Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
19 pages
1 file
The International Energy Agency estimates 1.4 billion people will still lack access to electricity in 2030 unless new approaches and policies are adopted" 1 .
Advocates of nuclear power argue that it is a proven technology that can provide cheap and reliable energy without contributing to climate change. Opponents disagree and argue that it is better to invest in conservation and alternative energy sources given the pollution, risks and costs associated with the mining, storage, shipping and disposal of radioactive fuels and waste. Both positions should be examined carefully. The need for environmental sustainability requires a paradigm shift from unsustainable quantitative growth to sustainable qualitative development. As a result the criteria for evaluating competing energy technologies should be widened to include not only economic and environmental costs and benefits, but also the extent to which various options support the transition to a sustainable economy. Factors supporting sustainability include: protecting ecosystems, reducing pollution, limiting consumption, conservation, using renewable energies and resources, recycling, decentralized and distributed production, smaller and smarter products, and improved networking.
"We spend more time developing means of escaping our troubles than we do solving the troubles we're trying to escape from." This statement given a decade ago by David Lloyd George, a British Statesman stands valid even today. This century saw some of the most successful breakthrough achievements in the field of technology, modernization and development. However, it also witnessed some of the most shocking natural phenomenon as well. For most climate experts and environmental scientists, the El Nino effect this year was the strongest as ever before. Global warming broke all existing records with prolonged summers and warmer winters. The polar ice sheet is melting rapidly and the level of the sea is continuing to rise at an alarming rate. If it is to be understood in layman's language, the atmosphere of this Earth is heating up rapidly and if certain counter measures are not taken, it would be disastrous for the existing ecosystems. During the Stockholm Conference when the leaders of the world got together, they brought forth the concept of a development which would be sustainable in nature and would not jeopardize our responsibility towards the environment. Towards the Rio Summit, the focus shifted on to two new human rights which were gradually becoming basic human rights. One is the basic human right of development and the other is the basic human right to a clean and healthy environment. Both these rights have been considered to be of utmost importance for each and every human being for leading a comfortable and dignified life. This however does not in any manner means that the fundamental approach to achieving Sustainable Development would be completely anthropocentric or completely eco-centric. The agenda is to create a balance in between development and maintaining the sanctity of the environment. However, it is important to also take into consideration the illeffects of technological advancement upon the environment. Majority of the environmental degradation, mostly carbon pollution leading to catastrophic global warming is due to the power industry. The energy generation industry is most critical for the growth and progress of any country or nation. To support the million and billions of people and to ensure that the infrastructure of the country runs smoothly, it is expedient to make sure that there is enough energy to power the same. The post-industrial era period caused the maximum damage to the atmosphere as that was the time when giga tons of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases were released into the atmosphere by thermal plants, industries and factories and simultaneously, the forest cover was depleted to make way for more construction and infrastructure. The damaged caused then, was unprecedented and till date, we as well as our planet are suffering the consequences. In wake of such catastrophe, it becomes important to understand the problem and find a solution which restores the balance in between mindless development and mindful development. Having a completely anthropocentric or a completely eco-centric approach would not be viable in today's times. With development being both, need of the hour and a basic human right, ignoring it completely would deny many countries of what is rightfully theirs.
This paper provides a review and analysis of the challenges that nuclear power must overcome in order to be considered sustainable. The results make it clear that not only do innovative technical solutions need to be generated for the fundamental inherent environmental burdens of nuclear energy technology, but the nuclear industry must also address difficult issues of equity both in the present and for future generations. The results show that if the concept of just sustainability is applied to the nuclear energy sector a global large-scale sustainable nuclear energy system to replace fossil fuel combustion requires the following: (i) a radical improvement in greenhouse gas emissions intensity by improved technology and efficiency through the entire life cycle to prevent energy cannibalism during rapid growth; (ii) the elimination of nuclear insecurity to reduce the risks associated with nuclear power so that the free market can indemnify it without substantial public nuclear energy insurance subsidies; (iii) the elimination of radioactive waste at the end of life and minimization of environmental impact during mining and operations; and (iv) the nuclear industry must regain public trust or face obsolescence as a swarm of renewable energy technologies quickly improve both technical and economic performance.
For the future of nuclear power it will be decisive whether or not nuclear fission technologies offer a sustainable solution to global energy problems. The impressive expansion of nuclear reactors in the 1960s and 1970 slowed down after the meltdown in Harrisburg and the nuclear explosion in Chernobyl. Since the end of the 1980s installed nuclear capacity has stagnated, and in Europe declined. However, a nuclear revival or renaissance has been predicted for 30 years. This article reviews global scenarios and national nuclear programmes and analyses problems in the nuclear industry. Special attention is given to nuclear power and global warming and the nexus between nuclear power and nuclear proliferation.
The consideration of issues relating to various aspects of energy security is in the focus of interest of the key factors in long-term strategies for sustainable development of modern states. To achieve the objectives of sustainable development requires the integration of social, economic and environmental dimensions, development of a new energy strategy relying on alternative energy sources. In this paper, is used the technique of content analysis of secondary documents of relevant international institutions within their jurisdiction collect, analyze and publish data on the current energy situation globally and greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the subject of the work relates to the analysis of the role of nuclear energy in achieving an ambitious seventh goal of sustainable development, which relates to access to affordable, reliable and sustainable energy for all of the role of nuclear energy and its share in the global fight against climate change. Aims of paper are showing the potential contribution of energy production addressing the development challenges for sustainable development. A comprehensive reassessment of the relevant domestic and foreign scientific papers on the issues treated came to the conclusion that nuclear energy contributes to the decarbonisation of the global economy especially the security of the energy sector. Keywords: security, nuclear energy, energy security, sustainable development
Energy is neither created nor destroyed but can be transformed from one form to another form. Keeping this concept of law of energy in consideration, scientists are always trying to transform the one form of energy into another efficient form of energy which can be beneficial for the whole world. Today world's main source of energy comes from petroleum, coal, natural gas, hydroelectric power etc. Due to liberalization, privatization and globalization (LPG), whole world is trying to put their efforts to make use of nuclear energy for constructive purpose. Very few countries use the nuclear energy as a source of energy like electricity production. Therefore it is the time for the developed as well as developing countries to enhance their energy production through nuclear power and distribute into the underdeveloped countries. This paper will highlight the growth and development through the nuclear power as a constructive part.
Nuclear energy is a proven technology for large scale base load electricity generation which can reduce dependence on imported gas and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, less vulnerable to fuel price changes than coal- and gas-fired power plants. With the discoveries of fertile Thorium fuel cycles that offer attractive features, including lower level of waste generation, less dangerous, less expensive, more accessible and more environmentally friendly option for nuclear fuel supply- this is against Uranium fuel cycle that most of the present reactors were built on. Furthermore, with the latest innovation of fast breed reactors (FBR) which offer more efficient use of uranium resources and the ability to burn actinides which are otherwise the long lived component of high-level nuclear wastes. In this submission, we will also look at environmental protection in line with sustainable development and how nuclear energy is in conformity with the environmental protection.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2022
Nuclear science and technology are used in many countries to help meet development objectives in areas including energy, human health, food production, water management and environmental protection. The focus of this paper will be on energy and specifically how nuclear energy fits into SDG 7 (Affordable and clean energy) and relates to SDG 13 (Climate action). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by the United Nations in 2015 as a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030. Sustainable Development Goal 7, Affordable and clean energy, aims to "Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all", with a focus on developing countries. This goal classes "renewable" technologies to be sustainable, while excluding nuclear energy. The term "renewable" usually includes unsustainable, high carbon biofuel. From a policy point of view, it is a problematic term. According to multiple scientific bodies, nuclear energy is clean, reliable and is needed to transition away from fossil fuels in order to combat climate change. No country in the world has been able to decarbonise its electricity sector without having either nuclear energy or-where available-substantial hydro or geothermal energy as part of the energy mix. SDG 13, Climate action, focuses on lowering greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to climate change. This goal does not mention nuclear energy. Significant research has shown that in the absence of suitable hydro or geothermal resources, decarbonisation aims are not achieved without nuclear energy. These issues will be discussed in this paper. Objective: To assess whether nuclear energy should be included in SDGs 7 and 13, and consider the reasons for its current exclusion.
Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2014
Humanity must face the reality that it cannot depend indefinitely on combustion of coal, gas and oil for most of its energy needs. In the unavoidable process of gradually replacing fossil fuels, many energy technologies may be considered and most will be deployed in specific applications. However, in the long term, we argue that nuclear fission technology is the only developed energy source that is capable of delivering the enormous quantities of energy that will be needed to run modern industrial societies safely, economically, reliably and in a sustainable way, both environmentally and as regards the available resource base. Consequently, nuclear fission has to play a major role in this necessary transformation of the 21st century energy-supply system. In a first phase of this necessary global energy transformation, the emphasis should be on converting the major part of the world's electrical energy generation capacity from fossil fuels to nuclear fission. This can realistically be achieved within a few decades, as has already been done in France during the 1970s and 1980s. Such an energy transformation would reduce the global emissions of carbon dioxide profoundly, as well as cutting other significant greenhouse gases like methane. Industrial nations should take the lead in this transition. Because methane is a potent greenhouse gas, replacing coal-fired generating stations with gas-fired stations will not necessarily result in a reduction of the rate of greenhouse-gas emission even for relatively low leakage rates of the natural gas into the atmosphere. The energy sources popularly known as 'renewables' (such as wind and solar), will be hard pressed to supply the needed quantities of energy sustainably, economically and reliably. They are inherently intermittent, depending on backup power or on energy storage if they are to be used for delivery of base-load electrical energy to the grid. This backup power has to be flexible and is derived in most cases from combustion of fossil fuels (mainly natural gas). If used in this way, intermittent energy sources do not meet the requirements of sustainability, nor are they economically viable because they require redundant, under-utilized investment in capacity both for generation and for transmission. Intermittent energy installations, in conjunction with gas-fired backup power installations, will in many cases be found to have a combined rate of greenhouse-gas emission that is higher than that of stand-alone coal-fired generating stations of equal generating capacity. A grid connection fee, to be imposed on countries with a large intermittent generating capacity, should be considered for the purpose of compensating adjacent countries for the use of their interconnected electric grids as backup power. Also, intermittent energy sources tend to negatively affect grid stability, especially as their market penetration rises. The alternativededicated energy storage for grid-connected intermittent energy sources (instead of backup power)is in many cases not yet economically viable. However, intermittent sources plus storage may be economically competitive for local electricity supply in geographically isolated regions without access to a large electric grid. Yet nuclear fission energy will, even then, be required for the majority displacement of fossil fuels this century.
INTRODUCCION En este último tiempo se ha planteado tanto de las voces de los creyentes en Yeshua sobre la exigencia de dinero y bienes por parte de las organizaciones religiosas y sus lideres para pertenecer y participar de sus servicios, lo que ha hecho que en este sentido se hagan constante lectura de citas bíblicas para exigirlo, tomando referencias fuera de contexto en relación con esto. Por un lado se puede hablar de las exuberantes cifras que recaudan anualmente las organizaciones religiosas a través de sus filiales, exigiendo el dinero por sus servicios, llámese diezmos, ofrendas, pactos, o cuotas en algunas congregaciones que dicen que sirven a “Dios” y que son “Cristianas”, argumentando muchos pasajes que han sido extraídos de la biblia, sacados de contexto, y aun con esto ya sea convenciendo, argumentando e incluso amenazando de que si no se hace esto, en primer lugar son excluidos de participar de los servicios hasta expulsarlos, queremos partir no solo explicando que era el diezmo en Israel y cuál era el único lugar donde debía ser entregado, para indicar como luego que fue destruido el Templo de Jerusalem , el único lugar donde era acepto por Yahweh, se fue tergiversando todo lo que tenía que ver con las prácticas en las primeras comunidades de creyentes en Yeshua , hasta lo que hoy vemos como una forma de extraer el dinero de las personas.
GMS Journal of Arts Therapies, 2019
La gestión sostenible de los servicios públicos: Agua en Andalucía (1780-2020), 2023
Il Fuoco nell'Alto Medioevo, 2013
The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Archaeology, 2020
Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
2017
Prosthetic Immortalities: Biology, Transhumanism, and the Search for Indefinite Life, 2024
Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, 2018
«Galleria» Rassegna semestrale di cultura, di storia patria, di scienze letterarie e artistiche e dell'antichità siciliane., 2021
Griot : Revista de Filosofia, 2023
Revista médica de Chile, 2009
Nordisk tidsskrift for helseforskning, 2010
Carbohydrate Research, 2019
The Herpetological …, 2011
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2006
Hepatology, 2004
Medical research archives, 2024
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2013