Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Healers Hands Really Do Get Hot

Patients receiving chemoradiation for cervical cancer are at risk for distress, chemoradiation-related side-effects, and immunosuppression. This prospective randomized clinical trial examined effects of a complementary therapy, Healing Touch (HT), versus relaxation training (RT) and usual care (UC) for (1) supporting cellular immunity, (2) improving mood and quality of life (QOL), and (3) reducing treatmentassociated toxicities and treatment delay in cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiation. Sixty women with stages IB1 to IVA cervical cancer were randomly assigned to receive UC or 4 ×/weekly individual sessions of either HT or RT immediately following radiation during their 6-week chemoradiation treatment. Patients completed psychosocial assessments and blood sampling before chemoradiation at baseline, weeks 4 and 6. Multilevel regression analyses using orthogonal contrasts tested for differences between treatment conditions over time. HT patients had a minimal decrease in natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC) over the course of treatment whereas NKCC of RT and UC patients declined sharply during chemoradiation (group by time interaction: p = 0.018). HT patients showed greater decreases in two different indicators of depressed mood (CES-D depressed mood subscale and POMS depression scale) compared to RT and UC (group by time interactions: p<0.05). No between group differences were observed in QOL, treatment delay, or clinically-rated toxicities. HT may benefit cervical cancer patients by moderating effects of chemoradiation on depressed mood and cellular immunity. Effects of HT on toxicities, treatment delay, QOL, and fatigue were not observed. Long-term clinical implications of findings are not known.

Healers Hands Really Do Get Hot! Dr. Melinda Connor, D.D., Ph.D., AMP, FAM, Faculty, Langara College and Adjunct Professor, Sr. Everest College-Online, Phoenix, AZ Dr. Linda Turner, RN, Ph.D, Director of Holistic Health Studies, Langara College Vancouver, BC. In the past 10 years there has been growth in the number of reputable peer reviewed studies done on energy healing and energy medicine. In the US the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed database of scientific and medical studies has included over 400 studies listed under search categories of Energy Medicine, Energy Healing, Healing Touch and Reiki. The QiGong Institute in California has compiled a database of 3000 abstracts of Qi Gong studies done around the world. Healing Touch International has a bibliography of over 150 studies which is available on their web site. Cutting edge research such as the NIH funded study by Dr. Susan Lutgendorf of the University of Iowa published in Brain Behavior and Immunity, 2010, demonstrated Healing Touch versus relaxation training and usual care supported cellular immunity, improved mood and quality of life, and reduced treatment-related toxicities among cervical cancer patients. Dr. Ann Baldwin of the University of Arizona recently presented findings at CAM Exeter, University of Exeter Medical School in Exeter, UK which demonstrated that several different schools of energy healing practitioners including Reiki, Resonance Modulation and Reconnection showed significant increase in micro-vascular profusion as they did an energy session. Healer’s hands really do get hot! Dr. Glen Rein, in a series of studies presented at International Society for the Study of Subtle Energy Research Symposium in June 2011, presented data which showed that energy practitioners could affect the speed at which DNA both winds and unwinds. Dr. Shamini Jain and her team at the Samueli Institute, has published findings in the journal Cancer, Jan 2012, which show that the Cortisol slope significantly decreased for biofield healing versus both mock healing and control (P < .04 in both cases) in breast cancer survivors. Dr. Melinda Connor of Langara College and Everest College, presented findings on a series of studies at the International Society for the Study of Subtle Energy Research Symposium in June 2010 which supports a potential test suite for energy practitioners. This suite includes practitioners producing oscillations at significantly higher than baseline rate of the extra low frequency magnetic field and the high frequency RF field, changing the pH of water, and producing physiological changes on demand that can be tracked in both the practitioner and client. ************************************** Cancer. 2012 Feb 1;118(3):777-87. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26345. Epub 2011 Aug 5. Complementary medicine for fatigue and cortisol variability in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Jain S, Pavlik D, Distefan J, Bruyere RL, Acer J, Garcia R, Coulter I, Ives J, Roesch SC, Jonas W, Mills PJ. Source Samueli Institute, Alexandria, Virginia, USA. [email protected] Abstract BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a chief complaint in cancer patients, and warrants effective treatment. Biofield therapies are complementary medicine approaches used by cancer populations. There is little information about their efficacy. METHODS: This blinded, randomized controlled trial examined the effects of 4 weeks (eight 1-hour sessions) of biofield healing compared with mock healing and a waitlist control group on fatigue in 76 fatigued breast cancer survivors (stages I-IIIa). Secondary outcomes were diurnal cortisol variability (via estimates of cortisol slope), depression, and quality of life (QOL). Treatment belief was assessed to explore whether belief predicted outcomes. Data were analyzed via hierarchical linear modeling. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between biofield healing and mock healing on belief; 75% thought they received biofield healing. Compared with controls, biofield healing significantly decreased total fatigue (P < .0005, Cohen's d = 1.04), as did mock healing (P = .02, Cohen's d = 0.68), with no significant differences between biofield healing and mock healing. Cortisol slope significantly decreased for biofield healing versus both mock healing and control (P < .04 in both cases; Cohen's d = 0.58). Belief predicted changes in QOL over and above group (P = .004, Cohen's d = 0.84). Belief did not impact fatigue or cortisol variability. CONCLUSIONS: Nonspecific factors are important in responses to biofield interventions for fatigue. Belief predicts QOL responses but not fatigue or cortisol variability. Biofield therapies increase cortisol variability independent of belief and other nonspecific factors. There is a need to further examine the effects of specific processes of biofield healing on outcomes for cancer populations. Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society. ********************************** Brain Behav Immun. 2010 Nov;24(8):1231-40. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Preservation of immune function in cervical cancer patients during chemoradiation using a novel integrative approach. Lutgendorf SK, Mullen-Houser E, Russell D, Degeest K, Jacobson G, Hart L, Bender D, Anderson B, Buekers TE, Goodheart MJ, Antoni MH, Sood AK, Lubaroff DM. Source Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. [email protected] Abstract Patients receiving chemoradiation for cervical cancer are at risk for distress, chemoradiation-related side-effects, and immunosuppression. This prospective randomized clinical trial examined effects of a complementary therapy, Healing Touch (HT), versus relaxation training (RT) and usual care (UC) for (1) supporting cellular immunity, (2) improving mood and quality of life (QOL), and (3) reducing treatmentassociated toxicities and treatment delay in cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiation. Sixty women with stages IB1 to IVA cervical cancer were randomly assigned to receive UC or 4 ×/weekly individual sessions of either HT or RT immediately following radiation during their 6-week chemoradiation treatment. Patients completed psychosocial assessments and blood sampling before chemoradiation at baseline, weeks 4 and 6. Multilevel regression analyses using orthogonal contrasts tested for differences between treatment conditions over time. HT patients had a minimal decrease in natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC) over the course of treatment whereas NKCC of RT and UC patients declined sharply during chemoradiation (group by time interaction: p = 0.018). HT patients showed greater decreases in two different indicators of depressed mood (CES-D depressed mood subscale and POMS depression scale) compared to RT and UC (group by time interactions: p<0.05). No between group differences were observed in QOL, treatment delay, or clinically-rated toxicities. HT may benefit cervical cancer patients by moderating effects of chemoradiation on depressed mood and cellular immunity. Effects of HT on toxicities, treatment delay, QOL, and fatigue were not observed. Long-term clinical implications of findings are not known. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Comment in Brain Behav Immun. 2010 Nov;24(8):1229-30. ********************************************************* Holist Nurs Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct;24(5):260-76. The Touchstone Process: an ongoing critical evaluation of reiki in the scientific literature. Baldwin AL, Vitale A, Brownell E, Scicinski J, Kearns M, Rand W. Source Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. [email protected] Abstract BACKGROUND: Reiki is used by a growing number of people but little is known about the scientific basis for its use. PURPOSE: The Touchstone Process was developed as an ongoing process to systematically analyze published, peer-reviewed studies of Reiki, the results being made accessible to the public online. METHOD: Thirteen scientifically qualified experts in the field of Reiki were assembled into 3 teams to retrieve, evaluate, and summarize articles using standardized, piloted evaluation forms. RESULTS: Summaries of 26 Reiki articles, including strengths and weaknesses, were posted on a newly developed Web site (www.centerforreikiresearch.org), together with an overall summary of the status of Reiki research and guidelines for future research: The Touchstone Process determined that only 12 articles were based on a robust experimental design and utilized well-established outcome parameters. Of these articles, 2 provided no support, 5 provided some support, and 5 demonstrated strong evidence for the use of Reiki as a healing modality. CONCLUSION: There is a need for further high-quality studies in this area. PMID: 20706088 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINEonstrated that Healing Touch practitioners were able to affect the View publication stats