Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Theoretical support for university/business/industry research

Gone are the days when research was done in dusty libraries and dungeonbased laboratories. The pride and domain of Ivy League Ivory Towers. The concept research has moved to industrial campus-type settings, with innovation in mind and being a glint in the eye of all venture capitalists. We

Theoretical support for university/business/industry research By Lize de Ridder, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of the Free State Gone are the days when research was done in dusty libraries and dungeonbased laboratories. The pride and domain of Ivy League Ivory Towers. The concept research has moved to industrial campus-type settings, with innovation in mind and being a glint in the eye of all venture capitalists. We entered the innovation and intellectual economy. Since the early 1990s there was a global boom based in innovation-led economic development. Every country wanted a Silicon Valley and stormed ahead to establish such research centres. Many failed and an innovation- slump hit the world. It was realised that theoretical support was required and research had to be done in and for the field of research itself. The theoretical support base for research is in many cases unlike the research it supports, qualitative in nature. In many instances based in post-modern narrative, rather than cold, hard facts. Academics and researchers worldwide are joining the cult of innovation as providing a theoretical base for the where, when and why of research. The nature of research has further advanced to include amateur enthusiasts that are crucial in astronomy, archaeology and computer programming. Research has opened its doors to all interested and amused. Economists are providing the building blocks for innovation, entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. Architects are explaining innovative spaces and many New Urbanist designs host modern research firms. Philosophers are musing on what globalization, research and innovation are and try to define its position in our time. Then enters even the field of urban and regional planning, where the old theories of industrial location and urban design is no longer relevant. New places are developing on the landscape, the kind that needs explanation and the re-think of old spatial patterns. From the 1980s the concept regional planning, which is mostly based in regional economic regeneration, has been ignored in favour of urban planning within the post-modern landscape. However, recently New Regionalism established itself within the planning field, firmly based in globalization, new technologies and naturally the need for university/business/industry research. Therefore, instead of providing municipal benefits for locating a little factory; the concept regional innovation systems developed where a region’s government and private sector promote industry clusters, foster academic entrepreneurship, set up regional venture capital firms Technopoles, and establish science-led developmental strategies. technoparks and technocorridors are established as an innovative milieu and become the temples of science and research by universities, business and industry. In the globalized world of post-fordist mass production and mass consumption, evolution is imperative and “Adapt or die” became the hidden force behind all university/business/industry research.