Bearing in mind the need for additional language teaching to focus on the promotion of social justice (Brasil, 1998; Crookes, 2013), this dissertation aims at investigating the effects of implementing a cycle of tasks (Ellis, 2003) for...
moreBearing in mind the need for additional language teaching to focus on the promotion of social justice (Brasil, 1998; Crookes, 2013), this dissertation aims at investigating the effects of implementing a cycle of tasks (Ellis, 2003) for critical English language development in the context of basic and technological education. More specifically, the goal is to understand the students’ and the teacher-researcher’s perception of classes that contain both communicative and critical objectives. The study, inserted in the area of Critical Applied Linguistics (Pennycook, 2009), is of a qualitative interpretive nature (Davis, 1995) and follows the premises of critical and participatory action research (Cohen et al, 2000; MacDonald, 2012). It was conducted with a group of 20 high school students in their fourth curricular semester of the English subject in a federal school in the South of Brazil. Based on the results of a critical needs-analysis (Crookes, 2013) and on the theoretical principles of both task-based language teaching (Long, 2015) and Critical Pedagogy (Freire, 2005; Crookes, 2013), a critical task-cycle focusing on gender representation in the context of Mechanics and Engineering was designed and later implemented by the teacher-researcher. In order to gather data during task-cycle implementation, questionnaires about students’ perceptions were administered and semi-structured interviews were conducted with the students. Besides carrying out reflection sessions with two students after each class, the teacher-researcher filmed the classes and kept self-report diaries. At last, students’ written answers in some of the tasks also served as data for the present study. Data were transcribed and/or tabulated, and the recurrent themes that emerged from them were identified through a thematic analysis (Yukymenko et al, 2014). Data analysis suggests that tasks may indeed serve as a venue for the development of both communicative and critical skills due to their specific characteristics (Ellis, 2003). Moreover, the analysis points out to the pivotal role of the teacher in the implementation process of a critical task-cycle, who has to cater for contextual factors, deal with possible students’ resistance, construct a collaborative and dialogical learning environment aiming at critical consciousness development (Freire, 2005), guarantee that the aims of the tasks will be met, and direct students’ attention to specific topics of the class. From the perspective of the teacher-researcher, tasks seemed to have worked best when students were heard, when questions were posed to them, when different views were juxtaposed and when they could get to know facts
11
and data that allowed them to reconsider certain views or myths (Freire, 2005). Data analysis also points out to the usefulness of Skehan’s (2009) framework for task-design and implementation in calibrating cognitive and linguistic complexities. Students, in turn, emphasized having learned to “do things with the language” (Long, 2015), implying that they could perceive their learning from a more holistic perspective. Their perceptions highlight that, in terms of critical content, they could better reflect on the issue of gender representation. The fact that the task-cycle dealt with a topic pertaining to the students’ contexts, together with its promotion of collaborative work was also perceived as positive. Even though students expressed resistance regarding the critical theme of the task-cycle, this seems to have changed throughout the process of task implementation, possibly due to the fact that they were engaged in a process of critical dialogue and could conduct research in order to build elaborate arguments. The present study indicates, therefore, the feasibility of promoting critical language development through the use of tasks and offers insight on how to approach language teaching from a critical perspective. Thus, it may inform teaching practices and teacher education initiatives that have a focus on social justice.