Commons:Kandidatët për fotografi të shkëlqyeshme
Në gjuhë tjera : Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
Në këtë faqe gjeni fotografit të cilat përdoruesit e projektit i vlerësojnë si të shkëlqyeshme dhe për këtë arsye i kanë propozuar që ato të futen në Galerinë Fotografi të Shkëlqyeshme.
VOTO!
Vini Re!: Votimi nuk është për Figurën e ditës!
Rrjedha
[edit]Fotografit e propozuara
[edit]Nëse ke hasur në jë fotografi që ty të pëlqen përdore këtë stampë për ta regjistruar atë! Për një gjë të tillë nuk nevojitet të kesh konto në Commons, propozimet nga kalimtarët janë të mirëseardhura.
Në rast suksesi, sigurohu që ajo fotografi ka edhe një përshkrim të shkëlqyeshëm dhe disponon Licencë
Votimi
[edit]Rregullat e votimit:
- Kohë zgjatja e votimit është 9 ditë. Ditën e 10 vendoset për rezultatin - Nëse një fotografi nuk merr asnjë votë "PRO" brenda 5 ditëve mund të tërhiqet brenda afatit - Propozimet nga Adresat IP janë të mirëseardhura - Diskutimet dhe vërejtjet nga Adresat IP janë të mirëseardhura - Votat e Adresat IP nuk numërohen - Propozimi nuk numërohet si votë por propozuesi ka drejtë votimi - Propozuesi mund të tërheq nga votimi fotografin e propozuar nga ai
Fotografia e propozuar mund të futet në Galerinë Fotografi të Shkëlqyeshme nëse plotëson këto kushte:
- Licencë të pa diskutueshme - Së paku 5 vota "PËR" ("Support") - Proporcioni PËR/KUNDËR i votave duhet të jetë së paku 2/1 (d.m.th së paku 67% apo 2/3 e votuesve të jen PËR)
Kandidatët
[edit]Votimi bëhet me "{{Pro}}" ose "{{Kontra}}", abstenimi "{{Neutral}}". Këtu vendosë një kandidatë
Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 22:01:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
- Info Veste Coburg, aerial view. All by -- Ermell (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent viewpoint and special building -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
- Info Raueneck Castle ruins, orthophoto. All by -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This one is not working for me, the profile is not really standing out and the right side in shadow isn't helping, either IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Beilstein - Billensbach - Stocksberger Str. 14 - Werkstatt - Fenster mit Hopfenranken (1).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:32:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info Window in a former joinery workshop in Billensbach, Beilstein, Württemberg, Germany. Hop has grown through another, broken window into the workshop and has draped its tendrils before this window. All by -- Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is certainly a matter of taste. I liked the little confusion created by the plants growing inside of the window while we are looking out, I love the contrast between the pretty curves of the hop vines and the (almost) rectangular window, and the image gives a friendly, but consistent impression of rural decay. -- Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Excellent idea. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support In addition to its composition, the scene captivates through nice backlighting, highlighting the beauty of transience. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Benji 22:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as suggested here, per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 08:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
- Info Mandelbox variant covered by fog illuminated by three different colored light sources, motif and settings by Krzysztof Marczak, tweaks by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 08:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Would make a great cover image for a textbook about mathematics for advanced learners. Who dares to say that math is boring … ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- If this image helps to render mathematics more interesting, it's the way to go :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Something different. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Spondylus imperialis
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 07:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive shell, impressive and very educative representation. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Different sizes? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info No, the diameter of the valves themselves is the same (height 3.3 cm (without spines) in both, see description), but the spines have different lengths. --Llez (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Better if the images make them look the same size. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info No, the diameter of the valves themselves is the same (height 3.3 cm (without spines) in both, see description), but the spines have different lengths. --Llez (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Convincing and educative, as always with your beautiful shell pictures. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special shape -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 02:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
- Info: the Mismaloya Arches, Puerto Vallarta; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, not enough "wow" for FP in my opinion, and the picture isn't really sharp. --Benji 22:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 21:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think the photo needs perspective correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not outstanding enough for me for FP, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs perspective correction but, sorry, although the building is nice, I don't think the light or composition are FP even after perspective correction. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, there is nothing featurable here. Strong tilt, lacks of perspective cotrrection, detail level not the best,...Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Please could you read Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:مستشفى بن صميم من الداخل.jpg and stop nominating pictures that fail at QIC? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 19:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovakia
- Info The Sitno Peak in Central Slovakia, see from north-northeast. Created and uploaded by Michalsmr, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love this wonderful late fall/early winter scene. Some of the trees are still showing their last reddish-brown leaves, the first snow is shining on the ground and the higher treetops, and the warm morning sun bathes the eastern (left) slope of the mountain in a glowing, warm light that emphasizes the contours. The contrast with the bluish shadows on the western (right) slope of the mountain lends depth to the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 16:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
- Info Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Aristeas, for me a dealbreaker. I'd support when fixed. Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great photo and good light. But maybe slightly tilted? Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, the light is nice in a part of it but the shadowed area, which is more than half of the image sp,oils it. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Vorarlberg
- Info created by Böhringer Friedrich - uploaded by Böhringer Friedrich - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Amazing mood and good composition but IMO oversharpening and JPEG artefacts preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 05:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
- Info created and uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by SHB2000 - SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great to see a 20 year old panoramic image in such good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good viewpoint/perspective: that the lighthouse appear so small between them makes the rocks even more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per other voters.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but there is some cw tilt Poco a poco (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 20:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Ostraciidae
- Info Front view of a female boxfish (Ostracion cyanurus), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. Ostracion cyanurus has a maximum published total length of 15 centimetres (5.9 in) and is found in the Western Indian Ocean where it occurs in the Red Sea and around the Arabian Peninsula into the Persian Gulf as far east as eastern Iran. This species is found in areas where there is a moderate growth of coral at depths between 5 and 50 metres (16 and 164 ft). Ostracion cyanurus is a solitary species which remains in the vicinity of shelter. The apparent lack of smaller males may mean that this species is protogynous (sequential hermaphroditism). If the bluetail trunkfish senses danger is releases a toxin called pahutoxin, or ostracotoxin, into the water as a defence. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support How poisonous is the toxin? Cmao20 (talk) 03:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Around 2ppm.--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've read that it can kill other fishes and even themselves but if you ask me about the impact on humans, I cannot tell you. This fish is in the menu of countries like Singapore and I've read concerns about that (in the case the toxin is generated just prior to the dwath of the fish) but I've no details. Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Remembers me this one --Llez (talk) 13:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, but this guy is free like a bird...Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photos by Giles Laurent
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 12:10:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak) and staying static
-
Walking all together as a group in the same direction while turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak)
-
Doing a courbette
-
Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings
-
Rinsing the foot in water and then scratch the head with it
-
Kissing
-
Mix of different moves: singing while turning their head from left to right + pointing head to the sky and spreading wings + a kiss
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info During the mating season, Greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) always express the above photographed courtship display. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not aligned with the criterias for a set. You could go on and add 10 more Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- According to FPC rules, sets can be used to showcase "a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same)".
- These pictures are litterally steps of a dance all part of the courtship display of the greater flamingo. The courtship display moves are not infinite. A good proportion of the courtship display steps are included in this one so "adding 10 more" wouldn't be possible. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be many hours between images 1 and 2. Giles, I don't think that's what 'the passage of time' is meant to mean. There are a large number of elements of courtship display.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- The FPC rules explicitely say that it could be different times of the day. So the picture number 2 is perfectly adequate. Also, I could have chosen this image as image number 2 but I prefer the actual one because you better see the movement being done with the feets splashing the water. This is wildlife and not human choreography. The animals do their courtship display and you can't ask them to do it just for the camera. Since they are often packed you will many times find yourself having other distracting flamingos in front of the one doing one of the steps of the courtship display. So waiting to have one subject isolated enough from the others to have a perfect capture of the courtship display step needs some time that can't be avoided.
- According to your article there are 11 courtship display moves. According to the information displayed on big signs in the Camargue there are less moves. In any case the moves that I posted on this set are the main ones that you will see. If you really want to see the preening you can see it here but I won't add it as it's less representative of the courtship display. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be many hours between images 1 and 2. Giles, I don't think that's what 'the passage of time' is meant to mean. There are a large number of elements of courtship display.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Several pictures could become FP, but I also don't think this selection meets the criteria of a set. The compositions are too different from each other. Some birds are alone while others are in group. The "passage of time" is not explicit. Moreover, the bird in "Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings" has the feet cropped out, while in a set all the pictures should be FP-level. I would recommend to renominate some images separately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment Basile. Eventhough the usual set nomination we see on FPC has similar composition across the images, FPC rules never asked for it. All the image needs is to fulfill two conditions : 1) "group of images that are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set" ; 2) fall into at least one of the following types : a) Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set ; b) a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. ; c) A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible ; d) A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object.
- In this case the thematical connection is obvious : it's the courtship display. As for the categories it can fall both in category b) and d). None of the above rules explicitely require to have the exact same composition on each image. On the opposite, for all categories it is possible to imagine different compositions across the images. I also personnaly think it's more interesting in a case like this one to have different compositions to have more diversity.
- As for the birds, they were all photographed while being in a group. I just waited patiently the perfect moment to have subjects a bit on the edge of the group in order to have an unobstructed view without disturbing elements in the middle of the frame.
- As for this picture having cropped feet I understand it would have been preferable to have uncropped feet but the movement is so quick (1 to 2 seconds) and you're often looking at something else that the time needed to point at the right direction don't always let enough time to zoom out. I also feel that the perfectly centered flamingo has a wow effect that overweights the cropped feet. Anyway, if you think it's a better one, I just removed that picture and replaced it with this one that has uncropped feet -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per reasonning in the alternative below -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]-
Turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak) and staying static
-
Walking all together as a group in the same direction while turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak)
-
Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings
-
Kissing
-
Mix of different moves: singing while turning their head from left to right + pointing head to the sky and spreading wings + a kiss
- Info Here's an alternative version with similar composition across the images, all photographed at the same place in a small 30 minutes window. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support both versions -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support If the photo sets don't pass, I would give the kissing image alone another try. I think this might be worth it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, Giles. Again, I'm sorry, but this is randomed and not valid as a set. Yes, the kissing one is great it would be a solid FP to me but not this Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- There is absolutely nothing random in this set. These are all the most common courtship display moves that can be seen every time during the courtship display. Also, as already explained on my comments above, there is nothing invalid with this set. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a valid set according to the guidelines, sorry. I don't see a "passage of time" between these images, except they are all taken at different minutes of the day (of course, like all pictures). These photos are too much unconnected to each other. For example the "kissing" birds has a totally different framing from others. Where is the passage of time? Where are the other 10 birds? Like Poco and PantheraLeo1359531, I agree some of these images could become FP if nominated separately. But at the difference of dance steps, for example, where the solo or duo dancers are supposed to remain the same all the time during the dance show, here we see groups of birds of different sizes, sometimes cropped out (#2 and #3) sometimes not cropped (#1 and #5), sometimes just a pair {#4). Imagine nominators proposing such "passage of time" for all the image sessions they live everywhere, and all the subjects, like vehicles, weather, sports, etc. Example an elephant in the water, then three elephants walking the same day, then 10 elephants eating, plus another shot with a mahout, etc., and finally all the pictures. Of course, there's always a "passage of time", but this wouldn't make a valid set. And I don't think you'll find such nominations in the archives. Some pictures look similar (#1, #2, #3, #5), but others can work separately as individual FPs. Please try to select the finest -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Wooden staircase steps in the forest of Hallasan Park Eorimok Trail at dusk on Jeju Island in South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 01:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fog creates a wonderful atmosphere. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 11:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rbrechko. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rbrechko, and I love these old wooden steps. – Aristeas (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 21:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
- Info A different look at the tui. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 06:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 18:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria
- Info North side of Hochosterwitz Castle, municipality of Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
- Info created by Agnes Monkelbaan - uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting facade -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for posting my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming indeed --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch Poco a poco (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Turkey
- Info Interior view of the main domes of the Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey. The officially known as Sultan Ahmed Mosque is one of the most iconic and popular monuments of Ottoman architecture. It was constructed between 1609 and 1617 during the rule of Ahmed I and remains a functioning mosque today. It is decorated with thousands of Iznik tiles and painted floral motifs in predominantly blue colours, which give the mosque its popular name. The Blue Mosque, included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list in 1985, was built next to the former Hippodrome and stands across from the Hagia Sophia, another popular tourist site. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Obviously amazing. Hope to see lots more of your Turkish photos. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Cmao20: all of them are online now, here probably the best of them, if you want to have a look :) Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Lots of good candidates here. This is particularly amazing! Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great architecure, very good framing and quality. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing place, very good quality, perfect framing. --Benji 22:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
- Info created by Tareq Uddin Ahmed - uploaded by ImamAnik - nominated by ImamAnik -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- John Harrison's image from 11 years ago is better, even without the benefits of today's processing software. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- All I was suggesting is that we shouldn't promote an inferior image if there is a much better one around... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice species but the level of detail is not what I expect here Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Morning view on old castle bridge in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The light in lanterns is turned off, there is only light from the low sun that has recently risen. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20; I love how the bridge seems to disappear in the haze. – Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Like the lyrical quality of this image. Suggest you add your comment about the lantern light as useful information in the image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Superb and striking motif and composition. A potential Picture of the Year candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice image as usual, but what bothers me a bit is that the large column is clearly to the right of the center.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae
- Info created by Stu's Images - uploaded by Stu's Images - nominated by Stu's Images -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Georgia
- Info created by David Osipov - uploaded by David Osipov - nominated by David Osipov. -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info
- Support -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Difficult light, lack of wow, not working compo Poco a poco (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great scenery but I think the composition feels quite unbalanced. I'd like to see less of that dull hill and more of what's on the left of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 15:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info created by PaestumPaestum - uploaded by PaestumPaestum - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Straight, but interesting composition; looks a bit boring as thumbnail, but works much better in full size. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Of historical significance but IMO not enought wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Geocoding would be helpful --Llez (talk) 13:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Llez, done. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 11:08:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Ocypodidae_(Ghost_Crabs_and_Fiddler_Crabs)
- Info Pallid ghost crab (Ocypode pallidula) emerging from burrow, Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu, India. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Just taken at the right time. Yann (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Serbia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed and atmospheric Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The WB feels off Poco a poco (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that, but it doesn't explain the greenish cast Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Similar to this FP, but the time of day gives the castle a totally different appearance; the existing FP may have higher educational value, but this photo has a more interesting mood and is IMHO more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support What is the light near the tower? — Yann (talk) 22:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yann; this is a spotlight fixed on the site. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition, well framed, and the patterns in the pavement are cool. The grey-blue light wouldn't normally work but for greyish stone architecture I think it actually works quite well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Cmao20 on composition and light/colours. For me, this square somehow resembles a theater set, the framing gives it a special impressiveness. – Aristeas (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really well executed composition in adverse lighting conditions. Terragio67 (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)
- Info On the Meridian (~International Date Line), so the photo may have been taken the day before! All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Isn't there a bit of blue fringing though? Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; but I was too late. Thanks, Wilfredo, for the edit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well captured in flight. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by TonyTheTiger - uploaded by TonyTheTiger - nominated by TonyTheTiger. This is the first contribution using exposure w:bracketing and w:compositing by this editor. This images is one of two extracted from File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and cropped.jpg, which is an exposure bracketed picture composited on October 4, 2024 in Canon Digital Photo Professional 4.19.10.0 from two Raw file images taken on September 20, 2024. The best two other attempts at compositing that were made from the same exposure bracketed sequence have also been uploaded:File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg and File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0341-0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg.-- TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info This is a solar w:diffraction spike in the context of an w:urban canyon (Avenue canyon per the article) at the golden hour. The canyon has a foreground with an intersection that features part of the w:National Register of Historic Places -listed w:Hotel Del Prado on the left diagonally across the street from part of the National Register of Historic Places-listed w:East Park Towers on the right. This composition of the canyon includes the top of the Chicago Landmark w:Hyde Park–Kenwood National Bank Building off in the distance on the left.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info The 2024 Fall Equinox in Chicago fell on September 22 and both September 22 and 23 were days in which the sunrise and sunset on east-west streets occurred in the middle of the street (days known as Chicagohenge).-TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support On WP:FPC, I believe that I did not prioritize the diffraction spike in the uses until after a lot of people had decided it was not intriguing based on the wrong set of uses. Hoping for better luck here focusing on what I feel is a splendid diffraction spike.TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- User:Sebring12Hrs, I am not sure how to read crop isn't very good in a way that would help me improve this submission or future compositions. Is it possible you could be a little more instructive as I aspire to be better.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but while the light is nice I find the composition cluttered and not sufficiently interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 (HW-361) at the Royal International Air Tattoo 2024. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality. It's nice to see the interior with the guy checking his Facebook notifications :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. Nice contrast between the red/white colours of the airplane and the blue sky. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 05:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
- Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I also like the evening light very much Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Funny enough I like (besides the special evening light) exactly that silhouette of a tree at the right; somehow it makes the composition special to me. The dark areas are rather noisy, yes, but because they have rightly been kept dark this does not degrade the overall impression too much. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 04:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Crop at the left and right not working for me, it also looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: I've uploaded a version with more fields at the bottom. Do you think this is worth nominating as an alternative? --Tagooty (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Those are at the edges of the frame, cannot be fixed now. Thanks for the review. Tagooty (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Left crop (and maybe also the right one) could be more satisfying, but the composition still works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The disturbing dust spots should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Ermell: Thanks for pointing this out. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit small, but great composition and mood Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch! :) I made some improvements, I hope they are fine with you --Poco a poco (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure, nice composition and colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:30:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info The rugged, rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque, with the sun setting behind the steep walls, leaving the last rays of direct sunlight (penumbra, almost complete eclipse). Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the grey sky will mean that people struggle to warm up this one, but I like it. I appreciate how it breaks compositional rules by not really having much of a sky at all. The clear, bright reflections in the water are nice. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat light and dull colors, burnt sky with blown highlights and no wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Reluctantly Oppose per Basile Morin as there are some good characteristics here. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 05:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Remnants of a water system in the Moselle at the Alter Krahn in Trier (Germany) (Silent witness like a still life from the past.)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great colours but I miss an outstanding composition. I wonder whether a more close up photo that more prominently features the textures on the rusted metal would be more interesting Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your comment. I have posted an alternative version.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Support --Llez (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: You write under this photo (nothing special). I think this is an assumption. It should be: (I find nothing special about this photo). Another voter may look at this photo very differently. When I look at the photo, I see an economically written-off object that has been embraced by nature over the years. It has become one with the environment. The earth colours merge seamlessly into each other. Art and nature have met each other by chance here. How beautiful can it be?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- All reviews are subjective -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with you. If a photo is clearly out of focus, then that is the case, because everyone can see that. If you find the photo (Nothing special), then that only applies to you and there may be other opinions about it. Then I think you should mention that it is (your opinion). Otherwise you are doing the photographer an injustice.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Out of focus" is a subjective opinion too. We all are individuals. Each person shares subjective reviews. Some people write "no wow", some people write "too ordinary", some people write "I miss something", etc. To help the photographers to face negative feelings, we usually write "sorry" as a courtesy formula. Here the subject looks like a standard pipe. These conventional objects are not rare in the countrysides of the world. The dead branches are not spectacular either. They make the composition cluttered. And I think the top-down view is not uncommon, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks everyone for the comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 00:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande hot spring, Caldeiras das Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 08:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment similar image already featured -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- I believe this is distinct enough in terms of subject and composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree, very different from existing FP Cmao20 (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not convinced about the compo. I've to say that I was there and couldn't either manage a great shot, Poco a poco (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Regretfully Oppose per George Chernilevsky. IMHO existing FP is better. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral: The patch of sunlight brings the necessary asymmetry to the photo --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC) changed to neutral after uploading new version --Superbass (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
- If one changes an image during the process of voting and the changes are very minor and uncontroversial (e.g., some dust spots have been fixed), we usually add a simple comment to the nomination saying that this or that has been fixed.
- If the changes are of intermediate importance, e.g. when the crop has been changed a little bit (like in this example) or when the exposure has been changed to a small degree, we usually add a comment and ping all previous voters to inform them about the change (the {{Ping}} template is useful for that purpose).
- If the changes are more important, e.g. when there has been a big change of the crop or a new development from the raw image file, or when one wants to propose a different exposure from the same photo session, it is advisable to upload that new version as a new file (under a new filename) and to add it to the nomination as an ‘Alternative’ image (see the “Formal things” box at the head of this page).
- If one wants to propose a completely different photo (even of the same subject), a separate nomination is necesssary.
- Hope this helps, – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. So I'd suggest, @Dirtsc uses the version he/she prefers and briefly notifies those who voted while another version was visible. So far, no one seems to be taking the change as an opportunity to vote pro instead of con or vice versa. Superbass (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
- CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sorry, my question about the possibility to improve the symmetry was not meant to spoil the nomination; it was just a question or suggestion. Personally I would still be happier about this photo of a very symmetric interior if the photo was completely symmetric, too (by the way, this is not my hobby horse, but a common idea often expressed on this page). But I agree that the photo is also attractive as it is, especially, as Moroder has rightly emphasized, the light spot brings some magic into the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ermell, the sun spot doesn't bring magic to this scene in my opinion. (and by the way, horizontal PC would be welcome, horizontal lines aren't parallel and I think they should in a symetric composition) --Benji 22:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful, but per Ermell. I think this one is okay because it's nearly sharp and quite high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not as sharp as I'd like everywhere, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)