Research Application Form

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Research Application Form RESEARCH TITLE COMPARATIVE STUDY ON E-COACHING AND FACE-TO-FACE COACHING IN CLUSTER 8 OF THE DIVISION OF CALAMBA CITY FOR SY 2022-2023 TOWARDS CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH (150 words only) E-coaching is the term for coaching that is provided by a coach to a trainee through webbased technologies. In a commercial setting, e-coaching may be provided through email, chat rooms, instant messaging, video chats, and social media. According to Bucur (2018), the usage of e-coaching in a professional setting has improved employers' capacity to monitor trainees' performance and engagement, giving workers more opportunity to advance their theoretical and practical knowledge. This research focused on how e-coaching behaviors and attitudes are formed in ways that provide the e-coach benefits and disadvantages, and how the e-coach must overcome the disadvantages. This will also examine e-coaching in the context of education as a continuously evolving set of practices with benefits and drawbacks that may be connected to variables. RESEARCH CATEGORY (choose only one) ☐Region ☐Schools Division ☒District ☐School (choose only one) ☐Action Research ☒Basic Research RESEARCH AGENDA CATEGORY (choose only one main research theme) ☐Teaching and Learning ☐Child Protection ☒Human Resource Development ☐Governance (choose one cross-cutting theme, if applicable) ☐DRRM ☐Gender and Development ☐Inclusive Education ☐Others (please specify): ____________ What part of the Basic Education – Learning Continuity Plan you anchored your research? This research is anchored DepEd – Matatag Agenda. G is to Give support to teachers to teach better. This is in terms of innovative, responsive, and inclusive teaching approaches following the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). This E-coaching is an innovative and responsive to the need of the teachers. AMOUNT ₱10,000.00 *indicate also if proponent will use personal funds; add rows if necessary Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 1 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education B. PROPONENT INFORMATION LEAD PROPONENT / INDIVIDUAL PROPONENT LAST NAME: ORLANDA FIRST NAME: MAYETTE MIDDLE NAME: RODRIGUEZ BIRTHDATE: 08/02/1987 SEX: Female POSITION / DESIGNATION: TEACHER III REGION CALABARZON SCHOOL LAGUERTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONTACT NUMBER 1: 09684931377 DIVISION Calamba City CONTACT NUMBER 2: EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Doctorate Degree DEGREE TITLE/COURSE EdD EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] TITLE OF THESIS / RELATED RESEARCH PROJECT Correlates of HRM Practices to Teachers Performance Choose an item. Choose an item. LANDBANK ACCOUNT CA 0545 0747 10 NUMBER SIGNATURE OF PROPONENT: LANDBANK BRANCH Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph PARIAN – CALAMBA CITY BRANCH Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 2 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education PROPONENT 2 LAST NAME: HERNANDEZ FIRST NAME: RODELIO BIRTHDATE: 28/12/1970 SEX: Male POSITION / DESIGNATION: School Head REGION CALABARZON SCHOOL LAGUERTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 09564439444 DIVISION Calamba City CONTACT NUMBER 2: EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Doctorate Degree DEGREE TITLE/COURSE EdD CONTACT NUMBER 1: MIDDLE NAME: DE OCAMPO EMAIL ADDRESS: TITLE OF THESIS / RELATED RESEARCH PROJECT Choose an item. Choose an item. LANDBANK ACCOUNT NUMBER SIGNATURE OF PROPONENT: LANDBANK BRANCH Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 3 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR’S CONFORME I hereby endorse the attached research proposal. I certify that the proponent/s has/have the capacity to implement a research study without compromising his/her office functions. RODELIO DO. HERNANDEZ Name and Signature of Immediate Supervisor SCHOOL HEAD Position / Designation 03/03/2023 Date MARILISA T. ESPADA Name and Signature of Immediate Supervisor PSDS Position / Designation 03/03/2023 Date Name and Signature of Immediate Supervisor Position / Designation Click or tap to enter a date. Date Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 4 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education BERF Basic Research Proposal Application Template LEAD PROPONENT MEMBER TITLE OF RESEARCH DIVISION ORLANDA, MAYETTE R. HERNANDEZ, RODELIO DO. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON E-COACHING AND FACE-TO-FACE COACHING IN CLUSTER 8 OF THE DIVISION OF CALAMBA CITY FOR SY 2022-2023 TOWARDS CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Calamba City Introduction and Rationale According to Hui (2015), coaching is a continuous, informal interaction in which a leader (the coach) supports the development of a follower (the trainee) with a goal in mind in order to enhance the follower's performance in a particular activity or collection of tasks. Employee performance can be improved through coaching in a professional setting, and improved employee performance will result in favorable organizational outcomes like higher production and efficiency. According to Ladyshewsky (2018), through coaching, employees can get the specialized advice and strategic direction they need to perform better on the job in an organizational setting. Even before the epidemic, businesses in the public and commercial sectors were depending more and more on web-based technologies to increase employee coaching's accessibility and effectiveness. E-coaching is the term for coaching that is provided by a coach to a trainee through web-based technologies. In a commercial setting, e-coaching may be provided through email, chat rooms, instant messaging, video chats, and social media. According to Bucur (2018), the usage of e-coaching in a professional setting has improved employers' capacity to monitor trainees' performance and engagement, giving workers more opportunity to advance their theoretical and practical knowledge. Researchers have discovered that coaching has changed in a number of ways as a result of the growing incorporation of web-based technology. According to Seifert & Nissen (2018) and Lynden & Avery (2016), these practices should be expanded and improved upon when choosing a coach, as well as eliminating or substituting technological mediation for conventional, face-to-face coaching practices, encouraging the development of new coaching engagement practices to make up for the loss of face-to-face interaction, and enhancing trainees' capacity to assess the performance of their coaches. This research focused on how e-coaching behaviors and attitudes are formed in ways that provide the e-coach benefits and disadvantages, and how the e-coach must overcome the disadvantages. This will also examine e-coaching in the context of education as a continuously evolving set of practices with benefits and drawbacks that may be connected to variables. Based on the result, the researcher will create a plan for continuous improvement plan for school heads. Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 5 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Literature Review One of the unprecedented impacts of Covid-19 and probably one of the positive effects is the urgent migration of learning from traditional classroom set-up to virtual meet-up. Even coaching and mentoring can be done online nowadays. McCarthy in 2010 stated that there are critics saying coaching is only truly effective when done in person. Coaching School leaders’ obligation is to be able to maximize their effectiveness and work with teachers to assume the role of partners. This partnership improves teacher competence and student achievement. When coaches focus on improving teacher practice, teachers become more effective and can improve student performance. Shidler (2008) found a positive correlation between the number of times a teacher interacted with teaching coach and improved student performance in the alphabet, letter identification. In faithfully implementing an educational coaching, Follow best practices for daily classroom instruction and student grading gain. "Coaching" is defined by the Cambridge dictionary as "the employment or activity of giving training for people or assisting them in preparing for something." But the definition isn't fully correct, because coaching isn't about training or preparation; it's about assisting and supporting people as they work toward a common objective. Likewise, coaching staff in education, according to Joyce and Showers (1988) cited in the works of Nitolicky (2016), foster collaborative teaching communities, cultivate shared language and understandings, advance clearer cognition of teaching purpose and practice, and build school norms that support continuous teacher improvement and effective organizational growth. In addition, according to Ahmed's findings from 2020, coaching can be a successful strategy for encouraging personal and professional development as well as contributing to organizational goals. E-Coaching Naturally, coaching entails intentional interactions between the coach and the individual or people being coached. With e-coaching, the procedure is moved online, opening up more options. Some e-coaches refer to what they perform as "telementoring," "telecoaching," or even "distance mentoring." E-coaching, as a concept, is the process of coaching through technology (Kamphorst, 2017). For instance, a human coach may use technology as a channel of communication to provide feedback or learn more about a coachee's actions. Alternatively, to put it more precisely, "e- Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 6 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education coaching is a non-hierarchical developmental collaboration between two people separated by a geographic distance, in which the learning and reflection process is accomplished by both analogue and virtual means," as stated in (Ribbers & Waringa, 2015). E-coaching is a new sort of coaching; it is not a new technique or approach, which is an important term. What makes this communication unique is that it is done electronically and can use a variety of mediums. Depending on the type of communication employed, there are various categories that e-coaching can fall under. Four Types of E-Coaching There are numerous technologies and communication channels accessible within the subject of e-coaching. The things that enable communication are known as communication tools. The chosen medium greatly influences communication, which in turn defines the many types of ecoaching. According Ribbers and Waringa (2015) these are: a. Coaching via video link (video coaching) b. Coaching by phone (telephone coaching) c. Coaching via a chat program (chat coaching) d. Coaching via e-mail (e-mail coaching) Difference of E-Coaching and Face-to-Face Coaching Additionally, other characteristics that set e-coaching apart from face-to-face coaching are also influenced by the chosen medium. These features are: a. Visibility: The coach and client must be able to see one another. b. Proximity: Are the coach and customer close to one another? c. Time: Is the communication carried out immediately? d. Mode of Expression: The method of expression is how communication is carried out. Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) The theory of planned behavior (TPB) will serve as the basis for contextualizing this research. TPB is one of the most popular theories of behavior that has been used to describe how attitudes or behaviors are incorporated into recurring and normative patterns (Ajzen, 1991). The TPB will be used to direct research questions and provide meaning to the findings of later data analysis because both e-coaching and face-to-face coaching stimulate repeated actions and thoughts to increase employee productivity and well-being. According to the theory, exposure to past beliefs and behaviors has an impact on a person's present behaviors and attitudes. Ajzen (1991) asserts that if a person has a lot of prior experience Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 7 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education with a belief or behavior, it appears normative. A thought or behavior does not seem normative if the individual has little or no experience with it. One's relationships with others or the interactions of people they respect, such as parents, siblings, peers, or other authority figures, can expose or experience someone. An individual is more inclined to adopt and incorporate a behavior or attitude into their routine or value system if they perceive it to be more normal. On the other hand, if a behavior or thought is not accepted as normal, it will often be rejected or ignored and not incorporated into frequently displayed actions. Normative behavior and beliefs value judgments are influenced by previous exposure in addition to based on self-control and self-efficacy perceptions. If people are seen as having high levels of self-control in their particular context, they will have confidence in their capacity to distinguish between right and wrong behavior and other normative and non-normative behaviors. In addition, when perceived self-control is low, people tend to avoid making behavioral decisions and more frequently imitate those around them in order to not deviate from situationally appropriate conduct, regardless of the personal feelings that were initially connected to the belief or action. Similar to this, people who have high perceived levels of self-efficacy are less likely to reevaluate their opinion of whether a viewpoint or action violates social standards. Strong decision-making is frequently correlated with high levels of self-efficacy. Furthermore, once a person makes a judgment, it is unlikely that it will be revisited or that the conclusion would be overturned unless there are enough instances when the need for further investigation is made clear. According to Ajzen (1991), a person with low self-efficacy will constantly review and internally challenge judgments about their behavior or beliefs as they struggle to know what is typical in a variety of scenarios. Research Questions This study will be guided by the following research questions: 1. What are the most commonly used type of e-coaching in cluster 8 used by the coaches? 2. How is the result of most commonly used e-coaching type can be compared using the face-to-face features? 3. How do coaches think that using e-coaching has affected them in one particular way? 3.1 coaching techniques 3.2 mindsets 4. What are coaches’ perceptions of e-coaching as an alternative to face-to-face coaching in an education context in terms of: 4.1 Advantages 4.2 Disadvantages 5. Is there significant difference between the responses determined by each group of coaches in terms of advantages and disadvantages of e-coaching? 6. What are coaches’ perceptions of how disadvantages of e-coaching in an education context may be overcome? 7. Based on the result, what continuous improvement plan can be proposed? Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 8 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Scope and Limitation This research will focus on comparing e-coaching and face-to-face coaching, the most commonly used type of e-coaching and finding the advantages and disadvantages of e-coaching and how disadvantages can be overcome. Also, this study was limited only to cluster 8 principals, head teachers and master teachers that serves as coach as stipulated in their plantilla position roles and functions for school year 2022-2023. In the case of school that don’t have master teacher, one teacher from the next rank will participate. The result of the research will only be used in the purpose of continuous improvement. Research Methodology A. Sampling The respondents in this study consisted of seven (7) principals, six 15 head teachers and 12 master teachers who generally are the provider of coaching and mentoring in school. Purposive sampling will be utilized in determining the number of participants. B. Data Collection The researcher will utilize survey questionnaire in checklist and in an open-ended question form. Questionnaire will be distributed and collected following the time-on-task policy. Part I of the questionnaire will be the participant’s profile that will determine if they are the principal, head teacher or master teacher. Part II will be the checklist of the type of e-coaching most commonly used in the cluster. Third part will determine how coaches are affected in terms of coaching technique and mindset by using e-coaching. Part IV will be the advantages and dis-advantages of e-coaching in the context of education. Part V of the questionnaire will be on how they think they can overcome the disadvantages they found in using e-coaching Part VI will focus of issues and concern they have about conducted coaching in form of e-coaching and in face-to-face. The data will be treated with full honesty and utmost respect to the respondents. C. Ethical Issues Prior to the conduct of data gathering, the researcher will secure permission for the conduct of the study through a letter to District Supervisor, School Head and letter of request to the individual respondents. After being granted approval, the researcher will send link to the proper authority for dissemination. It is also to be observed in this research study the so called no-disruption-of-classes policy stipulated in DepEd Order No. 9, s. 2005 entitled Instituting Measures to Increase Engaged Timeon-Task and Ensuring Compliance Therewith for the teaching coaches. D. Plan for Data Analysis In determining the level of affection in terms of coaching techniques and mindset, likert scale, and simple mean will be used. T-Test will be used in finding significant difference of the perceived advantages and disadvantages by the respondents. Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 9 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Timetable/Gantt Chart ACTIVITIES March April May June July Mont h3 Mont h4 Mont h5 August September 1. Crafting questionnaire 2. Validating / Revising questionnaire 3. Securing Permission 4. Distribution and Administration and collection of Questionnaire 5. Analysis and consolidation 6. Preparation of Terminal Report *Shade the corresponding month per activity Plans for Dissemination and Utilization DISSEMINATION Mont Mont ACTIVITIES h1 h2 Month 6 1. Edit/revise and finalize the content of the output. 2. Print and reproduce the output. 3. Research Poster, Oral Presentation,Publications *Shade the corresponding month per activity REFERENCES *Please follow the APA format Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 10 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Bucur, M. (2018). Enhancing organizational performance through e-coaching sessions: Quantitative approach. Conference Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education, 1(14), 370–375. doi:10.12753/2066-026X-18-051 Chawla, N., Gabriel, A. S., Dahling, J. J., & Patel, K. (2016). Feedback dynamics are critical to improving performance management systems. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 260–266. doi:10.1017/iop.2016.8 Hui, R. T. Y. (2015). Coaching in computer-mediated communication at workplace. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 215–219). Kamphorst, B. A. (2017). E-coaching systems: What they are, and what they aren’t. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 21(4), 625-632. Ladyshewsky, R. K., & Taplin, R. (2018). The interplay between organizational learning culture, the manager as coach, self-efficacy and workload on employee work engagement. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 16(2), 3. Retrieved from https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/b6bb9783-f20a44f6-9e07-f9bdf4437eb1/1 Netolicky, D. M. (2016). Coaching for professional growth in one australian school: “oil in water”. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 5(2), 66-86. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-09-2015-0025 Ribbers, A., & Waringa, A. (2015). E-Coaching: Theory and practice for a new online approach to coaching. Routledge. Shidler, L. (2008). The impact of time spent coaching for teacher efficacy on student achievement. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 453-460. MEMORANDUM Department of Education (2020) Top PH schools in PISA 2018 highlight mentoring, teacher empowerment as key in outstanding performance. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/12/03/top-ph-schools-in-pisa-2018-highlight-mentoringteacher-empowerment-as-key-in-outstanding-performance/ SUBMITTED BY: (Signature over printed name) MAYETTE R. ORLANDA LAGUERTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 11 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Annex 3: Declaration of Anti-Plagiarism and Absence of Conflict of Interest BERF Declaration of Anti-Plagiarism I/We, MAYETTE R. ORLANDA / RODELIO DO. HERNANDEZ, understand that plagiarism is the act of taking and using another’s ideas and works and passing them off as one’s own. This includes explicitly copying the whole work of another person or that of the undersigned proponents and/or using some parts of their work without proper acknowledgment and referencing. I/We hereby attest to the originality of this research proposal and has cited properly all the references used. I/We further commit that all deliverables and the final research study emanating from this proposal shall be of original content. I/We shall use appropriate citations in referencing other works from various sources. I/We also hereby attest that this research has not yet been finished and is not part of the proponent/s’ thesis/dissertation. I/We understand that violation from this declaration and commitment shall be subject to consequences and shall be dealt with accordingly by the Department of Education. MAYETTE R. ORLANDA Name and Signature of Lead Proponent 03/03/2023 Date RODELIO DO. HERNANDEZ Name and Signature of Proponent 03/03/2023 Date Name and Signature of Proponent Click or tap to enter a date. Date Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph Doc. Ref. Code Effectivity RO-PPRD-F039 07.19.22 Rev 00 Page 12 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education REGION IV-A CALABARZON BERF Declaration of Absence of Conflict of Interest I/We, MAYETTE R. ORLANDA / RODELIO DO. HERNANDEZ understand that conflict of interest refers to situations in which financial or other personal considerations may compromise my/our judgment in evaluating, conducting, or reporting research. I/We hereby declare that I/we do not have any personal conflict of interest that may arise from my application and submission of my research proposal. I/We understand that my research proposal may be returned to me if found out that there is conflict of interest during the initial screening as per DO 16, s. 2017. Further, in case of any form of conflict of interest (possible or actual) which may inadvertently emerge during the conduct of my research, I will duly report it to the research committee for immediate action. I understand that I may be held accountable by the Department of Education for any conflict of interest which I have intentionally concealed. MAYETTE R. ORLANDA Name and Signature of Lead Proponent 03/03/2023 Date RODELIO DO. HERNANDEZ Name and Signature of Proponent 03/03/2023 Date Name and Signature of Proponent Click or tap to enter a date. Date Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph 00 Doc. Ref. Code RO-PPRD-F017 Rev 09.20.21 Effectivity Page 13 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education REGION IV-A CALABARZON OATH OF AUTHENTICITY AND VERACITY OF DOCUMENTS This Certification must be submitted and duly signed by the sole/lead author as part of the documentary requirements during the research proposal submission. Failure to submit this certification will disqualify the proponents to be pre-assessed by the Policy, Planning and Research Division Secretariat for Research. I, MAYETTE R. ORLANDA, Filipino, of legal age, with permanent address at LAGUERTA CALAMBA CITY, after being sworn in accordance with law, hereby depose and state that: I am a researcher from SDO Choose an item.; I submitted the following documents in the Google Drive in PDF format and duly signed by the authorities: 1. Basic Research Proposal Template 2. Cost Estimate 3. Declaration of anti plagiarism 4. Oath of Authenticity and Veracity 5. Research Application Form I attest that I am the lead author of the submitted research and that, as a lead author, I did not plagiarize any content of my research. I am aware that I will be reprimanded once found to be guilty of plagiarizing any content of my research. I am executing this Certification to attest to the authenticity and veracity of all documents submitted. By executing this Certification of Authenticity and Veracity of Documents, I hereby authorize the Department of Education Region IV-A CALABARZON Regional Office through the Regional Research Committee members to verify the authenticity of the abovementioned documents. MAYETTE R. ORLANDA Signature over printed name March 3, 2023 Date Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph 00 Doc. Ref. Code RO-PPRD-F017 Rev 09.20.21 Effectivity Page 14 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education REGION IV-A CALABARZON Cost Estimates Approval Form General Instructions: • Please fill out the information in the second page. • Put your e-signature in the signature box in the last page. • Follow the provided guidelines in filling out eligible expenditures for BERF. COST ESTIMATE GUIDELINES: Eligible and Non-Eligible Activities and Expenditures The research committees shall ensure that the expenses detailed in the research proposal are appropriate and necessary in the conduct of research. Measures must be taken to ensure that the funds are maximized so more proposals will be covered. For BERF grantees, the research fund will be utilized for the following activities: A. Expenses related to the implementation of the approved research proposals which include, but are not limited to, the following: o Supplies and materials o Domestic travel expenses o Communication expenses (postpaid plan, prepaid load, electronic reloading, internet subscription fee, and other emerging method/technology) o Reproduction, printing and binding costs o Food and other incurred expenses during conduct of research (surveys, FGDs); and o Courier services o Other expenses related to the conduct of research not listed in the non-eligible expenditures B. Expenses related to research dissemination Specifically, the research fund will not be used for the following expenses: o Equipment o Software o Salary, overtime pay or honorarium for resource persons, statisticians and other service providers o Utilities o Office rental o All overseas travel and all items not included in the approved research proposal Reference: DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017 – Research Management Guidelines. p. 12-13 DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021 - Amendment to DO No. 16, s. 2017 Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph 00 Doc. Ref. Code RO-PPRD-F017 Rev 09.20.21 Effectivity Page 15 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education REGION IV-A CALABARZON TITLE OF RESEARCH TYPE OF RESEARCH (Please check) BERF CYCLE (Please check) ACCOUNT NAME (Lead proponent) ACCOUNT NUMBER LANDBANK BRANCH TYPE OF ACCOUNT COMPARATIVE STUDY ON E-COACHING AND FACE-TO-FACE COACHING IN CLUSTER 8 OF THE DIVISION OF CALAMBA CITY FOR SY 2022-2023 TOWARDS CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN ☐ACTION RESEARCH ☒REGIONAL/DIVISION/DISTRICT RESEARCH ☒8th CYCLE 2023 MAYETTE R. ORLANDA CA 0545 0747 10 PARIAN-CALAMBA CITY BRANCH ☐SAVINGS ☒CURRENT COST ESTIMATES ACTIVITY 1. Gathering Data 2. Crafting, validating revising questionnaire and 3. Dissemination and collection of questionnaires 4. Data Analysis 5. Oral Presentation / Poster Presentation ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES QUANTITY COST Supplies 1 ream 4 inks (set) 1500 Honoraria 2000 Travel expenses 1500 Honoraria 2000 Poster and travel expenses 3000 Communication expenses Expenses related to research dissemination Other expenses during the conduct of research Materials ₱ TOTAL 10000.00 *add rows if necessary MAYETTE R. ORLANDA ATTESTED BY: (Signature over printed name) RODELIO DO. HERNANDEZ To be filled out by the BERF Grantees Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph 00 Doc. Ref. Code RO-PPRD-F017 Rev 09.20.21 Effectivity Page 16 of 17 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education REGION IV-A CALABARZON APPROVED BY: (Signature over printed name) To be filled out by RRC Members Address: Gate 2, Karangalan Village, Cainta, Rizal Telephone Nos.: 02-8682-5773/8684-4914/8647-7487 Email Address: [email protected] Website: depedcalabarzon.ph 00 Doc. Ref. Code RO-PPRD-F017 Rev 09.20.21 Effectivity Page 17 of 17