TURKISH SOCIOLOGY’S FOOTPRINT IN THE HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY

INTERNATIONAL HISTORIES OF SOCIOLOGY Conference Proceedings of the Research Committee on History of Sociology from the XIV ISA World Congress of Sociology in Yokohama, 13‐19 July 2014 Edited by Per Wisselgren, Peter Baehr & Kiyomitsu Yui Please observe that this electronic volume is a pre‐publication effort only. The distribution is restricted to members of the Research Committee on the History of Sociology (RCHS) of the International Sociological Association (ISA). The authors retain the copyright of their own texts. Please do not quote or circulate any of the texts without the express permission of the author. Copyright © 2014 by each author 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Per Wisselgren, Peter Baehr & Kiyomitsu Yui 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 6 THE WAR ON TERROR AS A MODE OF SUBJECTION: POWER / KNOWLEDGE DYNAMICS IN THE AGE OF EMPIRE Michael Blain 7 DATA ARCHIVES & SURVEYS (“SAVED BY GESIS”) Charles Crothers 29 WHY DEAD ENDS MAY REMAIN WELL-TRODDEN PATHS: EPISTEMIC HOPES AND OBSTACLES IN THE HISTORY OF THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE Christian Dayé 34 EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF A GLOBAL ENCOUNTER: THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS (IIASA) Matthias Duller 42 A LIFE TRAJECTORY OF A SWEDISH SOCIOLOGIST Hedvig Ekerwald 52 NATION-BUILDING AND PATH DEPENDENCY: THE CASE OF MAX WEBER Sven Eliaeson 58 SCIENCE OF SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE NORWEGIAN EDUCATIONAL AND VOCATIONAL FIELDS 1910–1940 Marte Feiring 83 8. THE FIRST TWO PARADIGMS OF EMPIRICAL SOCIAL RESEARCH IN GERMANY DURING THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY – THE IMPACT OF SCHMOLLER´S AND WEBER´S DISPUTE ABOUT VALUES ON THE STRATEGIES OF EMPIRICAL SOCIAL RESEARCH Irmela Gorges 102 9. THE EMERGENCE OF THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH COUNCIL AS A SUPRANATIONAL FUNDING INSTITUTION Barbara Hoenig 10. SOCIOLOGY AS SOCIAL MEMORY: NARRATIVE IDENTITY AND KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION IN THE STUDY OF “CHINESE MODERNIZATION” IN COLD WAR TAIWAN A-chin Hsiau 3 111 123 11. THE INFLUENCE OF GABRIEL TARDE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF JAPANESE SOCIOLOGY IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY Yoshifusa Ikeda 134 12. ON HANNAH ARENDT’S UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIETY OR THE SOCIAL: RESISTING UNPRECEDENTED CRISES Kyohei Kawai 137 13. TURKISH SOCIOLOGY'S FOOTPRINT IN THE HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY Tülay Kaya 142 14. THE SOCIOLOGY OF WORK AND FACTORY SOCIOLOGISTS IN COMMUNIST POLAND Jarosław Kilias 149 15. THE FORGOTTEN ONE OF THE TRIAD: WHY DID RENE WORMS, AND NOT EMILE DURKHEIM OR GABRIEL TARDE, FAIL? Sebastien Mosbah-Natanson 160 16. JAPANESE CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE Michikuni Ohno 167 17. OLD WAYS AND NEW WAYS: THE RELATION BETWEEN CRIMINOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY IN POST-WAR SWEDEN Anders Pedersson 176 18. AUNTIE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT SOCIOLOGISTS DO. DON´T BLAME HER! A HISTORY OF PROFESSIONALIZATION OF SOCIOLOGY IN ARGENTINA (1960- 2010) Diego Pereyra & Leandro Aramburu 190 19. OBEDIENCE TO AUTHORITY: FROM BINET TO ASCH TO MILGRAM Harry Perlstadt 203 20. HOW CAN WE CHARACTERISE NATIONAL SOCIOLOGIES? (AND SHOULD WE CHARACTERISE NATIONAL SOCIOLOGIES) Jennifer Platt 210 21. AN “AREA STUDIES” PROGRAM IN FRANCE: SCIENTIFIC, INSTITUTIONAL AND GEOPOLITICAL RATIONALES DURING THE COLD WAR Ioana Popa 218 22. THE STATISTICAL CONSTRUCTION OF ALTERITY: GOVERNING NATIONAL POPULATION BY NUMBERS IN FRANCE AND GERMANY (1860-1900) Léa Renard 225 4 23. AGAINST THE STATE-CENTERED MODEL OF SOCIAL POLICY: THE MOMENT OF SCHÄFFLE IN THE SOCOLOGY OF DURKHEIM Takayoshi Ryuo 241 24. EUROPEAN (SOCIAL) SCIENCE POLICY-MAKING: SETTING THE AGENDA OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES IN THE EU FRAMEWORK PROGRAMMES Rafael Schögler 248 25. DANIEL BELL AS POST-COLD WAR INTELLECTUAL: THE IDEA OF “TRIUNITY” BEYOND THE COGNITIVE FRAMEWORKS OF THE COLD WAR Shinsaku Shimizu 268 26. ON INTERMEDIATE GROUPS IN JAPANESE SOCIOLOGY Yoshihiko Shiratori 278 27. THE FORBIDDEN DISCIPLINE: THE IMPACT OF THE PINOCHET DICTATORSHIP ON CHILEAN SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGISTS Elisabeth Simbürger 281 28. NORBERT ELIAS: FIGURATION AS A SOLUTION OF PROBLEM OF SOCIETY OF INDIVIDUALS Jiří Šubrt 300 29. HOUSING ESTATES AS EXPERIMENTAL FIELDS OF SOCIAL RESEARCH Yasushi Sukenari 312 30. BETWEEN THE WAR AND CONSOLIDATION OF COMMUNIST POWER: FORGOTTEN SOCIAL RESEARCH IN POLAND IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 1940S Antoni Sułek 325 31. ORDINARY SOCIOLOGIST: THE TEACHING ASSISTANTS Kamanto Sunarto 331 32. LANGUAGE AS A ZOMBIE CATEGORY OF SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY Mitsuhiro Tada 341 33. NATIONHOOD AS ESTABLISHMENT AND CANCELLATION OF BOUNDARIES: MARCEL MAUSS Jean Terrier 350 34. THE POLITICS OF INDIGENOUS SOCIAL SCIENCE: A VIEW FROM INDIAN SOCIOLOGY Manish Thakur 354 APPENDIX: Program of all RCHS sessions at the Yokohama Congress 368 5 INTRODUCTION As its contribution to the XIV ISA World Congress of Sociology in Yokohama, 13-19 July 2014, the Research Committee on History of Sociology (RC08) organised nineteen sessions. These included fourteen paper presentation sessions, one author meets critics session, one integrative session, one joint session, one roundtable session with five roundtables, and a business meeting. Altogether the RC08 program comprised 100 accepted papers. In preparation for the RC08 program, the Program Coordinating Committee decided to put together an electronic volume in order, first, to document the event; second, to offer an opportunity for all RC08 members -- both those who were able to come to Yokohama and those who were not -- to be apprised of papers that they were not able to attend in person; third, to provide some advance publicity for the papers in the form of a prepublication. Announcing the call for papers to all authors of accepted papers, we stressed that the post-conference submission of papers was an option not a requirement. Still, we received as many as 34 contributions. Since this is a pre-publication effort only -- and to avoid a conflict for those who plan to revise their papers into articles for publication -- the distribution of this volume is restricted exclusively to RC08 members. It will not be published on any public website. For the same reason we ask you not to circulate or quote any of the texts without the express permission of the author concerned. Email addresses of the authors are provided with their papers below. For similar (pre-publication) reasons we have restricted our role as editors and offered only very light editing of the papers, avoiding a uniform style of referencing etc. Nor have we tried to structure the volume thematically. The papers are instead ordered alphabetically after the family name of each author. To get a sense of the thematic contexts of the papers, the full RC08 program is enclosed as an appendix. We hope you will enjoy reading the papers! Umeå, Hong Kong and Kobe in January 2015, Per Wisselgren, Peter Baehr & Kiyomitsu Yui 6 13. TURKISH SOCIOLOGY’S FOOTPRINT IN THE HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY Tülay Kaya Istanbul University Turkey [email protected] © 2014 Tülay Kaya Abstract: A simple glance at classical or contemporary sociological theory books is enough to recognize the overall tendency of limiting the history of sociology to the West in general, without even mentioning the existence of other sociological traditions. The said situation has also a strong relation with the tendency of considering Western history as the main and the only source of sociology. The purpose of this paper is to show that history of sociology cannot be limited to Western traditions only. In that term, the emergence of sociology in Turkey and its establishment as an academic discipline at higher education institutions is a good example. As the need for knowledge and practice of sociology in Turkey was different from the conditions the West was facing, development of sociology had its own unique way in Turkey. Sociology as an academic discipline was first taught in Darülfünun (House of Sciences) which was a higher education institution in the Ottoman Empire period. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and with the emergence of the new Turkish Republic, new reforms took place in higher education. In 1933 Darülfünun was reorganized and named Istanbul University. Since then up until now lots of sociology departments have been established at various Turkish universities. One of the assertions of this paper is that while sociology is considered as a mere Western heritage, the history of sociology’s emergence and involvement in higher education in Turkey, on the other hand, shows that particular social and historical contexts of Turkey have created different needs for and relations with it as a science resulting in different approaches and traditions which are also scientific and historical contributions and which should not be overlooked. Keywords: Turkish sociology, History of sociology, Turkish society, Education *** It has been over 100 years since sociology emerged as a scientific discipline. During this time Western Europe’s societal problems which provided a base for the emergence of sociology have already been overcome. Besides, the interest dedicated to sociology has not been confined within Europe and different perspectives in sociology have been developed in other parts of the world. However, these efforts and traditions which were developed by non Western parts of the world generally have been overlooked in the studies regarding history of sociology. A simple glance at classical or contemporary sociological theory books is enough to recognize the overall tendency of limiting the history of sociology to the West 142 without even mentioning the existence of other sociological traditions. The said situation has a strong relation with the attitude of considering Western history as the main and the only source of sociology. The purpose of this paper is to show that history of sociology cannot be limited to Western traditions only. In that term the emergence of sociology in Turkey and its establishment as an academic discipline at higher education institutions is a good example. This year the 100 year anniversary of sociology as an academic discipline was celebrated in Turkey. The existence of sociology in Turkey dates back to the Ottoman Empire time in the 19th century while Durkheim was still alive (Sezer 1989, p. 30). Historically the interest in sociology emerged at a time when the Ottoman Empire, in quest of modernization, started applying various reforms in nearly all aspects of the society from administration to army, law, education, etc. The Ottoman Empire’s intellectuals developed interest in sociology with a belief that knowledge of sociology could be a remedy to the Empire’s problems. However, establishing the relationship with sociology cannot be confined to the personal interests of these intellectuals. As it can be seen in the publications of Yusuf Akçura1, Prince Sabahattin2 and Ziya Gökalp3, it is, in fact, more than that. Even though the Turkish intellectuals’ efforts to find a remedy for the society’s problems through the sociology traditions they acquainted themselves with in the West and the fact that they strongly represented these traditions in Turkey were seen as a weakness, their intellectual efforts for keeping the empire intact in a changing world made significant contributions to the history of Turkish sociology and the discipline of sociology in general. In this respect, the establishment of sociology in the USA and in Turkey presents two strikingly disparate examples (Kaya 2011). While sociology was transferred to the USA as a guide for a newly emerging society, the case was completely opposite for Ottoman Empire as the empire was about to collapse and the main motivation was to preserve whatever had possibly survived the decline. Nevertheless, sociology was transferred to the USA and Turkey from Continental Europe roughly at the same time. Despite the fact that the discipline was imported, original sociological studies have been produced both in the USA and Turkey. In both countries the relation with sociological knowledge depended on the social conditions which caused the needs for such knowledge in the two dissimilar geographies. However the main tendency in the field of sociology is to overlook the societal differences and to categorize the world history in respect to a specific perspective and sources. Or the similar case happens as Rawney describes in center-periphery relations: “The role of the periphery is to supply data, and later to apply knowledge in the form of technology and method. The role of the metropole, as well as producing data, is to collate and process data, producing theory (including methodology) and developing applications which are later exported to the periphery.” (Raewney 2014, p. 211) So looking at the Turkish society and sociology through the lens of Western centered perspectives is actually to put Turkish society and its problems into the position of just a paradigm to support Western ideas. Consequently, in such a way, it is not possible to evaluate the contribution of Turkish sociology’s richness to the field. Our country is a special example to comprehend the fact that sociology wouldn’t be developed independent from the problems of the society in which it emerged. The decisiveness of the Turkish 1 Üç Tarz-ı Siyaset (Three Style of Politics), 1904 Türkiye Nasıl Kurtarılabilir (How Turkey Can Be Saved), 1917 3Türkleşmek, İslamlaşmak, Muasırlaşmak (Becoming Turk, Becoming Islamic, Becoming Contemporary) (Published as a series of essays in 1912, and as a book in 1918) 2 143 society’s conditions on establishing relation with sociology has actually helped Turkish sociology to gain its strengths and richness. In this respect, to be able to evaluate the authentic features of Turkish sociology, it is necessary to understand the social and political background of the Turkish society. Specific periods and intellectuals have made significant contributions to the development of sociology in Turkey. 19th century was a crucial period for the birth of sociology as a science without a question, but the said period was also undoubtedly important for the development of Turkish sociology in a particular way. In the 19th century the world conjuncture was transformed radically. While the West started to be presented as the new model which was supposed to be followed by the rest of the world, Ottoman Empire was facing the reality of collapsing. In this context of political and social reality, “[T]he first acquaintance of Turks with sociology took place in a period in which the same people were intensively engaged in polity considerations…For most of this period, Ottoman sultans and their close circles on one side, and the Turkish intellectuals and activists, later known as the ‘Young Turks’, on the other, were engaged in intensive efforts to reinvigorate and modernize the Ottoman state through reforms in its basic structure.” (Çelebi 2002, p. 254) With a reflex to save the state, the solution was seen in transforming the social organization by taking Western countries as a model (modernization-westernization). Sociology was seen as a tool to adapt the identity of the Turkish society to the new political decisions for being a modern country. In such atmosphere, sociology took its place in Turkey not at educational institutions, but through publications first (Ülken 1950, p. 140). In this time course, various Western philosophy and sociology movements found supporters in Turkey. In this respect, it is important to note that Ahmet Şuayip was mentioning about Durkheim in 1908 and Mustafa Suphi wrote an introductory book about French sociology in 1911, whereas Durkheim wrote his most significant works in 18971912. (Sezer 1989, p. 30). Ahmet Rıza was one of the followers of Auguste Comte. According to Niyazi Berkes, the influence of Comte on Turkish sociology dates back to 1883 when Ahmet Rıza went to Paris. After his return, he introduced Comte’s philosophy to Turkey through his writings. (Berkes 1936, p. 241). In the early period, Spencer was also got in contact with. In 1896, his writings on Spencer were published in Rıza Tevfik’s Maarif journal (Sezer 1989, p. 30). The interest shown in Spencer is even more. In Ulum-ı İçtimaiye ve İktisadiye (Sciences of Sociology and Economics), a journal published by Rıza Tevfik, Cavit and Ahmet Şuayıp, the biological sociology argument of H.Spencer, Schaeffle and R. Worms was defended. İçtihad (Opinion), a journal which was established in 1903 in Cairo by Dr. Abdullah Cevdet who used to argue for radically adopting the western civilization and who translated many works by Gustave Le Bon into Turkish is also important in terms of tracing back to the interest of the period for the idea of modernization was at its axis (Ülken 1963, p. 28). These names and publications are only some of those which endeavoured during the period. During this period various sociological ideas and traditions which were produced in the West were brought forward through these publications. Emergence of authentic Turkish sociology wouldn’t have been possible without the efforts of the intellectuals who presented an understanding regarding the potential ideals the new social identity could be created on. Among these people, two names significantly stood out with their studies which are echoing up until today. One of them was Prince Sabahattin (1879-1948) who 144 introduced Science Sociale’s sociology and the other was Ziya Gökalp (I875-I924) who introduced Durkheim’s sociology in Turkey. Prince Sabahattin’s ideas during his lifetime were not accepted as widely as Gökalp’s. The said situation must be associated with the Turkish society’s conditions which provided a base for Gökalp’s ideas to gain more prevalence by comparison with Prince Sabahattin. Even though they both have followers today, the honour of being ‘the founder of sociology in Turkey’ would be ascribed to Ziya Gökalp. Sociology as an academic discipline was first taught by Ziya Gökalp in 1914 at Darülfünun (House of Sciences) which was a higher education institution in the Ottoman Empire period. The Sociology Chair at Darülfünun is one of the oldest sociology establishments in the world. Gökalp, in addition to his efforts at Darülfünun and his publications, was also among the founders of the first association which was Türk Bilgi Derneği (Turkish Knowledge Association) in 1913 (Çelebi 2002, p. 256). Gökalp also founded İçtimaiyat Darü’l-Mesaisi (Sociology Institute) which was attached to the Chair in 1915 and which can be seen as part of the efforts for the institutionalization of sociology in Turkey. In relation to these efforts, Gökalp, together with Necmettin Sadak, started publishing periodicals called İçtimaiyat Mecmuası (Journal of Sociology) in 1917 under the roof of Darülfünun. Due to the war conditions, İçtimaiyat Mecmuası was published for only 6 issues. It can be regarded as the first series of Sosyoloji Dergisi (The Turkish Journal of Sociology) which is still being published today by Istanbul University Department of Sociology. Periodicals, besides being among the core elements of institutionalization, are very important sources as they allow to trace the existing potential and tendencies in the country. In this regard, Sosyoloji Dergisi holds a very special position in the history of Turkish sociology. The extent to which the developments in the field of sociology was monitored since the institutionalization of sociology in Turkey can be traced through this journal. (Kaya 2008, pp.713-730) The largest share in establishing an institutionalized identity for sociology in Turkey is Gökalp’s. However, due to war conditions, he wasn’t able to continue to role of being the Chair of Sociology for many years. After the I. World War ended in 1919 with the occupation of Istanbul, Gökalp was also among the ones who were deported. Even though Gökalp’s former students took on the Chair of Sociology after Gökalp at Darülfünun, the circumstances were already different. First of all, the Republic was proclaimed in 1923 and the Ottoman Empire’s political existence ended. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and with the emergence of the Turkish Republic, new reforms took place in higher education as well. In 1933 Darülfünun was reorganized and named as Istanbul University. Relatively for a long time, the Chair of Sociology which was founded at Darülfünun and continued at Istanbul University was the only center of sociology in country. The first center outside of Istanbul University was founded at Ankara University in 1939 and ceased to exist in 1947 and the professors of sociology there were fired (Kasapoğlu 2005, p. 538). The Chair of Sociology at Ankara University is commented in various sources as one of the two schools of Turkish sociology - the other one being the Chair of Sociology at Istanbul University (Ertürk 1990; Kasapoğlu 1999; Alver 2002; Kaçmazoğlu 2006). After 1950s, a few new universities were established such as Boğaziçi, ODTÜ (Middle East Technical University), Atatürk and Hacettepe universities. Since 1980s up until now, the number of state and private universities and sociology departments has rapidly increased. The fact that sociology is being taught at formal education institutions is important for it to gain a continuum. But more importantly, it can be clearly seen in the history of Turkish sociology that the developments in the Western sociology have been closely followed and according to the needs of the day, various publications have been rapidly translated into 145 Turkish. However, most of these publications emerged as “fashion trends” and soon after they fell off the agenda as it can be seen in the examples of Wright Mills and Immanuel Wallerstein. We have witnessed that neither Mills nor Wallerstein was put on the agenda while they were zeniths of sociological thoughts in the USA, but in later years they were, in fact, in the agenda of Turkish sociology because of the changing circumstances. Therefore, being open to such connections is beyond a passive role of an audience as Korkut Tuna stated “The trust and belief in sociology in our country have suggested an active participation and to propose common solutions to significant affairs and the problems on the agenda of sociology; not by remotely monitoring nor waiting for the day when our problems might finally and possibly be solved” (Tuna 1991, p.30). Gökalp is one of the first examples of the said approach as “he was not a mere translator or interpreter of foreign sociology” (Berkes 1936, p. 242). His interest in Durkheim was not based on mere imitation. Gökalp established relations with Durkheim’s sociology as long as he could associate it with the problems of Turkey. The case is very similar with Prince Sabahattin. It can be clearly seen that both scholars’ intellectual identities were built on Western sources. However they were not limited to those sources. In this regard, the most decisive source was the unique conditions of the Turkish society. As mentioned in the beginning, the quest for relationship with sociology is related to the problems of Turkish society. In a sense, sociology in Turkey was assigned to seek ways to keep Turkish society intact in the changing conjunctural conditions. The relationship with Western theory and transferring these ideas to the country involved much more than following the trends in the field of sociology. Therefore, Turkish sociology “should not be described as a wholesale, linear import of Western political culture and institutional structure—as if Turkey had been a tabula rasa regarding modern ideas” (Pearce 2012, p. 413). Here, regarding the presence of the Turkish sociology, it should be stressed that Turkish sociology gained its authenticity with its role in the process of building a new identity for the Turkish society where historical and social layers were very intense. In other words, Turkish sociology’s interest and resolution suggestions were developed on this social heritage. Secondly, Turkish sociology’s existing accumulation of knowledge and experience proves that there is no single line of development of the world history as taken for granted by the Western centered theories. In this context, Baykan Sezer draws attention to the specific historical conditions and the experience of Turkish society as he considers that it is the primary source of Turkish sociology (Sezer 1988). Moreover, Sezer’s insistence on approaching to the problems of society based on our historical experience should also be understood as his insistence on intellectual independence. Today, how to handle the societies is still being systematized according to the major theories which are generated in the West. The source of the said theories is the Western society’s dilemmas mainly since the 19th century. However, there is a major difference between the studies of the 19th century and the new era. While sociology of the 19th century praised the modern society, in the new era as it can be seen in the works by Zygmunt Bauman, Ulrich Beck and Richard Sennett from the late 1970s, the sociological theory has largely focused on the dilemmas of modern society. Therefore, while the failure in industrialization was a problem in the past, now the problems stemmed from industrialization are the substantive issues in sociology. The point is how much of these issues are also the problems of the Turkish society, and to what extent the theories developed on the basis of these problems also apply to the Turkish society. Of course the 146 theories produced in the West are neither insignificant nor worthless. The problem is with implementing these theories which are conditioned by the social problems of the West on the basis of the principle of the universality of science to societies which have different experiences in the past. Eventually, sociology in the West focused on finding the remedy for the dilemmas of the Western society from the very beginning, whereas in Turkey, sociology was shaped by the efforts for finding ways to keep whatever inherited from the Empire and build a Turkish identity. The said heritage’s importance in the history of Turkish sociology can only be understood as long as it is kept in mind that history of the world neither started nor has ended with the Western societies, and non-Western societies are also indispensable actors of the same history. In other words, if the presence of inter-communal relations is not overlooked, the contributions of non-Western societies to sociology would not be ignored. In this respect, the development of Turkish sociology is also a contribution to the science of sociology as it shows that non-western societies can also have unique discourses. 147 References Alver, K. (2002). Türk sosyolojisinde kırılma ya da yeni yönelim: 1940’lı yıllar örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 2002, 184-194. Berkes, N. (1936). Sociology in Turkey. The American Journal of Sociology, 42(2), 238–246. Connell, R. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, 13(2) 210– 223. Çelebi, N. (2002). Sociology associations in Turkey: continuity behind discontinuity. International Sociology, 17(2), 253–267. Ertürk, Y. (1990). Trends in the development of sociology in Turkey. Journal of Human Sciences, IX(2), 37-55. Kaçmazoğlu, H.B. (2006). Türkiye’de Amerikan sosyolojisinin etkisi: Ankara ekolü ve köy şehir çalışmaları. Sosyoloji Yıllığı, Kitap 15, İstanbul: Kızılelma Yayınları, 2006, 778789. Kaya, T. (2008). İçtimaiyat’tan sosyoloji’ye: İÜEF Sosyoloji Bölümü’nün tarihine ve sosyoloji dergisine dair. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, Cilt 6, 713-730. Kaya, T. (2011). Türk sosyolojisinin Amerikan sosyolojisiyle ilişkisi ve bu ilişkinin gelişimi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı, İstanbul. Kasapoğlu, A. (1999). Sosyoloji bölümünün dünü ve bugünü, içinde ek 3, 60 Yıllık Gelenek: DTCF’de Uygulamalı Sosyoloji, Ed. Aytül Kasapoğlu, Ankara: Ümit Yayıncılık, 355-366. Kasapoğlu, A. (2005). The study of sociology in Turkish higher education. International Education Journal, 6(4), 537-546. Pearce, Susan C. (2012). The “Turkish Model” of sociology: East–West science, state formation, and the post-secular. The American Sociologist, 43(4), 406-427. Sezer, B. (1988). Türk Sosyolojisinin Ana Sorunları. İstanbul: Sümer Sezer, B. (1989). Türk sosyologları ve eserleri I. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3. Dizi 1. Sayı, 1-89. Tuna, K. (1991). Türk sosyolojisinin Batı sosyolojisi ile ilişkisi ve sonuçları. 75. Yılında Türkiye’de Sosyoloji. yay. Haz. İsmail Coşkun, İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 29-38. Ülken, H.Z. (1950). Sociology in Turkey. Sosyoloji Dergisi, Sayı 6, İstanbul, 140-149. Ülken, H.Z. (1963). Türkiyenin modernleşmesi ve bu hareketin öncüleri olan Türk düşünürleri. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 11, 27-30. 148 Appendix Program of all RCHS sessions (A‐U) at the Yokohama Congress _______________________________________________________________________________ Monday 14 July, 10:30-12:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: A. History of Japanese Sociology (Session organizer: Kiyomitsu Yui, Kobe University, JAPAN: [email protected]) 1. Michikuni OHNO, Kobe University, Japan, "Past, Present and Future Of Japanese Cultural Sociology" (id# 35113) 2. Masahiro OGINO, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Japan, "Postmodern View of Time in Sociology" (id# 43010) 3. Yoshihiko SHIRATORI, Kobe University, Japan, "On Intermediate Groups in Japanese Sociology" (id# 44463) 4. Kawol CHUNG, The University of Tokyo, Japan, "Development of Social Research in Japan from 1945 to the 1970's" (id# 66363) 5. Yoshifusa IKEDA, Toyo Eiwa Jogakuin University, Japan, "The Influence of Gabriel Tarde on the Development of Japanese Sociology in the Early Twentieth Century" (id# 65386) Distributed Paper: 6. Shoko TAKAHASHI, Tokyo Metroporitan University, Japan, "Japan's Making of ‘Western Society' without Democratic Social Foundations: A Historical Analysis of the Meiji Era and Beyond, 1850s-1900s" (id# 35130) _______________________________________________________________________________ Monday 14 July, 15:30-17:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: B. Circulation of Social Science Knowledge – the Influence of Textual and Contextual Elements (Session organizers: Wiebke Keim, Veronika Wöhrer, Ercüment Çelik, & Christian Ersche, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany: [email protected]; Chair: Wiebke Keim) 7. Thomas BRISSON & Laurent JEANPIERRE, University Paris 8, France, "Circulation of Social Sciences Between the West and Asia: A Contemporary Assessment" (id# 47918) 8. Christina MAY, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Germany, "Social Science Knowledge and Welfare Expertise – a Closely Intertwined Development" (id# 44470) 9. João MAIA, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, "Global Arenas of Knowledge: Perspectives from the Brazilian Case" (id# 46710) 10. Christian TOPALOV, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, France, "A Scientific Controversy Across the Channel: Unemployment Theories, Sociology and the Rise of Mathematical Statistics in the Early 20th Century" (id# 39463) Distributed Paper 11. Fernando A. VALENZUELA, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile, " The Circulation of Two Epistemic Objects That Carry Social Science Knowledge: Domestic Violence and Bullying" (id# 48943) 368 12. Aldon MORRIS, Northwestern University, USA, "Sociology of W.E.B. Du Bois: Why Du Bois Is the Founder of American Scientific Sociology" (id# 53229) _______________________________________________________________________________ Monday 14 July, 17:30-19:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: C. Cold War Social Science (Session organizer: Christian Dayé, University of Graz, Austria: [email protected]) 13. Ioana POPA, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France, "An 'Area Studies' Program in France: Scientific, Institutional and Geopolitical Rationales" (id# 59176) 14. A-chin HSIAU, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, "Sociology As Social Memory: Narrative Identity and Knowledge Construction in the Study of 'Chinese Modernization' in Cold War Taiwan" (id# 42766) 15. Per WISSELGREN, Umeå University, Sweden, "Alva Myrdal, Unesco, and Cold War International Social Science, 1951-1955" (id# 40195) 16. Albert TZENG, International Institute for Asian Studies, Leiden, Netherlands, "Geopolitics, Identity Politics and Sociology in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore" (id# 47095) _______________________________________________________________________________ Monday 14 July ,19:30-20:50, Yokohama, Booth 49: D. RC08 Business Meeting _______________________________________________________________________________ Tuesday 15 July, 08:30-10:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: E. Failed Sociologists and Dead Ends in the History of Sociology (Session organizers: Christian Fleck, University of Graz, Austria & Eric Royal Lybeck, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom: [email protected]) 17. Christian DAYE, University of Graz, Graz, Austria, "Why Dead Ends May Remain WellTrodden Paths: Epistemic Hopes and Obstacles in the History of the Delphi Technique" (id# 38500) 18. Mikhail SOKOLOV, European University at Saint Petersburg, Russia, "The Strange Case of Soviet Sociology: A Goffmanian Analysis of a Failed Discipline" (id# 65212) 19. Sebastien MOSBAH-NATANSON, Paris Sorbonne, France & University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, "The Forgotten One of the Triad: Why Did Rene Worms, and Not Emile Durkheim or Gabriel Tarde, Fail?" (id# 45680) 20. Joanna WAWRZYNIAK, Imre Kertesz Kolleg, FSU Jena, Germany, "Are There Only Detours and Dead Ends? Durkheimian Routes to the Suburb of Europe" (id# 48427) 21. Ronald JACOBS, University at Albany, USA, "Orphans Other Deadends in the History of Sociology: Symbolic Interactionism and the Mid-20th Century American Compromise" (id# 49116) 22. Reinhold SACKMANN, University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, "Totalitarianism and Dead Ends in Sociology" (id# 43391) _______________________________________________________________________________ Tuesday 15 July, 10:30-12:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: 369 G. Geopolitical Framing of Social Sciences (Session organizer: Albert Tzeng, International Institute for Asian Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands: [email protected]) 23. Yujing TAN, Leiden University, the Netherlands, "Negotiating the Knowledge: The Formation of Socio-Anthropological Discipline and Chinese Nation-State Building" (id# 45931) 24. Marek SKOVAJSA, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic, "Rockefeller Foundation's Role in Promoting Social Sciences in Interwar Czechoslovakia" (id# 65113) 25. Michael BLAIN, Boise State University, ID, USA, " The Cold-War As a Mode of Subjection: Power / Knowledge Dynamics in the Age of Empire" (id# 39575) 26. Rafael SCHÖGLER, University of Graz, Austria, "European (Social) Science Policy-Making: Setting the Agenda of the Social Sciences and Humanities in the EU Framework Programmes" (id# 53342) Distributed paper: 27. Elisabeth SIMBÜRGER, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile, Chile, "The Forbidden Discipline: The Impact of the Pinochet Dictatorship on Chilean Sociology and Sociologists" (id# 66577) _______________________________________________________________________________ Tuesday 15 July, 15:30-17:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: H. History of Empirical Social Research and Statistics (Session organizer: Irmela Gorges, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany: [email protected]) 28. Yasushi SUKENARI, University of Tokyo, Japan, "Housing Estates As Experimental Fields of Social Research" (id# 44380) 29. Antoni SULEK, University of Warsaw, Poland, "Between the War and Consolidation of Communist Power: The Forgotten Social Research in Poland in the Second Half of the 1940s" (id# 48849) 30. Tom W. SMITH, University of Chicago, USA, "The Origin and Diffusion of Comparative Survey Research" (id# 30722) 31. Kristoffer KROPP, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, "Europeanizing Social Science - the Case of the European Social Survey" (id# 44713) 32. Charles CROTHERS, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand, "The Scope and Scholarly Impact of Survey Research: Evidence from Data Archives" (id# 42477) 33. Léa RENARD, University of Potsdam, Germany, & Université Pierre Mendès, France, "The Statistical Construction of Alterity: Governing National Population By Numbers in France and Germany (1860-1900)" (id# 63456) _______________________________________________________________________________ Tuesday 15 July, 17:30-19:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: I. Ordinary Sociologists (Session organizer: Jennifer Platt, University of Sussex, United Kingdom: [email protected]) 34. John GOODWIN & Henrietta O'CONNOR, University of Leicester, United Kingdom, "Researching the Ordinary: The Extraordinary Sociological Research of Pearl Jephcott (19001980)" (id# 31387) 370 35. Kamanto SUNARTO, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia, "Ordinary Sociologists: The Teaching Assistants" (id# 47142) 36. Jarosław KILIAS, Warsaw University, Poland, "The Sociology of Work and Factory Sociologists in Communist Poland" (id# 40999) 37. Christian FLECK, & Rafael SCHÖGLER, University of Graz, Austria, "Indicators for the Institutionalization of the Social Sciences and Humanities" (id# 53175) 38. Hedvig EKERWALD, Uppsala University, Sweden, "Life Trajectories of Three Swedish Sociologists" (id# 51293) _______________________________________________________________________________ Tuesday 15 July, 19:30-, TBA: J. RCHS Dinner (Kiyomitsu Yui) _______________________________________________________________________________ Wednesday 16 July, 08:30-10:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: K. Sociological Trajectories from the Global South and Peripheral Countries (Session organizers: Fran Collyer, University of Sydney, Australia & João Marcelo Ehlert Maia, Fundacão Getúlio Vargas, Brazil: [email protected]) 39. Juan Ignacio PIOVANI, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, & Fernanda BEIGEL, Sociology, CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Ciudad, Argentina, "Potential, Strength and Weakness of Argentinian Social Sciences to Analyze Contemporary Society" (id# 41957) 40. Manish THAKUR, Indian Institute of Management, Kolkata, India, "The Politics of Indigenous Social Science: A View from Indian Sociology" (id# 44231) 41. Claudio RAMOS ZINCKE, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile, "Sociological Narrative Accounts Guiding Society: Work and Network of Production and Difussion of Three Chilean Sociologists (1970-2013)" (id# 47012) 42. Tülay KAYA, Istanbul University, Turkey, "Turkish Sociology's Footprint in the History of Sociology" (id# 52343) 43. Wale ADESINA, Ekiti State University, Nigeria, "Exploring the Narratives of Sociology in 21st Century Nigeria: Some Prospects and Challenges" (id# 46029) _______________________________________________________________________________ Wednesday 16 July, 15:30-17:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: L. The History of Ideas of Transformation Processes (Session organizer: Sven Eliaeson, Uppsala University, Sweden: [email protected]; Chair: Sanja Magdalenic: [email protected]) 44. Shinsaku SHIMIZU, Morioka University, Iwate Prefecture, Japan, "Daniel Bell As Post-Cold War Intellectual: The Idea of Triunity Beyond the Cognitive Frameworks of the Cold War" (id# 50580) 45. Svetlana BANKOVSKAYA, National Research University-Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, "The Theoretical Metaphors of Chicagoan Human Ecology" (id# 39861) 371 46. Carl MARKLUND, Södertörn University, Stockholm, Sweden, "Organized Hypocrisy – Disorganized Technocracy: The Assumed Retreat of Politics in Contemporary Governance in Historical Comparison" (id# 47572) 47. Sven ELIAESON, Uppsala University, Sweden, "Max Weber and Modern Nation-Building" (id# 50713) _______________________________________________________________________________ Wednesday 16 July, 17:30-19:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: M. The Books that Made Sociology (Session organizer: Filipe CARREIRA da Silva, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom: [email protected]; Chair: Hedvig Ekerwald: [email protected]) 48. Harry PERLSTADT, Michigan State University, USA, "The Making Of Obedience To Authority: From Binet To Asch To Milgram" (id# 33658) 49. Marta BUCHOLC, University of Warsaw, Poland, "The Protestant Ethic In Poland: A Book That Failed To Make Sociology" (id# 33926) 50. Ricardo PAGLIUSO REGATIERI, University of São Paulo, Brazil, "Dialectic of Enlightenment's Critique of the Civilizing Process As Aufhebung of a Debate" (id# 65307) 51. Filipe CARREIRA DA SILVA, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom & Mónica BRITO VIEIRA, University of York, United Kingdom, "Du Bois' the Souls of Black Folk: A Retrospective Classic?" (id# 43655) 52. Christian FLECK, University of Graz, Austria, "Why Understanding the Nazi Past Did Not Become the Topic of a Book Written By Everett Ch. Hughes" (id# 40054) Thursday 17 July, 08:30-10:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: N. The Role of Sociology in Relation to Other Social Sciences (Session organizer: Hedvig Ekerwald, Uppsala University, Sweden: [email protected]) 53. Anders PEDERSSON, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, "Old Ways and New Ways: The Relation Between Criminology and Sociology in Post-War Sweden" (id# 39382) 54. Carl MARKLUND, Södertörn University, Sweden, "Shaping the Things to Come: Concepts of Planning and European Modernity" (id# 47090) 55. Philippe STEINER, Université Paris-Sorbonne, France, "Auguste Comte, Altruism and the Critique to Political Economy" (id# 51724) 56. Irmela GORGES, Free University of Berlin, Germany, "The Two First Paradigms of Empirical Social Research in Germany" (id# 47741) 57. Marcelo FETZ & Leila FERREIRA, Campinas State University, Brazil, "A Reflexive Calling: The Rise of Sociology and the Problem of Scientific Knowledge" (id# 38561) _______________________________________________________________________________ Thursday 17 July, 10:30-12:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: O. Translations (Session organizer: Andreas Hess, University College Dublin, Ireland: [email protected]; Chair: Peter Baehr) 58. Marta BUCHOLC, University of Warsaw, Poland, "Fragmented Translation: Case Study of Max Weber's Reception in Poland" (id# 30692) 372 59. Andreas HESS & Mayte CALVO MARTIN, University College Dublin, Ireland, "Julio Caro Baroja: Cultural Sociologist Avant-La-Lettre" (id# 39386) 60. Marianne EGGER DE CAMPO, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Germany, "Translations of Concepts over Time: What Criteria Decide about the Appropriateness of a Translation?" (id# 46072) 61. Marcia CONSOLIM, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil, "Georges Dumas: From the Psychology in the French Academic Field to the Intellectual Movement Between France and Latin America (1890-1930)" (id# 46258) 62. Cherry SCHRECKER, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France, "In The Shadow Of Alfred Schutz: Two 'Ordinary' Sociologists In Extraordinary Circumstances" (id# 35496) _______________________________________________________________________________ Thursday 17 July, 15:30-17:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: P. Fernanda Beigel (ed.), Politics of Academic Autonomy in Latin America. Ashgate, 2013 (Session organizer: João Marcelo Ehlert Maia, Fundacão Getúlio Vargas, Brazil: [email protected]) Discussants: 63. Sari HANAFI, American University of Beirut, Lebanon. 64. Wiebke KEIM, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany, "Centre-periphery relations and academic autonomy in Latin American social sciences: critical comments" (id# 43842) _______________________________________________________________________________ Thursday 17 July, 17:30-19:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: Q. The Origins of Modern and Contemporary Sociology (Session organizer: Shoji Ishitsuka, Tokyo University of Information Sciences, Japan: [email protected]; Chair: Tatsuya ONAI: [email protected]) 65. Jeffrey C. ALEXANDER, Yale University, USA "The Origins Of Modern and Cultural Contemporary Sociology" (id# 32556) 66. Roberto CIPRIANI, University of Roma III, Italy, "Origins of Italian Sociology" (id# 32564) 67. Eliezer BEN-RAFAEL, Tel-Aviv University, Israel, "S. N. Eisenstadt: The Challenge Of Social Change" (id# 32567) 68. Federico D'AGOSTINO, University of Roma III, Italy, "The Dynamics Of Rational and Non Rational In The Process Of Social Change and Desease Of Contemporary Society: Pareto and Freud" (id# 32572) 69. Shoji ISHITSUKA, Tokyo University of Information Sciences, Japan, "The Origins of Modern and Contemporary Sociology: Simmel, Weber and Lukacs" (id# 42784) _______________________________________________________________________________ Friday 18 July, 08:30-10:20, Yokohama, Booth 49: R. Transnational Organisations in the History of the Social Sciences (Session organizers: Per Wisselgren, Umeå University, Sweden & Jennifer Platt, University of Sussex, United Kingdom: [email protected]; Chair: Per Wisselgren) 373 70. Matthias DULLER, University of Graz, Austria, "Epistemological Consequences of a Global Encounter: The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)" (id# 63545) 71. Barbara HOENIG, Innsbruck University, Austria, "The Emergence of the European Research Council As Supranational Funding Institution" (id# 68132) 72. Glauber SEZERINO, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, France, "Pierre Monbeig: Les Différents Traits D'un Entrepreneur Scientifique" (id# 66113) 73. Jennifer PLATT, University of Sussex, England, "How Can We Characterise National Sociologies?" (id# 37101) _______________________________________________________________________________ Friday 18 July, 12:30-13:50, TBA: S. Integrative Session (with RC35 and WG02): The Global South and Postcolonial Perspectives in International Sociology (Session coordinator: Raewyn Connell, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA: [email protected]) Speakers: 74. Sujata PATEL, University of Hyderabad, India 75. Gurminder K. BHAMBRA, University of Warwick, United Kingdom 76. Manuela Boatca, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany _______________________________________________________________________________ Friday 18 July, 15:30-17:20, Yokohama, 315: T. Roundtable session: General Session on the History of Sociology (Session organizer: Peter Baehr, Lingnan University, Hong Kong: [email protected])) Round Table A: On Society, Community and Nation: 77. Victor LIDZ, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA, & Helmut STAUBMANN, University of Innsbruck, Austria, "On The Development Of Talcott Parsons' Conception Of Societal Community" (id# 32933) 78. Kyohei KAWAI, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan, "On Hannah Arendt's Understanding of Society or the Social: Resisting Unprecedented Crises" (id# 48701) 79. Jean TERRIER, University of Münster, Germany, "The Nation As Greek Gift? Marcel Mauss on the Ambiguities of the Nation Form" (id# 63013) 80. Jiri SUBRT, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic, "Norbert Elias: Figuration As a Solution of Problem of Society of Individuals" (id# 37211) Round Table B: The Sociological Tradition: 81. Barbara JABLONSKA, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland, "Classical Sociologists on Music and Society" (id# 41782) 82. Mitsuhiro TADA, Kumamoto University, Japan, "Language As a Zombie Category of Sociological Theory" (id# 44030) 83. Wiebke KEIM, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany, & SAGE, CNRS, Strasbourg, France, "Ibn Khaldun – Assessing His Influence in the Foundation of Modern European Sociologies" (id# 44721) 374 84. Roberto MOTTA, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife PE, Brazil, "The Protestant Ethic Thesis before Weber: Forerunners in France and Brazil" (id# 47921) Round Table C: National Sociologies 1: 85. Homa ZANJANIZADEH EAZAZI, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran, "Sociological Dilemma of Iranian Sociology: Critic of Critics" (id# 44765) 86. Diego PEREYRA & Leandro ARAMBURU, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, "Auntie Does Not Know What Sociologists Do. Do Not Blame Her: A History of Professionalisation of Sociology in Argentina (1960- 2010)" (id# 46522) 87. Stavit SINAI, Universität Konstanz, Germany, "Self, Otherness and the Israeli Sociology" (id# 32357) Round Table D: National Sociologies 2: 88. Svetlana NOVIKOVA, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, "Characteristics of Becoming Sociology in Russia" (id# 52314) 89. Marte FEIRING, Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway, "Science of Selection: Developing Social Technology in Educational and Vocational Field 1920–1940, Norway" (id# 58352) 90. Jaeyoun WON, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, "K. D. Har: A Public Sociologist in (Post)Colonial Korea" (id# 66405) Round Table E: Crisis, Power, Subversion: 91. Lars UDEHN, Stockholm University, Sweden, "Power in Classical Sociology" (id# 52146) 92. Francis LE MAITRE, University of Konstanz, Germany & Veronika ZINK, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, "Sociology and the Myth of the Crisis" (id# 52774) 93. Yoshiro YANO, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan, "Culture As 'Agon': Agonological Features of Weberian Sociology" (id# 66390) 94. Edgar BURNS, La Trobe University, Australia, "Career and Profession As Subversive Concepts at Mid-20th Century" (id# 40464) _______________________________________________________________________________ Friday 18 July, 17:30-19:20, Yokohama, 313+314: U. Joint session with WG02: The Emergence of Sociology in an Interdisciplinary Context – Nothing but Success? (Session organizers: Wolfgang Knöbl, Universität Göttingen, Germany & Yutaka Koyama, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan: [email protected]; Chair: Jose Mauricio DOMINGUES, IESP-UERJ, Brazil) 95. Wolfgang KNÖBL, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany, "From Hegel to Weber: The Peculiar Relationship Between German Historiography and Sociology in the Long 19th Century" (id# 44106) 96. Jeremy SMITH, University of Ballarat, Australia, "Debating Civilizations: Sociology and The Inter-Disciplinary Field Of Civilizations Analysis" (id# 35436) 97. Christina MAY, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Germany, "The Influence of Sociology on Establishing Social Hygiene in Germany (1890-1920)" (id# 44460) 98. Takayoshi RYUO, Yokosuka Nursing School, Japan, "Against the State-Centered Model of Social Policy: The Moment of Schäffle in the Sociology of Durkheim" (id# 49698) Distributed Papers: 375 99. Sven HORT, Seoul National University, South Korea, & Gunnar OLOFSSON, Linnaeus University, Sweden, "A Life-Long Response to Talcott Parsons: The Global Sociology of Goran Therborn – a Critical Yet Friendly Appraisal" (id# 50973) 10. Nacira GUÉNIF-SOUILAMAS, University Paris 8, France, "Postcolonial Sociology: An Oxymoron or a Border Crossing?" (id# 52722) _______________________________________________________________________________ 376