Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Microstructures and aerodynamics of commercial swimsuits

2011, Procedia Engineering

In competitive swimming, every moment is important and counted. Professional swimmers attempt to utilize every possible legal means to enhance their performance. Using modern swimsuits, swimmers endeavor to reduce hydrodynamic drag thereby get competitive advantage. However, the hydrodynamic contribution of the swimsuits is not well studied and fully understood. The primary objective of this work is to the study aero/hydrodynamic behavior of a range of commercial swimsuits. Both aero/hydrodynamic and microscopic measurements were undertaken. The analyzed data indicate that the swimsuit surface structure has significant effect on aero/hydrodynamic properties especially on drag.

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 389–394 5th Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology (APCST) Microstructures and aerodynamics of commercial swimsuits Hazim Moria*, Harun Chowdhury, Firoz Alam School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne,Victoria, 3083, Australia Received 25 March 2011; revised 15 May 2011; accepted 16 May 2011 Abstract In competitive swimming, every moment is important and counted. Professional swimmers attempt to utilize every possible legal means to enhance their performance. Using modern swimsuits, swimmers endeavor to reduce hydrodynamic drag thereby get competitive advantage. However, the hydrodynamic contribution of the swimsuits is not well studied and fully understood. The primary objective of this work is to the study aero/hydrodynamic behavior of a range of commercial swimsuits. Both aero/hydrodynamic and microscopic measurements were undertaken. The analyzed data indicate that the swimsuit surface structure has significant effect on aero/hydrodynamic properties especially on drag. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of RMIT University Keywords: Aero/hydrodynamics; swimsuit; drag; wind tunnel; experimental measurement, surface structure 1. Introduction The body of a swimmer moving through the water experiences a retarding force known as drag. This drag can be divided approximately into three components: wave drag, form drag, and skin friction drag. The wave drag is associated with the work required to generate waves, form drag is the resistance to motion due to the shape of the body, and skin friction is the resistance to motion due to the area of the body with the water (the wetted area) [1]. The form drag is believed to be constituted almost 90% of the total drag [2, 3]. A series of studies by Vorontsov and Rumyantsev [4], Toussaint [5], Toussaint et al. [6, 7], Shimadzu et al. [8], Brandt and Pichowsky [9], Naemi et al. [10], Shahbazi and Sabbaghian [11], Pendergast et al. [12], Fish et al. [13] and Rushall et al. [14] have addressed the hydrodynamics of * Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 9925 6103; fax: +61 3 9925 6108. E-mail address: [email protected]. 1877–7058 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.05.103 390 Hazim Moria et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 389–394 swimmers as a function of body profile. However, little information on swimsuit hydrodynamics is available in the public domain, In order to understand the role of the swimsuit in enhancing swimming performance, especially the contributions made by the material surface morphology on drag and lift; we propose a macro scale swimsuit testing methodology. The textile material surface morphology is important in many respects. It may constrict the swimmer’s body so as to reduce the apparent roughness of the natural body shape. It may help to alter the swimmer’s buoyancy. For hydrodynamic drag the surface roughness is an important parameter because it can change the boundary layer state from laminar to turbulent, thus reducing the overall drag of the swimmer. In order to understand the effect of surface morphology of various swimsuits on the hydrodynamics of swimming, a large study was undertaken at RMIT University. As a part of this study, here we examined the aerodynamic properties of several commercial swimsuits and analyzed the microstructures. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Description of macro scale testing Standard cylinder with a 110 mm diameter and 200 mm length were used in this study. Textile sleeves were fabricated for the cylinder such that each fabric had similar tensions when installed on the cylinder. Figure 1 illustrates the set up in the wind tunnel. The cylinder was made of PVC tubing and made solid using fillers for structural rigidity. Further details about the macro scale can be found in Moria et al. [1]. Fig.1. Experimental bare cylinder set up in RMIT Industrial Wind Tunnel 2.2. Description of swimsuit fabrics Five different new of swimsuits have been selected for this study. These suits are: a) Speedo LZR racer, b) Speedo FSII, c) Diana submarine, d) TYR Sayonara and e) Spalding full length. Table 1 shows 391 Hazim Moria et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 389–394 the swimsuit materials and their compositions. Tests were conducted for each swimsuit fabric for a range of speeds from 10 to 130 km/h. Pictorial views of these fabrics are shown in Figure 2. Table 1. Material and composition of swimsuits used in this study Brand Material Composition 1 Speedo LZR 70% Nylon (Polyamide) &30% Elastane (Lycra) 2 Speedo FSII 81% Nylon (Polyamide) &19% Elastane (Lycra) 3 Diana submarine 66% Nylon (Polyamide) & 34% Elastane (Lycra) 4 Spalding full length 82% Nylon (Polyamide) & 18% Elastane (Lycra) 5 TYR Sayonara 55.5% PU-Chloroprene, 40.5% Nylon (Polyamide) & 4% Titanium Alloy (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Fig.2. Experimental set up of swimsuits’ fabric in RMIT Industrial Wind Tunnel 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Microscopic analysis of fabrics As mentioned earlier, the surface roughness of swimsuit materials can play a significant role in the optimization of drag and lift. In general, for streamlined bodies, the drag increases with increasing surface roughness. However, for bluff bodies such as a circular cylinder or sphere, an increase in surface roughness can cause a decrease in the drag. In this case, at a critical value of CD, the boundary layer of a smooth cylinder transitions from laminar to turbulent. The turbulent flow possesses more momentum than the laminar flow and thus, the flow stays attached longer and wake region behind the cylinder becomes considerably narrower. The result is a considerable drop in pressure drag with a slight increase in friction drag, combining to give a smaller overall drag and CD. The critical Reynolds number can be reduced by tripping the boundary layer by using a rough surface. In the case of textile fabrics, the roughness depends on the fabrics microstructure. The microstructure is characterized by the fiber physical dimension, orientation, crimp or curl, porosity, thickness, and tightness or openness, etc. In order to understand the macro-structural behavior of various swimsuit materials, an electron microscopic analysis was conducted. Electron microscope images at 200 times magnification are illustrated in Figure 3. The figure shows the fiber orientation, curl, porosity, thickness, tightness or openness and fiber bundles of surface structures for Speedo LZR, Speedo FSII, TYR Sayonara, Diana submarine and Spalding swimsuits fabrics. The 392 Hazim Moria et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 389–394 figure also shows the 200 times magnifications of the bare cylinder surface. The external surface of the TYR Sayonara is relatively smooth as it is made of polyurethane coating. Spalding is the roughest surfaced fabric among all. Speedo LZR is relatively smoother than Diana and FSII fabric. Also Diana is smoother than FSII. On the other hand, the surface roughness of the Spalding is relatively rougher than any other suit fabrics. Fig.3. Electron microscopic images of different materials with 200x magnification 3.2. Aerodynamic results In this paper, the dimensionless quantity, drag coefficient (CD) are presented as a function of Reynolds number (Re). The CD and Re were calculated by using the following formulas: CD= FD /0.5ȡV2A and Re= ȡVd/μ. The CD values for all 5 swimsuit fabrics are shown in Figure 4 as a function of Re. For comparison purpose, the CD values of the bare cylinder are also presented in the figure. 393 Hazim Moria et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 389–394 1.20 Drag Coefficient (CD) 1.00 Bare Cylinder Speedo LZR Speedo FSII Diana TYR Spalding 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.0E+00 5.0E+04 1.0E+05 1.5E+05 2.0E+05 Reynolds Number (Re) 2.5E+05 3.0E+05 Fig. 4. CD variation with Re for swimsuit fabrics The surface roughness has significant effect on the air flow characteristics over the surface. The data indicates the early transition for the Spalding fabric at Re=1.22 105. But the relatively smooth Speedo LZR fabric undergoes a late transition at Re=2.03 105. Similarly, Speedo FSII and Diana Submarine undergoes flow transition at Re=1.43 105 and Re=1.83 105 respectively. On the other hand, no transition is observed with the TYR Sayonara and the smooth cylinder within the experimental Re range. However, the minimum CD values for the Spalding, Speedo LZR, Speedo FSII and Diana Submarine fabric are almost 0.47 with very little variation after the transition occurs. Nevertheless, based on required Re range, an optimal utilization of various swimsuit fabrics with different roughness can be used to gain the advantage for the swimmer. 4. Conclusions The flow transition can be manipulated for gaining hydrodynamic advantages by using an optimal surface roughness of the fabric material. The surface morphology can be directly related to the aero/hydrodynamic parameters. Acknowledgements We express our sincere gratitude and thanks to the Government of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for providing the PhD Scholarships to the first author. We also express our sincere thanks to Mr. Phil Francis, RMIT Microscopy and Microanalysis facility, School of Applied Sciences, RMIT University, Australia. 394 Hazim Moria et al. / Procedia Engineering 13 (2011) 389–394 References [1] Moria H, Chowdhury H, Alam F, Subic A, Smits AJ, Jassim R and Bajaba NS. Contribution of swimsuits to swimmer’s performance. Procedia Engineering 2010;2(2):2505-2510. [2] Vorontsov AR, Rumyantsev VA. Resistive Forces in Swimming & Propulsive Forces in Swimming. Biomechanics in Sport (edited by Zatsiorsky). UK: Blackwell; 2000. [3] Nakashima M, Sato Y. Optimization of arm stroke in freestyle swimming by Simulation. Engineering of Sports III 2009;1:207-211. [4] Toussaint, H. M., Roos, P. E. and Kolmogorov, S., The determination of drag in front crawl swimming, Journal of Biomechanics 2004; 37(11):1655-1663, November. [5] Toussaint, H. M., de Groot, G., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., Active Drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers, Journal of Biomechanics 1988; 21:435-438. [6] Shimadzu, H., Shibata, R. and Ohgi, Y., Modelling swimmers’ speeds over the course of a race, Journal of Biomechanics 2008; 41 (3):549-555. [7] Brandt, R. A. and Pichowsky, M. A., (1995), Conservation of energy in competitive swimming, Journal of Biomechanics 1995; 28 (8):925-933, August. [8] Naemi R., Eassonb, W. J. and Sanders, R. H., Hydrodynamic glide efficiency in swimming. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2009, available online from 18 June [9] Shahbazi, M. M., Sabbaghian, S., Drag force to body dimensions in Butterfly swimming, Proceedings of XXIII International Symposium of Biomechanics in Sports 2005, University of Ottawa, 225-228. [10] Pendergast, D. R., Mollendorf, J. C., Cuviello, R. and Termin, A. C., Application of theoretical principles to swimsuit drag reduction, Sport Engineering 2006; 9:65-76. [11] Blümich, B., NMR Imaging of Materials, Clarendon Press 2000, Oxford. [12] Chan, E.C., & Lien, F-S., Permeability Effects of Turbulent Flow through a Porous Insert in a Backward-Facing-Step Channel, Transp Porous Med 2005; 59:47-71. [13] Fish, F., Smits, A. J. and Bart-Smith, H., Biomimetic swimmer inspired by the manta ray, Chapter 19 in Biomimetics: Nature-Based Innovation, Ed. Y. Bar-Cohen, 2010, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. [14] Rushall, B.S., Sprigings, E.J., Holt, L. E., & Cappaert, J. M., “A Re-Evaluation of Forces in Swimming”. Journal of Swimming Research 1994; 10:6-30.