Commons:Kandidatët për fotografi të shkëlqyeshme
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Në gjuhë tjera : Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文（中国大陆） | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
Në këtë faqe gjeni fotografit të cilat përdoruesit e projektit i vlerësojnë si të shkëlqyeshme dhe për këtë arsye i kanë propozuar që ato të futen në Galerinë Fotografi të Shkëlqyeshme.
VOTO!
Vini Re!: Votimi nuk është për Figurën e ditës!
Rrjedha
[edit]Fotografit e propozuara
[edit]Nëse ke hasur në jë fotografi që ty të pëlqen përdore këtë stampë për ta regjistruar atë! Për një gjë të tillë nuk nevojitet të kesh konto në Commons, propozimet nga kalimtarët janë të mirëseardhura.
Në rast suksesi, sigurohu që ajo fotografi ka edhe një përshkrim të shkëlqyeshëm dhe disponon Licencë
Votimi
[edit]Rregullat e votimit:
- Kohë zgjatja e votimit është 9 ditë. Ditën e 10 vendoset për rezultatin - Nëse një fotografi nuk merr asnjë votë "PRO" brenda 5 ditëve mund të tërhiqet brenda afatit - Propozimet nga Adresat IP janë të mirëseardhura - Diskutimet dhe vërejtjet nga Adresat IP janë të mirëseardhura - Votat e Adresat IP nuk numërohen - Propozimi nuk numërohet si votë por propozuesi ka drejtë votimi - Propozuesi mund të tërheq nga votimi fotografin e propozuar nga ai
Fotografia e propozuar mund të futet në Galerinë Fotografi të Shkëlqyeshme nëse plotëson këto kushte:
- Licencë të pa diskutueshme - Së paku 5 vota "PËR" ("Support") - Proporcioni PËR/KUNDËR i votave duhet të jetë së paku 2/1 (d.m.th së paku 67% apo 2/3 e votuesve të jen PËR)
Kandidatët
[edit]Votimi bëhet me "{{Pro}}" ose "{{Kontra}}", abstenimi "{{Neutral}}". Këtu vendosë një kandidatë
Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 21:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A different look at the tui. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 18:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria
- Info North side of Hochosterwitz Castle, municipality of Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
- Info created by Agnes Monkelbaan - uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Turkey
- Info Interior view of the main domes of the Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey. The officially known as Sultan Ahmed Mosque is one of the most iconic and popular monuments of Ottoman architecture. It was constructed between 1609 and 1617 during the rule of Ahmed I and remains a functioning mosque today. It is decorated with thousands of Iznik tiles and painted floral motifs in predominantly blue colours, which give the mosque its popular name. The Blue Mosque, included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list in 1985, was built next to the former Hippodrome and stands across from the Hagia Sophia, another popular tourist site. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Obviously amazing. Hope to see lots more of your Turkish photos. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Cmao20: all of them are online now, here probably the best of them, if you want to have a look :) Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great architecure, very good framing and quality. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
- Info created by Tareq Uddin Ahmed - uploaded by ImamAnik - nominated by ImamAnik -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- John Harrison's image from 11 years ago is better, even without the benefits of today's processing software. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- All I was suggesting is that we shouldn't promote an inferior image if there is a much better one around... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Morning view on old castle bridge in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The light in lanterns is turned off, there is only light from the low sun that has recently risen. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20; I love how the bridge seems to disappear in the haze. – Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Strong support Superb and striking motif and composition. A potential Picture of the Year candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae
- Info created by Stu's Images - uploaded by Stu's Images - nominated by Stu's Images -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Georgia
- Info created by David Osipov - uploaded by David Osipov - nominated by David Osipov. -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info
- Support -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Difficult light, lack of wow, not working compo Poco a poco (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)- Oppose Great scenery but I think the composition feels quite unbalanced. I'd like to see less of that dull hill and more of what's on the left of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 15:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info created by PaestumPaestum - uploaded by PaestumPaestum - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Straight, but interesting composition; looks a bit boring as thumbnail, but works much better in full size. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 11:08:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Ocypodidae_(Ghost_Crabs_and_Fiddler_Crabs)
- Info Pallid ghost crab (Ocypode pallidula) emerging from burrow, Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu, India. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Just taken at the right time. Yann (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Serbia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)- Support Well composed and atmospheric Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment The WB feels off Poco a poco (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that, but it doesn't explain the greenish cast Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Similar to this FP, but the time of day gives the castle a totally different appearance; the existing FP may have higher educational value, but this photo has a more interesting mood and is IMHO more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition, well framed, and the patterns in the pavement are cool. The grey-blue light wouldn't normally work but for greyish stone architecture I think it actually works quite well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Cmao20 on composition and light/colours. For me, this square somehow resembles a theater set, the framing gives it a special impressiveness. – Aristeas (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)
- Info On the Meridian (~International Date Line), so the photo may have been taken the day before! All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Isn't there a bit of blue fringing though? Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; but I was too late. Thanks, Wilfredo, for the edit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well captured in flight. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by TonyTheTiger - uploaded by TonyTheTiger - nominated by TonyTheTiger. This is the first contribution using exposure w:bracketing and w:compositing by this editor. This images is one of two extracted from File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and cropped.jpg, which is an exposure bracketed picture composited on October 4, 2024 in Canon Digital Photo Professional 4.19.10.0 from two Raw file images taken on September 20, 2024. The best two other attempts at compositing that were made from the same exposure bracketed sequence have also been uploaded:File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg and File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0341-0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg.-- TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info This is a solar w:diffraction spike in the context of an w:urban canyon (Avenue canyon per the article) at the golden hour. The canyon has a foreground with an intersection that features part of the w:National Register of Historic Places -listed w:Hotel Del Prado on the left diagonally across the street from part of the National Register of Historic Places-listed w:East Park Towers on the right. This composition of the canyon includes the top of the Chicago Landmark w:Hyde Park–Kenwood National Bank Building off in the distance on the left.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info The 2024 Fall Equinox in Chicago fell on September 22 and both September 22 and 23 were days in which the sunrise and sunset on east-west streets occurred in the middle of the street (days known as Chicagohenge).-TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support On WP:FPC, I believe that I did not prioritize the diffraction spike in the uses until after a lot of people had decided it was not intriguing based on the wrong set of uses. Hoping for better luck here focusing on what I feel is a splendid diffraction spike.TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- User:Sebring12Hrs, I am not sure how to read crop isn't very good in a way that would help me improve this submission or future compositions. Is it possible you could be a little more instructive as I aspire to be better.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but while the light is nice I find the composition cluttered and not sufficiently interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 (HW-361) at the Royal International Air Tattoo 2024. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality. It's nice to see the interior with the guy checking his Facebook notifications :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. Nice contrast between the red/white colours of the airplane and the blue sky. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 05:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
- Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I also like the evening light very much Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)- Weak support Funny enough I like (besides the special evening light) exactly that silhouette of a tree at the right; somehow it makes the composition special to me. The dark areas are rather noisy, yes, but because they have rightly been kept dark this does not degrade the overall impression too much. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 04:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Crop at the left and right not working for me, it also looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Left crop (and maybe also the right one) could be more satisfying, but the composition still works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The disturbing dust spots should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit small, but great composition and mood Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1920-1929
- Info created by Ansel Adams, restored and uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
- Info Monolith, Yosemite National Park, California, by Ansel Adams, 1927. Gelatin silver print.
- Support Notable photograph. -- Yann (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent restoration of one of the classic black-and-white scenery image that has stood the test of time. --Tagooty (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nominating this famous work, Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch! :) I made some improvements, I hope they are fine with you --Poco a poco (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure, nice composition and colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 17:38:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae_(Tyrant_Flycatchers)
- Info Western kingbird (Tyrannus verticalis). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, satisfying picture Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp, good light, posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info The Zagedan lakes are of ancient glacial origin. They are surrounded by rock formations in a mountain cirque, a typical ancient glacial landform in the Caucasus Mountains. The glacier retreated about 11,000 years ago, leaving behind the landscape we see today. Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unique view, perfectly captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition, though the greens seem over-saturated. --Tagooty (talk) 05:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:30:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info The rugged, rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque, with the sun setting behind the steep walls, leaving the last rays of direct sunlight (penumbra, almost complete eclipse). Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the grey sky will mean that people struggle to warm up this one, but I like it. I appreciate how it breaks compositional rules by not really having much of a sky at all. The clear, bright reflections in the water are nice. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat light and dull colors, burnt sky with blown highlights and no wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 22:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_Kingdom
- Info Detail of Big Ben on the newly restored Elizabeth tower. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Existing FPs of the tower or Big Ben: Full tower, 2, 3, Clock face (all pre-restoration). — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail and sharpness, esp. when we consider that this was taken at 500mm focal length. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gutes Foto, kann man nüscht sagen --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 10:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
- Info Large blue wood bee on a marigold flower. Focus stacked from 15 images. All by -- Ermell (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality and very impressive with good light, vivid colours, the bits of pollen all over the body of the wood bee, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Can you explain how you take 15 photos on a shy living object in a maybe windy surrounding? -- -donald- (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- I can tell you that, even with no wind, bumble bees are extraordinarily difficult to capture like this. The focus-stacking software actually compensates for the flower moving in the wind or the photographer moving. The skill here is in capturing a moment when the bee was still. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Charles is right. I took 12 series of 20 pictures, one of which was usable. The fact that the camera can take over 100 pictures per second is very helpful. Of course I also used a tripod..--Ermell (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wow! I dream about 100 pictures/second. No wonder I struggle with bees. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning. Aristeas has put everything in a nutshell. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 15:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 00:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow, stunning focus and DoF. Nice light and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support per Aristeas' and Charles' points. Extraordinary and very difficult image, and, what's more, a very good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 08:25:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 08:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 08:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Strong symbolic meaning. One of my favorites from WLM Germany this year. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The darkness/light contrast makes this photo beautiful and a bit mysterious. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's mysterious on the site. We were there several times and two photo sessions were in almost complete darkness. Only a few parts are lit, including the interior of the bunker, which can be seen in the photo. --XRay 💬 14:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 01:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good light, quality and composition. The pattern is a bit reminiscent of some of our great pictures of traditional Korean and Japanese architecture.--ArildV (talk) 10:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 07:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info Personally, I like the lighting and the cloudy sky in this northwest view of the Doberan Minster. From this location, the building appears clear only in winter, as the leafy trees obscure the view too much in summer. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and tranquil scenery with nice light emphasizing the facade of the Minster. This place can be very crowded, so it’s great to see the Minster without an irritating host of tourists. – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 07:34:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional_camera_movement_(ICM)
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Let me say a few words about the photo. Photographic art is always a matter of different opinions, but I would still like to nominate a photo here. It is a photo from a series of several photos. In each case, the basis was an illuminated Ferris wheel. The chaotic-looking image was created through the interplay of several shooting techniques: ICM (Intentional Camera Movement) and multiple exposures. The camera was moved in one direction on each of the 5 exposures, but in 5 different directions. The combination of the rotational movement of the Ferris wheel, the play of colors of the Ferris wheel and the linear movement of the camera results in this image. Although this type of shot produces similar photos, the result cannot actually be recreated or controlled. This is a special feature of the ICM technique. -- XRay 💬 07:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 07:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive and fascinating work. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice and good. Yann (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, an excellent example for the potential of these creative techniques. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Innovative and an impressive result. POTY finalist? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting work. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 06:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Riodinidae (Metalmarks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A fascinating macro photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for the size -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 08:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support An information about the size in the description would be useful --Llez (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is cool Poco a poco (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 21:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 05:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Remnants of a water system in the Moselle at the Alter Krahn in Trier (Germany) (Silent witness like a still life from the past.)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great colours but I miss an outstanding composition. I wonder whether a more close up photo that more prominently features the textures on the rusted metal would be more interesting Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your comment. I have posted an alternative version.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: You write under this photo (nothing special). I think this is an assumption. It should be: (I find nothing special about this photo). Another voter may look at this photo very differently. When I look at the photo, I see an economically written-off object that has been embraced by nature over the years. It has become one with the environment. The earth colours merge seamlessly into each other. Art and nature have met each other by chance here. How beautiful can it be?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- All reviews are subjective -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with you. If a photo is clearly out of focus, then that is the case, because everyone can see that. If you find the photo (Nothing special), then that only applies to you and there may be other opinions about it. Then I think you should mention that it is (your opinion). Otherwise you are doing the photographer an injustice.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Out of focus" is a subjective opinion too. We all are individuals. Each person shares subjective reviews. Some people write "no wow", some people write "too ordinary", some people write "I miss something", etc. To help the photographers to face negative feelings, we usually write "sorry" as a courtesy formula. Here the subject looks like a standard pipe. These conventional objects are not rare in the countrysides of the world. The dead branches are not spectacular either. They make the composition cluttered. And I think the top-down view is not uncommon, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 00:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande hot spring, Caldeiras das Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 08:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment similar image already featured -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- I believe this is distinct enough in terms of subject and composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree, very different from existing FP Cmao20 (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not convinced about the compo. I've to say that I was there and couldn't either manage a great shot, Poco a poco (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 21:19:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support As the nominator --Superbass (talk) 07:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful night cityscape, good composition. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition, pleasant lighting mood. The artificial rainbow makes this image special. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:50, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting: A "straight" Rain"bow" ;-) --Llez (talk) 09:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 19:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
- Info Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak Support The crop is a bit tight. Yann (talk) 08:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yann: Cropped improved, thank you --Poco a poco (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely better. Yann (talk) 20:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic resolution and quality. Love how angry he looks Cmao20 (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Probably because I was in his way, I may have been too bold here...Poco a poco (talk) 07:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the improvement, Poco. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 14:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info The picture shows 3 Bavarian Architectural Monuments
Hohenschwangau Castle
This is a photograph of an architectural monument.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-30.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-30.
Hotel Alpenrose
This is a photograph of an architectural monument.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-29.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-29.
Neuschwanstein Castle
This is a photograph of an architectural monument.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-33.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-33.
and 2 Protected Areas
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395500
|
|
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555537966
|
created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Somehow unsharp or high JPG compression. -- -donald- (talk) 07:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW --Llez (talk) 08:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great panorama. The new version is a significant improvement, thank you! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed much better now, beautiful panorama. – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool to see Neuschwanstein from a different angle with a lot more context! Cmao20 (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 11:47:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 23:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very detailed close-up, nice light and smooth background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. Terragio67 (talk) 14:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: The patch of sunlight brings the necessary asymmetry to the photo --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)- Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 08:55:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Uzman Naleer - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – nice composition and atmosphere. —Bruce1eetalk 09:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric, and it’s nice to discover the three kangaroos. Looks a little bit soft at first glance, but it’s just the mist which necessarily creates a soft impression. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The description may be improved. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Very low res, but it's nice... Terragio67 (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful, but per Ermell. I think this one is okay because it's nearly sharp and quite high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
File:004 Greater flamingos walking in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 01:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus, high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support excellent. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support amazing shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 08:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice posture. – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. Terragio67 (talk) 14:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Large milkweed bug (23188).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 20:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods
- Info Large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus). Despite the name, this fellow is about 13mm long. No FPs in this family, it seems (Lygaeidae). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good photo of that small creature. Please use just the gallery page link without a section anchor. If this photo gets promoted, I will add a section for the Lygaeidae family and move the photo to that section. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent! Cmao20 (talk) 02:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Terragio67 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not as sharp as I'd like everywhere, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:PacMan Nebula.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info An emission nebula in the constellation of Cassiopeia. No FPs of this nebula. Not a NASA photo, amateur astrophotography by a Commons user - always makes it more impressive to me, that we have users who can make content of NASA-level quality. created by Cpayoub - uploaded by Cpayoub - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A real talent, see here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- What an equipment! -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure! Yann (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC) 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, great find. No coma, not even in the corners; maybe a little bit of spherical aberration, but it looks just natural here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae
File:Collared lory (Vini solitaria) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
- Info A Fijian endemic. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition. Beautiful red bird and tasty branch, good focus on both, smooth bokeh -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 08:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice compo & colours. --Terragio67 (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Russia
- Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Till Niermann -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks downsampled, but good nonetheless. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. Exceptional landscape that looks almost surreal. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning mix of desert of snow dunes & glaciers, and light & darkness -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it's rather small for a landscape and coming from a 5DII, and there's this other picture which is better IMO and at 45 Mpx: File:Before it rains.jpg --Kadellar (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Two pictures taken one day apart... Till (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The other picture Kadellar links is definitely better, but it's a v different composition from this one Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. IMHO we can (and should) feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info Potocki Palace in Tulchyn (Ukraine) in sunset. All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support White balance seems a little warm to me, but cool architecture and nice composition so deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20
Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20
- Support Pretty good now IMO Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 17:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created by Rbrechko - uploaded by Rbrechko - nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Request A description in English would be appreciated. Captions, too. And more than one category -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Rbrechko (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful contrast between the fine natural structures and vivid green of the trees and the gray geometric shape of the fort. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment an English description will be useful, what about graffiti? no COM:FOP in Russia for artworks and it ruins the picture IMHO Ezarateesteban 16:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- These letters have some art style (not so original IMO, but still). Anyway, it's De minimis for me, while graffiti is an unwanted intrusion here and occupies less than 10% of the frame. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice one, but I think the picture would be better if author stepped back a little. Perspective correction here is borderline — if it would be a bit more building would look unnatural even while all verticals would be vertical. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose There are some interesting elements like the balcony and also the bricked building, but the compo with that grey wall doesn't really work for me. I also expect a minimum of information in every FP nomination to understand what we are looking at Poco a poco (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ludvig14 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition of somewhere with a fascinating history Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry I don't find the structure extraordinary, nor the composition with the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 23:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in black and white
- Info created by Jose Hernandez- uploaded by Shooke - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support restoration based on a very damaged original-- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shooke
(Talk me in spanish, english or italian) 02:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC) - Oppose Blue stamp removed, weird line under "Tacuari", and natural features deleted in comparison with the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Only 1,772 × 2,819 pixels, the resolution is quite low, considering this section aims to select the finest pictures of the website. The subject itself is not spectacular. I believe there are a lot of similar covers on Commons in better conservation state. About the restoration, it has gone too far in my opinion, distorting the original document a little too much (even though the weird line has now been removed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Removing the library stamp is OK, but reconstructing the damaged document not so IMO. More to the point, ordinary old book cover and resolution, so not FP. Yann (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Image is quite beautiful but the left side seems too empty – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the mountain in the distance works. The landscape and the cloudy sky emphasize the striking beauty of the mountain. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The trees in the foreground are distracting. There are better locations for an outstanding image of this mountain range. --Milseburg (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)
[edit]Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26
- Info Same image in higher resolution (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The file name "AS11-40-5877 (21472308758).jpg" does not seem to comply with COM:I. Also a Question: why is the resolution lower at the source on Flickr than on Commons? Has the image been upsampled or is it a display limitation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
_Tiritiri_Matangi_2.jpg){kind=link}
_71.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_flight_Taveuni.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Double-banded_Judy_WLB.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
,_islas_Ad_Dimaniyat,_Omán,_2024-08-13,_DD_69.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Plain_Tawny_Rajah_WLB.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
_on_octopus_tree_(Heptapleurum_actinophyllum)_Colo-I-Suva.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- I agree with a renaming. Image on Fickr is 4,048 × 3,968, so it is not lower resolution. Yann (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Terragio67 (talk) 13:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
- Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks fantastic, thank you! Uploaded and credited. Fernando (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the update! I am very happy that I was able to help solve technical quality issues :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking view and nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the perspective correction looks good in the middle, but it radically warped the shape and degraded the quality of the buildings in the background on the left and right. was the image scaled up with that version, too? If so, it would be better to do the noise correction before trying to scale it up (otherwise we wind up with some big noise). Still weakly supporting because the light and perspective is special. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special light, perspective, and atmosphere. Many thanks to Radomianin for the improvements, too. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support That is amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a dust spot right of the right tower (see note) --Llez (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Please, reduce the noise, on both sides. It's a great picture but I don't understand why that cannot be improved, it is not FP-worthy IMHO. Will happily change to support when done Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Updated version available at SwissTransfer (2): Pinging @Fernando: The denoising should have been done before rescaling to avoid its potentiation on the sides. I re-edited it as best I could. If you are satisfied with the result, please feel free to use it for an update. Thanks to Poco and Rhododendrites for their helpful comments. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Good job, Radomianin, that version looks much better Poco a poco (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
- Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Nikride (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Vote removed: I'm very sorry, but the voting period already ended at 13:53 (UTC) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain