Academia.eduAcademia.edu

The Meaning of Life W2019 syllabus

You know the purpose of the actions you perform in your life. You eat because you’re hungry, sleep because you’re tired, and read the news because you want to know what’s going on in the world. But what’s the purpose of your life as a whole, of life as such? The answer to that question isn’t obvious. In this course, we’ll analyze and evaluate theories of the meaning of life. Although this might seem like a vague or frivolous topic, it’s actually one of the most important. People have wondered about it ever since we began to think seriously, and a great many approaches to the problem have been developed. We’ll encounter a variety of fascinating themes: • What do we mean when we ask “What is the meaning of life?” What sort of question is it, and what sorts of replies count as plausible candidates for an answer? • Is there a meaning of life? Maybe life is pointless, absurd, or evil. • What is the significance of mortality? How should we think about living with death? • What can usefully be said about how best to live or what makes life worth living? • Why is there something rather than nothing? And given that there is something, why is it as it is, given that it might have been otherwise? Why anything? Why this? Most of the authors we’ll read are philosophers (Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Thomas Nagel, and Susan Wolf, among others), and we’ll use the philosophical method to study our topic: breaking the problem down into its elementary parts, carefully defining terms and concepts, and evaluating the validity of arguments and evidence for and against the various claims on offer. In addition to philosophers, however, we’ll also consult a psychologist (Jonathan Haidt), a couple of poets (Wallace Stevens, Philip Larkin), some painters and sculptors (Böcklin, Michelangelo, Rodin), a composer or two (Rachmaninoff and perhaps R. Strauss, Wagner, or Berlioz), and three films (Alain Resnais and Marguerite Duras’s Hiroshima mon amour, Carol Reed’s The Third Man, and Jean-Luc Godard’s Breathless). This course won’t provide you with any easy answers to the question of the meaning of life. But it will enable you to learn your way around the neighborhood of the question and improve your ability to ask and answer it for yourself.

Philosophy 91: The Meaning of Life: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and More Stanford Continuing Studies Winter 2019 Frederick M. Dolan ([email protected]) Course Summary: Please see course page for full description and the weekly outline (below) for topic details. Required Books: Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling (Penguin Classics, 1986). Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science (Vintage, 1974). Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (Vintage, 1989). Required Film: Alain Resnais (dir.), Hiroshima mon amour (1959). (Available streaming on Amazon.) Grade Options and Requirements: No Grade Requested (NGR): No work will be required; no credit shall be received; no proof of attendance can be provided. Credit/No Credit (CR/NC): Students must attend at least 80% of class sessions. Letter Grade (A, B, C, D, No Pass): Students must attend at least 80% of class sessions and submit a written reflection of around 800-1000 words (or longer) focused on a reasonably precise question or problem explored in the course. Tentative Weekly Outline: Week 1: Introduction: the big picture. There’s no assigned reading for the first meeting. I’ll talk about how the philosophical method can be applied to the question of the meaning of life, and explain two approaches to the topic: Externalism and Internalism. N.B. I’ve posted an essay by David Wiggins, “Truth, Invention, and the Meaning of Life” (1976). It’s an important essay and it informs the approach I take in this course, but it’s also a rather difficult essay. It is not an assigned reading, but I’m making it available in case anyone wants to consult it. Week 2: Questioning the value of life. Is there a meaning of life? Maybe life is pointless, absurd, or evil. Leo Tolstoy, “My Confession,” Arthur Schopenhauer, “On the Sufferings of the World,” Albert Camus, “The Myth of Sisyphus,” and Thomas Nagel, “The Absurd” (available on the Canvas course website). 2 Week 3: From the meaning of life to the meaning of death. What is the significance of mortality? How should we think about living with death? Shelly Kagan, selections from Death (on Canvas). Phillip Larkin, “Aubade” (on Canvas). Week 4: An Externalist answer: Kierkegaard. Life offers us a stark choice between two alternatives: inauthenticity and despair (the “knight of resignation”) versus authenticity and anxiety (the “knight of faith”). Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling: Preface, Attunement, Speech in Praise of Abraham, Preamble from the Heart. Week 5: An Externalist answer: Kierkegaard (continued). The moral ambiguities of the authentic life. Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling: Problema I-III, Epilogue. Week 6: Filming Despair and Authenticity. A knight of resignation meets a knight of faith. Alain Resnais (dir.), Hiroshima, mon amour (1959). Week 7: An Internalist answer: Nietzsche. Passive nihilism, active nihilism, and the “death” of God. Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, §§ 1, 116, 125, 143, 343-44, 349, 357, 382. ––. Beyond Good and Evil, §§ 199-201, 257-265. Week 8: An Internalist answer: Nietzsche (continued). Life as a work of art: the “free spirit.” Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, §§ 4-5, 26, 39, 54-55, 124, 132, 290, 295, 371. ––. Beyond Good and Evil, §§ 24-44, 268-70, 272-73, 284, 287, 292. Wallace Stevens, “Sunday Morning” (on Canvas). Week 9: How should we live? The best way of life for human beings. Aristotle, selections from the Ethics, Susan Wolf, “Meaningfulness: A Third Dimension of the Good Life,” Jonathan Haidt, “Finding Meaning in Vital Engagement,” and Bernard Williams, selections from “Persons, Character and Morality” (on Canvas). Week 10: The ultimate question. Why is there something rather than nothing? Given that there evidently is something, why is it as it is, given that it might have been otherwise? How should we live with vital but unanswerable questions? Derek Parfit, “Why Anything? Why This?” (on Canvas). Charles Ives, The Unanswered Question (1908, rev. 1930-35).