Commons:特色圖片候選

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

跳轉至評選區

特色圖片評選

歡迎來到特色圖片評選！社群將在此投票決定圖片是否會被選為維基共享資源最優秀的圖片之一，即特色圖片，每日圖片的影象便是從特色圖片中選取的。特色圖片是中文維基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的圖片或圖表。諺語有云：“一畫勝千言。”特色圖片能夠讓條目的內容更加清楚豐富。如果你認為你已經創作或找到了一張可能有價值的影象，請把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后達成了共識，影象就會成功入選。

這裡列出了特色圖片的評選記錄，你也可以在下方檢視按時間順序列出的圖片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020年 、2021年、2022年 以及本月。

關於我們最好的照片的另一個概述，請參閱我們的年度評選。

你可以：

增加一個新提名
查閱影象評估指南
瞭解現在的評選
重申特色圖片
檢視目前的除名
閱覽特色圖片評選標準
參閱目錄

規範

投票週期為10天，之後的投票將無效。
歡迎匿名使用者提名並參與討論。
提名者可以隨時撤回提名。
每個註冊使用者都可以投票，匿名使用者的票將不統計。
如果提名5天后沒有支援票，該提名將以不通過提前結束。
如果提名5天后有至少10個支援票，且沒有反對票，該提名將以通過提前結束。
通過的標準：至少7個支援票，支援票與反對票比例大於2/1。
完成的投票儲存在存檔。
參見投票結束後操作指引。

提名

如果您認為您已經找到或拍攝了一張可能符合標準的影象，並使用了適當的影象描述和版權標記許可，那麼請按照如下步驟操作：

1. 按照括號內的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名影象名稱.jpg）在下方的文字框輸入影象名稱，然後點選“建立新提名”按鈕。

如果本次提名為第n次提名，請按照括號內的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名影象名稱.jpg/2）展開操作。

所有的新圖片集提名頁面都應按照括號內的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）進行。

2. 按照編輯頁面上的說明進行操作並儲存頁面。（注：開啟編輯頁面後，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意為“這裡是候選圖片列表，請將您的提名提交到本節的頂部（在本行後）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意為“不要在本行上方新增新的貼士（除了頂部）”。）

3. 點選此處並按如下格式在圖片候選區的頂端加入新內容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名影象名稱.jpg}}

推薦操作：請COM:FP的列表處新增一個分類。

可選操作：如果您不是影象的建立者，請通知在他/她的討論頁添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括號）。

注意調校你的熒光屏

光暗度

在討論影象的光暗度的時候，投票者有必要知道他們的螢幕顯示有否被適當地調整。不同的螢幕顯示，它們顯示陰影細節的能力亦大有不同。旁邊為一幅畫了四個暗灰色的圓圈的圖片。如果您能辨明其中三個（甚至四個）圈子，那表示你的的螢幕可以正確地顯示陰影細節。如果你只能夠看到三個以下的圈子，你可能需要調整你的螢幕以及/或者電腦顯示設定。一些顯示裝置可能無法被調整至觀察陰影細節的最理想度數，故此請在投票的時候考慮這點。如果可行的話，也可以考慮把它打印出來。

色彩度

在伽瑪調整的螢幕顯示上從幾尺之外觀看右圖，圖中四個不同顏色的圈子會自然混入背景之中。如果他們完全跟背景混合，你則須要調校你的伽瑪設定（在電腦的輸出設定上，而不在於螢幕顯示），直到它們能彼此融合。調校的過程也許會非常困難，然而輕微的偏差並不是致命傷。未能更正的個人電腦顯示通常會顯示出比背景深色的圈子。請注意，在液晶顯示（無論膝上電腦或者平面螢幕）上觀看圖片，你的觀看角度有很大可能影響螢幕上的影象質素。如有需要，請點選影象以獲得更多技術資訊。

Featured picture candidates

File:Flow of time.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 21:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Telescope RC600 of the Caucasian mountain observatory SAI Moscow State University

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Telescopes / Telescope RC600 of the Caucasian mountain observatory SAI Moscow State University
Info created by Nerenisa – uploaded by Nerenisa – nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Закат на побережье Итурупа.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 20:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District / Sea of Okhotsk. Iturup Island.
Info created by Ted.ns – uploaded by Ted.ns – nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonnenhut (Rudbeckia) Raureif-20241201-RM-103828.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 11:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Coneflower (Rudbeckia) with hoarfrost. All by me. -- Ermell (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rolf Kranz (talk) 06:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent focus stacking, and here the hoar frost is word-for-word the icing on the cake ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20190226 FIS NWSC Seefeld Ladies CC 10km Yulia Belorukova 850 3815.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 11:24:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FIS Nordic World Ski Championships Seefeld 2019 - Ladies Cross Country 10km. Yulia Belorukova (RUS).

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_snow_sports
Info created by Granada – uploaded by Granada – nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 11:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I gave this nomination a lot of thought. The athlete is not perfectly sharp, but the photo resolution is big enough for this to not be an issue. The image greatly showcases the dynamics of cross-country finish line "reach out" technique, while having a nice overall composition and good setting without visual clutter (it's hard to have a sporting event image without ever present advertising posters etc). I had a look at hundreds of cross-country photos in Commons and this is one of the best.-- Tupungato (talk) 11:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo. Not really seeing any sharpness issue. Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you @Tupungato very much for the nomination! --Granada (talk) 10:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Expedition 41 Soyuz TMA-13M Landing (201411100033HQ).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 10:21:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Astronaut Max Suraev after 5-month ISS mission, recovered after Soyuz TMA-13M capsule landing

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Soldiers
Info created by NASA/Bill Ingalls – uploaded by Ras67 – nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the dynamism, composition, unique journalistic value. Roskosmos blanket and Soyuz capsule in background are nice touches. I'm aware of chromatic aberration, but support this photo nonetheless. -- Tupungato (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support CA is pretty minor, honestly Cmao20 (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friction d'une allumette.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 11:11:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

High-speed photography - Friction of a match

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Others
Info High-speed photography - Friction of a match. Created by Yann SEGALEN – uploaded by Yann SEGALEN – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 11:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 11:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 11:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fascinating, but it is the match going to burn? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. --Yann (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 08:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin-Kreuzberg, de torens van de Oberbaumbrücke Dm09095168 IMG 5495 2024-09-05 18.10.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 10:41:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Michielverbeek – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice photo, but I'm missing the "wow factor", some additional uniqueness. -- Tupungato (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for me the wow is in the composition with the cyclists providing a sense of dynamism, the nice light, and the interesting architecture. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White tern (Gygis alba candida) in flight Rarotonga 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 09:42:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Gygis
Info No FPs of this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It definitely needs to be brighter. The bright areas of feathers are between 220 and 230 RGB at highest. This should be corrected to higher levels, around 245-250. -- Tupungato (talk) 11:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yes @Tupungato: , I have increased brightness. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would make it even brighter. I looked at the whole thing again and noticed more issues. I added four notes to the image: 2 dust spots, white "ghost" artefacting below the bill/head, and strange patterns in the sky. I especially see the strange patterns in the sky, when trying to brighten the photo to see how it looks. I don't know what's going on there. Was there some serious Clone Brushing / Clone Stamping editing there? Sorry for being so picky. I'm a fellow birdwatcher and it's a better photo than I have ever taken of any moving bird, but still I feel it needs to be slightly better. Tupungato (talk) 12:56, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Have removed the dust spot. Can't see much else wrong actually... Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful simple composition – the bird is exactly at the right position and in the perfect angle. – Aristeas (talk) 11:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ardea cinerea - Grey heron - in a pond of Busan Citizens Park with blue sky in Busan city South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 06:28:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#South Korea
Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, but leaning Weak support – I don't love how my eyes are drawn to the background, which isn't the main subject (the grey heron) and feels rather unsharp, but the foreground is fairly good. That said I'm not sure what can be done about this. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, SHB2000, for your feedback. The background is not spectacular but I find the contrast between natural environment and skyscrapers uncommon compared to what we usually see here. The fact that the park is populated by large birds in total freedom is a local specificity that I find astonishing. As for sharpness, I did my best to optimize it according to the scene including a living being, but perhaps F/13 instead of F/11 would have increased the depth of field. The weather was beautiful that day, and it's a photo I like because it combines two contradictory ideas: nature and urbanization. Like a balance between the two. Landscape connected to megacity, or urbanization with a breath of fresh air in its heart -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator, I find the contrast between nature and urban to be compelling and sensitive. Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. IMHO especially the reflection is advantageous: it brings the background “into” the foreground and connects the buildings with the heron. – Aristeas (talk) 11:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally one expects another background --Llez (talk) 12:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Arrows Formation Duxford Flying Finale 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info Red Arrows fyling the “Tornado” manoeuvre in evening light at the Duxford Flying Finale 2024. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 20:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 20:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's pretty impressive --Superbass (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. bravo. --Gnosis (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SupportCmao20 (talk) 00:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Enjoy the last moments of your planet... But on a documentation level, it's very instructive. Fair composition and good quality. Noticed one vehicle upside down -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lion male.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2024 at 14:21:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info Again, a photo that is different to anything else in the gallery so far. created by Byrdyak – uploaded by Byrdyak – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is a very different composition, but we do already have a yawning lion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very good photo, Charles. But as you say, yours is a very different composition. Cmao20 (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And different light. The open mouth also seems wider here -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Useful profile perspective AND good detail quality. (I know how hard it can be to get such a shot when I try so with my cat🐱). Great job --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support that's a great perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20, Basile, PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dramatic Views of Hurricane Florence from the International Space Station From 9 12 (42828603210) (cropped).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2024 at 04:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An image of a tropical cyclone from space

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
Info created by NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center – uploaded by A1Cafel – cropped by Zzzs – nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 04:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There aren't a lot of featured pictures of tropical cyclones, especially ones taken from the International Space Station (ISS). Most ISS photos of tropical cyclones don't show the entirety of the storm's structure, have a perspective distortion (which sometimes makes the image look flat), were taken at an awkward position, or had lots of distracting elements/interior surroundings. I found this image, which I believe could be a featured picture, since the photo contains most, if not all of the tropical cyclone's structure and was taken at a good position. The image cannot be retaken since the storm in the picture no longer exists. This image is used in the tropical cyclone article on the English Wikipedia (the majority of the time being the one that was uncropped before I changed it to the cropped version), so I believe it implies that it is one of the best images of a tropical cyclone taken from the ISS. Although there is another FP, I don't think it is the best since it does not show all of the tropical cyclones and is of inferior quality in terms of resolution and file size. Although some elements are present in this image and could be distracting, they do determine the image's orientation at the time of imaging and make the image appear less artificial. They obscure little of the tropical cyclone and, in my opinion, do not interfere with the significant encyclopaedic value of the image. I mentioned this image in COM:CRIT right here and it was supported by a single person, so I feel it's ready for FPC. --Zzzs (talk) 04:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and I actually like that you can see parts of the ISS Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cup with a frieze of gazelles MET.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 23:49:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden Cup with a frieze of gazelles, ca. early 1st millennium BCE. Excavated at Marlik, a site southwest of the Caspian Sea in northern Iran.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info created by The Metropolitan Museum of Art – uploaded by Gnosis – nominated by Gnosis -- Gnosis (talk) 23:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gnosis (talk) 23:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The background is too large IMO. A lot of empty space, and the subject in comparison is not huge -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin can crop? --Gnosis (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested crop added (see image note), but only 2700 x 2100 pixels will be too small in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Basile for your recommendation, I ended up cropping the image and is now over 8 million pixels (4 times more than the minimum requirement). Hope this would satisfy other voters. --Gnosis (talk) 01:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now it works for me. A calm and sensitive photo of a beautiful artwork; the soft gray background is IMHO much more tactful than the strong black background often used with such golden artefacts. – Aristeas (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. The resolution is not huge but it is very sharp at full size so I think that's fine Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Valuable museum artwork. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eyershausen Mittelweg sculpture.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 22:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created by KaiBorgeest – uploaded by KaiBorgeest – nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Harsh light and, IMO, not an extraordinary photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The top crop is also tight --Poco a poco (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose per Basile Morin, sorry, but I think this is just too straightforward a presentation and the light is too dull for this subject. QI - and a good quality QI! - but not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It's ok, but there is no "wow" factor needed for Featured. --Tupungato (talk) 12:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:46-203-0009 Pidhirtsi Castle RB 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 17:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dusk autumn scenery near castle in Pidhirtsi, Ukraine.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A tad oversaturated? The sky looks a bit fake -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info This photo have been taken after sunset when the sky had enough light and clouds had specific colors after sunset, but the groud was too dark to take one shot and avoid gaps in shadows and highlights. So I had to use HDR to receive balance in light between the sky and the ground. Maybe this can explain your thoughts about fake sky. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It does look a bit too saturated but then again I think autumn trees can look like this at sunset Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose too oversaturated. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: great composition, and the sky looks natural to me, very similar to what I see in Canada in autumn. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tree on the left spoils the compo IMHO, and yes it looks a bit oversaturated and the WB a bit purpelish Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vesikirp perekonnast Kiivrik (Daphnia).jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 14:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A water flea of genus Daphnia photographed under a microscope using an 8x objective

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae
Info created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 14:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 14:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note added asking about possible stacking errors. Photographer's choice, but I can see more detail when the image is less dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was a small stacking error, yes. I fixed it.

About the light - In general, I like this kind of light (as you have already seen here many times :) ) Janeklass (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Underexposed in my view. But fixable. I agree with Charles. Once brightened, the image becomes more interesting, revealing fine details and less muted colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that honestly all these pictures are underexposed but I'm going to keep supporting them because the details are so interesting and they are pretty difficult, unique photos. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:If you talk too much, this man may die.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 13:15:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

U.S. soldier looks into washroom mirror with sign around it reading "IF YOU TALK TOO MUCH THIS MAN MAY DIE!"

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by U.S. Office of War Information, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support In addition to the historical value, I think that the mirror reflection is very well done here. -- Yann (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- An insect photographer (talk) 14:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed a good photo with a clear and creative implementation of the message. – Aristeas (talk) 16:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting self-reference. If it gets seven supports, this picture may be promoted :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JackDelanolocomotiveshop.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 13:06:52

Info Nearly identical to File:Chicago and Northwestern railroad locomotive shop fsac.1a34676u.jpg, but in lower resolution. That FPC should have been a Delist and Replace. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Yann (talk) 13:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Thi (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Thank you for the delist nomination, Yann! The other version has (besides the higher resolution) also better colours. – Aristeas (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Per above, TY -- (Terragio67) (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Harlock81 (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Karelj — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Zzzs (talk) 00:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --SHB2000 (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orca-Loro-Parque-Show-01-2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 08:09:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orca during a show at Loro Parque in Tenerife

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Delphinidae (Oceanic Dolphins)
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The last orca - after which these shows will end.Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Was it a comment to the photo or to anything else, Charlesjsharp? A user from France added to photo a fews weeks ago to https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orque#Captivit%C3%A9 You can like these kinds of shows or not. However, I see no reason why there shouldn't be well-composed and well-done photos of them on Commons. Perhaps you could use the photo in connection with a critical article about orca shows, if you like. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - No comment on the photo (although the composition is poor, not showing the orca well and obstruction in the foreground); that just that I thought orca shows would have stopped by now. It is more than 30 years after the film Free Willy. I think it's OK to comment on controversial subject at FPC - see this FPC or this one and others featuring children or nudity. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 05:47:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
Info: Aztec Sandstone outcropping in the Valley of Fire. Second nomination - redeveloped to improve fidelity; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calico Hills - panorama.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 05:47:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
Info: Calico Hills panorama. Photo from 2009, so sharpness is admittedly borderline by modern standards. But I feel it still deserves a star based on light and colours. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's quite good, but the different color of the sky (see note) is distracting for me. Is it a stitching error? — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done: fixed; it was some sort of artefact indeed, thanks for the note! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Agree with nomination. Quality is okay but composition + light is really good, happy to see this get the star Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parked bicycle with graffitied building facade and doors in Amsterdam.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 01:06:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The juxtaposition of the traditional architecture to the creative chaos of the graffiti and the leaning bicycle makes this scene attractive and charming. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the composition. --Thi (talk) 10:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Павильон Турецкая Баня 9 6. Екатерининский парк, Пушкин.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 21:17:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great Pond and Turkish Bath pavilion, Catherine park, Pushkin town, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Russia
Info Great Pond and Turkish Bath pavilion in Catherine park, Tsarskoe Selo (now Pushkin town), Saint Petersburg, Russia. UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created & uploaded by Игорь Гордеев – nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely light, crisp reflections Cmao20 (talk) 21:29, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --An insect photographer (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first glance I thought it's by Florstein ;-) --A.Savin 07:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 20:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting scenery, beautiful mirror image -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciudadela, Carcasona, Francia, 2023-01-08, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 20:32:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower of Trésau, fortified city of Carcassonne, France

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
Info Tower of Trésau, fortified city of Carcassonne, France. The medieval citadel is situated on a hill on the right bank of the river Aude. It was restored at the end of the 19th century by the theorist and architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc. In 1997, it was added to the UNESCO list of World Heritage Sites because of its exceptional testimony to the architecture and planning of a medieval fortress town. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, and I like how the slight asymmetry means that the eye is led gently up the steps towards the castle. However, could you do some work on the transition between the arch and the sky to smooth out some of those jagged edges and possibly stop the light bleeding into the stonework so much? Cmao20 (talk) 21:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cmao20: Thank you for your feedback. I gave it a try, please, let me know what you think. Poco a poco (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely improved. Cmao20 (talk) 23:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --An insect photographer (talk) 23:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice framing effect, like an invitation to visit the citadel. – Aristeas (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 18:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC) Composition is very good.[reply]
Support--XRay 💬 18:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --Rbrechko (talk) 18:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cisterna Basílica, Estambul, Turquía, 2024-09-28, DD 58-60 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 20:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Turkey
Info View of the Basilica Cistern, Istanbul, Turkey. The Basilica Cistern, or Cisterna Basilica is the largest of several hundred ancient cisterns that lie beneath the city. This subterranean cistern was called Basilica because it was located under a large public square, the Stoa Basilica, on the First Hill of Constantinople. The cistern, built in the 6th century during the reign of Byzantine emperor Justinian I, provided a water filtration system for the Great Palace of Constantinople and other buildings on the First Hill, and continued to provide water to the Topkapı Palace after the Ottoman conquest in 1453 and into modern times. Today it is kept with little water, for public access inside the space. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I had a look at all your pictures of this place and I think this one is the best because it doesn't have any large distracting elements e.g. modern lights in the foreground, and because of the long sight lines accentuated by the choice of vertical composition. The top is not that sharp but I accept that trade-off for a very high-resolution file, particularly because if it were cropped tighter we'd lose those nice long reflections and the sense of immense space. All in all a very good candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 21:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A unique location and a fantastic photo considering the lighting conditions on site. The reflections are a big plus. Somehow, for me personally, the photo has a bit of an Indiana Jones feel to it :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Are there some coins at the bottom? --Llez (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of coins, no shells, though :) Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--XRay 💬 18:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective composition. --Rbrechko (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rolf Kranz (talk) 12:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) with calf Moorea 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 15:47:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Balaenopteridae (Rorquals)
Info To explain: the female is 15m long, so the camera is much further away and the water reduces clarity. The calf is the one photographed on its own. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but the water is a little too murky for my liking. Wolverine X-eye 18:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I quite understand the comment. The water isn't strictly speaking murky. It is very clean. The problem is the physics of how light behaves underwater. Have a look online at pictures of humpbacks taken from the same distance that show the whole adult animal in profile, you will see they all look like this. It would be possible to mask the whales in post-processing but that would distort real life. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, and per photographer's explanation for apparent lack of clarity. I think the composition is really good. Cmao20 (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. As looking featured pictures taken in the same conditions, it has good resolution and clarity. Also we see a charming family. --An insect photographer (talk) 23:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose This light was far better, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was much closer. Less water between camera and subject. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Less water but more photons? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The views expressed for and against are quite similar to those made over ten years ago when this similar composition was promoted. Should it be delisted? I don't think so. I too have searched for a better image than mine online... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That image is much more clearer, imo. Wolverine X-eye 20:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and there are also many great photos of whales + calf online -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Detail is not good here, compo, lighting, detail is in the other one much better. Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20 and An insect photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The diffraction of the sunlight under the sea imho adds an interesting feature in the composition, even though paid with a lower definition of the whales. Also, the subject of a mother with her calve is extremely valuable. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decagonal Dome of St Gereon's Basilica, Cologne.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 15:01:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info Another great ceiling by T meltzer. For centuries this was the second largest dome in Europe after only the Hagia Sophia. created by T meltzer – uploaded by T meltzer – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo of this beautiful church, especially when we consider that it is difficult to take photos there. 19:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristeas (talk • contribs)
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Truly overwhelming because there are so many details to discover. High quality and a perfectly centered perspective. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 07:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas--Rolf Kranz (talk) 14:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fassade Mark-Twain-Grundschule 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 15:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The façade of the Mark Twain elementary school in Neu-Ulm, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info created and uploaded by ThoBel-0043, nominated by Yann
Info The façade of the Mark Twain elementary school in Neu-Ulm, Germany.
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Terragio67 (talk) 19:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Such stylistic images I like very much. A clear Wow, in my opinion. Thanks for the nomination, Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janeklass (talk) 4:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Great motif. The cobblestones bother me a little. --XRay 💬 18:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 Tour of Slovenia (Stage 3, Tadej Pogačar celebrating victory on Celje Castle v2).jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 13:34:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tadej Pogačar, cyclist on 2022 Tour of Slovenia

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
Info Tadej Pogačar, No.1 ranked UCI cycler. Photo from 2022 Tour of Slovenia. Infobox picture. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 13:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a man showing his teeth. What more can I say? Well, nothing except that this image is not doing for me. Wolverine X-eye 18:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is also a bonus por celebrity here Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:На хвилях.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 13:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order : Poales
Info Close-up of feather grass (Stipa) interspersed with woodland sage (Salvia nemorosa) in the Tarutyns'kyj steppe nature reserve, Ukraine. The filename means something like ‘On the waves’. If a renaming to a more appropriate title should be necessary after the nomination, I would suggest ‘Ковила, Тарутинський степ, Україна’, which means ‘Stipa, Tarutyns'kyj steppe, Ukraine’. Created and uploaded by Максим Яковлєв, nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 13:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this image where the tufts of feather grass look like waves on the ocean. The shallow depth of field accentuates the woodland sage. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice waves. I like this depth of field. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- artistic, almost like a painting Je-str (talk) 16:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rbrechko — Terragio67 (talk) 19:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, delicate, artistic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow it's a beautiful picture. --An insect photographer (talk) 22:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janeklass (talk) 4:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--XRay 💬 18:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps the composition would have worked also with a wider DoF, but this style is different and highlights the purple plants. "On the waves" is a poetic name -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support (Although I agree with Basile.) — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-11-17-Manhattan Bridge Dumbo-0407.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 08:20:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Very classic one: View of the Manhattan Bridge from Washington Street in Brooklyn

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States of America
Info created by Superbass – uploaded by Superbass – nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Superbass (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps you can crop under the lamppost. You won't lose much of the sky. Otherwise the composition works for me. Great light on the bridge, and the little tower fits perfectly into the oval frame at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture of the famous Dumbo scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:03, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A famous view captured under superb, appealing light. Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20; AFAICS the best photo on Commons of this famous place. – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is room for improvement: the cropped light in the top left corner and the off-centered Empire State Building, anyhow, FP to me. Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
because the crop is important to me, I stamped out the lamp very cleanly in a different version. Would it be ok from your point of view to upload this version during the vote on the current version? --Superbass (talk) 12:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine to me and an improvement. I don't believe that would be a dealmaker for anybody here. Poco a poco (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I did that. Superbass (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States of America

File:Van Vorst Park Jersey City November 2021.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 06:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Van Vorst Park, Jersey City

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info created by King of Hearts – uploaded by King of Hearts – nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Those crossings. Especially left-top. I suppose they need some wrap etc. --Mile (talk) 13:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful autumn colours, fascinating perspective like in a game etc. These crossings are indeed odd, but looking at aerial imagery I see the same there, so I guess they are skew in reality, too. – Aristeas (talk) 19:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition --An insect photographer (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United States

File:Aztec Ruins October 2022 HDR 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 06:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Great Kiva, Aztec Ruins National Monument

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
Info created by King of Hearts – uploaded by King of Hearts – nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not convinced here, I see a bit of asymmetry maybe due to difference between natural light at right and artificial light at left or the vanishing point or the windows' position. I don't know how to explain but I'm not fond of the composition, sorry it's not clear why even for me. --An insect photographer (talk) 23:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloem van een Plumbago auriculata. 04-10-2024. (d.j.b).jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 05:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Plumbaginaceae
Info Flower of a Plumbago auriculata. Focus stack of 42 photos.
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, but i would crop above and make it in the center. --Mile (talk) 13:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Weird halo at the top, several technical problems (visible retouching) in the background and on the green leaf, also a focus stacking issue. Images notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Repairs carried out. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Famberhorst, besides the problems Basile pointed out, which I don't think were fully addressed, there's a couple of other issues: i) the blotchy background (on the 'Retouching' tab, use a single source image to paint over the entire background); ii) the blurry areas below the rightmost petal (run a second stack with method C, go to the 'Retouching' tab, select it in the 'Use another output as a source', and paint over this area) Julesvernex2 (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Plumbaginaceae

File:Schönau am Königssee (DE), Königssee, Bootshäuser -- 2024 -- 0982.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2024 at 22:06:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boathouses at the Königssee in Schönau am Königssee in Berchtesgadener Land, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me -- A. Öztas (talk) 22:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A. Öztas (talk) 22:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not convinced this is as sharp as it could be, but the colours, composition, and mood are just outstanding. Artistically this photo really works for me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice thumbnail, but low quality at full resolution. Similar to many other nice pictures we have on Commons, but not "one of the best" in my opinion. The narrow DoF (F/5.6) makes the background blurry, and also the walls. High (2500) ISO reduce the level of detail. Perhaps a tripod would have helped here -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Reasons are similar to Basile's above. Judging from the ISO and timestamp this was taken in low light, yet the WB in the photograph looks like it was shot during the day. Main issue is that the high ISO and subsequent noise reduction have significantly affected the image quality to the extent that it has the appearance of a smartphone image when viewed fullscreen. I agree with Basile that this is nice, but unfortunately not the best of the best. BigDom (talk) 06:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is unfortunately not up to par. Wolverine X-eye 18:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Copenhagen, Kødbyen by night, September 2022.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2024 at 17:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Denmark
Info Kødbyen is a place of companies and activities in Copenhagen (Denmark) related to the meat and food industry, these functions today take up much less space and recently the area has transformed into a new creative cluster with galleries, restaurants, nightlife and small creative activities. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid snowbound.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2024 at 14:00:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Madrid covered with snow during storm Filomena (January 2021)

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#Europe
Info created by European Space Agency: Sentinel-2, uploaded by Up and Go – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting satellite photo with good composition and quality Cmao20 (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:57, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 13:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Only 3000 x 2000 pixels and poor categorization -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Excellent composition and light but per on your other nomination, 6mpx is pretty small and tempers my support. Cmao20 (talk) 02:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough wow, sorry, I would have preferred the light coming from the candles, rather than from windows. Also per my comment above. "Bigorski Monastery" is vague. There are many things in this monastery: bells, doors, paintings, church, stairs, etc. A view from outside is also "Monastery". See COM:CAT. This task is part of COM:I, prerequisite for FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20; I actually like the combination of candles with the light/shadow arches from the windows. Basile rightly emphasizes that description and categories should be refined though. – Aristeas (talk) 15:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Cmao20 and Aristeas --An insect photographer (talk) 23:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:005b Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 13:16:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:52, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this one stand out from the other great shots you took. Good detail but the right crop is difficult Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not a big fan of the right crop, but I believe this image can be an exception. --Zzzs (talk) 00:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Gerald abbey church of Aurillac 16.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 11:02:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chancel in the Saint Gerald abbey church of Aurillac, Cantal, France

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and well framed church interior Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20; good light and colours. Left and right crop are a little bit difficult (I guess there was no better solution), but when viewed in full screen mode the image is impressive and appears as a unit. – Aristeas (talk) 15:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not convinced here, it is cluttered and hard to distinguish the altar from the stained window in the back, also off-centered Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Beautiful picture, just a detail : on the right there is a yellow object a bit distracting at second glance. Is it possible to cropped it ? If not, it's a no for me because every detail is important for FP, sorry. --An insect photographer (talk) 22:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-05-29 Your rainbow panorama at ARoS Aarhus Kunstmuseum (cropped).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 05:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Your rainbow panorama installation by Ólafur Eliasson at the ARoS Art Museum, Aarhus, Denmark

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info Your rainbow panorama installation by Ólafur Eliasson at the ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark. c/u/n by GRDN711 -- GRDN711 (talk) 05:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At the suggestion of another user, have re-cropped this image from the original in a larger size. While still small, IMHO, this image has merit for FP consideration. -- GRDN711 (talk) 05:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMHO it works better now; the image is still not big, but meets our minimum requirements, and the new crop has the advantage that it shows how this installation is located between sky and earth. From this perspective the visitors look like a part of the installation. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small compared with current FPC. Such a resolution is acceptable only for something very special, which could not be photographed again. Yann (talk) 11:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great subject but sorry, I do think 862 pixels high is just too small for an FP in 2024. Cmao20 (talk) 02:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yann, Cmao20 - I welcome your opinions but as listed above, the FP resolution requirement is a minimum of 2 MB (and even less with strong mitigating circumstances). If you want to change FP criteria, that argument goes to a different forum. If you judge this image on its own (taken in 2011 when this rainbow panorama was created) and work through the FP critera at the top of the page, I think you will find it meets all, particularly the last one - value in illustrating the intended, interactive use of an architectural work of art by a significant modern artist. IMHO, it has a little wow too. --GRDN711 (talk) 06:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are many images which would pass in 2011, but not today. We had 10 millions files, and we have now more than 110 M. Sorry, but we can't get back in time. Yann (talk) 09:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the lower limit is 2 megapixels, but in practice, photos of an easily reproducible subject should be much larger. I would not vote for a picture this size unless either it was a technically difficult photograph or it was very difficult or impossible to replace. And it isn't even that sharp even at this small size. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harvesting at Mount Barton, Devon, England, 1942 D10334.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2024 at 20:21:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harvesting at Mount Barton, Devon, England, 1942. Land Girls Joan Day, her sister Ivy, and Iris Andrews help a farmer to transfer stooks of harvested oats into a truck in the sunshine on Hollow Moor, Devon.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info Harvesting at Mount Barton, Devon, England, 1942. Land Girls Joan Day, her sister Ivy, and Iris Andrews help a farmer to transfer stooks of harvested oats into a truck in the sunshine on Hollow Moor, Devon. Artist: Ministry of Information Photo Division Photographer, Wildman Shaw?. This photograph was scanned and released by the Imperial War Museum - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting, and good composition, but low resolution. It is possible to get much higher resolution images in this field: File:Fordson tractor with members of British Women's Land Army 1940s.jpg. Yann (talk) 21:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The resolution is indeed low, but we may allow it as this is a historical image, and it is sharp, with good composition and exposure. It’s also interesting as it represents the official interpretation of the Women’s Land Army especially nicely, giving an impression of cheerful cooperation and leaving out the difficulties and trouble. – Aristeas (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 22:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support (and 7) Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newport Beach Pier by Don Ramey Logan (1) copy.jpg

Note: Cropped, minor vibrance adjustment and file type changed to JPG Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2024 at 16:13:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by -- Don --Don (talk) 20:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Don (talk) 20:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this now. The crop and the adjustment to the saturation have improved it a lot. Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't really love this composition, to be honest. I feel like there's too wide a space on top.--Peulle (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing to say technically, a very good photo but for me this picture hasn't a woaw effect for FP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by An insect photographer (talk • contribs)
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old Jewish cemetery in Cieszyn (Teschen) 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2024 at 15:42:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Poland
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Wonderfully atmospheric and great colours, but a bit small for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Relevant parts of the photo are underexposed, this concerns the gravestones and the tree trunks, where any structure or natural colour is lost in blackness. I recognize the intention to create a gloomy mood, which the picture succeeds in doing. However, in my opinion, this would also be possible without that massive underexposure. As far as I can tell, this is more of a technical issue than a purposeful image design. --Superbass (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The somewhat sinister atmosphere (suitable for such an old cemetery) appeals to me very much.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think that Superbass got a point but the main issue is the resoluation, 6 MPx is nowadays just too low res to me, otherwise nice Poco a poco (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose per Poco a poco --An insect photographer (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice at thumbnail size but at full resolution the narrow depth of field makes the content out of focus. All these blurry leaves are not extraordinary in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco a poco. --Karelj (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:特色圖片候選

規範

提名

注意調校你的熒光屏

光暗度

色彩度

Featured picture candidates

File:JackDelanolocomotiveshop.jpg (delist)

File:2024-11-17-Manhattan Bridge Dumbo-0407.jpg, featured

File:Van Vorst Park Jersey City November 2021.jpg, featured

File:Bloem van een Plumbago auriculata. 04-10-2024. (d.j.b).jpg, featured

Navigation menu

Search