Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-02

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests | Checkuser
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 30000lightyears in topic Requests

Requests

Latest comment: 3 years ago241 comments41 people in discussion

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
C0800095590d (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Nivea757575 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Tablemousecomputer (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Both user 1 and user 2 edit an entry, and the edit tag indicates that they have used the mobile web version to edit. User 3 and user 1 edit the same entry in the same content and summary. Considering that user 2 has created other accounts, please check the sleepers of user 2 after confirming the relationship among user 1, user 2 and user 3.Thanks!-- メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 01:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... Please make sure the discussion link works properly! --Sotiale (talk) 11:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Hellocrazyegg, Lazymotorcry, Userbagbang, Threebatterybottle, Deskcomputerchair
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Peace20201118, Helpyou0001, C0800095590d, Peace20201110, Peace20201106
  •  Confirmed Group 3: Tubelightwar, Seensungee, Hackhahahaha, Lunchboxgoodeat, Loginlinefb, Singfloordoor, Boxchairbed, Homeglobalorg, Girlkeyboardcircle, Telbottle, Girlkeyboardcircle
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive Nivea757575
  • Stale Tablemousecomputer
  •  Confirmed Group 1 and 2
  • Likely Likely Group 1/2 and 3

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done
List of users
ZillZill (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The reason is similar to the above one. This account is confirmed that it is a sock puppet of Copyangry7fcvc. Sleeper investigation is requested. For comparison: m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-12#[email protected]. Thanks. --Yining Chen (Talk) 08:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Not done It is not allowed to process request with only one account without comparison target. --Sotiale (talk) 12:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: The user request to compare this user with users listed at Steward_requests/Checkuser/2020-12#[email protected].--GZWDer (talk) 18:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
A25252558008 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
A2525258tt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Qqkuro66541 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
格雷斯 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
NJBB751 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
陈利雄 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
한태림 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
A7878789 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
PoWai Wung (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Rfvhuhbggggt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s):

They had an edit warring in the article w:zh:明星大侦探第六季节目列表 and their numbers of edit are small. So a local admin Techyan wants to ask for a sockpuppet investigation. Because they had similar user names but it is hard to DUCK through their editing patterns. --Yining Chen (Talk) 03:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Let me explain in detail: we are suspecting that A2525258tt is a sock of A25252558008 and they may have more socks. Techyan listed all users whose contributions are mostly on w:zh:明星大侦探第六季节目列表 for CU to find if there are any socks of A25252558008. Itcfangye (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't want to check for A25252558008 specifically. The thing is, on the affected article on zhwiki, there were a bunch of accounts, not very experienced but they still made a few dozens of edits, edit warring the same page. There are some duck-able ones, such as A25252558008 and A2525258tt (listed as account #1 and #2 above), but many of them are not. Although I suspect plenty of them are MEAT, I'm also pretty sure that there must be some sockpuppets mixed in. --Techyan（Talk） 06:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: A25252558008, A2525258, A7878789, A2525258tt, A4545456, Rfvhuhbggggt, Wewerrcgt, A455333222222, Wewertffhjjvcdfg, Aotmfkl
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 格雷斯, NJBB751, N323J428
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2
  • Unrelated Unrelated Qqkuro66541, 한태림, 陈利雄, PoWai Wung, HaydonLee127, Lew0716, Liili, Infinite Prophet

From a technical point of view. It was an annoying investigation. --Sotiale (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, the message has been forwarded to the zhwiki HAM page. That was really a mess isn't it. LuciferianThomas．Talk 11:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! --Techyan（Talk） 11:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your contribution to Chinese Wikipedia!--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 11:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

逸箖傳統診復@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
逸箖傳統診復 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Wen Ng Ng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Zhe Ng Ng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Yun Ng Ng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Big-White-Duel (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mintclown (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Hello. The first account was confirmed as 小昌(LTA) through the contributions，then the fifth account and sixth account were confirmed as 米记123 by a sockpuppet investigation in enwiki. The fourth account was blocked because a sysop thought that it looked like 米記123. The second and third account were blocked because that they had similar user names. Then, the editing tendencies of the second and third account is similar to the first one(for example, they all edit the articles about television series), and the editing tendencies of the fourth one is just like the first, the second and the third. So we need technical data to verify. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
So may I ask why you need this checkuser? For example, are they claiming to be different users? @Techyan:, May I ask for your opinion? --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale:I would like to try explaining it. A sysop thought the fourth account related to the fifth and sixth account, but someone thinks it may be wrong. He thinks the editing tendencies of the fourth account is similar to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd. But he doesn't know that if the 1st, 2nd and 3rd account relate to each other. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Let me put try to explain it like this. Let's say, account #2, #3, and #4 all end with "Ng Ng", which make them definitely look like a duck from their usernames. However, different admins conclude differently when attempting a duck. Account #4 was ducked as a sockpuppet of 米記123 by an admin on zhwiki, relating to the CU case on enwiki; but #2 and #3 were deemed as a sockpuppet of 小昌, relating to the case of account #1. MCC214 suggested that, a CU needs to be completed to determine whether this strain of sockpuppets either belong to 小昌 or 米記123. On editing patterns, Yining Chen translated MCC214's remarks on zhwiki, suggesting account #1-#4 have a similar pattern, while #5 and #6 behave differently than the first four. If I'm not mistaken, MCC214 wanted a CU to clarify this. I haven't look into the editing patterns of those sockpuppets, but on the face of it, this doesn't look like a very necessary CU request to me. Reblocking #4 as 小昌 may just do. --Techyan（Talk） 14:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
@Techyan: Thank you. To sum up, from what you understand, you mean they made a request to find out who the accounts were? If it is such a request, it is difficult to proceed. @Yining Chen and MCC214: Could you discuss more on local? Get opinions of other users on local on the need for this checkuser. This is a return(although it is marked as Not done) for further discussion and may be requested again with other users' consent. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale To make it easy, MCC214 thinks Yun Ng Ng, Big-White-Duel and Mintclown is not 米記123 (A local sysop duck blocked those as 米記123, for Big-White-Duel and Mintclown is also based on enwp CU) but another LTA 小昌. He just wants CU verification to prove his point is correct. This is what I gather from reading the local discussion and the main point of CU. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

VISHAL JAISWAL [email protected]

Status:    Not done
List of users
VISHAL JAISWAL SOLAR (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
INDIAN SOLAR GROUP (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Editing the same promotional page on hiwiki. --QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 08:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 It looks like a duck to me. May I ask why you think you need an investigation? --Sotiale (talk) 10:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Probably yes, As they might have more sleepers? thanks QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 09:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Is there any evidence that they previously created the same page or created accounts continuously? In general, sleepers investigations are limited and evidence is needed. --Sotiale (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Not done Please request again later if necessary. --Sotiale (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Liberalus homo [email protected]

Status:    Not done
List of users
Liberalus homo universalus (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lordluka99 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Editing similar pages, similar writing style, we want to know if they are same person. Thank you in advance. P.s. Both users agree to be checked.
Not done Requests from IP users are generally not allowed. --Sotiale (talk) 23:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Please sir, everyone agree.

Please come to your account. Isn't it weird that you know SRCU but don't have an account? This request has been closed, so do not further comment. --Sotiale (talk) 23:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done
List of users
Lordluka99 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Croxyz (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): He told himself that he is Lordluka99. If you want evidence I have a screenshot. Liberalus homo universalus (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
@Croxyz, Ivi104, and Lasta: Hello. Could you please explain what this is going on? --Sotiale (talk) 23:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Sotiale, it was a joke on a shared Discord server that I am Lordluka99. I was the one who requested a good portion of the previous Lordluka99 CU checks (I'll link them in a couple of minutes). Doing this would be a waste of time, since nothing will be found regarding my account, except Croxyz2. However, if this request will be fulfilled, potentially new socks belonging to Lordluka99 can be found. Croxyz (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Sotiale, [1][2] Croxyz (talk) 23:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: We believe the user who posted the CU request is a sock of Lordluka99, but we also believe he has learned to mask or somehow change his IP address and UA. If he slipped up, this check would reveal new socks of Lordluka or the poster. There is also a ridiculous joke going around that Croxyz is actually Lordluka who has previously requested multiple checks on "himself" (similar to what is happening now). --Ivi104 (talk) 23:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Not done See above. --Sotiale (talk) 23:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Wetrace (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Marvin 2009 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
诗琳童 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): We believe that the following reasons are sufficient to support this check request:

  1. They edit in the same entry and have the same tone.
  2. They were inactive for a period of time, but they returned at the same time.
  3. The tendency is the same.
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Unrelated Unrelated Wetrace, Marvin 2009, 诗琳童

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks！--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 10:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
This CU request has been fulfilled. If you have something else to check, please file a new request. — regards, Revi 13:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Status:    Done
List of users
Xsaorapa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ردم (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Sixesurly (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Auxentios (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Numwide (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Wulverine claws (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
MusenInvincible (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Block evasion with multiple accounts on multiple individual wiki projects, user is blocked on wikiquote and user is indefinitely blocked on multiple individual wikis for abuse and having violated principles which are grounds for indefinite blocks.

Banned user who continuously created dozens of sockpuppets and used a large number of IP over years on all projects where he was banned. User is indef blocked on multiple wikis like the English and French wikipedia and wikiquote, and has been evading his indef blocks on multiple wikipedias many times with many sock accounts. It needs to be checked/confirmed if these accounts are part of the Xsaorapa/TwoHorned sockfarms and if there are sleepers.

As per the previous SPIs, this user has a history of often using proxies (like VPNs or other proxies), some of these proxies are blocked on english wikipedia (but not on wikiquote or French wikipedia where he is also banned). The IPs used by this user were mostly proxies/VPNs, or also IPs from France/Western Europe (like the IP 109.190.166.77) or India (like the IP 122.180.219.190, the IP was blocked on WQ). Some of the IPs of this sock are listed here and here. An earlier SPI concluded that they mostly contributed by VPN proxies. See the last two SPIs on meta, where the sockpuppetry was again confirmed here and here.

I have added accounts from other projects were he is also banned: Sixesurly (wikidata), Auxentios (enwiki, where he is banned), Numwide (enwiki, frwiki where he is also banned). The pattern and typical contributions very strongly matches these socks, who appear to create dozens of socks to avoid pattern detection. But these accounts are clearly the same as this sock, who is using different socks to avoid detection based on his pattern. It should be checked to confirm this. დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
@დამოკიდებულება: Hi. The only account that exists on enwikiquote is ردم(Xsaorapa is stale). The other accounts are scattered and there are local checkusers on each wiki, so we can't investigate directly. If you have strong evidence you mentioned, ask for blocking of them on each wiki; the checkuser process is not necessary. --Sotiale (talk) 11:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
But it can only be checked here on meta if these socks from multiple projects are the same sock (which the evidence very strongly suggests). Because the sock creates different socks to avoid pattern detection, such a check should be done, and because it is across wikis it can only be done here. Please let me know if you need more information. Also because the sock continuously created dozens of sockpuppets and used a large number of IP socks, a sleeper check should be done. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Even given that you're not presenting what strong evidence is, you don't need checkuser results if that's really strong evidence. If you are convinced that these accounts are them, strong evidence can be the basis for blocking. And I'd like to ask a question that Xsaorapa is not blocked on enwiki yet. If Xsaorapa is the same user, why hasn't it been blocked on enwiki yet? I'm wondering why it hasn't been blocked yet even though there is a separate category for sockpuppets. --Sotiale (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Because the sock uses different socks to avoid pattern detection, such a check should be done as explained above. The sockmaster and many of the sockpuppets are blocked indef on enwiki, the sock uses different accounts, not all of the socks are active on each of the wikis where he is blocked. Xsaorapa is the same user as indef blocked TwoHorned which checkusers confirmed on frwiki where the user is indefinitely blocked, and is also supported by the virtually identical editing pattern across all wikis where he is blocked on the french WQ and enwiki On wikidata it seems there was only one recent sock, so wikidata cannot do a check, it must be checked against the socks on wikiquote for confirmation, this can only be checked on meta. Xsaorapa is too old to check, and Auxentios was checked on enwiki in a request by @Georgethedragonslayer: but the result was Inconclusive to anything else, presumably because the sock was again using proxies. When an user uses proxies and is known for continuously creating sockpuppets cross-wiki, a more detailed check across wikis is needed.

Examples of relations of accounts: After checking his SPIs on multiple projects, all his socks have the same pattern, the same couple of tells, his contribution is a copy typical of his habits:

  • Using 2, 3 or more socks in vote stacking (several socks voting in the same vote).
  • Using socks with the goal of changing the consensus in talk page discussions (several socks discussing on the same talkpage to turn the consensus in the sock's favor). Many examples, even in RfC and dispute resolution pages (for example, where two or more socks were discussing against another user in a dispute resolution!)
  • Edit-warring with several socks in the same articles
  • Violations of indefinite ban on English and French wikipedia and wikiquote many times with many accounts
  • Personal attacks, harassment, hounding, defamation, intimidation, and stalking, spreading false and misleading claims, using socks for harassment and recruiting meatpuppets
  • Blanking and censorship vandalism
  • Anti-semitic and hinduphobic pov pushing
  • BLP violations and character assassinations of BLP people, for example of those he alleges to be Zionists, Neocons (especially BLP articles on Jews or Hindus)
  • Pov pushing apologist views and blanking content about terrorism, genocide, persecution, ethnic cleansing
  • Pov pushing fringe views and original research at Rene Guenon articles [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. See the recent comments by @Fabien Gatti:
  • Favorite articles include: Rene Guenon, Quran, Kafir, Quran on infidels, Islam and violence, Neoconservatism, Leo Strauss, Daniel Pipes, 9/11, Islamism-related, Jewish-related, Hindu-related, Religion-related
ردم

Edits in the same articles like Kafir (previously the article was called Quran on infidels), Quran. These articles were also very heavily edited by Xsaorapa, and doing exactly the same kind of edits. Also added apologist content, and content that is defaming to some scholars critical of religious radicalism, to articles Robert Spencer and Daniel Pipes, exactly the same type of edits were done by Xsaorapa

Numwide

Extensive edits at one of the socks favorite articles, Rene Guenon [10] [11] [12] [13] [14].

The SPI is noting that the sock targets Rene Guenon, User:PiCo and Gog and Magog, all these are targeted also by this user as can be found in the user contributions. There are more clues in the contributions of Numwide and the wikipedia SPI that show they are the same user. See also this comment: "TwoHorned is obsessed with neoconservatives, Leo Strauss, and especially René Guénon"

Sixesurly

Mass deletions on wikidata [15], and other edits exactly like previous socks like Xsaorapa also did, targeting the same articles

Auxentios

Mass deletions at wikipedia, and other edits exactly like previous socks like Xsaorapa also did, targeting the same articles

Wulverine claws
MusenInvincible

Edits in the same articles or same content which were very heavily edited with same pov by the sock (most of the created and edited articles and content of the user Wulverine claws were deleted by admins and thats why cannot be seen anymore), and another user at WQ just days ago was concerned by the antisemitic image spamming by this user MusenInvincible, which seems to match with the anti-semitic pov pushing of the sock

If it can be shown here that the users are the same, which the evidence strongly suggests, it would confirm that the user is using different socks to avoid pattern detection. Such a check can only be done on meta. Also because the sock continuously created dozens of sockpuppets and used a large number of IP socks, a sleeper check should be done. Please also note that this user was previously checked on meta, by you and by Wim b and by Ruslik0, and the sockpuppetry was confirmed multiple times on meta, which means that the assumptions on this sock were correct. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

To rephrase, in addition to checking the 4 wikiquote accounts, cross-wiki checks are needed because the banned sock continuously created dozens of sockpuppets and used a large number of IPs and proxies for cross-wiki abuse and to avoid pattern detection of the socks, and the Xsaorapa account is stale on wikiquote (and wikidata and enwiki and frwiki) and cannot be checked directly anymore (although we know from previous checks that they used VPN proxies), therefore to check the account against other non-stale accounts, a cross wiki check is needed. To be sure that ردم is the same user as Xsaorapa is easier to prove once we know that ردم is the same user as Sixesurly, Numwide and Auxentios. And the same goes the other way around, for example to prove that Auxentios is the same as TwoHorned and Xsaorapa, cross-wiki checks are needed. To prove that Sixesurly, Numwide and Auxentios and ردم are the same user, cross-wiki checks are needed. It seems certain that they are the same account, but because the socks continuously created dozens of accounts cross-wiki to avoid pattern detection of their accounts, and used many VPNs and proxies, a cross wiki check is needed in this case. So ردم , Sixesurly, Numwide and Auxentios cannot be checked against Xsaorapa because it is stale, but it can be checked cross-wiki. (And Auxentios was checked locally but not cross-wiki). A sleeper check should also be done. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
When a sockpuppet continuously creates dozens of sockpuppets and used a large number of IPs and proxies on multiple wikis where he is indef blocked for cross-wiki abuse and to avoid pattern detection of the socks (and this seems to have gone for years, so this is a LTA), then a cross-wiki check is needed. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
@Wim b: you checked this account here. Are the results still available and can they be checked against the new socks? Thank you. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 20:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
@დამოკიდებულება: The smartest way to process your request the fastest is to not rush others while they are reviewing it. Don't assume that those who serve without getting paid will prioritize your request. Please, wait patiently. Since you have asked for cross-wiki checking, it will take some time and procedure to achieve it. --Sotiale (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed ردم, Sixesurly, Auxentios, Sheardevi, Koalajove == Xsaorapa
  • Completely Unrelated Unrelated Numwide, Wulverine claws, MusenInvincible
  • With the cooperation of enwiki, wikidatawiki and metawiki

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Sotiale. I apologize. It was not my intention to rush or be impatient. This is a complex case and I wasn't sure if I was doing it right.
About Numwide, even though there is no technical evidence, it seems quite obvious he is part of the Xsaorapa-TwoHorned sockfarm. The behavioural evidence is very strong, not just the shared obsession with Rene Guenon, but also for example his edit warring with Pico at Gog and Magog just as the sock did earlier as can be seen from the SPI, and a few other strong clues. (The accounts Wulverine claws, MusenInvincible may not be part of the sockfarm: the first is difficult to check and investigate now because almost all of his edits and article creations on WQ were deleted by admins, and the second was suspect because of anti-semitic pov pushing and editing same articles, but this could also be someone with similar pov) --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
@დამოკიდებულება:: yes, the results still available, if @Sotiale: want I can provide them. --Wim b 18:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
@Wim b:, thank you. Yes, I think hopefully it could be helpful regarding the Numwide account. No technical evidence could be found about Numwide, but maybe the evidence from the earlier check could help. The Numwide account is very likely part of the Xsaorapa-TwoHorned sockfarm because:
This is very strong behavioral evidence. And as I have written above, checkusers confirmed Xsaorapa=TwoHorned=Feitoria. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust. If the data exists as Wim b declared in the past, then Numwide is still technically different. If you have strong evidence, go to local. --Sotiale (talk) 21:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: The checkuser at the French Wikipedia never confirmed that my account and TwoHorned were related, this old report User:დამოკიდებულება keeps mentioning as some kind of proof says the opposite: This was a check on Feitoria (talk · contribs) against two blocked socks on the French wiki (Betapictoris and Tecomu), the conclusion was negative. The result only revealed that Feitoria is my account. Anyone can check and see that both accounts have not been blocked on fr-wiki [18] [19] and en-wiki [20] [21]. Ask any steward speaking French here to confirm what I am saying about this. All these allegations about me being TwoHorned are coming from a user involved in a serious case of anti-Muslim and Hindu nationalist POV-pushing at Wikiquote. This was reported by several users [22] [23] [24]. --Xsaorapa (talk) 21:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@Numwide: @Wulverine claws:, @MusenInvincible: I am also pinging these users so they can defend themselves. --Xsaorapa (talk) 21:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@Xsaorapa: Already they have been declared to have nothing to do with you. This is not a space for discussion and this request has already been closed, so please discuss it on დამოკიდებულება's talkpage. --Sotiale (talk) 22:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Comments on request that has already been closed
I have said above that of the 3 users only Numwide is really suspect of being a sock of this sockfarm. Xsaorapa is again making the same personal attacks and false misleading claims that he did with dozens of socks and IPs across multiple wikis.
About the checkuser, as I have written above, checkusers confirmed Xsaorapa=TwoHorned=Feitoria.
Let's see:
  • The section is called :Request about : Feitoria, Betapictoris, Tecomu and was made by @Hesan:
  • Hesan made the request to check the user Feitoria against the sockmaster Two-horned, and some of Two-horned's confirmed socks "shravan" and "Betapictoris"
  • Hesan explains in many words how the edits of Two Horned and of the confirmed socks of Two Horned are identical to the sock Feitoria
  • Feitoria is confirmed as a sock of Xsaorapa here
  • The checkuser @Hexasoft: concludes that based on technical evidence it is certain that Xsaorapa and the sock account Two Horned are one and the same person.
So the checkuser in the SPI clearly says that the Xsaorapa account is one and the same person as the sock --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

And in addition there is plenty of behavioural evidence that corrobarates the technical evidence.

Below is some of the French text and translation:

  • Betapictoris, faux-nez de Two-horned, souhaitait supprimer une phrase sourcée de l'article Al-Fatiha, quitte à utiliser un autre Faux-nez, shravan, pour passer en force
    • Machine translation : Betapictoris, Two-horned fake-nose, wanted to delete a sentence sourced from the article Al-Fatiha, even if it means using another fake-nose, shravan, to force its way through. Since August 23, it has been blocked indefinitely.
  • Vocabulaire identique : "Il s'agit donc d'un avis non-notable" (Betapictoris, PdD de l'article, 21 fev 2017)/"avis non notable" (Feitoria, com. diff de l'article) ; "n'est repris par aucune source sérieuse"(betapictoris, PdD de l'article, 22 fev 2017)/ "qui n'est repris par aucune source sérieuse" (Feitoria, com. diff)
    • Identical vocabulary:
  • Arguments similaires : "cet auteur n'a aucune reconaissance dans le domaine de l'islam"(Feitoria, com. diff) / La spécialité de Taguieff en histoire des idées n'est pas non plus centrée sur l'Islam (Betapictoris, PdD de l'article, 17 fev 2017)
    • Similar arguments
  • Horaires similaires : Betapictoris participait beaucoup entre 1h et 3h du matin. Le compte Feitoria a été créé dans cette tranche horaire, ce qui n'est pas extrêmement fréquent comme horaire.
    • Similar schedules
  • Je note que Xsaorapa [1], Tecomu [2] et Bidibidibidi (faux nez confirmé de TwoHorned) [3] ont été actives sur le sujet de Taqîya. Et comme dit Hesan, Betapictoris (faux nez confirmé de TwoHorned) était aussi active sur ce sujet [4]. Donc il y a une relation avec les comptes faux nez de TwoHorned. --Dekacarandaebonelm (discuter) 12 septembre 2017 à 14:50 (CEST)
    • there is a relation with the false nose accounts of TwoHorned.
  • Conclusion : ... Toutefois il semble quasi certain que Xsaorapa (d · c · b) et ce compte sont une seule et même personne. Je l'indique ici car bien que n'ayant pas abusé (pas de contribution sur les mêmes pages) l'absence d'indication sur leurs pages est problématique.
    • Conclusion:... However it is almost certain that Xsaorapa (d · c · b) and this account are one and the same. I indicate it here because although not having abused (no contribution on the same pages) the absence of indication on their pages is problematic.

And that some of his dozens or hundreds of socks are not blocked does not mean anything. Sometimes accounts are not blocked even though they are suspected of being socks because they did no obvious vandalism edits or because the account is too old/stale or for any other reason. Or he is not blocked because, what seems to have been policy at frwiki, the sock did not edit on the same articles as his other socks, as the checkuser explaines here --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Note Note: This is a space for checkuser requests, this request has already been closed. There is no other means to help with any claim, so any comment should be discussed locally. Therefore, please do further discussion elsewhere, not here. Additional comments may be removed without notification. --Sotiale (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Sotiale, (I have understood, but this comment is directly related to the case) could the account Xsaorapa again be checked, maybe his edit at Meta in the past hours has brought new evidence, especially in relation to the Numwide account? Thank you again for your help which is much appreciated. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Sarawakartist (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Borneotalent (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Disruptive edits by removing deletion tag on same topic. History edits. CyberTroopers (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Borneotalent, Sarawakartist

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
0789-GR (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
芋仔蕃薯 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): User 1 and user 2 have the same editing tendency, and an IP address appears in an entry created by user 1. There is an editing war between user 1 and user "寒吉", and then user 2 is created (Note: the "番薯" in user 2's user name means "han-tsî" in Minnan dialect, that is "寒吉"). In addition, the user "Lu Tiwan" is excluded because the data is out of date. Please check the relationship between the two users, thanks!--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 04:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Unlikely Unlikely 0789-GR, 芋仔蕃薯

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

OK，thanks.--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 14:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Protoss1234 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ZillZill (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): See Steward_requests/Checkuser/2021-02#[email protected]. Thanks. --Yining Chen (Talk) 07:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. --Yining Chen (Talk) 11:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
ZillZill. --Sotiale (talk) 02:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
R125463268 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Huang Mingyi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): They created the articles about television and did vandalism in the same way. So someone thinks they are sockpuppets. Then a sockpuppet investigation is requested. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed R125463268, Huang Mingyi

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

History of [email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
History of Rajasthan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Pseudo Nihilist (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Continuously biased and hateful editing. One account is already blocked by another admin. Please let us know if there are any other IP or accounts associated with this account.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed History of Rajasthan, Pseudo Nihilist, भारत का प्रतिहार, F4E1C0

@संजीव कुमार: From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 12:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Rndjdkdnn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mmttyom (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Forwarding local admin's request. These are suspected socks of these ones, both editwar at w:zh:明星大侦探第六季节目列表. The admin said he couldn't judge from their edit patterns 'cause it's messy, so we would like a check to see if these two accounts are related to the confirmed ones. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 04:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed A7878778b, Rndjdkdnn, Qwertyuopececec, Qwertyuoprcrcrc, Mmttyom, Tgeuhruh

From a technical point of view. @Super Wang and Techyan: Here you are. --Sotiale (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 12:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done
List of users
Gunungkinabalu144 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
FishMara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Glowindadark (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Christinna Kuan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kbairagi0 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): As per English Wikipedia log this page was created by sock puppet FishMara and page was deleted in 2019 deleted in English Wikipedia and not sock with new user id was trying to create same page here also[25]. BubblySnow  💬 13:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Simple have their own CU, please file at w:simple:WP:SPI. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok Thanks for Information I don't know that so I have placed the request here. BubblySnow  💬 13:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
@BubblySnow: Hello. Please visit this page. We can't normally do it where there are local checkusers. Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok Thanks. BubblySnow  💬 13:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

上海之殇@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
上海之殇 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
什麼權利1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
大秦征百越05 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
泥馬06 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
泥馬05 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
泥馬04 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
泥馬03 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
蟲飛蟲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
飛蟲蟲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
習包子逆行倒施 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Their user names are similar to some sock puppets of w:zh:WP:HBN, so we want to know the relationship between these accounts and w:zh:WP:HBN. Then a sleeper checking is requested. Thanks.--生化魔龙2008 (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
@生化魔龙2008: Have there been any discussion locally, for zhwp requests stewards will need a discussion at local w:zh:WP:HAM page. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

there are some other accounts that had similar names to these accounts, and they have been confirmed that they were HBN m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-07#[email protected]

m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-07#[email protected] 2

m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-07#[email protected]

m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-07#AntiFA [email protected]，Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求/2020/7#Ryan9959

Not done --Sotiale (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Niki0327126 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Stephen0327 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vincestyle (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): User 3 is reported to the local AIV board for suspected sock of user 1 who is an active abuser and sockpuppeteer, but they denied the claim and the community could not duck for this case, hence a request was made to check the relationship of user 3 with the first two user accounts (sockpuppets of each other) along with users found in this request. I understand there may be conflicts between the zhwiki community and stewards, but I trust that you stewards can still do your best to work against vandalism. Thank you in advance. --LuciferianThomas．Talk 01:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
@LuciferianThomas:Hello. It seems that you typed a wrong user name. Then I have corrected it :) --Yining Chen (Talk) 01:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
oops thanks 😊 LuciferianThomas．Talk 01:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... I've already mentioned it, but it's up to your community to decide. At least, I don't think I'm in conflict with you. I've been getting complaints and inquiries from time to time about the results, and this is nothing different from that. Still, I have never changed my mind to serve the zhwiki community. Of course, I know there are people who don't like me in recent events, and there are times when my motivation diminishes, but that's an opinion they can have enough. There is no difference between before, and now for me. --Sotiale (talk) 03:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Stephen0327, Vincestyle, Sprewell2222000, Niki0327
  • Stale Niki0327126
  • About Stale: It is 90 days, not 3 months. Sadly..

Have a happy 春节. --Sotiale (talk) 04:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, and you too!--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 05:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your understanding and your blessings. -- LuciferianThomas．Talk 14:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Bbt1htbhtbh2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
LilMig21 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BerculeFtw (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): ro:Special:PageHistory/Brașov. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 15:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed BerculeFtw, Bercule
  • Unrelated Unrelated LilMig21, Bbt1htbhtbh2

--Sotiale (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Ado11744 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Adnan1135 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Adnan7758 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Adnan44478 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Policajci nisu zli (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Evidence:

(Pinging @Maestro Ivanković: who brought these users to my attention.)

Please find additional sleeper accounts and if possible suggest a rangeblock to prevent them from coming back. Thank you! --Ivi104 (talk) 14:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Doing... --Wim b 17:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Confirmed Adnan1135, Adnan7758, Adnan44478. They share the same IP and UA at least once with every other user.
  • Possible Possible Ado11744 used IPs very similar to the others, but without direct sharing.
  • Possible Possible Policajci nisu zli, like Ado11744, this user used IPs very similar to the others, but without direct sharing.

During the check I found also:

  • Ado11744 (bs wiki) and Adnan11299 that they shared IP and UA with Adnan1135 and Adnan44478 on 8 (whit Adnan11299) and 9 February (others) ;
  • Picasso12343 that shared IP and UA with Policajci nisu zli the same day
  • Bosanac 114 that shared IP and UA with Adnan7758 and Adnan1135

All users have the same /26 range. IMHO if the behavior is the same it can be assumed that it is the same person,  It looks like a duck to me --Wim b 17:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Mitchell345 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Moellinah (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
MolanHaker1008 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Noellinah (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This user has been treating enwn as Wikia, creating templates and categories such as "template:DF AU" and "Category:Pages that take place in the DF AU" (with the message "This article takes place in the AP AU. As a result, the information on this article may not be real.") They seem to be creating news articles taking plance in some fiction world ("Dan Dann and Danny are back"). We are not here to talk about "alternate universe", and this seems like a new string of LTA. When their article is deleted, they go on the "template:OwnerProtected" as if this is some sort of all-purpose wiki.acagastya 05:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Wim b 11:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Mitchell345, Noellinah and MolanHaker1008
  • Likely Likely Moellinah: this user have a same User Agent and provider (and /66 range) of MolanHaker1008 and Noellinah
  • during the check I also found user:NolanBaker2008 with the same ip as Mitchell345 and Noellinah, seeing the user page I could confirm that it is the same person. --Wim b 11:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

逸箖傳統診復@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
逸箖傳統診復 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Wen Ng Ng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Zhe Ng Ng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Yun Ng Ng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Big-White-Duel (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mintclown (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
MCC214B (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The first three accounts are blocked socks of LTA zh:WP:MJ123 (vandalizes sports articles; create usernames like TV drama names), the latter three are zh:WP:小昌 (vandalizes TV series articles). Although Yun Ng Ng follows a naming pattern as MJ123, but local admin block Yun as 小昌. So we'd like make it clear that which LTA Yun is. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 09:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Vickson ng, Hen hen jen, Yun Ng Ng, Ken Ng Ng, Gen Ng Ng, Ren ng ng, Wen Ng Ng, Qen ng ng, Ten ng ng, Zhe Ng Ng, Hen party
  •  Confirmed Group 2: MCC214B, Big-White-Duel
  • Likely Likely Mintclown and Group 2
  • Unrelated Unrelated 逸箖傳統診復
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Sotiale, I guess MCC214 finally gotten what they want, which is good. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Auvajs (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Miluju dynamický IP adresy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vysočina také na generuje vojáky (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vojín Vomáčka z Postoloprt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Diktátor obecný (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Zcenzurujem všecko (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Vojín Nazdárek z Chotěboře (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Nadporučík Fučík z Nepomuku (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Četař Rechtsknecht z Ptenína (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): After indefinite blocking of their main account Auvajs due to declared intention to vandalise and disrupt the project using sockpuppets, the user has created numerous sockpuppet accounts causing disruption to the project. As the user appears to be using dynamic IP addresses to avoid the automated blocks, it would be helpful if someone could investigate whether a range block or other measure could be applied to prevent further abuse. Sintakso (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello steawards. Sintakso is secret agent from North Korea and he censors Czech Wiktionary for political purposes. I fight against it. The other users Tchoř and Palu aa well. They only pretend to be Czech.--Jihokorejec Kim (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Jihokorejec Kim Do you have any proof of the secret agent part / censoring. Please provide or this is just casting aspersions. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm on it, but Jihokorejec Kim obviously belongs to the cluster. --Vituzzu (talk) 11:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
My point of view: I am not a secret agent from North Korea :-). We are both active on multiple Czech projects, with me being usually considered part of the establishment (admin on multiple projects, arbitration committee member of Czech Wikipedia), so in "revolutionary" mood, Auvajs considers me an enemy by default. He had actually articulated his intent to harm the project before I have blocked his cswikt main account indefinitely – his pronounced harmful intent was the reason why I blocked him. Auvajs is an experienced sock puppeteer, AFAIK first arbitration case with him happened on cswiki in 2006 with main account named Vandalista, later he asked under the name Aeromix for a permission to have new clean start, which has failed (note: I have participated in this last case as an AC member).--Tchoř (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Robert Procházka, Svobodný pán Wikislovníku Rastislav Bořivoj Spytihněv ze Staráku u UH and Tlatlatlahtlalilli are still unblocked.
Vytuněná Šunka Antoine Doinel de Bohumín are POSSIBLY related, please be careful.
Četař Rechtsknecht z Ptenína and Nadporučík Fučík z Nepomuku are apparently unrelated.
There are no smoking guns linking this cluster to Aujvais, though some clue surely is present.
If needed I can make a rangeblock.
--Vituzzu (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for investigating. As the disruptive editing has since ceased, I think we can probably wait with the rangeblock and only resort to it if the user returns. However, I leave this to your judgement. Sintakso (talk) 09:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

中台澎南高@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
中台澎南高 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
KTL 29 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Two users have made a lot of editing for the same entry in a period of time, but it can not be judged directly from the existing evidence, so the local sysop requested this request. So please check the relationship between the two users, thanks!--勇猛な貓BureibuNeko 14:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 中台澎南高, KTL 29
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 遮掩, 技巧, 衣物, 俄語系, 保留, 醉倒, 湖泊岸邊, 捕捉, 起床, 右邊境, US9766, 特別法, 出現, 球隊人員, 戲劇, 或有些, 智力測驗, 洲際, Yfgo9, 碥, 酣睡, 袋子口, 有點擊, V9h9lk, 汝窯洞, 既有點, 然而是否, 盛大型, TF7002, 蹦跳, 嫩葉子, 就在此時, 飛行里數, 豚肉食材, 嫁人, 罐頭髮, 曲調, 由不得, 別墅, 留言板, N8jm9, 哺, 面積, 酶, 待遇, 踩踏, 成長者, 球衣, 魅力度, 曲奇餅, 桶蓋, 幽默感, 腿腳, 海關, 戈壁爐, 好像是, 安全感覺, 凸面, 此處, 2021年, 想要, 有效, PD7560, 必備, 月球車站, 玉米飯, 力求, 0P9O1Q2W

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 03:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Withdrawn
List of users
S0362541 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This user was interested in articles about musicians (especially marimba musicians). And he created poorly translated articles. Then an admin believed that there must be some sockpuppets had not been found because he was sure that he had seen similar users before(like w:zh:User:Rubyng2004). So sleepers investigation is requested. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 06:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
@Yining Chen and Techyan: Could you please provide an account for comparison? In general, dealing with SRCU with just one account is an investigation not allowed. --Sotiale (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Local CU policy allows Checkusers to check IP used by blocked vandals for the convenience of prolonging autoblock (w:zh:WP:CUP#1). Yes, Techyan may come up with more info. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 01:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Techyan says in local discussion that it would take him some time to check the logs and reply as he may have got some new findings. Itcfangye (talk) 14:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Yo everyone, Techyan is busy these days, and he allowed me to turn off this request. Sorry for holding you up. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 09:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

你 是 自 由 的@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
你 是 自 由 的 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
New user messages (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
宣傳性用戶名 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
不文明用戶 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
傀儡帳戶 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
共用帳戶 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Old user message (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
千村狐免 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
滥用过滤嚣 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): In the previous HAM discussion, LClightcat (with signature 你·是·自·由·的) suspected #1, #2 and Laddzhao (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate) (not blocked) as sock puppets as they used the same signature as LClightcat. #1 and #2 are blocked as obvious misleading user names. The community does not endorse the request by LClightcat as they does not think Laddzhao is a LTA.

In recent days, there are a large number of improper user names created. #2-#9 all created user pages as their first edit.GZWDer (talk) 19:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... I feel like I already know who it is. --Sotiale (talk) 11:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 口中, 待命, 史前, 減, 外出了, 品質, 快要, 城市化石, 仙境內, 海洋學, 啄, 述, 内下, 分鐘, 列表, 在此, 吐出, 明年, 球賽, 古代史, 心裡話題, 威脅, 拐, 化學品, 瓜分, 砂鍋爐, 忠於, 必須, 藏身, 成為此時, B-KPC, 世界上, 任何時間, 此後, 保障, 有點名, 足夠, 布丁香氣, 子民間, 一個月份, 砂糖廠, 倔, As you say, 七月底, 皮膚科, 點心紙, N2u1e, 火車站牌, 能量飲品, Aaa0004, 做, Yoz2moz2, 1qsz2wsx3edx4rfx, 事件, 成立時間, 可見光, 例如, 坡, Pqr2008, 低價, 傀儡帳戶, 彈性, Yc9vh, 式微電影, 上升, 堡壘, 求情, 乜食物, 足球隊, 木材質料, 借, 才能夠, 方針和指引, 宣傳性用戶名, 或者是, 息影, 为我想, 凸顯了, 海外僑胞, 工廠, 加上了, 必需, 都在, 十分鐘, 363g7ik, More details is required, 企, 叮噹噹噹, 2sb72sj8, 四月份, 册, 冬天黑暗, 域名, J7lp0, 或則, 水果攤販, 3sin8hnz, 前晚, 定義工, 己見, 加強, 翻, 腿, Not for edit, 似地, 有點名稱, 研發, 兜風, 少見, 懈, 歇, 物件, 7gvc8b, 內容, 域外, Aaa0003, 心理戰, 由此, 例行, 召開, 肌肉注射, 抄, 分別, 升級, 吩, 威力量, LTA USERS, 戶籍, 公共, 時候到了, 或然, 小組, 或許是, 史前, 影展, 的確, 加上, 快要, 恂, 力氣質量, 叫做, 啄, 拓寬, 下午茶市, 外觀, 列表, 一的, 上網, 瓜田, 球賽, .usn28j, 山上, 入場, 拐, 埸, Dnoebn2ieb, 日前, 忠於, 硫, 入境, 巴士, B-KPC, 存款, W2taa3swlqbammlc, Wz7jj9d, 保障, 每個, A LTA User in here, 外, 子民間, 惋, 的士, 子女, As you say, 醉酒, 又區, 子彈列車, N2u1e, 響應, 錢幣, 妒, 做, 個案, 趾甲, 汀九橋, 成立時間, 肽, HSBC Ltd, 州縣, Pqr2008, 本身, 山區, Sbu2b28j, Yc9vh, 公園區, 乙是什麼？, Guuc8v, 求情, 破壞性用戶名, 忿, Uh18j19, 借, 加價, 母校, 又是, 或者是, 翅膀臂, LTA 101, 和約, 海外僑胞, 區域性, Old user message, 6月中, 都在, 吼叫, 能力量度器, 低溫, 企, 出席, 尖沙咀站, 似乎乾啦, 册, 球場, 九成, 賽車, 或則, 才會, 叉燒包飯, 由中, 定義工, 任期, 少於, 必要, 腿, 忙忙碌碌, 方案, 已, 研發, 屋頂花園, 正式微生物, 加油站牌, 歇, 式子, 不文明用戶, 少年人, 域外, 更是, Ybdjndbi, 及時, 例行, 汗水, User xxxxxxxxxx, 得知, 分別, 居住, It is me in here, 入口, LTA USERS, 總是, 3rd February 2021, 何必要, 或然, 低, WI29KW, 口感, 影展, 便, HI THERE IS IT POSSIBLE, 定義, 恂, 你好好, Zero dollars, -山上面, 拓寬, 共用帳戶, No a good name, 所在地, 一的, 它們, Good morning everybody, 依舊稱, .usn28j, 台下, LX-VCA, 解釋, 埸, 前面, SH963, 很大, 硫, 2j22jj2, Go to school now, Wybwn72m, 存款, F u8tb, No user talk, 餵雞霉體雞精會, 每個, 2un2m, Let everyone to do, 7ns2ne, 惋, 缺, 12ABC34D, 肚, 醉酒, 透過, Do I know him, 硬, 響應, 由來, What is this thing, 技, 個案, 延伸, He is she, 哪兒童？, 肽, 世紀末期, Why you are here, 研製, 本身, 每, 加上升, 公園區, 所在, 汝州街, 破壞性用戶名, 成為了, 孤獨木舟, 加價, 號碼, 匆匆匆, 翅膀臂, 配, 延伸舌頭, 區域性, 教, 安排除名, 凸顯了, Sunwbuwn, 婚, 必需, 假帳戶, 匆促, More details is required, 付款, 伐木材, 四月份, 召喚起, 喊出, J7lp0, 常識科, 盛大, 前晚, 些許, 烈日, 翻, 加入口, 化學反應爐, 有點名稱, 凹凸不平, 印象派, 懈, 港元, 蟹肉, 內容, 式樣, 删, 由此, 河流, 利益, 抄, 使用權, 止痛, 威力量, 凸顯, 或有, 時候到了, 花生醬汁
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 滥用过滤嚣, 千村狐免
  •  Confirmed Group 3: New user messages, 你 是 自 由 的
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 3
  • Possible Possible Group 2 and 3

Group 1 has a total of 380 accounts. Yes, I know who this is(Group 1): Group 2 on past request. From a technical point of view. There are so many accounts, if you find anything inaccurate username, please let me know. But I'm on a Seollal holiday now, so my answer may be late. --Sotiale (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

+  Confirmed 旗號令 as Group 1. --Sotiale (talk) 12:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: In Steward_requests/Checkuser/2021-01#[email protected], Easterlies listed three addition groups accounts to check.--GZWDer (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: They are 67 accounts appears twice in the list: .usn28j, As you say, B-KPC, J7lp0, LTA USERS, More details is required, N2u1e, Pqr2008, Yc9vh, 一的, 企, 例行, 保障, 個案, 借, 做, 內容, 公園區, 册, 凸顯了, 分別, 列表, 前晚, 加價, 區域性, 史前, 啄, 四月份, 域外, 埸, 威力量, 子民間, 存款, 定義工, 影展, 必需, 忠於, 快要, 恂, 惋, 懈, 成立時間, 或則, 或然, 或者是, 抄, 拐, 拓寬, 時候到了, 有點名稱, 本身, 歇, 每個, 求情, 海外僑胞, 球賽, 由此, 研發, 破壞性用戶名, 硫, 翅膀臂, 翻, 肽, 腿, 都在, 醉酒, 響應--GZWDer (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Please perform some CheckUser block in zhwiki as new accounts is still being created from the IP.--GZWDer (talk) 13:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@GZWDer: (Mobile) Those accounts have already been processed before. / Ignore all duplicate accounts safely :) And just subtract the number of duplicate accounts from the total number of accounts. / In the case of CheckUser block, I will answer you tomorrow.. or within a few days. --Sotiale (talk) 13:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution!--勇猛な貓BureibuNeko 14:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale:Hello. I noticed that User:餵雞霉體雞精會 has not been registered([26]). Is there something wrong? --Yining Chen (Talk) 01:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Yining Chen: An account that is not registered is because it was blocked in the creation process. This is the account name the user attempted to create, but failed. In general I exclude it, but sometimes it may appear. Simply identify his/her trends and ignore them. --Sotiale (talk) 10:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
OK. Thanks. --Yining Chen (Talk) 10:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
+  Confirmed 519AAA209, M2989AA, 257AM2. --Sotiale (talk) 10:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I would like to know that which group these accounts belonged to. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Yining Chen: Group 1! --Sotiale (talk) 03:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
OK. Thanks! --Yining Chen (Talk) 06:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
AndyAndyAndyAlbert (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
AndyAndyAndyAndyAlbert (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
A LTA User in here (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
千村狐免 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
你 是 自 由 的 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BurebuNeko (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
LClightcat. (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Hello. The first account was blocked recently. Then the second account was registered. #3 -- #7 used to imitate the usernames of others and #6 -- #7 have similar editing tendencies with the second one. So we thought that the second account might be a sock puppet of #3 -- #7. Then we would like to know that if the second account was registered by the first user or anybody else. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 08:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Other accounts:
  1. 造貓萬歲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  2. 維貓萬歲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  3. WikiCatNews (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  4. 維基小野貓 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  5. CataeCat.CC (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  6. 自新世界 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  7. 光猫猫 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  8. 维猫报 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  9. 勇猛な猫 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

They are apperently socks of #7 per DUCK and blocked in zhwiki as such.--GZWDer (talk) 09:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Doing... I think impersonating a user as mocking is one of the unacceptable behaviors. --Sotiale (talk) 09:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: BABABABAABB, 12344455ggg
  • Possible Possible AndyAndyAndyAndyAlbert and Group 1
  • A LTA User in here: No other sleepers found and Unrelated Unrelated
  • 千村狐免: Same. No other sleepers found and Unrelated Unrelated (Previously declared relationships remain unchanged, it means comparison with other groups)
  •  Confirmed as 你 是 自 由 的 Group: CCF KUAIXIATAI, CCF QUANWEIJIZUICHADEGUANLIYUAN, CCF LANYONGKUILEI, CCF XIATAI, BurebuNeko, WikiCatNews, LClightcat., 自新世界, 光猫猫, 维猫报, 勇猛な猫
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 維貓萬歲, 維基小野貓
  • Possible Possible 造貓萬歲 and Group 2
  • Unrelated Unrelated AndyAndyAndyAlbert (No association with any of the above groups)

From a technical point of view. There are several people mixed up, but it seems to be meaningless to distinguish them specifically. Undeclared accounts do not have enough data to distinguish them or are separate groups. --Sotiale (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Why you are [email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Why you are here (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
吻合 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
必需用品 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
太多 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
本月 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
加價錢 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
伐木頭 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
右側 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
此外 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
出境 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): More users:

We think that they are sockpuppets of a LTA "Why you are here". So we want to have a sleeper investigation. Then, because of w:zh:WP:CUP#1, we would like to ask the steward to block the IP that the users used to registered the accounts. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 00:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
All gone. --Sotiale (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! By the way, I want to know，should the accounts that we find in future be reported to SRG? --Yining Chen (Talk) 11:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Nivea757575 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Pinkyku (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): They both messed with Angela Chang's nationality (adding original research claiming she's Canadian) and both edited on mobile devices. Nivea757575 was once blocked, but unblocked by local admin per AGF. That admin endorses this request, see if there are new IDs with Nivea. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 23:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Stale Pinkyku
  • There is no comparison target, so Inconclusive Inconclusive Nivea757575

Erm.. Perhaps mistook the year of the account's contribution. --Sotiale (talk) 09:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Oops. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
OpusDEI (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alan.H (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Striking similarities in wording and argumentation, combined with interest in similar or same topics and inactivity unless discussions at the village pump begin, demonstrating entirely the same or similar positions on issues. George M. (talk) 19:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Could you please explain in more detail? In addition to the same opinion, please describe any other suspicious circumstances. Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Of course: it's not just about the same opinion, it's about the same language, wording, argument and sentence structure, as well as appearances on specific intertwined topics with high rates of inactivity in the meantime.--George M. (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Unrelated Unrelated OpusDEI, Alan.H

From a technical point of view. No information can be found that is related to each other. --Sotiale (talk) 02:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

必然性@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
必然性 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
LTA_YURH (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
忽略 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
比如 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
附近 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Wwwwkjjhvz (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Wwwwkjjhvzvvf_f_dd (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
R_6fouo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
豚肉食材 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
用戶查核 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): More users:

We think that these accounts may be sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:YURH, and we want to have a confirmation. Then we want to have a sleeper investigation and ask the steward to block the IP that they used according to w:zh:WP:CUP#1. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Done. And Unrelated Unrelated Wwwwkjjhvz, Wwwwkjjhvzvvf_f_dd, 可可巧克力, 機械島, 我愛台灣. These are obviously different users. But  Confirmed Wwwwkjjhvz, Wwwwkjjhvzvvf_f_dd. If they have no other abuse, it is recommended to unblock. --Sotiale (talk) 03:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. --Easterlies (talk) 03:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Sweety439 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
胡蝶47しのぶ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
彤蜜妡璃647 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts were confirmed that they are sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:X43, Then we want to have a sleeper investigation. Thank you. For comparing: m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-12#紅神琦@zh.wikipedia 2. --Yining Chen (Talk) 07:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 胡蝶47しのぶ and past case(2020-12)
  • Likely Likely Sweety439, 彤蜜妡璃647

No other sleepers found. --Sotiale (talk) 11:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
77no1lovsu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Asika1234 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Q1112emm (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
杨洋已经是我的老公了 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
閣下一樣嘅人建造 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
乘風破浪的花湖華 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Bohemiiima (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts were confirmed that they are sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:冏, Then we want to have a sleeper investigation. Thank you. For comparing: m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-01#炸弹天师@zh.wikipedia. --Yining Chen (Talk) 07:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 乘風破浪的花湖華, Bohemiiima, Asika1234, 77no1lovsu, 閣下一樣嘅人建造, Q1112emm, 神奈川隆二, 上善若水不是誰, 杨洋已经是我的老公了, No1bei-lun-jian-si-le
  • Likely Likely Llliutyre, 泥垢哗啦啦啦

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
0789-GR (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
CTPNK KTL 29 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These users were suspected as Lu tiwan's socks, but local admin unblocked CTPNK later. However, CTPNK soon showed multiple edit patterns as Lu tiwan, including typo and unconsciousness of template:unblock. So we'd like to see the relationship. For comparison, please see this round of check (the 30th archive of that month). Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 04:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed CTPNK KTL 29, KTL 29, 0789-GR

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Gunffhutg (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Sockven (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These users deleted useful contents from w:zh:詹江村, just like these users did. Judging from username, we couldn't block them as ducks, so a check may be of help. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 08:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Gunffhutg, Sockven
  •  Confirmed Group 1 and past case(2021-02) Group 3

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
AXXXXK (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
藝興大廈1314 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Abcdefghixx (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This user uses both socks and ip to vand in zhwiki and commons after being blocked by zhwiki and we suspect they might have more socks/sleepers. The ip they use (as can be ducked) is 138.19.24.64 (for reference only; there is no need to tell the relationship between this ip and their accounts). Itcfangye (talk) 02:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Abcdefghixx, 藝興大廈1314, AXXXXK

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 12:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Yurly [email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Yurly kosygln (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
新生儿的高血压十分罕见，由于未满1周岁的婴儿不适宜外出旅游 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
新生儿的高血糖十分罕见，由于未满1周岁的婴儿不适宜外出旅游 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
新生儿的高血脂十分罕见，由于未满1周岁的婴儿不适宜外出旅游 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
习普拉屎 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
猛犬 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
夢蝶夢花 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
习狗 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): #1 and #7 tried to impersonate (former and current) admins and vandalize; #5, #6 and #8 attacked another admin; #2-#4 and #7 created hoaxes. We would like to catch possible sleepers and request (range) global blocks, as the pattern seems appeared on multiple wikis: zhwikibooks (inserting username into articles), zhwiki 1, zhwiki 2 and zhwiki 3 (creating accounts similar to established users for attack/impersonating purposes). Note that this post combined my translation of local discussion with my own researches. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 12:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 新生儿的高血糖十分罕见，由于未满1周岁的婴儿不适宜外出旅游, 新生儿的高血脂十分罕见，由于未满1周岁的婴儿不适宜外出旅游, 新生儿的高血压十分罕见，由于未满1周岁的婴儿不适宜外出旅游, 夢蝶夢花, 习普拉屎狗, 习狗, 习普拉屎是狗, 习普拉屎, Yurly kosygln, 猛犬

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
BetThisWillWork (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
KidsAreVeryCool (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
CopyrightProfanity (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Looking for stewards to identify if we have a common IP range for the three accounts so the community can have a hard block on the range. Happy or you to implement block if you find a clean range, and ask that it be for three months, based on the period of the issue. Duck test says that they are the same person.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed BetThisWillWork, KidsAreVeryCool, CopyrightProfanity

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 11:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Another suspect account is User:Fordaliton, used to send harrasing messages. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a different friend. --Sotiale (talk) 11:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

連登討論區@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
連登討論區 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
搬東西 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
民主建港協進聯盟 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
香港工會聯合會 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
香港經濟民生聯盟 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): All accounts are created recently; #1-#3 disrupts desysop discussion of 蟲蟲飛; #3-#5 all use organization name as user name and have image in their signatures (which is prohibited by policy).--GZWDer (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: South Africa No.1, 綠色小巴, 紅色小巴, CRHK128, ときめきポポロン, 李薇戰狼教授, 戰狼李薇, 戰狼教授李薇, 香港工會聯合會, 民主建港協進聯盟, 香港經濟民生聯盟
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 教授李薇戰狼, 教授戰狼李薇, 助理教授戰狼李薇, 助理教授李薇戰狼
  •  Confirmed Group 3: 願榮光歸香港, 連登討論區
  •  Confirmed Group 4: 韓國輸市長, 林鄭月娥特首
  •  Confirmed Group 5: SHB17, Sincewegaredie
  • Unrelated Unrelated 搬東西
  • Likely Likely Group 1 and Group 2/3/4/5
  • Likely Likely Group 1 and Garish176

From a technical point of view. For reference, I don't think this is KAGE(there are accounts blocked as KAGE). It was a complicated investigation.. tired. --Sotiale (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale:Regarding the Group 1, are the IP(s) of these accounts OP/Proxy? Since some of the accounts in group 1 are experienced users, and I would like to have more information for determining whether they are sockpuppet or not. Thank you. SCP-2000 14:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
They used an obvious normal IP bands. --Sotiale (talk) 02:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The result is kind of strange. CRHK128 is Hong Kongese but South Africa No.1 is Taiwanese. They could not be the same person unless one of them hide their true identity. I am not blaming CU though. Itcfangye (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
If you take their claim to be true, it will, but at least the IPs they used show that they don't live in separate places. --Sotiale (talk) 02:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Can you tell where their IPs come from, HK, Taiwan, UK or South Africa? Thank you. Itcfangye (talk) 03:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
That's something I can't answer :( --Sotiale (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: Also, can you confirm that the H in CRHK128 is the latin letter en:H, not en:Eta nor Cyrillic En? So are the other 6 letters/numbers. Itcfangye (talk) 04:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't type in the account, I just copy what's in the log. So, the account name above is the account name I saw. --Sotiale (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want the answer, try it yourself. At least I can directly type in the account name in SUL, with the same keyboard you use. --Hamish 04:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale:I would like to suggest you try typing in for further checking...--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@Cmsth11126a02: May I ask why you think so? I believe in logs more than my keyboard. And investigating other users for keyboard typing errors can be against the policy. --Sotiale (talk) 10:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Well...I just want to AGF them, especially I do not have the detail of IP they use.--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 11:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Ah, OK. --Sotiale (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Withdrawn
List of users
Ca11ist0 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ABX456 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts were confirmed that they are sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:SiuMai, Then we want to have a sleeper investigation. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 03:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Stewards, trust me, I never forgot to relay your concern to local community that sleeper check should not be carried out so frequently or without an acceptable reason. However, people just don't listen. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
I decide to withdraw this request. No good reason to proceed. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 08:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

A few [email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
A few centuries (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Looking forward to (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
The only account (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
This is what I want (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
No such account is found (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Who are you and him (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): We think that these accounts may be sockpuppets of w:zh:LTA:YURH because of their user names, and we want to have confirmation. Then a sleeper investigation is requested. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 09:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Erm... Do I have to list it? :p All locked now. But..
  •  Confirmed Airbus A350-900, No such account is found, See u tmr, WiFi signal, EXIT 9D, ABC12DEF34, 卸任, This is what I want, The only account, 大學教育, Looking forward to, A few centuries, 或有點, Who are you and him, Public IP Account, Qwertyuiop032, Global lock me now, A long day

When their main ranges were blocked, I think they found another detour. However, it seems difficult to prevent this bypass, so I will think about how. --Sotiale (talk) 11:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

But means accounts above have no relationship with the LTA technically, right? --Easterlies (talk) 11:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@Easterlies: Yes? Accounts are locked because they are the same LTA. --Sotiale (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Oh, I had thought that but shows that accounts above might be strange and different from the LTA. My bad lol.--Easterlies (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Toby [email protected]

Status:    Withdrawn
List of users
Toby 2111 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
三次用戶 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
貨艇貨船 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
順岸碼頭 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
石洲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
大𢃇 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Clean sock (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
襪仔機械人 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
襪公仔 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
機械人 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Rather interesting user names especially for the last 4, which means "Clean sock", "Sockpuppet bot", "Sockpuppet" and "Bot". All either created a user-space sandbox or made (disruptive) edits related to ferry transport in Hong Kong. First one is also strikingly similar to Steward_requests/Checkuser/2021-01#[email protected] Group 2 (in which User:Extremely bus is not stale yet), but their edit patterns are different so may be unrelated. H78c67c (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@H78c67c: Could you please explain in more detail? For example, if you have two groups, please let me know why you posted them in one request, or what abuse each group did. Thanks! --Sotiale (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
On second thought, I am withdrawing this request while I leave a user warning on their talk page about sockpuppetry and wait for an answer. I will repost the request if necessary. H78c67c (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
SuppleBuck (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
TwinkleDinkle (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These two users have been creating advertisement pages about Discovery Fanatic. Seems like abusing the wiki using multiple accounts, and if they are, then blocking the range might be a good idea. acagastya 03:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Mitchell345, Moellinah, MolanHaker1008, Noellinah, NolanBaker2008, SuppleBuck, TwinkleDinkle

@Acagastya: These are friends who have an account on enwikinews. So, shall we look at their other accounts on en: projects?

  •  Confirmed AND(AurNeigh), BooksWithLooks, KidsAreVeryCool, SuppleBuck, Mitchell345, Noellinah, CopyrightProfanity, HollyJollyUser, TwinkleDinkle, BetThisWillWork, PleazeWork, ScoobyReferences, Moellinah, MolanHaker1008, NolanBaker2008, IForgotMyPassoword, LippyLappy, YipYapSippySap, AlreadyTeddy

@Billinghurst: If my memory is correct, you might be interested in this friend. --Sotiale (talk) 11:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale:, thanks for this. I will discuss with other admins, what we should do about this. Any idea, if we could block their IP range?
acagastya 11:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@Acagastya: This is a crosswiki abuse, so I'll handle it appropriately later. I think you only need to discuss the follow-up on them locally :) --Sotiale (talk) 11:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Blackariteam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Scot0ma (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Scot0ma using Blackariteam's signature on discussions. [27]. We need to check if there is sockpuppet abuse on RfU. NMW03 (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
NMW03: have you seen this block log? --Wim b 11:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Oh, thank you. That's enough. --NMW03 (talk) 11:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
I explained my question incorrectly: are you still asking for confirmation of a possible alteration of the vote? --Wim b 11:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Wim b, yes. I think I need more details. I asked this to Blackariteam and he said "No, it is not my account but I know that user. --NMW03 (talk) 11:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
NMW03 ok thanks, Doing... --Wim b 11:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Done

on several occasions they shared the IPs and UAs, some days they had the same IP and UA within minutes of each other and edited alternately.

In at least one day they had the same IP all day and 2 AUs shared within minutes. They are certainly acquaintances as they stated. This from a technical point of view is the result --Wim b 11:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

2 AUs means different user agents, right?--NMW03 (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
NMW03 UA = user agent. this 2 users shared IP and UA in the same days, even after a few minutes. --Wim b 12:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks.--NMW03 (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Kevin Seefried on [email protected]

Status:    Withdrawn
List of users
Kevin Seefried on tires (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Robert Packer (aka Camp Auschwitz guy) on tires (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Adam Christian Johnson on tires (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): We have had previous LTAs with the username FOOBAR on Wheels, and this seems to have resurrected. It is rather odd to see these three accounts were created in a span of just two minutes.acagastya 02:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
@Acagastya: Hello. All of these accounts are locked, and from the reason they are locked, they all appear to be the same user. Is there a separate need for investigation? --Sotiale (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: I didn't know they were locked. If they are, there is no point in further investigation, you can close this.
acagastya 03:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
OK :) --Sotiale (talk) 13:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Neploxie (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Trainkeptarolling (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Xmaji (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Sent an email to stewards explaining the problem. Please see ticket number #2021020810004063, which describes the reason, and lists all the usernames which have been performing same kind of activiites.--acagastya 09:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec: I think it would be more appropriate for you to handle it. Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 09:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale and Martin Urbanec: Is this being handled on your end elsewhere? Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
It looks like Martin had handled something related, so I handed it over to him, but if he is busy, someone can handle it. --Sotiale (talk) 13:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Done. @Acagastya: All related accounts were locked and your ticket was answered. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 07:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Tadasu Satoru Rin@global

Status:    Locally handled
List of users
Tadasu Satoru Rin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
TungHiuLam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Same cross-wiki spam. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

They are the same person  Confirmed, but finding any other accounts will be difficult. I took the liberty of running a local CU on enwiki only. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

@1234qwer1234qwer4: There is no global CU, for meta it should be filed on RfCU, for enwp should be on w:en:WP:SPI, but with AmandaNP confirmation here, I locally blocked them on meta as behavioral matches too. (I compared meta deleted contributions and seek a mediawiki sysop assistance to ascertain the contents of the master account on mediawiki)Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Malik202045 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kenizx (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Yeniheyat2020 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Sebuhi2222 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mirzefilankes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lee Chi Chek (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Azimoffff (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mrsmrn688 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Just look at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mirzefilankes/Archive. All of these accounts are either newly created or have not been active for a long time. They just edited this RfU, which increases the chance of being a sockpuppet. If there is any other accounts, please let me know. NMW03 (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 03:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Sebuhi2222, Yeniheyat2020
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Malik202045, Mirzefilankes
  • Unrelated Unrelated Kenizx, Lee Chi Chek, Azimoffff, Mrsmrn688
  • Likely Likely Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 06:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.--NMW03 (talk) 08:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done
List of users
Randykobe2020 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Sallywong2021 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Annyhj604 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Edge20212 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Eunwoo1121 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These accounts posted bad links to K-pop articles, and were once blocked as ducks, because their usernames followed the same pattern (words+digits). However, Eunwoo1121 posted a block review and was bailed. We'd like to see if they are technically related, and if we need to block again. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Unrelated Unrelated Annyhj604 and Randykobe2020 group
  • Unrelated Unrelated Eunwoo1121 and Randykobe2020 group
  • Unrelated Unrelated Annyhj604 and Eunwoo1121

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 02:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.--LightyearsTalk 03:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser/2021-02&oldid=24893938"