Role of Echocardiography in The Hemodynamic Monitorization of Critical Patients
Role of Echocardiography in The Hemodynamic Monitorization of Critical Patients
Role of Echocardiography in The Hemodynamic Monitorization of Critical Patients
2012;36(3):220---232
www.elsevier.es/medintensiva
a
Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital General Yagüe, Burgos, Spain
b
Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital de Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
c
Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Corporación Sanitaria y Universitaria Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
d
Servicio de Medicina Intensiva Clínica USP-Palmaplanas, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
KEYWORDS Abstract The use of echocardiography in intensive care units in shock patients allows us to
Echocardiography; measure various hemodynamic variables in an accurate and non-invasive manner.
Hemodynamic; By using echocardiography not only as a diagnostic technique but also as a tool for continuous
Left ventricular hemodynamic monitorization, the intensivist can evaluate various aspects of shock states, such
function; as cardiac output and fluid responsiveness, myocardial contractility, intracavitary pressures,
Monitoring; heart---lung interaction and biventricular interdependence.
Critical care patients However, to date there has been little guidance orienting echocardiographic hemodynamic
parameters in the intensive care unit, and intensivists are usually not familiar with this tool.
In this review, we describe some of the most important hemodynamic parameters that can be
obtained at the patient bedside with transthoracic echocardiography in critically ill patients.
© 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. and SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.
夽 Please cite this article as: Ayuela Azcarate JM, et al. Papel de la ecocardiografía en la monitorización hemodinámica de los pacientes
2173-5727/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. and SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.
Role of echocardiography in the hemodynamic monitorization of critical patients 221
Sin embargo, hasta la fecha, ha habido pocas guías que orienten respecto a los parámetros
hemodinámicos ecocardiográficos en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, y la mayoría de los
intensivistas por lo general no están familiarizados con esta herramienta.
En esta revisión, se describen algunos de los parámetros hemodinámicos más importantes
que pueden obtenerse con la ecocardiografía transtorácica en los pacientes críticos.
© 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. y SEMICYUC. Todos los derechos reservados.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of windows and images obtained by transthoracic echocardiography. Parasternal longitudinal
plane of the LV (1A) showing the left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), aorta (Ao) and right ventricle (RV). Parasternal transverse plane
at major vessel level (1B), with the right ventricle outlet tract (RVOT), pulmonary artery (PA) and right atrium. Apical four-chambers
plane (1C), and subcostal plane (1D) showing the right and left cavities.
Role of echocardiography in the hemodynamic monitorization of critical patients 223
Figure 2 Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) represented between the two asterisks (1) and registry of systolic wave
velocity using Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) (2), showing a systolic wave (S) and two retrograde E- and A-waves. Normal registries.
For these reasons, analysis is made of the relative size rela- 15 mm are considered pathological and of prognostic value
tionship between RV and LV at the end of diastole (normal (Fig. 2).
ratio < 0.6 with RV < LV; moderate dilatation RV = LV; severe Registry of the maximum velocity of the systolic wave
dilatation RV > LV, with ratio > 1). using Doppler tissue imaging (DTI)32 is carried out at RV lat-
The interventricular septum (IVS) is a muscle wall sepa- eral wall level in four-chambers apical acquisition. A positive
rating the right ventricle (RV) from the left ventricle (LV), wave is recorded after QRS, and is preceded by another
though it is anatomically and functionally part of the latter. wave of shorter duration, corresponding to isovolumetric
The diameter in diastole is 7---11 mm, which is three-fold contraction. Normality is taken to be 15 ± 2 cm/s, while
greater than the RV free wall, with a systolic thickening of RV dysfunction is considered to be present when <10 cm/s
35%. (Fig. 2).
Ultrasound is the only technique allowing us to study By using ultrasound in its M and 2D modes, we can obtain
interventricular dynamics and inter-dependency. Mobility of direct and indirect data relating to pulmonary hypertension,
the IVS can be analyzed using two-dimensional ultrasound, suspect its presence even though its evaluation is not quan-
particularly in the parasternal transverse plane, at mitral titative, and study its repercussions upon the heart valves
valve level. The LV appears as a circle and the septum as an and chambers. However, Doppler echocardiography33 is the
arc encompassing 2/5 of the circumference. Under normal technique that informs of and quantifies pulmonary hyper-
conditions the IVS is convex towards the RV and concave tension.
towards the LV, and maintains this morphology over the Analysis of the morphology of pulmonary flow is car-
entire cardiac cycle. Movement alterations in the form of ried out in the parasternal transverse plane at major vessel
systolic fluttering, or the configuration of the RV in both level, positioning the pulsed Doppler sample volume at pul-
systole and diastole, can be used to identify the existence monary valve level. Under normal conditions a triangular
of diastolic or systolic overload. In situations of RV diastolic pattern is observed, gradually accelerating with a peak in
overload, the IVS undergoes flattening during diastole, since the mid-portion of systole, followed by a slow decrease end-
the RV diastolic pressure equals or exceeds that of the LV. ing just before valve closure (Type I). The presence of a
Systolic overload, in the presence of greater pressure in the mid-systolic notch is indicative of severe pulmonary hyper-
RV than in the LF, is recognized by the presence of a flat- tension (Type III), with a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of
tened septum (septum in D) in both systole and diastole, 100% for PAPs > 50 mmHg.34,35 Another very useful and acces-
with diminished dynamics. sible option from the same plane is the measurement of
The analysis of segmental contractility alterations the acceleration time (AT) of pulmonary flow, which is mea-
acquires greater importance in right ventricle infarction, sured from the start of the wave to the maximum velocity
which is typically characterized by akinesis or dyskinesia (if >90 ms, pulmonary hypertension is discarded).36---38
of some of the explored surfaces in the different projec- The presence of tricuspid valve insufficiency (TI) is
tions. In pulmonary embolism, in the presence of pressure detected as systolic flow in the right atrium, with a max-
overload, the McConnell sign has been described as contrac- imum velocity that can be quantified by continuous Doppler
tility alteration in the form of akinesis of the free wall but with the help of color Doppler for correct assessment and
without affecting the apical zone----though its usefulness is positioning of the sample, allowing us to calculate the
questionable.30 transvalvular pressure gradient between the right atrium
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is mea- (RA) and right ventricle (RV) from the modified Bernoulli
sured in M-mode and represents the excursion or distance equation: PRV − PRA = 4Vmax TI2 .
displaced by the tricuspid ring from the end of diastole to Right ventricle systolic pressure equals the sum of the
the end of systole.31 To this effect, and in the apical four- systolic gradient between RA and RV plus the right atrial
chambers plane, the M-mode cursor is positioned at the free pressure (RAP), and in the absence of obstruction of the
margin of the tricuspid ring, with measurement of its sys- right atrium outlet tract, it equals the systolic pressure of
tolic displacement. It is not influenced by heart rate (HR) the pulmonary artery, whereby: PAPs = 4Vmax IT2 + RAP.
but is affected by pre- and afterload. This is an easy method Different alternatives are available for determining the
for assessing right ventricular contractility. Values of under mean right atrial pressure to be summed to the gradient:
Role of echocardiography in the hemodynamic monitorization of critical patients 225
Figure 3 Obtainment of the diameter of the left ventricle outlet tract (LVOT) in the parasternal longitudinal plane (1) and
estimation of the area (0.785 × 2.22 = 3.79 cm2 . We then (2) register the LVOT flow with pulsed Doppler, in the apical 5-chambers
plane, and obtain VTI (velocity time integral) (the figure registers three measurements with a mean of 24 cm). The stroke volume
(SV) = 3.79 × 24 = 91 ml.
• Use of a central venous catheter. the endocardium to the same point of the posterior cusp:
• Use of the diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) area = Л × (D/2)2 = 0.785 × D2 .
(normal diameter 16 ± 2 mm) and its inspiratory collapse Stroke volume is determined by echocardiography usu-
(IC) index, due to the existence of good correlation ally by calculating the volume of blood crossing the aortic
between these parameters and right atrial pressure. An valve in each beat. Pulsed Doppler yields the flow velocity
IVC ≤ 21 mm with IC > 50% estimates a RA pressure of spectrum at that level, using the apical 5-chambers plane,
between 0 and 5 mmHg, while IVC > 21 mm and a non- which allows more parallel alignment between the direction
collapsible vein indicates a pressure of ≥15 mmHg. of flow and the Doppler interrogation line. Measurement of
the flow (IVT of the left ventricular outlet tract, LVOT) is
made placing the sample volume close to the valve area. The
The reliability of the estimation is well established in
normal values are between 18 and 23 cm----a value of <12 cm
the echocardiography laboratory; however, there are tech-
indicating low output. At present, all echocardiography sys-
nical limitations in patients admitted to the ICU. Mechanical
tems provide IVT (in cm) when the Doppler signal curve is
ventilation in particular complicates the technique due to
delineated with the incorporated measurement software.
the absence of an adequate echocardiographic window. In
non-ventilated patients, the presence of dyspnea and the
impossibility of tolerating left lateral decubitus are the CO(cm3 /min) = 0.785 × D2 (cm2 ) × IVT(cm/beat) ×
main impediments. The presence of arrhythmias, particu-
HR(beats/min)
larly atrial fibrillation, makes it necessary to average the
measurements over 5---10 beats. Despite these limitations,
the measurement of pulmonary artery systolic pressure using This method,39 despite all the assumptions upon which it
Doppler ultrasound is reliable, with good correlation to the rests and the need for careful and good quality exploration,
invasive methods. has revealed acceptable global correlations with the inva-
sive techniques----though with great individual variability and
the need for a normal left ventricular outlet tract (LVOT) and
Is cardiac output normal or reduced? the absence of significant aortic insufficiency. The main lim-
itation is represented by errors in measurement of the aortic
Cardiac output is an estimator of global cardiovascular sys- ring diameter, particularly when considering that such error
tem function, and is calculated as the product of heart rate is moreover magnified by having to square the measure (i.e.,
and stroke volume (SV). According to classical hydrodynam- raise it to the second power) (Fig. 3).
ics, the volume passing through a certain section can be Precisely with the idea of avoiding this error, Evangelista
calculated by multiplying the area of the section or zone et al.40 have shown that we can obviate measurement of
(A, cm2 ) by the integral of velocity versus time of the flow the aortic ring, since there is a closer correlation between
passing through it (IVT, cm)----this representing the systolic the cardiac index (CI) estimated by thermodilution and
distance traveled by the blood during the measured time the mean velocity in the LVOT obtained by pulsed Doppler
period: SV = A × IVT (Fig. 3). (r = 0.97) than between the cardiac index and the esti-
The area most often used for this purpose in clinical prac- mation made with the usual method described in this
tice is the area of the aortic valve ring. The annular or section (r = 0.90). The resulting regression equation is: CI
ring diameter (D) is measured at the level of insertion of (ml/min/m2 ) = 172 × mean velocity − 172.
the valve cusps or leaflets, which in most cases is correctly The standard deviation of the estimation is
visualized in the parasternal longitudinal plane of the left 0.24 l/min/m2 . The mean flow velocity in the LVOT is
ventricle in TTE and/or in the two-chambers mid-esophageal an extraordinarily useful parameter for estimation of the
plane in TEE, assuming a circular geometry. To this effect cardiac index, and especially for monitoring the changes
zoom is applied to the zone at the start of systole, measur- occurring in the face of new hemodynamic situations or as
ing from the insertion or junction of the anterior cusp on a result of treatment.
226 J.M. Ayuela Azcarate et al.
Figure 4 Pulsed Doppler recording showing the isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) and the ventricular filling patterns in normal
filling (1 and 2) and inadequate relaxation (3), the restrictive pattern (4) and its relation to the ECG tracing. An inadequate relaxation
pattern (2) is characterized by a decrease in E-wave velocity, an increase in A-wave velocity, E/A ratio < 1, and a prolongation of
the deceleration time (DT) of the E-wave and of IVRT. Diminished ventricular elasticity in turn produces an increase in left atrial
pressure that implies a filling pattern inverse to the previously described pattern, known as the restrictive pattern (4), with an
increase in E-wave velocity, a decrease in A-wave velocity, and shortening of DT and IVRT. In the progressive transition between the
inadequate or delayed relaxation pattern and the restrictive pattern, mitral flow may present a ‘‘pseudonormal’’ morphology, that
can shift to an inadequate relaxation pattern if the patient performs the Valsalva maneuver.
of >2.5 offers acceptable predictive value in predict- jet, hypertrophic myocardiopathy, mitral valve stenosis
ing PCP > 15 mmHg (r = 0.80, p < 0.001)----its value being or prosthesis, and in the presence of preserved LV systolic
estimated from PCP = 5.27 × [E/Vp] + 4.6.53 However, its function.
usefulness decreases in the presence of atrial fibrilla- • The combined parameter 1.000/([2 × IVRT] + Vp) is closely
tion, dilated myocardiopathy with an eccentric filling correlated to PCP, according to the regression equation
Figure 5 Restrictive mitral filling pattern (1) in a patient presenting Killip class III after anteroseptal infarction, with DT = 130 ms
and an E/A ratio of >2. E-wave velocity = 1.07 m/s. DTI (2) with e′ -wave velocity = 0.80 cm/s, E/e′ ratio > 12, suggesting increased
filling pressures.
228 J.M. Ayuela Azcarate et al.
Septal E/e’ ≥ 15
E/A <1 E/A ≥ 2
E/e’ ≤ 8 Lateral E/e’ ≥ 12
E ≤ 50 cm/s DT < 150 ms
Mean E/e’ ≥ 13
Figure 6 Doppler evaluation of filling pressures. The extreme values have been represented, use being required of the E/Vp ratio,
pulmonary vein flow, IVRT/T E/e′ < 2, 100/([2 × IVRT] + PV) or combined parameters in the intermediate values.
Source: Adapted from: Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA et al. Recommendations for the
evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:165---93.
PCP = 4.5 × 1.000/[(2 × IVRT) + Vp] − 9, independently of • e′ , early diastolic wave, representing the rapid filling
ventricular systolic function.54 A value of >5.5 for this phase.
parameter discriminates between PCP over or under • a′ , late diastolic wave, representing the late filling phase
15 mmHg in 96% of all cases. In practical terms, and atrial contraction.
IVRT < 80 ms in the presence of a low EF is indicative of
decompensation. The peak velocity of the E-wave obtained by DTI (e′ )
is correlated to ventricular relaxation and is relatively
independent of the preload. The ratio between the peak
Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) velocity of the mitral E-wave and the E velocity of the
When the ultrasound beam is directed towards the heart, lateral mitral ring (E/e′ ) shows close correlations to PCP
the waves are reflected from the cardiac structures. In (PCP = 1.24 [E/e′ ] + 1.9)----values above 15 being predictive
the same way as with the red blood cells, mobile tis- of PCP > 15 mmHg.55 Values of <8 in turn are associated with
sues such as the myocardium reflect low-velocity Doppler normal PCP values). However, E/e′ ratios between 8 and 15
signals. The longitudinal muscle fibers in the heart are have low predictive value. At present, septal E/e′ ≥ 15, lat-
located in the basal segments. Positioning of the pulsed eral E/e′ ≥ 12 and mean E/e′ ≥ 13 is considered indicative of
Doppler sample, generally in the lateral portion of the increased filling pressures.56
mitral valve ring or in the basal portion of the septum, in The method has been validated in the presence of
the apical four-chambers plane, allows us to quantify the sinus node tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic
maximum velocities of this myocardial zone in the differ- myocardiopathy. Its limitations are the presence of mitral
ent phases of the cardiac cycle. By means of a series of valve stenosis or prosthesis, moderate to severe mitral
Doppler signal modifications, we can record a velocity/time valve insufficiency, severe mitral ring calcification and
curve, obtaining a type of signal referred to as Doppler the existence of posterolateral wall akinesis. Recently57
tissue imaging (DTI). In clinical practice, DTI measure- the recommendations for evaluating diastolic function via
ments have been standardized in the mitral and tricuspid echocardiography have been published. In this context,
ring to determine variables of systolic and diastolic func- Fig. 6 shows the recommendations for estimating the fill-
tion. A normal registry comprises systolic and diastolic ing pressures in patients with normal and depressed systolic
waves: function.
The clinical usefulness of the described parameters
depends on two factors: (a) the experience and technical
• Sm, systolic wave, showing two components in some knowledge of the explorer and the available technology;
patients, and representing isovolumetric contraction and and (b) the physiological mechanisms that inter-relate the
the ejective systolic phase. A peak systolic velocity Doppler data with the diastolic properties of the LV, the
Sm > 5.4 cm/s predicts EF >50% with a sensitivity of 88% loading conditions and their variations in different etio-
and a specificity of 97%. logical situations, or the response to applied treatment.
Role of echocardiography in the hemodynamic monitorization of critical patients 229
SHOCK
Evaluation and context
OBJECTIVES 2 AND 3
Echocardiography and Doppler
Figure 7 Evaluation and monitorization algorithm based on echocardiography among patients in shock. FUSE: focused ultrasound
exam.
The main limitations of these studies are the number of Is the heart dependent upon preload?
patients involved, their very different characteristics, and
the by now classical controversy regarding the relationship Measurement of the size of the heart cavities (left ventri-
between pulmonary wedge pressure and left atrial pressure, cle end-diastolic surface and volume) has been proposed as
and its usefulness as an indicator of left ventricular preload. reliable preload indexes. However, there are no sufficiently
Thus, no single parameter is correlated in a universal and sensitive concrete values allowing us to predict the response
statistically significant manner to PCP, and we must use and to volume expansion.
integrate all the information that can be obtained from the Recently, Doppler ultrasound and 2D imaging have led
different echocardiographic methods, either isolatedly or in to the development of new hypovolemia indicators and
combination. to the prediction of response to volume expansion. These
Nevertheless, data such as the E/A ratio, IVRT, DT of the parameters should serve to identify those patients who will
E-wave in patients with depressed EF, and the E/e′ ratio benefit from volume expansion, increasing their systolic
via DTI (at present all systems are equipped with DTI) in volume (responders) and at the same time avoiding use-
patients with normal EF not only can be easily obtained but less and potentially harmful therapy (non-responders). The
moreover form part of the routine protocol used in basic dynamic parameters, which analyze cardiovascular response
echocardiographic studies such as measurement of the size to the respiratory changes in pleural pressure produced by a
of the different heart chambers or the evaluation of systolic mechanical respiratory cycle, are the variables which have
or valve function. Other data, including pulmonary vein flow been most extensively studied to date.
(PVF), or combined parameters, can be used in those cases
in which the mitral filling pattern presents some of the limi- Analysis of the diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC)
tations commented above. It should be remembered that all The subcostal plane often allows us to evaluate the infe-
of them are quickly obtainable by transthoracic echocardio- rior vena cava and the suprahepatic veins and to indirectly
graphy at the patient bedside, and can be repeated as often estimate right atrial pressure. Changes in intraabdominal
as necessary. pressure and breathing rapidly modify their volume. During
230 J.M. Ayuela Azcarate et al.
7. Ayuela JM, Zabalegui A. Ecocardiografía modo M y bidimen- nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A state-
sional. In: Ayuela JM, López Pérez JM, Fiol M, editors. El ment for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging
ecocardiograma normal. Ecocardiografía en el paciente crítico, Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American
vol. 2. Barcelona: Springer-Verlag Ibérica; 2000. p.33---44. Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18:539---42.
8. Guerrero M, Lesmes A, Castillo JM. In: Ayuela JM, López Pérez 27. Lindqvist P, Calcutteea A, Henein M. Echocardiography in
JM, Fiol M, editors. Ecocardiografía Doppler: pulsado, continuo the assessment of right heart function. Eur J Echocardiogr.
y color Ecocardiografía en el paciente crítico, 3. Barcelona: 2008;9:225---34.
Springer-Verlag Ibérica; 2000. p. 45---62. 28. Janda S, Shahidi N, Gin K, Swiston J. Diagnostic accuracy of
9. Porembka DT. Importance of transesophageal echocardiography echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic
in the critically ill and injured patient. Crit Care Med. 2007;35 review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2011;97:612---22.
Suppl 8:S414---30. 29. Haddad F, Hunt SA, Rosenthal DN, Murphy DJ. Right ventricular
10. Colreavy FB, Donovan K, Lee KY, John W. Transesophageal function in cardiovascular disease. Part I. Anatomy, physiology,
echocardiography in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circu-
2002;30:989---96. lation. 2008;117:1436---48.
11. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE. Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU. Part 30. Lopez-Candales A, Edelman K, Candales MD. Right ventric-
1 y 2. Chest. 2005;128:881---95. ular apical contractility in acute pulmonary embolism: the
12. Price S, Nicol E, Gibson DG, Evans TW. Echocardiography in the McConnell sign revisited. Echocardiography. 2010;27:614---20.
critically ill: current and potential roles. Intensive Care Med. 31. Miller D, Farah MG, Liner A, Fox K, Schluchter M, Hoit BD. The
2006;32:48---59. relation between quantitative right ventricular ejection frac-
13. Boyd JH, Walley KR. The role of echocardiography in tion and indices of tricuspid annular motion and myocardial
hemodynamic monitoring. Current Opinion in Critical Care. performance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:443---7.
2009;15:1---5. 32. Hsiao SH, Lee CY, Chang SM, Yang SH, Lin SK, Huang WC.
14. García-Vicente E, Campos-Nogué A, Gobernado Serrano MM. Pulmonary embolism and right heart function: insights from
Ecocardiografía en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Med. Inten- myocardial Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.
siva. 2008;32:237---47. 2006;19:822---8.
15. NPOCUS Focused echocardiography and ultrasound in Inten- 33. Horton K, Meece RW, Hill JC. Assessment of the right ventricle
sive care Medicine Working group (FUSE-ICM). Guidance by echocardiography: a primer for cardiac sonographers. J Am
and standards in training and service delivery of focused Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:776---92.
ultrasound and echocardiography (FUSE) in UK intensive care 34. Fisher MR, Forfia PR, Chamera E, Housten-Harris T, Champion
medicine [accessed February 2010]. Available from: http:// HC, Girgis RE, et al. Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in
web.mac.com/connrussell/.Focus Ultrasound/Welcome files/ the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension. Am J
ICM%20focused%20ultrasound.doc. Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:615---21.
16. Byrne MW, Hwang J. Ultrasound in the critically ill. Ultrasound 35. Arkles JS, Opotowsky AR, Ojeda J, Rogers F, Liu T, Prassana V,
Clin. 2011;6:235---59. et al. Shape of the right ventricular Doppler envelope predicts
17. Middleton PM, Davies SR. Noninvasive hemodynamic moni- hemodynamics and right heart function in pulmonary hyperten-
toring in the emergency department. Curr Opin Crit Care. sion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:268---76.
2011;17:342---50. 36. Van der Laarse A, Steendijk P, van der Wall EE. Evaluation of
18. Knobloch K. Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring using pulmonary arterial hypertension: invasive or noninvasive? Int J
USCOM in HEMS at the scene. J Trauma. 2007;62:1069---70. Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:943---5.
19. Breitkreutz R, Uddin S, Steiger H, Ilper H, Steche M, Walcher F, 37. Yared K, Noseworthy P, Weyman AE, McCabe E, Picard MH,
et al. Focused echocardiography entry level: new concept of a Baggish AL. Pulmonary artery acceleration time provides an
1-day training course. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75:285---92. accurate estimate of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure dur-
20. Schmidt GA. ICU ultrasound. The coming boom. Chest. ing transthoracic echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.
2009;135:1407---8. 2011;24:687---92.
21. Gudmundsson P, Rydberg E, Winter R, Willenheimer R. Visually 38. Bouhemad B, Ferrari F, Leleu K, Arbelot C, Lu Q, Rouby
estimated left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiogra- JJ. Echocardiographic Doppler estimation of pulmonary artery
phy is closely correlated with formal quantitative methods. Int pressure in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemia. Anes-
J Cardiol. 2005;101:209---12. thesiology. 2008;108:55---62.
22. Melamed R, Sprenkle MD, Ulstad VK, Herzog CA, Leatherman 39. Ayuela JM, González Vílchez F. Estimación de las presiones de
JW. Assessment of left ventricular function by intensivists using llenado del ventrículo izquierdo por ecocardiografía Doppler en
hand-held echocardiography. Chest. 2009;135:1416---20. pacientes críticos. Med Intensiva. 2004;288:20---5.
23. Bergenzaun L, Gudmundsson P, Ohlin H, Düring J, Ersson A, 40. Evangelista A, García Dorado D, García del Castillo H, González-
Ihrman L, et al. Assessing left ventricular systolic function in Alujas T, y Soler-Soler J. Cardiac index quantification by Doppler
shock: evaluation of echocardiographic parameters in intensive ultrasound in patients without left ventricular outflow tract
care. Crit Care. 2011;15:R200, 16. abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:710---6.
24. Dittoe N, Stultz D, Schwartz B, Hahn H. Quantitave left ventric- 41. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C,
ular systolic function: from chamber to myocardium. Critical et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict
Care Med. 2007;35 Suppl 8:S330---9. hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med.
25. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, 2007;35:64---8.
Pellikka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantifica- 42. Pinsky MR, Vincent JL. Let us use the pulmonary artery
tion: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s catheter correctly and only when we need it. Crit Care Med.
Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quan- 2005;33:1119---22.
tification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the 43. Goebel B, Luthardt E, Schmidt-Winter C, Otto S, Jung C, Lauten
European Association of Echocardiography, a Branch of the Euro- A, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling
pean Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18: pressures validated against an implantable left ventricular pres-
1440---63. sure monitoring system. Echocardiography. 2011;28:619---25.
26. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, 44. Hsiao SH, Chiou KR, Lin KL, Lin SK, Huang WC, Kuo FY, et al. Left
Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and atrial distensibility and E/e′ for estimating left ventricular filling
232 J.M. Ayuela Azcarate et al.
pressure in patients with stable angina. A comparative echocar- estimation of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: an empirical
diography and catheterization study. Circ J. 2011;75:1942---50. approach based on an analytical relation. J Am Coll Cardiol.
45. Lamia B, Maizel J, Ochagavia A, Chemla D, Osman D, Richard 1999;34:515---23.
C, et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of pulmonary artery 55. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA. Doppler tissue imaging:
occlusion pressure elevation during weaning from mechanical A noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relax-
ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1696---701. ation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol.
46. Hsiao SH, Chiou KR, Porter TR, Huang WC, Lin SK, Kuo FY, 1997;30:1527---33.
et al. Left atrial parameters in the estimation of left ventricu- 56. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth
lar filling pressure and prognosis in patients with acute coronary OA, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricu-
syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1117---24. lar diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am J Echocardiogr.
47. Marcelino P, Germano N, Marum S, Fernandes AP, Ribeiro P, 2009;22:107---23.
Lopes MG. Haemodynamic parameters obtained by transtho- 57. Little WC, Oh JK. Is echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic
racic echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheter: a compar- function useful in determining clinical care, echocardiographic
ative study in liver transplant patients. Acta Med Port. evaluation of diastolic function can be used to guide clinical
2006;19:197---205. care. Circulation. 2009;120:802---9.
48. Vignon P. Hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients 58. Feissel M, Richard F, Faller JP. The respiratory variation in infe-
using echocardiography Doppler. Curr Opin Crit Care. rior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive
2005;11:227---34. Care Med. 2004;30:1834---7.
49. Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Redfield MM, Ilstrup DM, Holmes 59. Vieillard-Baron A, Augarde R, Prin S, Page B, Beauchet A, Jardin
Jr DR, Tajik AJ. Noninvasive Doppler echocardiographic F. Influence of superior vena caval zone condition on cyclic
evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients changes in right ventricular outflow during respiratory support.
with cardiomyopathies: a simultaneous Doppler echocardio- Anesthesiol. 2001;95:1083---8.
graphic and cardiac catheterization study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 60. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, Peyrouset O, Page B,
1996;28:1226---33. Beauchet A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge
50. Gulati VK, Katz We Follansbee WP, Gorcsan J. Mitral annu- of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care
lar descent velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography as Med. 2004;30:1734---9.
a index of global left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 61. Salem R, Vallee F, Rusca M, Mebazaa A. Hemodynamic mon-
1996;77:979---84. itoring by echocardiography in the ICU: the role of the
51. Pozzoli M, Traversi E, Roelandt RTC. Non-invasive estimation of new echo techniques. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:561---
left ventricular filling pressures by Doppler echocardiography. 8.
Eur J Echocardiography. 2002;3:75---9. 62. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman Dl. Esophageal Doppler monitoring
52. Khouri SJ, Maly GT, Suh DS, Walsh TE. A practical approach to predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients.
the echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function. J Am Soc Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1195---201.
Echocardiogr. 2004;17:290---7. 63. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Can-
53. Garcia MJ, Ares MA, Asher C, Rodriguez L, Vandervoort P, dela D, et al., AzuRéa Group. An increase in aortic blood flow
Thomas JD. An index of early left ventricular filling that after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid
combined with pulsed Doppler peak E velocity may estimate responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology.
capillary wedge pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:448---54. 2011;115:541---7.
54. González Vílchez F, Ares MA, Ayuela JM, Alonso L. Combined use 64. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med.
of pulsed and color M-mode Doppler echocardiography for the 2008;34:659---63.