Commons:特色图片评选

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:
Skip to current candidates 跳转至评选区
此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语,如果需要中文交流区,请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区

特色图片评选


欢迎来到特色图片评选!社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一,即特色图片每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻,也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云:“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像,请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识,图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录,你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片:2004年2005年, 2006年2007年2008年2009年2010年2011年2012年2013年2014年2015年2016年2017年2018年2019年2020 以及本月

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述,请参阅我们的年度评选

规范

[edit]
  • 投票周期为10天,之后的投票将无效。
  • 欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
  • 提名者可以随时撤回提名。
  • 每个注册用户都可以投票,匿名用户的票将不统计。
  • 如果提名5天后没有支持票,该提名将提前结束。
  • 通过的标准:至少5个支持票,支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
  • 完成的投票保存在存档
  • 参见投票结束后操作指引

提名

[edit]

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像,并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可,那么请按照如下步骤操作:

1. 按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg)在下方的文本框输入图像名称,然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名,请按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2)展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination)进行。


2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。(注:打开编辑页面后,您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表,请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部(在本行后)”;您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士(除了顶部)”。 )

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区顶端加入新内容:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作:COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作:如果您不是图像的创建者,请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”(不含括号)。

注意,你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当!

[edit]

光暗度

[edit]

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候,投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示,它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个(甚至四个)圈子,那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子,你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数,故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话,也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度

[edit]

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图,图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合,你则须要调校你的伽玛设置(在电脑的输出设置上,而不在于屏幕显示),直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难,然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意,在液晶显示(无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕)上观看图片,你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要,请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 22:01:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Veste Coburg, aerial view

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Raueneck Castle ruins, orthophoto

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:32:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dried hop vines in front of the window of a former carpenter’s workshop in Billensbach, Beilstein, Württemberg

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 08:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mandelbox variant covered by fog illuminated by three different colored light sources
If this image helps to render mathematics more interesting, it's the way to go :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spondylus imperialis

[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 07:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 02:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Los Arcos de Mismaloya

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 21:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Euro Camping Emirates Tourist Center Azrou Ifrane Morocco

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 19:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sitno Peak in Central Slovakia, see from north-northeast

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 16:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ)

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gythio Port, Greece

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tilisuna-Schwarzhorn mountain in Austria

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 05:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gantheaume Point, WA, Australia

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 20:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boxfish (Ostracion cyanurus), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman
  • I've read that it can kill other fishes and even themselves but if you ask me about the impact on humans, I cannot tell you. This fish is in the menu of countries like Singapore and I've read concerns about that (in the case the toxin is generated just prior to the dwath of the fish) but I've no details. Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photos by Giles Laurent

[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 12:10:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
  •  Info During the mating season, Greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) always express the above photographed courtship display. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Not aligned with the criterias for a set. You could go on and add 10 more Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    According to FPC rules, sets can be used to showcase "a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same)".
    These pictures are litterally steps of a dance all part of the courtship display of the greater flamingo. The courtship display moves are not infinite. A good proportion of the courtship display steps are included in this one so "adding 10 more" wouldn't be possible. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There seems to be many hours between images 1 and 2. Giles, I don't think that's what 'the passage of time' is meant to mean. There are a large number of elements of courtship display.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The FPC rules explicitely say that it could be different times of the day. So the picture number 2 is perfectly adequate. Also, I could have chosen this image as image number 2 but I prefer the actual one because you better see the movement being done with the feets splashing the water. This is wildlife and not human choreography. The animals do their courtship display and you can't ask them to do it just for the camera. Since they are often packed you will many times find yourself having other distracting flamingos in front of the one doing one of the steps of the courtship display. So waiting to have one subject isolated enough from the others to have a perfect capture of the courtship display step needs some time that can't be avoided.
    According to your article there are 11 courtship display moves. According to the information displayed on big signs in the Camargue there are less moves. In any case the moves that I posted on this set are the main ones that you will see. If you really want to see the preening you can see it here but I won't add it as it's less representative of the courtship display. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Several pictures could become FP, but I also don't think this selection meets the criteria of a set. The compositions are too different from each other. Some birds are alone while others are in group. The "passage of time" is not explicit. Moreover, the bird in "Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings" has the feet cropped out, while in a set all the pictures should be FP-level. I would recommend to renominate some images separately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your comment Basile. Eventhough the usual set nomination we see on FPC has similar composition across the images, FPC rules never asked for it. All the image needs is to fulfill two conditions : 1) "group of images that are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set" ; 2) fall into at least one of the following types : a) Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set ; b) a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. ; c) A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible ; d) A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object.
    In this case the thematical connection is obvious : it's the courtship display. As for the categories it can fall both in category b) and d). None of the above rules explicitely require to have the exact same composition on each image. On the opposite, for all categories it is possible to imagine different compositions across the images. I also personnaly think it's more interesting in a case like this one to have different compositions to have more diversity.
    As for the birds, they were all photographed while being in a group. I just waited patiently the perfect moment to have subjects a bit on the edge of the group in order to have an unobstructed view without disturbing elements in the middle of the frame.
    As for this picture having cropped feet I understand it would have been preferable to have uncropped feet but the movement is so quick (1 to 2 seconds) and you're often looking at something else that the time needed to point at the right direction don't always let enough time to zoom out. I also feel that the perfectly centered flamingo has a wow effect that overweights the cropped feet. Anyway, if you think it's a better one, I just removed that picture and replaced it with this one that has uncropped feet -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]
  •  Info Here's an alternative version with similar composition across the images, all photographed at the same place in a small 30 minutes window. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support both versions -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support If the photo sets don't pass, I would give the kissing image alone another try. I think this might be worth it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry, Giles. Again, I'm sorry, but this is randomed and not valid as a set. Yes, the kissing one is great it would be a solid FP to me but not this Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is absolutely nothing random in this set. These are all the most common courtship display moves that can be seen every time during the courtship display. Also, as already explained on my comments above, there is nothing invalid with this set. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Not a valid set according to the guidelines, sorry. I don't see a "passage of time" between these images, except they are all taken at different minutes of the day (of course, like all pictures). These photos are too much unconnected to each other. For example the "kissing" birds has a totally different framing from others. Where is the passage of time? Where are the other 10 birds? Like Poco and PantheraLeo1359531, I agree some of these images could become FP if nominated separately. But at the difference of dance steps, for example, where the solo or duo dancers are supposed to remain the same all the time during the dance show, here we see groups of birds of different sizes, sometimes cropped out (#2 and #3) sometimes not cropped (#1 and #5), sometimes just a pair {#4). Imagine nominators proposing such "passage of time" for all the image sessions they live everywhere, and all the subjects, like vehicles, weather, sports, etc. Example an elephant in the water, then three elephants walking the same day, then 10 elephants eating, plus another shot with a mahout, etc., and finally all the pictures. Of course, there's always a "passage of time", but this wouldn't make a valid set. And I don't think you'll find such nominations in the archives. Some pictures look similar (#1, #2, #3, #5), but others can work separately as individual FPs. Please try to select the finest -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 01:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wooden staircase steps in the forest of Hallasan Park Eorimok Trail at dusk on Jeju Island in South Korea

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 21:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae)

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 18:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hochosterwitz Castle, north side

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of the main domes of the Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey.

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-naped Monarch in Bangladesh
  • Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Morning view on old castle bridge in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The light in lanterns is turned off, there is only light from the low sun that has recently risen.

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mycena haematopus, Burgundydrop Bonnet

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Abano Mineral Lake Natural Monument, Truso Valley, Georgia

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 15:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 11:08:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pallid ghost crab (Ocypode pallidula), front view emerging from burrow, Mahabalipuram

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bač Fortress in Bač, Vojvodina, Serbia
Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware of that, but it doesn't explain the greenish cast Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yann; this is a spotlight fixed on the site. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place Jeanne d'Arc in Neufchâteau, Vosges, France

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Polynesian flying fox (Pteropus tonganus)
Yes; but I was too late. Thanks, Wilfredo, for the edit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 05:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 04:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fields of Yugar on the left bank of the Tsarap, Zanskar, India

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bigorski Monastery, North Macedonia

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, South Sudan

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:30:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque.
This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctantly  Oppose per Basile Morin as there are some good characteristics here. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 05:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative

[edit]

  • Note: You write under this photo (nothing special). I think this is an assumption. It should be: (I find nothing special about this photo). Another voter may look at this photo very differently. When I look at the photo, I see an economically written-off object that has been embraced by nature over the years. It has become one with the environment. The earth colours merge seamlessly into each other. Art and nature have met each other by chance here. How beautiful can it be?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree with you. If a photo is clearly out of focus, then that is the case, because everyone can see that. If you find the photo (Nothing special), then that only applies to you and there may be other opinions about it. Then I think you should mention that it is (your opinion). Otherwise you are doing the photographer an injustice.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Out of focus" is a subjective opinion too. We all are individuals. Each person shares subjective reviews. Some people write "no wow", some people write "too ordinary", some people write "I miss something", etc. To help the photographers to face negative feelings, we usually write "sorry" as a courtesy formula. Here the subject looks like a standard pipe. These conventional objects are not rare in the countrysides of the world. The dead branches are not spectacular either. They make the composition cluttered. And I think the top-down view is not uncommon, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 00:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caldeira Grande
I believe this is distinct enough in terms of subject and composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Main altar in the Old Church of Pellworm
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
  •  Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral: The patch of sunlight brings the necessary asymmetry to the photo --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC) changed to neutral after uploading new version --Superbass (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        •  CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          •  CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            •  Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
              1. If one changes an image during the process of voting and the changes are very minor and uncontroversial (e.g., some dust spots have been fixed), we usually add a simple comment to the nomination saying that this or that has been fixed.
              2. If the changes are of intermediate importance, e.g. when the crop has been changed a little bit (like in this example) or when the exposure has been changed to a small degree, we usually add a comment and ping all previous voters to inform them about the change (the {{Ping}} template is useful for that purpose).
              3. If the changes are more important, e.g. when there has been a big change of the crop or a new development from the raw image file, or when one wants to propose a different exposure from the same photo session, it is advisable to upload that new version as a new file (under a new filename) and to add it to the nomination as an ‘Alternative’ image (see the “Formal things” box at the head of this page).
              4. If one wants to propose a completely different photo (even of the same subject), a separate nomination is necesssary.
            Hope this helps, – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            Thank you. So I'd suggest, @Dirtsc uses the version he/she prefers and briefly notifies those who voted while another version was visible. So far, no one seems to be taking the change as an opportunity to vote pro instead of con or vice versa. Superbass (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Sorry, my question about the possibility to improve the symmetry was not meant to spoil the nomination; it was just a question or suggestion. Personally I would still be happier about this photo of a very symmetric interior if the photo was completely symmetric, too (by the way, this is not my hobby horse, but a common idea often expressed on this page). But I agree that the photo is also attractive as it is, especially, as Moroder has rightly emphasized, the light spot brings some magic into the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Ermell, the sun spot doesn't bring magic to this scene in my opinion. (and by the way, horizontal PC would be welcome, horizontal lines aren't parallel and I think they should in a symetric composition) --Benji 22:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah

Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria.