLAMINDA AİLE İŞLETMELERİ, 2020
Research, Society and Development
International Journal of Social Science & Management Studies (I.J.S.S.M.S.) Peer Reviewed–Refereed Research Journal, Indexing & Impact Factor - 5.2, Ex - UGC S.N. 5351. ISSN : 2454 - 4655, Vol. - 9, No. – 2, March – 2023, Conference Special Issue English 3rd , 2023
MİLEL VE NİHAL inanç, kültür ve mitoloji araştırmaları dergisi, 2015
Social Work in Public Health, 2011
Research Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Scientific Reports, 2019
Zoological Science, 2009
Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2004
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010