Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2014, Oxford University Press eBooks
…
5 pages
1 file
2019
PWPM-Review of International, European and Comparative Law vol. XVII A.D. MMXIX ARTICLE I. Freedom of expression and its limits under the European Convention on Human Rights The standards of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the ECtHR) on expressions that apply to the past and history arise from the ECtHR's more general approach to freedom of expression, as well as limitations and abuses of this freedom. Freedom of expression is enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter: ECHR). 1 There is no exhaustive list of means and forms of expressions and the protection applies to highly diverse, imaginative and unconventional forms of communication. 2 However, under the ECHR, freedom of expression is not an absolute right and may be subject to restrictions, sanctions and responsibilities defined by law. The ECHR requires that there is a pressing social need to restrict expression and the restrictions must be proportionate. 3 Furthermore, any restrictions must be convincingly established and narrowly interpreted. 4 Article 10.2 ECHR lists the grounds for limiting freedom of expression. These include the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, the prevention of disorder or crime, the protection of health or morals, the protection of the reputation or rights of others, the prevention 1 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950.
Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
With regard to certain types of hate speech, the European Court of Human Rights and the former Commission have developed a tradition of applying Article 17 ECHR; the socalled abuse clause. This application leads to categorical exclusion from protection of the right to freedom of expression (Article 10), an approach that contrasts sharply with the Court's general attitude toward accepting and even creating a broad scope of protection under this right. It also contrasts with the Court's usual examination of interferences with freedom of expression in the light of the case as a whole, all its factual and legally relevant elements being taken into consideration. The aim of this article is to show that the abuse clause's application is undesirable, since it tends, even in its indirect variant, to set aside substantial principles and safeguards that are characteristic of the European speech-protective framework. The application of Article 17 is also unnecessary, as it in no way generates an added value for democracy or for human rights protection. We therefore strongly encourage the European Court to consider all forms of hate speech from the perspective of Article 10, without affording a decisive impact, directly nor indirectly, from Article 17 of the Convention.
Acta U. Danubius Jur., 2009
In international commercial disputes the extension of jurisdiction concerns the situation where a court extended its jurisdiction to the detriment of another abroad. Such an extension would not work but with an absolute breach of jurisdiction of other states. However, one cannot ignore the fact that article 25 of Regulation (EC) no. 44/2001 on jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters refers to mandatory reporting lack of competence whenever the court finds that a claim is another instance of a Member State of the Union shall have exclusive jurisdiction, text that indicate that incidental or accessory applications remain in the national court seized of the original proceedings. Although in theory it was argued that the lis pendens -related actions has no effect on international trade dispute, we can note that in relation to European Union member states lis pendens creates a special case of mandatory suspension of the case, while related actions a special case of voluntary suspension.
2012
Although Article 10 in principle prohibits interferences by public authorities with the right to freedom of expression, it leaves open some possibilities and margin for State authorities to limit, restrict or sanction certain types of expressions or media-content, due to the “duties and responsibilities” related to communicating ideas and information. This paper, in its first part, clarifies under which circumstances and conditions state interferences with the right to freedom of expression and information can be justified under the European Human Rights system. The second part of the paper will focus on the added value created by the European Court’s (recent) jurisprudence by safeguarding public debate and reporting on matters of public interest, by protecting investigative journalism, whistle-blowing and journalistic sources, and by guaranteeing access to information held by public authorities.
De Witte et al. (eds.), National Courts and EU Law. New Issues, Theories and Methods, 2016
Revue québécoise de droit international, 2018
The right to freedom of expression (FOE) is one of the cornerstones of the rule of law, but it is not an absolute right. It can be restricted on specific conditions. International criminal justice, in its fight against war crimes, and more recently against terrorism, by issuing contempt orders restricting FOE, reveals at first sight a disrespect of this fundamental right. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the legality of the restrictions imposed by international criminal courts, according to the international standards set by international human rights conventions. The applicability of the principles enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in particular the restrictive circumstances allowing limitation of FOE before international criminal courts, raises doubts. Restriction of FOE for ordre public protection, in particular, is of great interest. This notion of ordre public appeared in recent international case-law but it is quite difficult to pin dow...
Asuntos Públicos CED, 2019
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2023
Artikel Sosialisasi , 2024
Gaceta médica de México
Annales de physique, 1997
Revista Cientifica Farem Esteli, 2013
Health, Culture and Society, 2010
Journal of Material Cultures in the Muslim World, 2024
School Psychology Review, 2018
Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2020
XIth International Congress on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 1987
Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan Corporate Social Responsibility (PKM-CSR), 2021
Plant Physiology, 2013
Clinical and Translational Allergy, 2015
Journal of Nutrition and Intermediary Metabolism, 2016