Programa Historiografía
Programa Historiografía
Programa Historiografía
Department of History
HISTORIOGRAPHY (HI323)
2014-15
This is a core module counting for one 30-CAT unit in Finals. It is compulsory for all
single-honours History students, optional for joint degree and other advanced students.
As a core module it complements teaching in specialised History modules, by providing
a broad context for understanding developments in the discipline of history during the
modern period. It asks students to consider what form of thinking and writing (what
kind of human endeavour) ‘history’ is, and to relate the historiographical developments
discussed during the course, to the works of history they study on Advanced Option and
Special Subject modules.
Historiography is also intended to develop students’ abilities in study, research, and oral
and written communication, through a programme of seminars, lectures and essay
work.
Context
Historiography has been designed to complement the learning which students will have
done so far in their work in the Department, both in core and optional modules. For all
students taking it, Historiography provides an overview of ‘doing History’ from the later
eighteenth-century onwards, the ideas that have underpinned historical research and
writing, and of recent theories of history (many of them drawn from other disciplines),
as they have been used by historians. It provides students with an opportunity to think
reflexively about the nature of the historical enterprise. You are encouraged to link your
studies in Historiography with your other third-year modules.
Syllabus
The module introduces students to some of the central thinkers on history writing since
the 18th century, the period in which modern history writing was first conceptualised
and practiced. The lectures engage closely with the ideas these men and women had on
how history should be pursued and what they believed its purpose was. However, ideas
do not float in empty space, and, therefore, the lectures take great care to locate these
changing ideas and practices within the specific socio-cultural environment in which
they were voiced.
propositions about it. The perspectives of the lecture and the reading assigned by your
tutor make up the material discussed in the seminar. You are expected to read in
advance the basic texts set for that week.
Seminar Preparation:
In this Handbook each seminar is described in terms of reading Texts/Documents
/Arguments/Sources which, with the guidance of your seminar tutor, you should
complete as preparation for the seminar. It is important that you always read the set
text reading for the week, as familiarity with these texts forms one of the criteria in the
awarding of marks in the summer examination. For each seminar there is a list of
Questions to guide your reading and note-taking (some of these may also be adapted as
short-essay titles; an extended list of possible titles will be also found at the end of this
Handbook). Your seminar tutor may also assign additional or alternative readings from
the Background Seminar Reading lists. Additional readings are listed under different
headings to provide you with Bibliographies for essay-writing. Sometimes, these
additional or further readings and the questions they raise may be the focus of your
seminar group’s discussion. The summer examination paper is composed by the course
team that conducts the lectures and seminars, bearing in mind the experience of each
seminar group, as well as the lecture series.
General Surveys:
Bentley, Michael, Modern Historiography: An Introduction (1999). Focuses on broad
trends in largely European history-writing from the Enlightenment period onwards.
Berger, Stefan, H. Feldner and K. Passmore (eds), Writing History: Theory and Practice
(2003).
Brown, Callum, Postmodernism for Historians (2005), explains it very well and has a
super useful glossary of key terms!
Burrow, John, A History of Histories. Epics, Chronicles, Romances and Inquiries from
Herodotus … to the Twentieth Century (2007).
Carr, E.H., What is History? (1961). A core text that you should read in full at the start of
the year.
Claus, Peter and John Marriott, History: An Introduction to Theory, Method and Practice
(2012)
Collingwood, R.G., The Idea of History (1946). A classic!)
Ermath, Elizabeth Deeds, History in the Discursive Condition: Reconsidering the Tools of
Thought (2011). Examines the state of history-writing in the light of the postmodern
challenge.
Green, Anna and Kathleen Troup (eds), The Houses of History: A Critical Reader in
Twentieth-century History and Theory (1999). This is particularly useful for the way it
introduces a theoretical and methodological vocabulary for studying twentieth-century
historiography.
Hughes-Warrington, Marnie, Fifty Key Thinkers on History (2008). Provides short essays
on fifty mainly European and US historians, historiographers, and thinkers who have
had an impact on history-writing.
Iggers, George G. and Q. Edward Wang, A Global History of Modern Historiography
(2008). Examines history-writing as a global phenomenon, getting away from the
Eurocentricity of much of the existing literature on historiography. Focuses on the
period covered in this module (in contrast to Woolf, below).
5
Lambert, Peter and Schofield, Peter, Making History (2004). (very clear introduction to
the topic)
Munslow, A., The Routledge Companion to the Historical Studies (London, 2006) (library
electronic resource) excellent glossary of key terms!!!
Poster, Mark, Cultural History and Postmodernity: Disciplinary Readings and Challenges
(1997) (library electronic resources).
Rochona, Majumdar, Writing Postcolonial History (2010).
Smith, B. The Gender of History: Men, Women and Historical Practice (1998). Provides a
particularly useful account of nineteenth-century developments in historical thinking
and writing, and the professionalization of the discipline.
Shryock, Andrew/Smail, D.L., Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present (2001).
Southgate, Beverley, History: What and Why: Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern
Perspectives (1996).
Stunkel, Kenneth R., Fifty Key Works of History and Historiography (2011). Provides
short introductions to key writings of fifty historians and thinkers who have had an
impact on history-writing, from all over the world.
Walker, Garthine (ed.), Writing Early Modern History (2005). Provides a really helpful
discussion relevant to all historians, not just early modernists.
Woolf, Daniel, A Global History of History (2011). Takes a broad sweep, with chapters on
the different historical epochs of the past three millennia.
Books to Buy?
We suggest you buy books for highly practical reasons, as the university library cannot
(under copyright legislation) digitalise more than one chapter or one-fifth (whichever is
the shortest) of a book. Many of the books on the ‘General Survey’ list are appropriate
in this respect. Most focus on broad historiographical trends rather than the particular
historians and theorists that provide the focus for this particular module. Such figures
will however be covered in these books in more or less depth in passing (use the
content-list and index). You will get your money’s worth out of purchasing books such
as Troup and Green’s Houses of History, Hughes-Warrington’s Fifty Key Thinkers in
History (2000), Bentley’s Modern Historiography (1999), Claus and Marriot’s History: An
Introduction to Theory, Method and Practice (2012), and, for a more global spread,
Iggers and Wang, A Global History of Modern Historiography (2008). Very useful are also
the books from Oxford University Press series, A Very Short Introduction. Several of the
authors we will be discussing during the year are treated here. (Marx, Weber, Foucault
etc). They offer a good first introduction and some are indeed excellent (e.g. the one on
Foucault).
Terminology:
You may encounter some unfamiliar sociological and philosophical terms in your
reading. Allan Bullock & Stephen Trombley (eds), New Fontana Dictionary of Modern
Thought (London, 2000) provides a useful glossary. You could retrieve Raymond
Williams’ Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (1976; 1984) from your
‘Making of the Modern World’ archive, though probably far more useful will be Tony
Bennett, Lawrence Grossberg, Meaghan Morris (eds), New Keywords. A Revised
Vocabulary of Culture and Society (2005). The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies
(ed. Alan Munslow, 2000) (library electronic resources) aims to provide the same kind
of conceptual help for students of history and historiography. The on-line version of the
6
Oxford Dictionary of Social Sciences (ed. Craig Calhoun, 2002) was found useful by
students taking Historiography last year. Find it at http://www.oxfordreference.com
Many of the basic texts studied in seminars are available in both the bookshop and the
Library. Many of the key book-sections and articles listed below will also be found in
the Photocopy Collection: always check there if you cannot find the journal on the shelf.
The back issues of most journals are available ONLINE. Type the journal title into the
Library catalogue search box, searching ‘Journals’. You will be taken to all electronic
portals for the journal in question.
When a book/article extract has been scanned and is available online it is listed at:
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/electronicresources/extracts/hi/hi323
Every Historiography extract that can be legally digitalised, has been digitalised. You
should check this list regularly, as new extracts may be added throughout the year.
including histories. The Making of the Modern World (MMW) is a data-base of social and
economic texts from the fifteenth- to the nineteenth-century. Much history-writing has
ended up here. Access it, as above, via the Library pages
Assessment:
All students submit three non-assessed essays of about 2000 words each during terms 1
and 2. The questions in each seminar section can be reformulated as essay topics; there
is also a full list of Essay Titles at the end of this Handbook. You are encouraged to
negotiate essay titles with your seminar tutor; the final title must have been approved
by him or her. Your seminar tutor may agree to your substituting a mock exam question
or questions for the third and final essay. Seminar tutors will establish deadlines for
their tutees, and assignments should be handed to him or her.
Venice Stream students follow an adapted version of the module, and the initial xx
questions on the exam paper will relate to texts not studied by Modern Stream
students
Note: Further detailed information on the exam format will be announced at the
beginning of the term!
The one-hour lectures all take place on Tuesdays at 10-11am in Art Cinema (term1) and
HO. 52 (term 2). The panel round up session (term 3, week 3) and the revision lectures
(term 3, week 4) will also take place in xx. The seminars will be on Tuesday afternoon,
right after the weekly lecture.
Lecturers/Seminar Tutors: Jonathan Davies (JD); Aditya Sakar (AS); Rebecca Earle (RB);
Sarah Hodges (SH); CS=Claudia Stein; CW=Charles Walton
Term 1
Week Lecturer Lecture Seminar
1 Tue 1. What is history? 1. Changing views on what is
history
2 Tue 2. Enlightenment traditions of 2. Philosophical History in the
history writing Eighteenth-Century
15 14. Edward Said: The West and 14. Inventing the oriental ‘Other’
Tue ‘Orientalism’
16 Research and reading week
Tue
The following 4 weeks are ‘topical’ and each lecture will deal with a specific topic and
its historiographical development over time. As always, each lecture will explain these
changes in methodology/theory within their specific socio-cultural context.
Term 3
23 Panel 19. Round up panel session (two hours) 19. Revision seminar I
Tue*
24 20. Revision lecture 20. Revision seminar II
Tue**
11
What people have understood by History and history writing and would should be
achieved by this activity has changed over time. This lecture-seminar will introduce you
to some of the problems involved in studying the history of history writing. It will and
will discuss some of the issues that will be pop up in different disguises repeatedly
during the entire course such as human agency, experience, the nature of change, what
is a fact?.
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources
Carr, E. H., What Is History? (London, 1961), pp. 1-24 7-30 (digitised extract)
Lowenthal, D. The Past is a Foreign Country (Cambridge, 1985), pp.
210-238. (digitised extract)
Alun Munslow, Deconstructing History (New York: Routledge, 1997), pp. 17-35.
(digitised extract)
Seminar/Essay Questions:
What is history for according to the three authors?
What are ‘facts’ in history according to Carr? What does Alun Munslow about
this?
How does ‘memory’ differ from ‘history’?
‘History writing is based on textual evidence.’ Discuss.
‘Historians establish the truth about the past’. Discuss.
12
The way the past was recorded changed dramatically during the eighteenth-century.
‘Enlightened’ men and women writing about the past began to understand their activity
as central to the well being and ‘progress’ of their respective nation, indeed of all human
civilization. This lecture investigates some key examples of this Enlightenment
historiography within their specific socio-cultural context.
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Giambattista Vico, The New Science, (1725) (online:
(https://archive.org/details/newscienceofgiam030174mbp), § 331-334, 399.
Ferguson, Adam, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767); read, ‘On the General
Characteristics of Human Nature, pp.1-15; and have a think about the general
organisation of the book. All online:
http://books.google.de/books?id=CvoIAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source
=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Gibbon, Edward, An Essay on the Study of Literature (1764) online:
https://archive.org/details/anessayonstudyl01gibbgoog
Seminar Readings:
Allan, D., ‘Scottish Historical Writing of the Enlightenment’, in Daniel Woolf (ed.), The
Oxford History of Historical Writing, vol. 3: 1400-1800 (Oxford, 2012), pp. 497-517.
(digitised extract)
Burke, P. Vico (Oxford, 1985), chapter 3: The New Science, here pp. 39-68. (digitised
extract).
O'Brien, K., ‘English Enlightenment Histories, 1750-c.1815’, in José Rabasa, Masayuki
Sato, Edoardo Tortarolo, and Daniel Woolf (eds), The Oxford History of Historical
Writing, Vol. 3, 1400-1800 (Oxford, 2012), pp. 518-525. (digitised extract)
Seminar/Essay Questions:
What were the central features of the ‘new’ history writing that emerge during
the 18th century?
What was distinctive about Scottish history writing in the 18th century?
‘Modern history writing was invented in the Enlightenment’. Discuss.
Further Readings on History-writing in the (long) Western Eighteenth Century (see also
readings on ‘Enlightenment Historiography’ in the Historiography Venice Stream
Handbook, which is available on the historiography website):
Further Readings:
Abbattista, Guido, ‘The Historical Thought of the French Philosophes’, in Daniel Woolf
(ed.), The Oxford History of Historical Writing, vol. 3: 1400-1800 (Oxford, 2012), pp. 406-
427.
13
Berlin, Isaiah, Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder (Princeton,
2000), read ‘Philosophical Ideas of Giambattista Vico’, pp. 21-121; and ‘Vico’s Theory of
Knowledge and its Sources’, pp. 168-242.
ibid., Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas (London, 1976).
Ibid., ‘Discussions on Vico’, Philosophical Quarterly 35, 140 (1985): 15-30.
Bedani, Gino. Vico Revisited: Orthodoxy, Naturalism and Science in the Scienza Nuova
(Oxford, 1989).
Bruce, B., ‘Enlightened Histories. Civilization, War and the Scottish Enlightenment’,
European Legacy, 10:2 (2005): 177-192.
Cassirer, Ernst, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, trans. Koelln and Pettegrove
(Princeton, 1932), particularly see chapter 1: The Mind of the Enlightenment, pp. 3-36.
Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of History (Oxford, 1946).
Giambattista Vico: An International Symposium, ed by Giorgio Tagliacozzo and Hayden V.
White (Baltimore, 1969)
Attempts to inaugurate a non-historicist interpretation of Vico are found in
Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy, Spring 2009, Vol. 36.2, and Spring 2010
37.3, as well as in Historia Philosophica, Vol. 11, 2013
Cook, A., ‘The Gradual Emergence of History Writing as a Separate Genre’, Clio, 15:2
1986: 171-89.
Fisch, Max, and Thomas Bergin, trans. Vita di Giambattista Vico (The Autobiography of
Giambattista Vico). 1735-41 (Ithaca, 1963, ).
Grafton, Anthony, Introduction, in Vico, Giambattista, New Science (London, 2001=, pp.
vi-xxxv.
Levine, Joseph, ‘Giambattista Vico and the Quarrel between the Ancients and the
Moderns’. Journal of the History of Ideas 52,1 (1991): 55-79.
Hicks, P., ‘Catharine Macaulay's Civil War: Gender, History, and Republicanism in
Georgian Britain’, Journal of British Studies, 41:2 (2002), 170-198
Höpfl, Harro, ‘From Savage to Scotsman: Conjectural History in the Scottish
Enlightenment’, Journal of British Studies 17 (1978): 19-40.
Kidd, C. Subverting Scotland’s Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo-
British Identity (Cambridge, 1993).
Lilla, M., G.B. Vico: The Making of an Anti-Modern (Cambridge, Mass., 1993).
Mason, Hayden, ‘Optimism, Progress, and Philosophical History’, in Goldie, Mark and
Robert Wokler (eds), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought
(Oxford, 2012), pp. 199-217. (digitised extract)
McKitterick, R., Quinault, R. (eds), Edward Gibbon and Empire (Cambridge, 1997).
Miller, Cecilia, Giambattista Vico: Imagination and Historical Knowledge (Basingstoke,
1993).
O’Brien, K., ‘The History Market in Eighteenth-Century England’, Books and their Readers
in Eighteenth-Century England: New Essays, ed. I. Rivers (London, 2001), 105-34.
Ibid., ‘Catharine Macaulay’s Histories of England. A Female Perspective on the
History of Liberty’, Women, Gender and Enlightenment, eds. B. Taylor and S. Knott
Basingstoke, 2005), 523-37.
Ibid., ‘Robertson on the Triumph of Europe and Its Empires’, in ibid., Narratives of
Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge, 1997), pp.
129-166.
Ibid., ‘Emulation and Revival: Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire’, in ibid.
Narratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge,
1997), pp. 167-203.
14
Olson, R., ‘Sex and Status in Scottish Enlightenment Social Science. John Millar and the
Sociology of Gender Roles’, History of the Human Sciences, 11:1 (1998), 73-100.
Perkins, P. ‘ “Too Classical for a Female Pen”? Late Eighteenth-Century Women Reading
and Writing Classical History', Clio, 33:3 (2004), 241-64.
Phillips, M. S., Society and Sentiment. Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740-1820
(Princeton NJ, 2000), pp. 3-78.
Pocock, J.G. A. Barbarism and Religion. Vol. I: The Enlightenment of Edward Gibbon
1737-1764 (Cambridge, 1999).
Ibid., Barbarism and Religion, vol. II: Narratives of Civil Government (Cambridge, 1999).
Porter, Roy, Edward Gibbon: Making History (London, 1988) (really good read!)
Sebastini, Silvia, Race, ‘Progress and Women in the Late Scottish Enlightenment, in
Sarah Knott and Barbara Taylor (eds), Women, Gender and Enlightenment (Houndsmills,
Basingstoke, 2005), pp. 53-69.
Stone, H. Vico’s Cultural History: The Production and Transmission of Ideas in Naples,
1685-1750 (Leiden, 1997).
Tagliacozzo, G., Mooney, M., Verene, D.P: (eds), Vico: Past and Present (Atlantic
Highlands, 1981).
Trevor-Roper, Hugh, ‘The Historical Philosophy of the Enlightenment’, (1963), reprinted
in R.H. Hanley and D. M. McMahon (eds.), The Enlightenment. Critical Concepts in
Historical Studies, vol. 1 (London, 2010), pp. 24-37.
Venturi, Franco, ‘The European Enlightenment’ (1972), reprinted in The Enlightenment.
Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, ed. By R.H. Hanley and D. M. McMahon, vol. 1
(London, 2010), pp. 129-156 – links intellectual developments with 18th-century socio-
political events in Europe.
Womersley, D., Edward Gibbon: Bicentenary Essays (Oxford, 1997).
Wright, Johnson Kent, ‘Historical Thought in the Era of the Enlightenment’, in L. Kramer
and S. Maza (ed.), A Companion to Western Historical Thought (Oxford, 2002), pp. 123-
142.
Zimmerman, Everett, The Boundaries of Fiction: History and the Eighteenth-Century
British Novel (Cornell, 1996), 1-10; 11-55.
Zagorin, P. ‘Vico’s Theory of Knowledge’, The Philosophical Quarterly 35, 140 (1985): 15-
30. (it is a critique of Berlin’s take on Vico).
India was conquered by the British East India Company in the late-eighteenth and early-
nineteenth centuries – the very moment that the new discipline of history was emerging
in Europe. Informed by this new understanding of how to go about studying the past,
the British adopted a highly critical view of the existing ways in which the Indian people
regarded their past. As in any sophisticated civilisation, the Indian people recounted
and wrote about their past in a complex and different ways. These are examined in the
lecture. The new methods that the British provided were in time adopted by Indians,
and then within the space of hardly more than half a century began to be turned against
the colonial rulers, as new nationalist histories of India were produced as a key element
15
in the project of defining an Indian ‘nation’ that Indians demanded should be free from
British rule.
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Anon., ‘A View of the History of India, from the earliest Ages, to the Year 1603 of the
Christian Æra’, Ch. 1 of The Asiatic Annual Register; or, A View of the History of
Hindustan, and of the politics, commerce, and literature of Asia [electronic resource]
(London, 1800) ECCO
Mill, James, The History of British India, 3 vols (1818).
(http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1867): get an idea of the structure of the book, read
some of the section on the Hindu, think about the archival basis of his arguments.
Seminar/Essay Questions:
What did ‘history’ mean in precolonial India? Think of some ways that Indians
might justify their understandings of the past.
How did the British set about constructing a new history of India? What was
their agenda in doing so?
Did British and Indian historiography interact in the late-eighteenth and early-
nineteenth centuries? If so, in what ways?
How did Indians respond to British-history writing in the late-nineteenth and
early-twentieth centuries? How did their histories differ from colonial histories,
and with what intent?
Majeed, J., Ungoverned Imaginings. James Mill’s The History of British India and
Orientalism, (Oxford, 1992).
Metcalf, T., Ideologies of the Raj (Cambridge 1994).
Pollack, S. ‘Pretextures of Time’, History and Theory, 46: 3 (2007): 366-85.
Prakash, G., ‘Writing Post-Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Indian
Historiography is
Good to Think’, Colonialism and Culture (Ann Arbor MI, 1992), pp. 353-89.
Subrahmanyam, S., ‘Introduction: Making Sense of Indian Historiography’, Indian
Economic
and Social History Review, 38:2-3 (2002): 121-131.
Subrahmanyam, S., Textures of Time: Writing History in South India, 1600-1800 (New
Delhi 2001). [A review symposium on this book appeared in History and Theory, 46
(2007)].
Subrahmanyam, S., ‘Intertwined Histories: Crónica and Tarikh in the Sixteenth-Century
Indian Ocean World’, History and Theory, 49 (2010).
Thapar, R., ‘Some Reflections on Early Historical Thinking’, J. Rusen (ed.) Western
Historical
Thinking: An Intercultural Debate (New York, 2002),pp. 178-18.
Viswanathan, G., Masks of Conquest: Literary Studies and British Rule in India (New York,
1989).
Finn, M., ‘Anglo-Indian Lives in the Later Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries’,
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 32:3 (2009): 3-17.
Mill, J., The History of British India [electronic resource] (London, 1820).
Teltsher, K., ‘The Sentimental Ambassador: the Letters of George Bogle from Bengal,
Bhutan
and Tibet, 1770-1781’, in R. Earle (ed.), Epistolary Selves, Letters and Letter-Writers,
1600-1945 (Aldershot, 1999), pp. 79-94.
Woolf, D., A Global History of History (Cambridge 2011), pp. 89-99, pp. 211-27, pp. 280-
343, pp. 401-05.
17
The German historian Leopold von Ranke was the superstar of 19th-century history,
indeed he is often referred to as the ‘father’ of modern history writing. We will explore
in this session what earned him this celebratory title. What we will discover is that
much of his fame is, in fact, grounded on a constructive misunderstanding of his work. It
will be suggested that Ranke and the world of German Idealism in which his thinking
and writings have to be located may have something interesting to say to historians
today.
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Ranke, L. von, The Young Ranke’s Vision of History and God’, in Leopold von Ranke, The
Theory and Practice of History, ed. by G. G. Iggers (London, 2011), p. 4. (digitised extract)
Ranke, L. von, ‘On the Relations of History and Philosophy’, in Leopold von Ranke, The
Theory and Practice of History, ed. by G. G. Iggers (London, 2011), pp. 6-7. (digitised
extract)
Ranke, L. von, ‘On the Character of History Science’, Leopold von Ranke, The Theory and
Practice of History, ed. by G. G. Iggers (London, 2011), pp. 8-16. (digitised extract)
Ranke, L. von, ‘Progress in History’, in Leopold von Ranke, The Theory and Practice of
History ed. by G. G. Iggers (London, 2011), pp. 20-23. (digitised extract)
Ranke, L. von, ‘The Role of the Particular and the General in the Study of Universal
History’, in Leopold von Ranke, The Theory and Practice of History, ed. by G. G. Iggers
(London, 2011), pp. 24-25. (digitised extract)
Note: Looks like a massive list of reading but each reading is very short! If you still don’t
have enough of ‘father Ranke’, you are welcome to read the Preface to the six volumes of
Ranke’s History of England, Principally in the Seventeenth Century here:
http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/ranke/
Seminar Readings:
Iggers, G.G., (eds), The Theory and Practice of History: Leopold von Ranke (Abington,
2011), ‘Introduction’, pp. xi-xlv. (digitised extract)
Ross, D., ‘On the Misunderstanding of Ranke and the Origins of the Historical Profession
in America,’ in Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline, ed. Georg
G. Iggers and James M. Powell (Syracuse, 1990), pp. 154-169. (digitised extract)
Harrison, R., Jones, Aled, and Lambert, P., ‘Scientific History and the Problem of
Objectivity’, in Lambert, P., Schofield, Phillipp (eds), Making History: An Introduction to
the History and Practices of a Discipline (London/New York, 2004), pp. 27-37. (digitised
extract)
Seminar/Essay Questions:
What was ‘philosophical’ history in 19th-century Germany? Why did Ranke reject
it?
Assess the view that ‘for Ranke the writing of history was an act of worship’?
‘Ranke’s history was ideological.’ Discuss.
What did Ranke mean when he argues that the historian must not be a judge?
18
Karl Marx is without doubt the most influential thinker of the 19th century. And his
thinking about society, economics and politics did not remain on an abstract level; it
was used as a means to change the world and shaped entire societies. Moreover, Marx
legacy is far from over today. Indeed, after the most recent economic crash, we are
currently experiencing a renewed interest in Marx’s theories among historians. This
session explores one of his famous text, The Eighteenth Brumaire, which Marx wrote in
the middle of what would only later be labelled ‘a historical event’ (Louis Bonaparte’s
1852 coup in France).
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Marx, K., ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’ (1852), in Karl Marx: Selected
Writings (ed. D. McLellan, Oxford, 1977), pp. 300-25. (online:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1346/1346-h/1346-h.htm)
Marx, K., ‘Preface’ to A Critique of Political Economy in Karl Marx: Selected Writings (ed.
D. McLellan, Oxford, 1977), pp. 388-92 or online:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-
economy/preface.htm.
Seminar/Essay Questions:
In which particular ways were Marx’s historical method distinctive? How did he
differ from (a) Ranke and (b) positivist history?
How did Marx understand the relationship between philosophy and social
action? How did this differ from Hegel?
How successful is The Eighteenth Brumaire in explaining away the failure of the
vision expressed in The Communist Manifesto?
Is Marx still relevant today?
Snyder, R. C., ‘The Citizen-Soldier and the Tragedy of The Eighteenth Brumaire’,
Strategies 16:1 (2003): 23-37. (issue of journal in library)
Wendling, A. E., ‘Are All Revolution Bourgeois? Revolutionary Temporality in Karl
Marx’s Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’, Strategies 16:1 (2003): 39-49.
Roberts, W. C., ‘Marx Contra the Democrats: The Force of The Eighteenth Brumaire’,
Strategies 16:1 (2003): 51-64. (issue of journal in library)
Macdonald, B. J., ‘Inaugurating Heterodoxy: Marx’s Eighteenth Brumaire and the “Limit-
Experience” of Class Struggle’, Strategies 16:1 (2003): 65-75. (issue of journal in library)
Seminar 6: Max Weber: Concepts, Ideal Types and the Rise of Capitalism
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Weber, M., ‘‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Science Policy’, in ibid. The Methodologies
of the Social Sciences, trans. And ed. by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch (Free press,
1977), pp. 76-85; 110-12
(http://cooley.libarts.wsu.edu/schwartj/pdf/Weber_Objectivity.pdf).
Weber, M., The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1904/5), read introduction,
chapter 1-3 (online: https://archive.org/details/protestantethics00webe)
Seminar/Essay Questions:
In what way does Weber’s explanation of the rise of capitalism differ from Marx’
ideas?
‘Weber held that the social values embodied in capitalistic economic activity
were not ‘natural’ but precipitates from historical development’. Discuss.
‘An “objective” analysis of cultural events is meaningless.’ (Max Weber). Discuss.
Blaut, J. M., Eight Eurocentric Historians (New York, 2000), 19-30 (ch.2, ‘Max Weber:
Western Rationality’).
Green, A., & Troup, K. (eds), The Houses of History: A Critical Reader in Twentieth-century
History and Theory (Manchester, 1999), 110-120 (‘Historical Sociology’)
Harrison, Robert, ‘History and Sociology’, in: Lambert, P., Schofield, Phillipp (eds),
Making History: An Introduction to the History and Practices of a Discipline
(London/New York, 2004), pp. 138-149 (very good and readable overview of the
interactions between sociology and history!)
Iggers, G. & Wang, Q. E, A Global History of Modern Historiography (London, 2008), 165-
171.
Kasler, D., Max Weber: An Introduction to His Life and Work (Cambridge, 1988), 174-84.
Parkin, F., Max Weber (Chichester, 1982).
Radkau, Joachim, Max Weber. A Biography (London, 2009), 179-207.
Turner, B. S., Max Weber: From History to Modernity (London, 1992), chs. 1-3.
Mommsen, W. J., The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber: Collected Essays
(Chicago, 1989)
Nelson, B., ‘Max Weber’s “Author’s Introduction” (1920): A Master Clue to His Main
Aims’, Sociological Inquiry, 44:4 (1974), 269-78
Oakes, G., ‘The Verstehen Thesis and the Foundations of Max Weber’s Methodology’,
History & Theory, 16 (1977), 11-29
Peltonen, ‘The Weber Thesis and Economic Historians’, Max Weber Studies, 8:1 (2008):
79-98
Razzell, P., ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: A Natural Scientific
Critique’, British Journal of Sociology, 28:1 (1977), pp. 17-37.
Thomas, P., ‘Being Max Weber’, New Left Review, 41 (Sept-Oct 2006), 147-58
Tawney, R. H., Religion and the Rise of Capitalism (London, 1926). For a critique by a
later historian. A particularly relevant footnote has been scanned.
Whatmore, Richard, ‘The Weber Thesis: “unproven yet unrefuted”,’ in W. Lamont (ed.),
Historical Controversies and Historians (London, 1998), pp. 95-108.
This seminar looks at some of the neo-marxists thinkers associated with the Institute
for Social Research at the Goethe University in Frankfurt. The Institute was founded in
1923 and was the first Marx-oriented research institute at a major university. Following
Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the institute moved to New York City in 1935,
where it became affiliated with Columbia University. Some of its members resettled in
West Germany in the early 1950s, but it was only in 1953 that the Institute was formally
re-established in Frankfurt. The lecture will focus on the work and life of two scholars
who shaped the intellectual direction of the school during the 1930-1950s, Theodor
Adorno and Max Horkheimer.
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Adorno, Theodor W./Horkheimer, M., Dialectic of the Enlightenment (1944), online
extract from the introduction and chapter 1, taken from Knowledge and Postmodernism
in Historical Perspective, eds J. Appleby et al. (London, 1996), pp. 327-337. (digital
extract)
Ibid., Dialectic of the Enlightenment (1944) (London 1997); chapter: ‘The Culture
Industry: Enlightenment and Mass Deception’, pp. 120-167. (digital extract)
Schmidt, J., ‘Language, Mythodology, and Enlightenment’, Social Research 65,4 (1998):
807-838. (online)
Stone, A., ‘Adorno and the Disenchantment of Nature’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 32,
2 (2006). (online)
Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, transl. by Thomas
Burger (Cambridge Mass., 1989).
Horkheimer, M., ‘Traditional and Critical Theory’, in Critical Theory: Selected Essays,
trans. M.J. O’Connell (New York, 1972).
Ibid., ‘Traditional and Critical Theory’, in ibid., Critical Theory: Selected Essays, transl. by
Mattew J. O’Connell (New York, 1972), pp. 188-243.
Ibid., ‘Art and Mass Culture’ in, ibid., Critical Theory: Selected Essays, transl. by Mattew J.
O’Connell (New York, 1972), pp. 273-290.
Ibid., Eclipse of Reason (New York, 1947).
Kracauer, Siegfried, History: The Last Thing before the Last (1969).
Ibid., On Time (online:
http://www.economics.rpi.edu/public_html/century/eao12/Kracauer.pdf)
Kracauer, Siegfried, The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays (1927), ed. and trans. T. Y. Levin
(Cambridge and London, 1995).
Lukács, Georg, ‘What is Orthodox Marxism’, in History and Class Consciousness. Studies in
Marxist Dialectics (London, 1971). (online:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/lukacs/works/history/orthodox.htm
Marcuse, H., ‘Some Social Implications of Modern Technology’, in The Essential Frankfurt
School Reader, eds. A. Arato and E. Gebhardt (New York, 1982) (online:
(http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/papers/Socialimplicationsoftechnology.pd
f)
Marcuse, H., Eros and Civilisation: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud (London: 1970)
Ibid., The One-Dimensional Man (1964). Online:
(http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/marcuse/works/one-dimensional-
man/one-dimensional-man.pdf) One of the most important books of the 1960s debates!
Brilliant!
Simmel, Georg, The Philosophy of Money (London, 1990).
Ibid., Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings, trans. D. Frisby and M. Featherstone
(London, 1997)
On Critical Theory:
Abromeit, J., Max Horkheimer and the Foundation of the Frankfurt School (Cambridge,
2011).
Berry, D., Revisiting the Frankfurt School: Essays on Culture, Media and Theory
(Aldershot, 2011). (electronic resource online).
Doon, S. M., Adorno: A Biography (Cambridge, 2005).
Robinson, I., The Sexual Radicals: Wilhelm Reich, Geza Roheim, Herbert Marcuse (London,
1970)
Benhabib, S. et al., On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives, ed. by S. Benhabib et al.,
(London, 1993), Introduction.
Bernstein, J. M., ed., The Frankfurt School: Critical Assessments, 6 vols. (New York, 1994).
Buck-Morss, S., The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project
(Cambridge, MA, 1989).
Brosio, Richard A. The Frankfurt School: An Analysis of the Contradictions and Crises of
Liberal Capitalist Societies (Muncia, 1980). (online)
Burke et al, Adorno and the Need in Thinking: New Critical Essays (Toronto, 2007).
Cook, D. The Culture Industry Revisited. Rowman & Littlefield. (1996).
Cook, D., Adorno, Habermans and the Search for a Rational Society (Cambridge, 1994).
30
Cohen, M., Profane Illumination: Walter Benjamin and the Paris of Surreal Revolution
(Berkeley, 1993)
Eagleton, T., Walter Benjamin: or, Towards a Revolutionary Criticism (London, 1981)
Ferris, D.S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin (Cambridge 2004) -
electronic version available through library.
Frisby, D., Fragments of Modernity: Theories of Modernity in the Work of Simmel,
Kracauer and Benjamin (Cambridge, 1986)
Habermas, J., ‘The Entwinement of myth and Enlightenment: Max Horkheimer and
Theodor Adorno’, in, Theordor Adorno: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory, ed. Simon
Jarvis, vol. III, (London, 2007), pp. 46-66. (band nicht in bibliothek?)
Ibid., ‘Georg Simmel on Philosophy and Culture: Postcript to a Collection of Essays’,
Critical Inquiry 22 (1996): 403-14. (online)
Ibid., ‘Remarks on the Development of Horkheimer’s Work, in, On Max Horkheimer: New
Perspectives, ed. by S. Benhabib et al., (London, 1993), pp. ?
Honneth, Axel, Foucault and Adorno: Two Forms of Critique of Modernity, in Theodor
Adorno: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory, ed. Simon Jarvis, vol. III (London, 2007),
pp. 90-100.
Huyssen, A., ‘Mass Culture as Woman: Modernism's Other,’ in After the Great Divide:
Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism (Bloomington, 1986)
Huhn, Tom ed., The Cambridge Companion to Adorno (Cambridge, 2004), (many useful
articles in it).
Jay, M., Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas
(Berkeley, 1984)
McCole, J., Walter Benjamin and the Antinomies of Tradition (Ithaca, 1993)
Rose, G., The Melancholy Science. An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno
(New York, 1978).
O’Connor, Brian, ‘Philosophy of History’, in Theodor Adorno: Key Concepts, ed. by
Deborah Cook (Stockfield, 2008), pp. 161-170. (digitised extract).
Schwartz, Vanessa, ‘Walter Benjamin for Historians,’ The American Historical Review
106: 5 (December 2001): 1721-1743.
Miller, Tyrus, Modernism and the Frankfurt School (2014),
Steinberg, Michael (ed.), Walter Benjamin and the Demands of History (Ithaca, New York
1996)
Tar, Zoltan, The Frankfurt School: The Critical Theories of Max Horkheimer and
Theodor W., Adorno (New York, 1977).
Taithe, T., Buse, P., McCracken, S., Benjamin's Arcades: An Unguided Tour (Manchester
2006)
Wheatland, Thomas. The Frankfurt School in Exile (Minneapolis, 2009).
Schmidt, Alfred, The Concept of Nature in Marx, trans. Ben Fowkes (London, 1972).
Schnädelbach, H., ‚The Contemporary Relevance of the Dialectic of Enlightenment’
(1987), in Theodor Adorno: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory, ed. Simon Jarvis, vol. I
(London, 2007), pp. 137-155.
Vogel, Steven, Against Nature: The Concept of Nature in Critical Theory (Albany, 2006).
Witkin, Robert W., Adorno on Popular Culture (London, 2003).
Wolin, R., Walter Benjamin: An Aesthetic of Redemption (New York, 1982), ch. 8 on
Benjamin’s ‘Thesis on History’.
Wolin, R., The Terms of Cultural Criticism: The Frankfurt School, Existentialism,
Postructuralism (New York, 1992).
31
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Braudel, F., ‘History and the Social Sciences. The Long Term’, Social Science Information,
9:1 (1970), 144-174 OR Braudel, F., ‘History and the Social Sciences: The Longue Durée’,
in On History (Chicago, 1980), pp. 25-54. (digitised extract)
Febvre, L., ‘A New Kind of History’, in A New Kind of History: From the Writings of Lucien
Febvre, ed. P. Burke (London, 1973), pp. 27-43. (digitised extract)
Le Roy Ladurie, Emmanuel, Montaillou: Cathars and Catholics in a French Village, 1294-
1324 (London, 1980); chapter VII: The Shepherd’s Mental Outlook, pp. 120-135; and
chapter VIII: Body Language and Sex, pp. 139-152 (digitised extract).
Seminar 9: E.P. Thompson: The Rise of ‘Experience’ and the New Social History
If asked who m they consider the most important English historian of the 20th century,
many would answer: E.P. Thompson. This lecture/seminar investigates why the British
historian, writer, socialist and peace campaigner Edward Palmer Thompson – he held a
position at the Warwick History Department during the 1960s and early 1970s -- is still
so highly regarded among the historical profession and in wider British culture. What
was his new social history about? Why did he stress the experience of people in the past
so much?
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (London, 1963), pp. 9-27, 207-
232, 887-915. (digitised extracts)
Ibid., The Poverty of Theory (London, 1995), pp. 50-68.
(http://home.ku.edu.tr/~mbaker/CSHS503/ThompsonPovertyofTheory.pdf)
Ibid., ‘Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism’, Past & Present 38,1 (1967):
(http://tems.umn.edu/pdf/epthompson-pastpresent.pdf)
34
Seminar/Essay Questions:
What were E.P Thompson’s key ideas? How ‘original’ was he?
What were the main failures and omissions from his history writing?
Did Thompson’s political work make him a better historian?
Donnelly, F. K., ‘Ideology and Early English Working-Class History: Edward Thompson
and his Critics’, Social History 2 (1976), 219-38
Eastwood, D., ‘History, Politics and Reputation: E.P. Thompson Reconsidered’, History
85 [No.280] (2000), 634-54
Hamilton, S., The Crisis of Theory: EP Thompson, the New Left and Postwar British Politics
(Manchester 2011)
Hitchcock, T., ‘A New History From Below’, History Workshop Journal, 57 (2004), 294-
98
Iggers, G. G., Historiography in the Twentieth Century: from Scientific Objectivity to the
Postmodern Challenge (Middletown CT, 1997), ch.7
Jay, M., Songs of Experience. Modern American And European Variations On A Universal
Theme, (Berkeley CA and London, 2005)
Ireland, C., ‘The Appeal to Experience and its Consequences: Variations on a Persistent
Thompsonian Theme’, Cultural Critique 52 (2002), 86-107
Johnson, R., ‘Edward Thompson, Eugene Genovese and Socialist-Humanist History’,
History Workshop Journal, 6 (1978), 79-100
Kaye, H., & McClelland, K. (eds), E.P. Thompson: Critical Perspectives (Cambridge, 1991)
Michael Kenny, The First New Left: British Intellectuals After Stalin (London: Lawrence &
Wishart, 1995)
King, P., ‘Edward Thompson’s Contribution to Eighteenth-Century Studies: The
Patrician-Plebeian Model Re-Examined’, Social History, 21 (1996), 215-28
Randall, A., & Charlesworth, A. (eds), Moral Economy and Popular Protest: Crowds,
Conflict and Authority (Basingstoke, 2000)
Scott, J. W., ‘The Evidence of Experience’, Critical Inquiry, 17 (1991), 773-97, & revised
as ‘Experience’, in J. Butler & J.W. Scott (eds), Feminists Theorize the Political (New York,
1992), 22-40
Steinberg, M. W., ‘A Way of Struggle: Reformations and Affirmations of E.P. Thompson’s
Class Analysis in the Light of Post-modern Theories of Language’, British Journal of
Sociology, 48 (1997), 471-92
Steinberg, M. W., ‘Culturally Speaking: Finding a Commons Between Post-Structuralism
and the Thompsonian Perspective’, Social History, 21 (1996), 193-214
Wrightson, K., English Society, 1580-1680 (London, 2003), 9-16 (Introduction)
Yeo, E., ‘E. P. Thompson: Witness Against the Beast’, in W. Lamont (ed.), Historical
Controversies and Historians (London, 1998), 215-224
Rollison, D., ‘Discourse and Class Struggle: The Politics of Industry in Early Modern
England’, Social History, 26 (2001), 166-89
Wahrman, D., Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain,
c.1750-1840 (Cambridge, 1995)
Walter, J., Understanding Popular Violence in the English Revolution: The Colchester
Plunderers (Cambridge, 1999), ch.7 (esp. 260-84)
Wood, A., The Politics of Social Conflict: The Peak Country, 1520-1770 (Cambridge, 1999),
10-26, 316-25
During the 1960s and 1970s scholars in the humanities became fascinated with an
intellectual tradition that originated at the turn of the 20thcentury and which focussed
on the relationship between the human sciences and language. One of its central ideas is
that language is not a transparent medium of thought and is not capable of
expressing reality. The ‘linguistic turn’ took many directions, and this session will
engage with scholars of the structuralist tradition and the ensuing movement of
poststructuralism. The seminar/lecture will introduce us to the central theories and key
terms of this fascinating and incredible important intellectual tradition in history
writing, which is still very much alive today. We will also look at the socio-cultural
conditions which made the ‘linguistic turn’ possible.
Seminar Readings:
Barthes, Roland, ‘The Death of the Author’, in ibid., Music, Image, Text (1977) (online:
http://www.deathoftheauthor.com/
37
Seminar/Essay Questions:
‘Language can never express reality’. Discuss.
Is Hayden White wrong to argue that history is entire subjective?
What is the difference between structuralism and poststructurialism?
Further Readings:
Kramer, L.S., ‘Literature, Criticism, and Historical Imagination: The Literary Challenge of
Hayden White and Dominique Capra, in Hunt, L., New Cultural History
LaCapra, D., Kaplan, S.L., Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New
Perspectives (Cornell University Press, 1982) (important collection).
Marwick, A., ‘Two Approaches to Historical Study: The Metaphysical (Including
“Postmodernism”) and the Historical’, Journal of Contemporary History, 30 (1995): 5-35
(& cf. H. White, ‘Response to Arthur Marwick in idem., 30 (1995), 233-46; & Symposium
on the Marwick-White debate in idem., 31 (1996): 191-28 (incl. C. Lloyd, ‘For Realism
and Against the Inadequacies of Common Sense: A Response to Arthur Marwick’: 191-
207; B. Southgate, ‘History and Metahistory: Marwick versus White’: 209-14; W.
Kansteiner, ‘Searching for an Audience: The Historical Profession in the Media Age: A
Comment on Arthur Marwick and Hayden White’: 215-219; G. Roberts, ‘Narrative
History as a Way of Life’: 221-228
Passmore, K., ‘Poststructuralism and History’, in S. Berger, H. Feldner and K. Passmore
(eds), Writing History: Theory and Practice (London, 2003), 118-40
Poster, M., Cultural History and Postmodernity: Disciplinary Readings and Challenges
(New York, 1997).
Paul, H., “Hayden White and the Crisis of Historicism,” in Re-figuring Hayden White, ed.
Ankersmit, F., Domanska, E., and Kellner, H. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009).
Paul, H., Hayden White: The Historical Imagination (2011).
Paul, H.,“An Ironic Battle against Irony: Epistemological and Ideological Irony in Hayden
White’s Philosophy of History, 1955–73,” in Tropes for the Past: Hayden White and the
History/Literature Debate, ed. Kuisma Korhonen (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006), pp.
Southgate, B., History: What and Why? Ancient, Modern and Postmodern Perspectives
(London, 1996), pp. 108-122.
Toews, John, ‘Intellectual History After the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning
and the Irreducibility of Experience’, American Historical Review, 92 (1987): ?.
White, H. ‘The Burden of History’, History and Theory 52, 131 (1966): 111-34 (online).
White, H., The Content of Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation
(Baltimore, 1987).
White, H., Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect (Baltimore, 1999).
White, H., Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore, 1978).
White, H., ‘Manifesto Time’, in K. Jenkins, S. Morgan, A. Munslow (eds.), Manifestos for
History (Abingdon, 2007), pp. 220-234. (his reflection on recent developments)
White, H., ‘The Historical Text as a Literary Artifact’, Clio 3, 3 (1974): ? (online)
Elton, G.R., Return to Essentials: Some Reflections on the Present State of Historical Study
(Cambridge, 1991), esp. ch.2
Evans, R., In Defense of History (London, 1997), most influential and widely read critique
of postmodernism in History
Fulbrook, M., Historical Theory (London, 2002) (seeks middle ground between
postmodernism and its opponents.
Himmelfarb, G., ‘Some Reflections on the New History’, American Historical Review, 94
(1989), 661-70
Jameson, Frederic, Postmodernism, Or the Logic of Late Capitalism (Online:
http://flawedart.net/courses/articles/Jameson_Postmodernism__cultural_logic_late_ca
pitalism.pdf), a famous and powerful Marxist critique of postmodernism first published
in New Left Review I/146, July–August 1984 and as a book in 1991.
Jordanova, L. History in Practice (London, 2000) (see Fulbrook).
Kirk, N., ‘History, Language, Ideas and Post-Modernism: A Materialist View’, Social
History 19 (1994): 221-40.
Marwick, A., The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language (Basingstoke
2001).
Norris, C., What is Wrong with Postmodernism: Cultural Theory and the End of Philosophy
(Baltimore, 1990).
Palmer, B. Descent into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social
History (Philadelphia, 1990).
Price, R., ‘Postmodernism as Theory and History’, in J. Belchem and N. Kirk (eds),
Languages of Labour (Aldershot 1997), pp.
Spiegel, G., ‘History, Historicsm and the Social Logic of the Text’ in ibid., The Past as a
Text: the Theory and Practice of Medieval Historiography (Baltimore, 1997), pp.
see or/also her excellent piece, ‘History and Postmodernism’, Past and Present 135
(1992): pp. (online). Here she extends her arguments from the Speculum article.
Stedman Jones, G., ‘The Deterministic Fix: Some Obstacles to the Further Development
of the Linguistic Approach to History in the 1990s’, History Workshop Journal 42 (1996):
19-35.
Stone, L., & Spiegel, G.,1 ‘History and Postmodernism’, Past & Present 135 (1992): 89-
208.
Thompson, Willie, What Happened to History? (London, 2000).
Windshuttle, K., Killing of History: How a Discipline is being Murdered by Literary Critics
and Social Theorists (San Francisco, 1996).
Parallel to the postmodern linguistic movement discussed in the last session, emerges
another form of history writing in the 1970s. It suggested an intensive investigation of a
well-defined smaller unit of research and embraced the small, the everyday, such as the
story of a village, a family or even a single person. A group of Italian scholars, among
them Carlo Ginzburg, called their enterprise ‘micro-history’. We investigate why this
new trend emerges in Italy of the 1960s and 70s and what kind of new methodologies it
involved.
41
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Ginzburg, C., The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller
([1976] London, 1980), xi-xxvi, 1-41, 112-128
Ginzburg, C., ‘Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific Method’, History
Workshop Journal, 9 (1980), 5-36, reprinted as ‘Clues: Roots of an Evidential Paradigm’,
in Ginzburg, Myths, Emblems, Clues (London, 1990), 96-127
LaCapra, D., ‘The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Twentieth-Century Historian’,
in LaCapra, History and Criticism (Ithaca, 1980), 45-70
Luria, K., ‘The Paradoxical Carlo Ginzburg’, Radical History Review 35 (1986), 80-87
Luria, K. & Gandolfo, R., ‘Carlo Ginzburg: An Interview’, Radical History Review, 35
(1986), 89-111.
Martin, J., ‘Journey to the World of the Dead: The Work of Carlo Ginzburg’, Journal of
Social History, 25 (1992), 613-26
Midelfort, H., ‘Review [of Ginzburg, The Cheese and the Worms]’, Catholic Historical
Review 68 (1982), 513-4
Molho, T., ‘Carlo Ginzburg: Reflections on the Intellectual Cosmos of a 20th Century
Historian’, History of European Ideas, 30 (2004), 121-148
Schutte, A. J., ‘Review [of Ginzburg, The Cheese and the Worms]’, Church History, 51
(1982), 218
Schutte, A. J., ‘Review Article: Carlo Ginzburg’, Journal of Modern History, 48 (1976), 296-
315
Scribner, R. W., ‘Is a History of Popular Culture Possible?’, History of European Ideas, 10
(1989), 175-91
Scribner, R., ‘The Historical Anthropology of Early Modern Europe’, in R. Po-Chia Hsia &
R. W. Scribner (eds), Problems in the Historical Anthropology of Early Modern Europe
(Wiesbaden, 1997), 11-34
Valeri, V., ‘Review [of Ginzburg, The Cheese and the Worms]’, Journal of Modern History,
54 (1982), 139-43
Zambelli, P., ‘From Menocchio to Piero della Francesca: The Work of Carlo Ginzburg’,
Historical Journal 28 (1985), 983-99
Peltonen, M., ‘Clues, Margins and Monads: The Micro-Macro Link in Historical Research’,
History and Theory 40 (2001), 347-59
Ruggiero, G., Binding Passions: Tales of Magic, Marriage and Power at the End of the
Renaissance (Oxford, 1993)
Szijarto, I., ‘Four Arguments for Micro-history’, Rethinking History 6:2 (2002), 209-15
Seminar 12: In Search of Symbolic Meaning: Robert Darnton’s The Great Cat
Massacre and the New Cultural History
We have seen in earlier sessions that the discipline of anthropology and its
methodologies became increasingly important to historians in the 1970s and 1980s.
This lecture/seminar investigates this ‘love’ for anthropology in more detail through the
reading of one of the most fascinating historical works that uses anthropological
concepts fashionable in the 1980s.
Seminar Readings:
Darnton, R., The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes of Cultural History (London,
2009), chapter 1: Peasants Tell Tales, pp. 9-74 (online:
http://designstudiesdiscourses.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/86704216-robert-
darnton-the-great-cat-massacre.pdf).
Seminar/Essay Questions:
Why did anthropology become important to historians in the 1980s (and
sociology less so)?
What are the aims of the New Cultural History of the 1980s?
Why were historians like Darnton interested in rituals of the past that appears
strange and rather foreign to us?
Further Readings:
Burke, P., Varieties of Cultural History (Cambridge, 1997).
Burke, P., What Is Cultural History (Cambridge, 2004).
Christie, N. J, ‘From Intellectual to Cultural History: The Comparative Catalyst’, Journal of
History and Politics, 6 (1988-89), 79-100
44
Ortner, Sherry B., The Fate of Culture: Geertz and Behond (Berkely, 1999).
Poster, M., Cultural History and Postmodernity: Disciplinary Readings and Challenges
(New York, 1997).
Rabinow, ‘Representations are Social Facts: Modernity and Postmodernity in
Anthropology’, in J. Clifford and G. Marcus (eds.), Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics
of Writing Culture (Berkeley, 1986), pp. 234-261.
Thompson, E. P., ‘Folklore, Anthropology and Social History’, Indian Historical Review, 3
(1977), 247-66 & reprinted as a Studies in Labour History Pamphlet (1979), copy
available in library.
Turner, C., Bruner, E.M., The Anthropology of Experience (Urbana, 1986).
Walters, R. G., ‘Signs of the Times: Clifford Geertz and Historians’, Social Research, 47
(1980), 537-556.
Walton, Charles, Introduction, ibid. (ed.), Into Print. Limits and Legacies of the
Enlightenment (University Park, 2011), pp. vii-xviii. (very good overview).
‘The power to punish is not essentially different from that of curing or educating’
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Foucault, M., ‘So, is it important to think?’, Rabinow, O., Nikolas Rose (eds.), The Essential
Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (New York, 1994), pp.
170-173. (digitised extract)
Ibid., ‘Introduction’, in ibid., The Archaeology of Knowledge (London, 1972), pp. 3-17.
(digitised abstract) or (online:
http://monoskop.org/images/9/90/Foucault_Michel_Archaeology_of_Knowledge.pdf)
Ibid., ‘The Body of the Condemned’, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
(London, 1977), pp. 3-31. (digitised abstract) or (online:
https://archive.org/details/MichelFoucaultDisciplineAndPunish.)
Ibid., ‘Introduction’ and ‘The Right of Death and Power over Life’, ibid., The History of
Sexuality, Vol. 1.: An Introduction (London, 1978), pp. 1-14; pp.135-159. (digitised
abstract) or (online: http://suplaney.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/foucault-the-
history-of-sexuality-volume-1.pdf)
(It might be beneficial for you to buy the very cheap, but utterly brilliant Gutting, G.,
Foucault: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, 2005). Best intro on the market and easy to
read! Hard to believe but true!
Seminar/Essay Questions:
How useful to historians is the Foucauldian insight that ‘knowledge is power’?
Why was ‘the body’ such an important theme in Foucault’s work?
Do you think that Foucault’s work is still a ‘threat’ to academic history (as it was
seen by many historians still in the 1990s)?
Jones, C., & Porter, R. (eds), Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body (London,
1994).
Koopman, Colin, Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity
(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013) (order).
McClaren, M., ‘Foucault and the Subject of Feminism’, Social Theory and Practice, 23:11
(1997): 109-128.
McNay, L., Foucault. A Critical Introduction (Cambridge, 1994).
Nick, C., ‘Body-Subject/Body-Power: Agency, Inscription and Control in Foucault and
Merleau-Ponty’, Body and Society, 2: 2. (1996): 99-116.
Megill, A., ‘The Reception of Foucault by Historians’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 48
(1987): 117-41.
Merquior, J.G., Foucault (London, 1991).
Mitchell, D., Critical and Effective Histories. Foucault's Methods and Historical Sociology
(London, 1994).
Munslow, A., The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies (London, 2000), pp. 107-
111.
Noiriel, G., ‘Foucault and History: The Lessons of a Disillusion’, Journal of Modern
History, 66 (1994): 547-68.
O’Brien, P., ‘Michel Foucault's History of Culture', in L. Hunt (ed.), The New Cultural
History (Berkeley, 1989), pp. 25-46.
Poster, M., Foucault, Marxism and History: Modes of Production, Modes of Information
(Cambridge, 1984).
Ramazanoğlu, C., Up Against Foucault. Explorations of Some Tensions between Foucault
and Feminism (London, 1993).
Roth, M. S., ‘Foucault’s “History of the Present”’, History and Theory, 20:1 (1981), 32-46.
Rousseau, G. S., ‘Whose Enlightenment? Not Man’s. The Case of Michel Foucault’,
Eighteenth-Century Studies, 6:2 (1972): 238-56.
Skinner, Q. (ed.), The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences (Cambridge, 1990)
Strozier, R. M., Foucault, Subjectivity, and Identity. Historical Constructions of Subject and
Self (Detroit, 2002).
Veyne, Paul, Foucault: His Thought, His Character (Cambridge, 2008).
Weeks, J., ‘Foucault for Historians’, History Workshop Journal 14 (1982), 106-119.
White, Hayden, ‘Foucault Decoded: Notes from Underground’, History and Theory 12
(1973).
In his famous work Orientalism, the literary scholar Edward Said proposed that the
nineteenth-century literary Western conceptions of ‘the Orient’ did no only reflect
views of the past but had real and long-lasting social and political effects. Much of the
information and knowledge about Islam and the Orient that was used by the colonial
powers to justify their colonialism derived from Orientalist scholarship’. Indeed, he
argued, that American foreigns policies of the 1980s were still heavily shaped by the
‘orientalist’ perspectives of the 19th century. But Said’s work also became famous
because he was one of the firsts to use Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge in
combination with Gramsci’s Marxist concept of hegemony to explain how ‘orientalism’
works.
48
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Said, E., Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient (London, 1978), pp. 1-28
(‘Introduction’), pp. 31-49 (‘Knowing the Oriental’), pp. 73-92 (‘Projects’), pp. 92-110
(‘Crisis’), pp. 284-328 (‘The Latest Phase’). (online:
http://is.cuni.cz/studium/predmety/index.php?do=download&did=37402&kod=JMB1
13
Seminar Readings:
Claus, P., and J. Marriott, History: An Introduction to Theory, Method and Practice
(Harlow, 2012), 98-102. (digitised extract)
Iggers, G. G., A Global History of Modern Historiography (London, 2008), pp. 281-284, pp.
342-344. (digitised extract)
Karsh, E., & Millar, R., ‘Did Edward Said Really Speak Truth to Power?’, Middle East
Quarterly, (2008): 13-21. (online)
Seminar/Essay Questions:
On ‘Orientalism’:
Ahmad, A., In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures (London, 1992)
Ashcroft, B., & Ahluwalia, P., Edward Said: The Paradox of Identity (London, 1999)
Bhaba, H., The Location of Culture (London, 1994)
Bove, P. A. (ed.), Edward Said and the Work of the Critic: Speaking Truth to Power
(Durham NC, 2000)
Hart, W. D., Edward Said and the Religious Effects of Culture (Cambridge, 2000)
Heehs, P., ‘Shades of Orientalism: Paradoxes and Problems in Indian Historiography’,
History & Theory 42 (2003), 169-95
Inden, R., Imagining India (Oxford, 1990)
Irwin, Robert, Dangerous Knowledge: Orientalism and its Discontents (New York, 2006)
Kennedy, V., Edward Said: A Critical Introduction (Oxford, 2000)
Macfie, A. L., Orientalism (London, 2002)
MacKenzie, J., Orientalism: History, Theory and the Arts (Manchester, 1995), esp. ch.1
Majeed, J., Ungoverned Imaginings: James Mill’s The History of British India and
Orientalism (Oxford, 1992)
Moore-Gilbert, B., Postcolonial Theory: Contexts, Practices, Politics (London, 1997)
Said, E., ‘Orientalism Reconsidered’, in F. Barker et al (eds), Literature, Politics and
Theory: Papers from the Essex Conference, 1976-84 (London, 1986), 210-29
Said, E., Out of Place: A Memoir (London, 2000)
Sardar, Z., Orientalism (Buckingham, 1999)
49
Sarkar, S., ‘Orientalism Revisited: Saidian Frameworks in the Writing of Modern Indian
History’, Oxford Literary Review 16 (1994), 205-24. A critical view of Said’s impact on
history-writing.
Spanos, W.V., The Legacy of Edward Said (Urbana-Champaign IL, 2009)
Sprinker, M. (ed.), Edward Said: A Critical Reader (Oxford, 1992)
Thomas, N., Colonialism's Culture: Anthropology, Travel and Government (Cambridge,
1994), esp. Intro & chs.1-2
Turner, B. S., Orientalism: Postmodernism and Globalism (London, 1994)
Williams, P. (ed.), Edward Said, 4 Vols. (London, 2001), esp. Vol. 2
The Reception of Edward Said: From Early Reviews of Orientalism to the Present
Asad, T., ‘Review [of Said, Orientalism]’, English Historical Review 95 (1980), 648-49
Clifford, J., ‘Review [of Said, Orientalism]’, History & Theory 19 (1980), 204-23
Gellner, E., ‘Review [of Said, Orientalism]’, Times Literary Supplement (19 Feb 1993)
Lewis, B., ‘The Question of Orientalism [Review of Said, Orientalism]’, New York Review
of Books 29:11 (24 June 1982) [& cf. E. Said, C. Grober & B. Lewis, ‘Orientalism: An
Exchange’, New York Review of Books 29:13 (12 Aug 1982)
Mani, L., & Frankenberg, R., ‘The Challenge of Orientalism’, Economy and Society 14
(1985), 174-92
Parry, B., ‘Problems in Current Theories of Colonial Discourse’, Oxford Literary Review, 9
(1987), 27-58
Varisco, D. M., Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid (Washington DC), 2007.
Seminar 15: From Women’s History to Gender History/ From Social History to
Cultural History
It is only in the 1960s that historians began to be seriously interested in the study of the
role that women have played in history. Women’s history quickly developed into an
50
Seminar Readings:
Walkowitz, J. , Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class and the State
(Cambridge, 1980) and Walkowitz, J. City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual
Danger in Late Victorian England (London, 1992), esp. Intro. & chs. 1-3.
Scott, J., ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’ The American Historical
Review, 91:5 (1986): 1053-1075 [Essential reading].
Seminar Questions:
What was the impact of post-1960s feminism on the practice of social history?
Account for differences in approach to the history of women in Prostitution and
Victorian Society and City of Dreadful Delight.
What was ‘the linguistic turn’? Did Walkowitz take this turn?
How and why did the shift to ‘gender’ studies occur? What are the implications
for the historian’s work of the view that gender identities are inherently
unstable?
Clark, A. The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working
Class (1995) [Introduction]
Taylor, B., Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century
(Virago, 1983)
Dworkin, D.L., ‘Remaking the British Working Class: Sonya Rose and Feminist History’,
in P. Levine & S.R. Grayzel (eds.), Gender, Labour, War and Empire : Essays on Modern
Britain (2009)
Alexander, Sally, Becoming a Woman: And Other Essays in 19th and 20th Century
Feminist History (1994)
L. Davidoff & C. Hall, Family Fortunes. Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780-
1850 (1987)
In the early 1980s, 'Subaltern Studies' began publishing and soon gained a world-wide
reputation as part of a series of postcolonial critiques across the disciplines. Where
previously the history of modern India was written as the history of 'elites', the work of
the subaltern studies collective sought to capture the experience of 'subaltern groups'.
'Subaltern Studies', as a collective enterprise, represents one of the most significant
achievement of South Asian 'cultural studies.' It effectively contested what were, until
recently, the dominant interpretations of Indian history in particular and colonial
history in general. More generally, subaltern studies provided a framework—in dialog
both with postcolonial and Marxian thought—within which to apprehend and contest
dominant modes of knowledge. However, even during its heyday, subaltern history has
not always had an easy relationship with feminism; the feminist critique brought
questions of voice, agency, and resistance to the fore.
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Vinayak Chaturvedi, ‘Introduction’ in Mapping subaltern studies and the postcolonial
(London, 2000).
Seminar/essay questions:
‘The study of colonialism erases the boundaries between anthropology and
history.’ Discuss.
‘Subaltern studies main contribution was to question how historians read.’
Discuss.
Why was the work of the subaltern studies collective taken up by historians
working on areas other than India?
The past dwells primarily in the present. Discuss.
Stree Shakti Sangathana. We Were Making History: Women and the Telengana Uprising.
(London: Zed Press, 1990), see esp. pp. 1-73, 137-79, 258-84.
Vasantha Kannabiran and K. Lalitha, "That Magic Time: Women in the Telangana
People's Struggle", in Recasting Women, pp. 180-203. R
Julie Stephens, "Feminist Fictions: A Critique of the Category 'Non-Western Woman' in
Feminist Writings on India", in Subaltern Studies VI, pp. 92-125.
Susie Tharu, "Response to Julie Stephens", in Subaltern Studies VI, pp. 126-31.
Gayatri C. Spivak, "Can the Subaltern Speak?", in Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg,
eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (Urbana & Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press,
1988), pp. 271-313
Monographs: (Many of the articles in the core reading became monographs. Read
them alongside one another. What can a book do that an article cannot?)
Shahid Amin, Event, Metaphor, Memory: The Story of Chauri Chaura, 1922-1992
(Princeton, 1995).
David Hardiman, The Coming of the Devi: Adivasi assertion in Western India (Delhi,
1987).
Partha Chatterjee, Nationalist Thought & the Colonial World (1986).
Ranajit Guha, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency (Oxford, 1999).
Gyanendra Pandey, The construction of communalism in colonial north India (Delhi,
1990).
Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincialising Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical
difference (Princeton, 2007).
Seminar 17: Ways of Seeing: The Visual and Material World of History Writing
Two of the latest developments in history writing are the increasing focus on the visual
and material worlds in the past. While objects and images have always played a role as a
form of evidence in history writing, it is only since the 1980s that historians have
seriously engaged with with objects/images on a theoretical level. Important for a
rethinking of the material and visual world was the influence of postmodern thinking.
The lecture/seminar introduces us to these new sexy topics and will also couch their
emergence within the wider cultural concerns of the 1980s/1990s.
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
Benjamin, W., ‘Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, pp. 219-226, in Hanna
Arendt (ed.) Illuminations, trans. Harry Zohn, New York, 1968). (there exist many
different editions of his famous text online see, for example,
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm
Seminar/Essay Questions:
How does visual culture studies differ from traditional art history?
What can objects contribute to history writing? How can one make them ‘speak’?
55
Martin Jay, ed. Warren Breckman, Peter e. gordon, a. dirk moses, Samuel moyn, and
elliot Neaman(New York: Berghahn Books, 2009).
Greenberg, Udi, ‘The Politics of the Walter Benjamin Industry’, Theory, Culture & Society
25 (2008): 50-73.
Hall, S., (ed), Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices (London,
1997).Ibid, ‘Encoding, Decoding’, in The Cultural Studies Reader, ed. by Simon During
(London: 1993).Ibid., ‘Introduction: Looking and Subjectivity’, in Evans, H., and Hall, S.
(ed), Visual Culture: The Reader (London, 1999), pp. 309-314.Jay, Martin, Downcast Eyes:
The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought (Berkeley, 1993). Ibid.,
and Brennan, T. (eds) Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on
Sight (London: Routledge, 1996).
Jenks, C., ‘The Centrality of the Eye in Western Culture’, in Visual Culture (London,
1995), pp. 1-12.
Henare, A., Museums, Anthropology and Colonial Exchange (Cambridge, 2005).
Howells, R., Visual Culture (Cambridge, 2003).
Kingery, David W., Learning from Things: Methodology and Theory of Material Culture
Studies (London, 1996).
Laqueur, W., ‘The Walter Benjamin Brigade: How an Original but Maddeningly Opaque
German Jewish Intellectual became a Thriving Academic Industry’, Mosaic April 2014
(online: http://mosaicmagazine.com/tesserae/2014/04/the-walter-benjamin-
brigade/)
Mitchell, W.J.T., Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (Chicago, 1986).
Ibid., Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation (Chicago, 1994).
Ibid., ‘What do Images really want?’ October 77 (1996): 71-82.
Pinney, C., ‘Photos of the Gods’: The Printed Image and Political Struggle in India
(London, 2004).
Poole, D. Vision, Race and Modernity: A Visual Economy of the Andean Image World
(Princeton, 1997).
Pratt, M.L., Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation (London, 1992).
Ramamurthy, A., ‘Constructions of Illusion: Photography and Commodity Culture’, in L.
Wells (ed.) Photography: A Critical Introduction (London, 1997), pp. 151-98.
Ryan, J., Picturing Empire: Photography and the Visualisation of the British Empire
(London, 1997).
Vanessa Schwartz, “Walter Benjamin for historians,” American Historical Review106,
no. 5 (2001), 1721-1743.
Smith, M., Visual Culture Studies (Los Angeles, 2008) (very good interviews with visual
culture scholars), online http://www.journalofvisualculture.org/wp-
content/uploads/2010/05/Visual-Culture-Studies-Interviews.pdf
gary Smith, “Walter Benjamin: a Bibliography of Secondary literature,” New German
Critique,“Special Walter Benjamin Issue” (Spring 1977), 75-82.
Stanford, B.M., Body Criticism: Imaging the Unseen in Enlightenment Art and Science
(London: 1991).
Ibid., Good Looking: Essays on the Virtue of Images (London, 1996).
Weigel, Sigrid, Body-and Image-Space: Rereading Walter Benjamin, trans. G. Paul
(London 1996).
57
Seminar 18: New Directions: ‘Deep History’, History of Emotions, and Actor-
Network-Theory
Texts/Documents/Arguments/Sources:
a. Reddy, William, ‘The Logic of Action: Intermediacy, Emotion and Historical Narrative’,
History and Theory 40 (2001): 10-33 (online).
b. Shyrock, A., and Smail, D.L., Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present
(Berkeley, 2011), Part II, Chapter 3. Body, pp. 55-77. (digitised extract)
c. Latour, Bruno, ‘Third Source of Uncertainty: Objects too Have Agency’, in ibid.
‘Reassembling the Social: An Introdution into Actor-Network Theory (Oxford, 2005), pp.
63-86 (online: http://dss-edit.com/plu/Latour_Reassembling.pdf).
Seminar/Essay Questions:
‘The old idea of the social is dead. We live in social assemblages.’ Discuss.
Do you think the concept of ‘deep history’ is convincing?
‘Nonhumans are as important as humans in social relations’. Discuss.
Further Readings:
Allen, James Smith, ‘Navigating the Social Sciences: A Theory for the Meta-History of
Emotions’, review essay of William Reddy, Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the
History of Emotions, in History and Theory 42 (2003): 82-93.
Amato, Joe, ‘Review’, Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present, Journal of Social
History (2014) 47 (4): 1101-1103.
58