Commons:Кандидати за изабране слике
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
Ово су кандидати за изабране слике. Уочите да ово није исто што и слика дана.
За архиву претходних номинација, погледајте: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
Постоји такође хронолошки списак изабраних слика.
Формалности
[edit]Номинација
[edit]Ако мислите да сте нашли или направили слику која може да се сматра вредном, онда је додајте испод у секцију номинације, на врх стране путем овог линка.(Упутства)
Пре него што то урадите, осигурајте да сте унели одговарајући опис слике, као и прикладну лиценцу.
Молимо гласајте користећи реч из вашег језика или одговарајуће шаблоне:
- За - Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, 支持 , Tak,...
- Против - No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, 反对 , Nie,...
Такође можете користити шаблоне {{Oppose}}( Oppose) и {{Support}}( Support). Такође можете изразити да волите слику са {{I love}}( Support) или да сте неутрални {{Neutral}}( Neutral).
Молимо покушајте да укључите неколико речи о томе зашто вам се (није) свидела слика, посебно када гласате против.
Политика за кандидате за изабране слике
[edit]- На крају гласања, резултати ће бити одређени петнаестог дана од номинације.
- Номинације од анонимних корисника су добродошле
- Доприноси у разговорима од стране анонимних корисника су добродошли
- Гласови анонимних корисника се не рачунају
- Номинације се не рачунају као гласови. Подршка мора да буде експлицитно изречена.
- Номинатори могу да повуку своју номинацију било када.
- Запамтите, циљ Викимедијине Оставе је да пружи централну базу за слободне слике које би се могле користити у свим Викимедијиним пројектима, укључујући и могуће будуће пројекте. Ово није проста остава за википедијине слика, тако да о сликама не треба судити према томе да ли одговарају неком пројекту.
- Слике могу да се уклоне са списка уколико немају подршке (не рачунајући номинаторов глас) после седмог дана.
Кандидат ће постати изабрана слика у складу са следећим условима:
- Одговарајућа лиценца (наравно)
- Најмање 7 гласова подршке
- Однос гласова за и против мора да буде најмање 2:1 (двотрећинска већина)
- Код две различите верзије исте слике, не могу обе бити изабране, већ само она са већим бројем гласова.
За упутства о томе како се процесују старе номинације, погледајте Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.
Кандидати за уклањање статуса изабране слике
[edit]Током времена, стандарди за изабране слике се мењају. Може бити одлучено да за неке слике које су некада биле "довољно добре", ово више није случај. Овде се наводе слике за које сматрате да више не заслужују да буду изабране. Ово захтева двотрећинску већину (и минимум од 5 гласова) за уклањање статуса. Ако нема 2/3 за уклањање, слика остаје изабрана. За ове радње, гласајте са {{Keep}} Keep (заслужује да остане изабрана слика) или or {{Delist}} Delist (не заслужује да више буде изабрана слика). Молимо пружите и линк ка оригиналној номинацији за изабрану слику (појавиће се под "Links" на страни са описом слике). За остало, иста правила важе као и изнад. Молимо користите овај линк како бисте додали новог кандидата за уклањање статуса
Освежавање стране: purge this page's cache
Кандидати за изабране слике
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Spondylus imperialis
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 07:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 02:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
- Info: the Mismaloya Arches, Puerto Vallarta; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 21:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think the photo needs perspective correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 19:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovakia
- Info The Sitno Peak in Central Slovakia, see from north-northeast. Created and uploaded by Michalsmr, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love this wonderful late fall/early winter scene. Some of the trees are still showing their last reddish-brown leaves, the first snow is shining on the ground and the higher treetops, and the warm morning sun bathes the eastern (left) slope of the mountain in a glowing, warm light that emphasizes the contours. The contrast with the bluish shadows on the western (right) slope of the mountain lends depth to the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 16:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
- Info Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great photo and good light. But maybe slightly tilted? Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Vorarlberg
- Info created by Böhringer Friedrich - uploaded by Böhringer Friedrich - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Amazing mood and good composition but IMO oversharpening and JPEG artefacts preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 10:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created by Carsten Nebel - uploaded by Carsten Nebel - nominated and digitally modified by Ratekreel -- Ratekreel (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ratekreel (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A beautiful composition but there is IMO too much contrast and the colours are oversaturated Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Cmao20, contrast is mostly original. I added a bit and cleared the sky. I can rework the original file without adding any additional contrast. Ratekreel (talk) 13:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- And remove some too. Ratekreel (talk) 13:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded a different version. Can you check now? Ratekreel (talk) 15:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with the new version is that reducing the contrast doesn't do much good because the detail in the shadows is already gone. It can't be recovered just from the JPEG. So you just end up turning dark black shadows into dull grey shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Original version is better. In 2022 A.Savin Also reverted to original V. And The house looks unnatural, sorry -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 16:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry. The original photo was taken by Carsten Nebel, so IMHO only small changes should be made by other users (see COM:OVERWRITE. Dear Ratekreel, if you want to make such substantial edits (which are obviously not uncontroversial), it would be much more polite and respectful to the original creator to upload the edited photo under a new filename and to link to the original photo with the {{Derived from}} template. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. Thank you Aristeas for reminding me of COM:OVERWRITE. Ratekreel (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 05:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
- Info created and uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by SHB2000 - SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great to see a 20 year old panoramic image in such good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good viewpoint/perspective: that the lighthouse appear so small between them makes the rocks even more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per other voters.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 20:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Ostraciidae
- Info Front view of a female boxfish (Ostracion cyanurus), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. Ostracion cyanurus has a maximum published total length of 15 centimetres (5.9 in) and is found in the Western Indian Ocean where it occurs in the Red Sea and around the Arabian Peninsula into the Persian Gulf as far east as eastern Iran. This species is found in areas where there is a moderate growth of coral at depths between 5 and 50 metres (16 and 164 ft). Ostracion cyanurus is a solitary species which remains in the vicinity of shelter. The apparent lack of smaller males may mean that this species is protogynous (sequential hermaphroditism). If the bluetail trunkfish senses danger is releases a toxin called pahutoxin, or ostracotoxin, into the water as a defence. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support How poisonous is the toxin? Cmao20 (talk) 03:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Around 2ppm.--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've read that it can kill other fishes and even themselves but if you ask me about the impact on humans, I cannot tell you. This fish is in the menu of countries like Singapore and I've read concerns about that (in the case the toxin is generated just prior to the dwath of the fish) but I've no details. Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Remembers me this one --Llez (talk) 13:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, but this guy is free like a bird...Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photos by Giles Laurent
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 12:10:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak) and staying static
-
Walking all together as a group in the same direction while turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak)
-
Doing a courbette
-
Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings
-
Rinsing the foot in water and then scratch the head with it
-
Kissing
-
Mix of different moves: singing while turning their head from left to right + pointing head to the sky and spreading wings + a kiss
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info During the mating season, Greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) always express the above photographed courtship display. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not aligned with the criterias for a set. You could go on and add 10 more Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- According to FPC rules, sets can be used to showcase "a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same)".
- These pictures are litterally steps of a dance all part of the courtship display of the greater flamingo. The courtship display moves are not infinite. A good proportion of the courtship display steps are included in this one so "adding 10 more" wouldn't be possible. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be many hours between images 1 and 2. Giles, I don't think that's what 'the passage of time' is meant to mean. There are a large number of elements of courtship display.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- The FPC rules explicitely say that it could be different times of the day. So the picture number 2 is perfectly adequate. Also, I could have chosen this image as image number 2 but I prefer the actual one because you better see the movement being done with the feets splashing the water. This is wildlife and not human choreography. The animals do their courtship display and you can't ask them to do it just for the camera. Since they are often packed you will many times find yourself having other distracting flamingos in front of the one doing one of the steps of the courtship display. So waiting to have one subject isolated enough from the others to have a perfect capture of the courtship display step needs some time that can't be avoided.
- According to your article there are 11 courtship display moves. According to the information displayed on big signs in the Camargue there are less moves. In any case the moves that I posted on this set are the main ones that you will see. If you really want to see the preening you can see it here but I won't add it as it's less representative of the courtship display. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be many hours between images 1 and 2. Giles, I don't think that's what 'the passage of time' is meant to mean. There are a large number of elements of courtship display.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Several pictures could become FP, but I also don't think this selection meets the criteria of a set. The compositions are too different from each other. Some birds are alone while others are in group. The "passage of time" is not explicit. Moreover, the bird in "Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings" has the feet cropped out, while in a set all the pictures should be FP-level. I would recommend to renominate some images separately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment Basile. Eventhough the usual set nomination we see on FPC has similar composition across the images, FPC rules never asked for it. All the image needs is to fulfill two conditions : 1) "group of images that are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set" ; 2) fall into at least one of the following types : a) Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set ; b) a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. ; c) A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible ; d) A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object.
- In this case the thematical connection is obvious : it's the courtship display. As for the categories it can fall both in category b) and d). None of the above rules explicitely require to have the exact same composition on each image. On the opposite, for all categories it is possible to imagine different compositions across the images. I also personnaly think it's more interesting in a case like this one to have different compositions to have more diversity.
- As for the birds, they were all photographed while being in a group. I just waited patiently the perfect moment to have subjects a bit on the edge of the group in order to have an unobstructed view without disturbing elements in the middle of the frame.
- As for this picture having cropped feet I understand it would have been preferable to have uncropped feet but the movement is so quick (1 to 2 seconds) and you're often looking at something else that the time needed to point at the right direction don't always let enough time to zoom out. I also feel that the perfectly centered flamingo has a wow effect that overweights the cropped feet. Anyway, if you think it's a better one, I just removed that picture and replaced it with this one that has uncropped feet -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]-
Turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak) and staying static
-
Walking all together as a group in the same direction while turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak)
-
Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings
-
Kissing
-
Mix of different moves: singing while turning their head from left to right + pointing head to the sky and spreading wings + a kiss
- Info Here's an alternative version with similar composition across the images, all photographed at the same place in a small 30 minutes window. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support both versions -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Wooden staircase steps in the forest of Hallasan Park Eorimok Trail at dusk on Jeju Island in South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 01:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fog creates a wonderful atmosphere. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 11:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rbrechko. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rbrechko, and I love these old wooden steps. – Aristeas (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 21:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
- Info A different look at the tui. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 06:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 18:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria
- Info North side of Hochosterwitz Castle, municipality of Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
- Info created by Agnes Monkelbaan - uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting facade -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for posting my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming indeed --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch Poco a poco (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Turkey
- Info Interior view of the main domes of the Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey. The officially known as Sultan Ahmed Mosque is one of the most iconic and popular monuments of Ottoman architecture. It was constructed between 1609 and 1617 during the rule of Ahmed I and remains a functioning mosque today. It is decorated with thousands of Iznik tiles and painted floral motifs in predominantly blue colours, which give the mosque its popular name. The Blue Mosque, included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list in 1985, was built next to the former Hippodrome and stands across from the Hagia Sophia, another popular tourist site. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Obviously amazing. Hope to see lots more of your Turkish photos. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Cmao20: all of them are online now, here probably the best of them, if you want to have a look :) Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Lots of good candidates here. This is particularly amazing! Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great architecure, very good framing and quality. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
- Info created by Tareq Uddin Ahmed - uploaded by ImamAnik - nominated by ImamAnik -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- John Harrison's image from 11 years ago is better, even without the benefits of today's processing software. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- All I was suggesting is that we shouldn't promote an inferior image if there is a much better one around... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice species but the level of detail is not what I expect here Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Morning view on old castle bridge in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The light in lanterns is turned off, there is only light from the low sun that has recently risen. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20; I love how the bridge seems to disappear in the haze. – Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Like the lyrical quality of this image. Suggest you add your comment about the lantern light as useful information in the image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Superb and striking motif and composition. A potential Picture of the Year candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice image as usual, but what bothers me a bit is that the large column is clearly to the right of the center.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae
- Info created by Stu's Images - uploaded by Stu's Images - nominated by Stu's Images -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Georgia
- Info created by David Osipov - uploaded by David Osipov - nominated by David Osipov. -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info
- Support -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Difficult light, lack of wow, not working compo Poco a poco (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great scenery but I think the composition feels quite unbalanced. I'd like to see less of that dull hill and more of what's on the left of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 15:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info created by PaestumPaestum - uploaded by PaestumPaestum - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Straight, but interesting composition; looks a bit boring as thumbnail, but works much better in full size. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Of historical significance but IMO not enought wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Geocoding would be helpful --Llez (talk) 13:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Llez, done. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 11:08:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Ocypodidae_(Ghost_Crabs_and_Fiddler_Crabs)
- Info Pallid ghost crab (Ocypode pallidula) emerging from burrow, Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu, India. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Just taken at the right time. Yann (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Serbia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed and atmospheric Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The WB feels off Poco a poco (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that, but it doesn't explain the greenish cast Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Similar to this FP, but the time of day gives the castle a totally different appearance; the existing FP may have higher educational value, but this photo has a more interesting mood and is IMHO more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support What is the light near the tower? — Yann (talk) 22:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yann; this is a spotlight fixed on the site. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition, well framed, and the patterns in the pavement are cool. The grey-blue light wouldn't normally work but for greyish stone architecture I think it actually works quite well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Cmao20 on composition and light/colours. For me, this square somehow resembles a theater set, the framing gives it a special impressiveness. – Aristeas (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)
- Info On the Meridian (~International Date Line), so the photo may have been taken the day before! All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Isn't there a bit of blue fringing though? Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; but I was too late. Thanks, Wilfredo, for the edit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well captured in flight. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by TonyTheTiger - uploaded by TonyTheTiger - nominated by TonyTheTiger. This is the first contribution using exposure w:bracketing and w:compositing by this editor. This images is one of two extracted from File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and cropped.jpg, which is an exposure bracketed picture composited on October 4, 2024 in Canon Digital Photo Professional 4.19.10.0 from two Raw file images taken on September 20, 2024. The best two other attempts at compositing that were made from the same exposure bracketed sequence have also been uploaded:File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg and File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0341-0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg.-- TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info This is a solar w:diffraction spike in the context of an w:urban canyon (Avenue canyon per the article) at the golden hour. The canyon has a foreground with an intersection that features part of the w:National Register of Historic Places -listed w:Hotel Del Prado on the left diagonally across the street from part of the National Register of Historic Places-listed w:East Park Towers on the right. This composition of the canyon includes the top of the Chicago Landmark w:Hyde Park–Kenwood National Bank Building off in the distance on the left.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info The 2024 Fall Equinox in Chicago fell on September 22 and both September 22 and 23 were days in which the sunrise and sunset on east-west streets occurred in the middle of the street (days known as Chicagohenge).-TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support On WP:FPC, I believe that I did not prioritize the diffraction spike in the uses until after a lot of people had decided it was not intriguing based on the wrong set of uses. Hoping for better luck here focusing on what I feel is a splendid diffraction spike.TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- User:Sebring12Hrs, I am not sure how to read crop isn't very good in a way that would help me improve this submission or future compositions. Is it possible you could be a little more instructive as I aspire to be better.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but while the light is nice I find the composition cluttered and not sufficiently interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 (HW-361) at the Royal International Air Tattoo 2024. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality. It's nice to see the interior with the guy checking his Facebook notifications :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. Nice contrast between the red/white colours of the airplane and the blue sky. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 05:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
- Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I also like the evening light very much Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Funny enough I like (besides the special evening light) exactly that silhouette of a tree at the right; somehow it makes the composition special to me. The dark areas are rather noisy, yes, but because they have rightly been kept dark this does not degrade the overall impression too much. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 04:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Crop at the left and right not working for me, it also looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: I've uploaded a version with more fields at the bottom. Do you think this is worth nominating as an alternative? --Tagooty (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Those are at the edges of the frame, cannot be fixed now. Thanks for the review. Tagooty (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Left crop (and maybe also the right one) could be more satisfying, but the composition still works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The disturbing dust spots should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Ermell: Thanks for pointing this out. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit small, but great composition and mood Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1920-1929
- Info created by Ansel Adams, restored and uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
- Info Monolith, Yosemite National Park, California, by Ansel Adams, 1927. Gelatin silver print.
- Support Notable photograph. -- Yann (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent restoration of one of the classic black-and-white scenery image that has stood the test of time. --Tagooty (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nominating this famous work, Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch! :) I made some improvements, I hope they are fine with you --Poco a poco (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure, nice composition and colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 17:38:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae_(Tyrant_Flycatchers)
- Info Western kingbird (Tyrannus verticalis). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, satisfying picture Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp, good light, posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 09:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info The Zagedan lakes are of ancient glacial origin. They are surrounded by rock formations in a mountain cirque, a typical ancient glacial landform in the Caucasus Mountains. The glacier retreated about 11,000 years ago, leaving behind the landscape we see today. Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unique view, perfectly captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition, though the greens seem over-saturated. --Tagooty (talk) 05:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:30:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info The rugged, rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque, with the sun setting behind the steep walls, leaving the last rays of direct sunlight (penumbra, almost complete eclipse). Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the grey sky will mean that people struggle to warm up this one, but I like it. I appreciate how it breaks compositional rules by not really having much of a sky at all. The clear, bright reflections in the water are nice. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat light and dull colors, burnt sky with blown highlights and no wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Reluctantly Oppose per Basile Morin as there are some good characteristics here. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 22:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_Kingdom
- Info Detail of Big Ben on the newly restored Elizabeth tower. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Existing FPs of the tower or Big Ben: Full tower, 2, 3, Clock face (all pre-restoration). — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail and sharpness, esp. when we consider that this was taken at 500mm focal length. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gutes Foto, kann man nüscht sagen --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 05:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Remnants of a water system in the Moselle at the Alter Krahn in Trier (Germany) (Silent witness like a still life from the past.)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great colours but I miss an outstanding composition. I wonder whether a more close up photo that more prominently features the textures on the rusted metal would be more interesting Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your comment. I have posted an alternative version.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Support --Llez (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: You write under this photo (nothing special). I think this is an assumption. It should be: (I find nothing special about this photo). Another voter may look at this photo very differently. When I look at the photo, I see an economically written-off object that has been embraced by nature over the years. It has become one with the environment. The earth colours merge seamlessly into each other. Art and nature have met each other by chance here. How beautiful can it be?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- All reviews are subjective -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with you. If a photo is clearly out of focus, then that is the case, because everyone can see that. If you find the photo (Nothing special), then that only applies to you and there may be other opinions about it. Then I think you should mention that it is (your opinion). Otherwise you are doing the photographer an injustice.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Out of focus" is a subjective opinion too. We all are individuals. Each person shares subjective reviews. Some people write "no wow", some people write "too ordinary", some people write "I miss something", etc. To help the photographers to face negative feelings, we usually write "sorry" as a courtesy formula. Here the subject looks like a standard pipe. These conventional objects are not rare in the countrysides of the world. The dead branches are not spectacular either. They make the composition cluttered. And I think the top-down view is not uncommon, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks everyone for the comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 00:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande hot spring, Caldeiras das Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 08:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment similar image already featured -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- I believe this is distinct enough in terms of subject and composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree, very different from existing FP Cmao20 (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not convinced about the compo. I've to say that I was there and couldn't either manage a great shot, Poco a poco (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Regretfully Oppose per George Chernilevsky. IMHO existing FP is better. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral: The patch of sunlight brings the necessary asymmetry to the photo --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC) changed to neutral after uploading new version --Superbass (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
- If one changes an image during the process of voting and the changes are very minor and uncontroversial (e.g., some dust spots have been fixed), we usually add a simple comment to the nomination saying that this or that has been fixed.
- If the changes are of intermediate importance, e.g. when the crop has been changed a little bit (like in this example) or when the exposure has been changed to a small degree, we usually add a comment and ping all previous voters to inform them about the change (the {{Ping}} template is useful for that purpose).
- If the changes are more important, e.g. when there has been a big change of the crop or a new development from the raw image file, or when one wants to propose a different exposure from the same photo session, it is advisable to upload that new version as a new file (under a new filename) and to add it to the nomination as an ‘Alternative’ image (see the “Formal things” box at the head of this page).
- If one wants to propose a completely different photo (even of the same subject), a separate nomination is necesssary.
- Hope this helps, – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. So I'd suggest, @Dirtsc uses the version he/she prefers and briefly notifies those who voted while another version was visible. So far, no one seems to be taking the change as an opportunity to vote pro instead of con or vice versa. Superbass (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
- CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sorry, my question about the possibility to improve the symmetry was not meant to spoil the nomination; it was just a question or suggestion. Personally I would still be happier about this photo of a very symmetric interior if the photo was completely symmetric, too (by the way, this is not my hobby horse, but a common idea often expressed on this page). But I agree that the photo is also attractive as it is, especially, as Moroder has rightly emphasized, the light spot brings some magic into the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ermell, the sun spot doesn't bring magic to this scene in my opinion. (and by the way, horizontal PC would be welcome, horizontal lines aren't parallel and I think they should in a symetric composition) --Benji 22:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful, but per Ermell. I think this one is okay because it's nearly sharp and quite high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not as sharp as I'd like everywhere, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
- Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Till Niermann -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks downsampled, but good nonetheless. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. Exceptional landscape that looks almost surreal. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning mix of desert of snow dunes & glaciers, and light & darkness -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it's rather small for a landscape and coming from a 5DII, and there's this other picture which is better IMO and at 45 Mpx: File:Before it rains.jpg --Kadellar (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Two pictures taken one day apart... Till (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The other picture Kadellar links is definitely better, but it's a v different composition from this one Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. IMHO we can (and should) feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info Potocki Palace in Tulchyn (Ukraine) in sunset. All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support White balance seems a little warm to me, but cool architecture and nice composition so deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty good now IMO Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Кандидати за брисање
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Spondylus imperialis
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 07:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 02:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
- Info: the Mismaloya Arches, Puerto Vallarta; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 21:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think the photo needs perspective correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 19:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovakia
- Info The Sitno Peak in Central Slovakia, see from north-northeast. Created and uploaded by Michalsmr, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love this wonderful late fall/early winter scene. Some of the trees are still showing their last reddish-brown leaves, the first snow is shining on the ground and the higher treetops, and the warm morning sun bathes the eastern (left) slope of the mountain in a glowing, warm light that emphasizes the contours. The contrast with the bluish shadows on the western (right) slope of the mountain lends depth to the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 16:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
- Info Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great photo and good light. But maybe slightly tilted? Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Vorarlberg
- Info created by Böhringer Friedrich - uploaded by Böhringer Friedrich - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Amazing mood and good composition but IMO oversharpening and JPEG artefacts preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 10:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created by Carsten Nebel - uploaded by Carsten Nebel - nominated and digitally modified by Ratekreel -- Ratekreel (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ratekreel (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A beautiful composition but there is IMO too much contrast and the colours are oversaturated Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Cmao20, contrast is mostly original. I added a bit and cleared the sky. I can rework the original file without adding any additional contrast. Ratekreel (talk) 13:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- And remove some too. Ratekreel (talk) 13:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded a different version. Can you check now? Ratekreel (talk) 15:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with the new version is that reducing the contrast doesn't do much good because the detail in the shadows is already gone. It can't be recovered just from the JPEG. So you just end up turning dark black shadows into dull grey shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Original version is better. In 2022 A.Savin Also reverted to original V. And The house looks unnatural, sorry -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 16:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry. The original photo was taken by Carsten Nebel, so IMHO only small changes should be made by other users (see COM:OVERWRITE. Dear Ratekreel, if you want to make such substantial edits (which are obviously not uncontroversial), it would be much more polite and respectful to the original creator to upload the edited photo under a new filename and to link to the original photo with the {{Derived from}} template. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. Thank you Aristeas for reminding me of COM:OVERWRITE. Ratekreel (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 05:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
- Info created and uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by SHB2000 - SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great to see a 20 year old panoramic image in such good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good viewpoint/perspective: that the lighthouse appear so small between them makes the rocks even more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per other voters.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 20:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Ostraciidae
- Info Front view of a female boxfish (Ostracion cyanurus), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. Ostracion cyanurus has a maximum published total length of 15 centimetres (5.9 in) and is found in the Western Indian Ocean where it occurs in the Red Sea and around the Arabian Peninsula into the Persian Gulf as far east as eastern Iran. This species is found in areas where there is a moderate growth of coral at depths between 5 and 50 metres (16 and 164 ft). Ostracion cyanurus is a solitary species which remains in the vicinity of shelter. The apparent lack of smaller males may mean that this species is protogynous (sequential hermaphroditism). If the bluetail trunkfish senses danger is releases a toxin called pahutoxin, or ostracotoxin, into the water as a defence. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support How poisonous is the toxin? Cmao20 (talk) 03:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Around 2ppm.--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've read that it can kill other fishes and even themselves but if you ask me about the impact on humans, I cannot tell you. This fish is in the menu of countries like Singapore and I've read concerns about that (in the case the toxin is generated just prior to the dwath of the fish) but I've no details. Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Remembers me this one --Llez (talk) 13:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, but this guy is free like a bird...Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Greater flamingos courtship display in the Camargue during mating season Photos by Giles Laurent
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 12:10:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak) and staying static
-
Walking all together as a group in the same direction while turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak)
-
Doing a courbette
-
Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings
-
Rinsing the foot in water and then scratch the head with it
-
Kissing
-
Mix of different moves: singing while turning their head from left to right + pointing head to the sky and spreading wings + a kiss
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info During the mating season, Greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) always express the above photographed courtship display. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not aligned with the criterias for a set. You could go on and add 10 more Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- According to FPC rules, sets can be used to showcase "a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same)".
- These pictures are litterally steps of a dance all part of the courtship display of the greater flamingo. The courtship display moves are not infinite. A good proportion of the courtship display steps are included in this one so "adding 10 more" wouldn't be possible. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be many hours between images 1 and 2. Giles, I don't think that's what 'the passage of time' is meant to mean. There are a large number of elements of courtship display.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- The FPC rules explicitely say that it could be different times of the day. So the picture number 2 is perfectly adequate. Also, I could have chosen this image as image number 2 but I prefer the actual one because you better see the movement being done with the feets splashing the water. This is wildlife and not human choreography. The animals do their courtship display and you can't ask them to do it just for the camera. Since they are often packed you will many times find yourself having other distracting flamingos in front of the one doing one of the steps of the courtship display. So waiting to have one subject isolated enough from the others to have a perfect capture of the courtship display step needs some time that can't be avoided.
- According to your article there are 11 courtship display moves. According to the information displayed on big signs in the Camargue there are less moves. In any case the moves that I posted on this set are the main ones that you will see. If you really want to see the preening you can see it here but I won't add it as it's less representative of the courtship display. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be many hours between images 1 and 2. Giles, I don't think that's what 'the passage of time' is meant to mean. There are a large number of elements of courtship display.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Several pictures could become FP, but I also don't think this selection meets the criteria of a set. The compositions are too different from each other. Some birds are alone while others are in group. The "passage of time" is not explicit. Moreover, the bird in "Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings" has the feet cropped out, while in a set all the pictures should be FP-level. I would recommend to renominate some images separately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment Basile. Eventhough the usual set nomination we see on FPC has similar composition across the images, FPC rules never asked for it. All the image needs is to fulfill two conditions : 1) "group of images that are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set" ; 2) fall into at least one of the following types : a) Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set ; b) a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. ; c) A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible ; d) A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object.
- In this case the thematical connection is obvious : it's the courtship display. As for the categories it can fall both in category b) and d). None of the above rules explicitely require to have the exact same composition on each image. On the opposite, for all categories it is possible to imagine different compositions across the images. I also personnaly think it's more interesting in a case like this one to have different compositions to have more diversity.
- As for the birds, they were all photographed while being in a group. I just waited patiently the perfect moment to have subjects a bit on the edge of the group in order to have an unobstructed view without disturbing elements in the middle of the frame.
- As for this picture having cropped feet I understand it would have been preferable to have uncropped feet but the movement is so quick (1 to 2 seconds) and you're often looking at something else that the time needed to point at the right direction don't always let enough time to zoom out. I also feel that the perfectly centered flamingo has a wow effect that overweights the cropped feet. Anyway, if you think it's a better one, I just removed that picture and replaced it with this one that has uncropped feet -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]-
Turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak) and staying static
-
Walking all together as a group in the same direction while turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak)
-
Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings
-
Kissing
-
Mix of different moves: singing while turning their head from left to right + pointing head to the sky and spreading wings + a kiss
- Info Here's an alternative version with similar composition across the images, all photographed at the same place in a small 30 minutes window. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support both versions -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Wooden staircase steps in the forest of Hallasan Park Eorimok Trail at dusk on Jeju Island in South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 01:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fog creates a wonderful atmosphere. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 11:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rbrechko. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rbrechko, and I love these old wooden steps. – Aristeas (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 21:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
- Info A different look at the tui. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 06:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 18:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria
- Info North side of Hochosterwitz Castle, municipality of Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
- Info created by Agnes Monkelbaan - uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting facade -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for posting my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming indeed --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch Poco a poco (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Turkey
- Info Interior view of the main domes of the Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey. The officially known as Sultan Ahmed Mosque is one of the most iconic and popular monuments of Ottoman architecture. It was constructed between 1609 and 1617 during the rule of Ahmed I and remains a functioning mosque today. It is decorated with thousands of Iznik tiles and painted floral motifs in predominantly blue colours, which give the mosque its popular name. The Blue Mosque, included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list in 1985, was built next to the former Hippodrome and stands across from the Hagia Sophia, another popular tourist site. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Obviously amazing. Hope to see lots more of your Turkish photos. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Cmao20: all of them are online now, here probably the best of them, if you want to have a look :) Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Lots of good candidates here. This is particularly amazing! Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great architecure, very good framing and quality. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
- Info created by Tareq Uddin Ahmed - uploaded by ImamAnik - nominated by ImamAnik -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- John Harrison's image from 11 years ago is better, even without the benefits of today's processing software. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- All I was suggesting is that we shouldn't promote an inferior image if there is a much better one around... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice species but the level of detail is not what I expect here Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Morning view on old castle bridge in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The light in lanterns is turned off, there is only light from the low sun that has recently risen. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20; I love how the bridge seems to disappear in the haze. – Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Like the lyrical quality of this image. Suggest you add your comment about the lantern light as useful information in the image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Superb and striking motif and composition. A potential Picture of the Year candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice image as usual, but what bothers me a bit is that the large column is clearly to the right of the center.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae
- Info created by Stu's Images - uploaded by Stu's Images - nominated by Stu's Images -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Georgia
- Info created by David Osipov - uploaded by David Osipov - nominated by David Osipov. -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info
- Support -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Difficult light, lack of wow, not working compo Poco a poco (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great scenery but I think the composition feels quite unbalanced. I'd like to see less of that dull hill and more of what's on the left of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 15:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info created by PaestumPaestum - uploaded by PaestumPaestum - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Straight, but interesting composition; looks a bit boring as thumbnail, but works much better in full size. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Of historical significance but IMO not enought wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Geocoding would be helpful --Llez (talk) 13:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Llez, done. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 11:08:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Ocypodidae_(Ghost_Crabs_and_Fiddler_Crabs)
- Info Pallid ghost crab (Ocypode pallidula) emerging from burrow, Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu, India. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Just taken at the right time. Yann (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Serbia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed and atmospheric Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The WB feels off Poco a poco (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that, but it doesn't explain the greenish cast Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Similar to this FP, but the time of day gives the castle a totally different appearance; the existing FP may have higher educational value, but this photo has a more interesting mood and is IMHO more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support What is the light near the tower? — Yann (talk) 22:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yann; this is a spotlight fixed on the site. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition, well framed, and the patterns in the pavement are cool. The grey-blue light wouldn't normally work but for greyish stone architecture I think it actually works quite well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Cmao20 on composition and light/colours. For me, this square somehow resembles a theater set, the framing gives it a special impressiveness. – Aristeas (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support איז「Ysa」 23:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)
- Info On the Meridian (~International Date Line), so the photo may have been taken the day before! All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 12:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Isn't there a bit of blue fringing though? Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; but I was too late. Thanks, Wilfredo, for the edit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well captured in flight. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by TonyTheTiger - uploaded by TonyTheTiger - nominated by TonyTheTiger. This is the first contribution using exposure w:bracketing and w:compositing by this editor. This images is one of two extracted from File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and cropped.jpg, which is an exposure bracketed picture composited on October 4, 2024 in Canon Digital Photo Professional 4.19.10.0 from two Raw file images taken on September 20, 2024. The best two other attempts at compositing that were made from the same exposure bracketed sequence have also been uploaded:File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg and File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0341-0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg.-- TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info This is a solar w:diffraction spike in the context of an w:urban canyon (Avenue canyon per the article) at the golden hour. The canyon has a foreground with an intersection that features part of the w:National Register of Historic Places -listed w:Hotel Del Prado on the left diagonally across the street from part of the National Register of Historic Places-listed w:East Park Towers on the right. This composition of the canyon includes the top of the Chicago Landmark w:Hyde Park–Kenwood National Bank Building off in the distance on the left.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info The 2024 Fall Equinox in Chicago fell on September 22 and both September 22 and 23 were days in which the sunrise and sunset on east-west streets occurred in the middle of the street (days known as Chicagohenge).-TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support On WP:FPC, I believe that I did not prioritize the diffraction spike in the uses until after a lot of people had decided it was not intriguing based on the wrong set of uses. Hoping for better luck here focusing on what I feel is a splendid diffraction spike.TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- User:Sebring12Hrs, I am not sure how to read crop isn't very good in a way that would help me improve this submission or future compositions. Is it possible you could be a little more instructive as I aspire to be better.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but while the light is nice I find the composition cluttered and not sufficiently interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 (HW-361) at the Royal International Air Tattoo 2024. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality. It's nice to see the interior with the guy checking his Facebook notifications :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. Nice contrast between the red/white colours of the airplane and the blue sky. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 05:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
- Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I also like the evening light very much Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Funny enough I like (besides the special evening light) exactly that silhouette of a tree at the right; somehow it makes the composition special to me. The dark areas are rather noisy, yes, but because they have rightly been kept dark this does not degrade the overall impression too much. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 04:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Crop at the left and right not working for me, it also looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: I've uploaded a version with more fields at the bottom. Do you think this is worth nominating as an alternative? --Tagooty (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Those are at the edges of the frame, cannot be fixed now. Thanks for the review. Tagooty (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Left crop (and maybe also the right one) could be more satisfying, but the composition still works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The disturbing dust spots should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Ermell: Thanks for pointing this out. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit small, but great composition and mood Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1920-1929
- Info created by Ansel Adams, restored and uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
- Info Monolith, Yosemite National Park, California, by Ansel Adams, 1927. Gelatin silver print.
- Support Notable photograph. -- Yann (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent restoration of one of the classic black-and-white scenery image that has stood the test of time. --Tagooty (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nominating this famous work, Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch! :) I made some improvements, I hope they are fine with you --Poco a poco (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure, nice composition and colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 17:38:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae_(Tyrant_Flycatchers)
- Info Western kingbird (Tyrannus verticalis). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, satisfying picture Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp, good light, posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 09:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info The Zagedan lakes are of ancient glacial origin. They are surrounded by rock formations in a mountain cirque, a typical ancient glacial landform in the Caucasus Mountains. The glacier retreated about 11,000 years ago, leaving behind the landscape we see today. Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unique view, perfectly captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition, though the greens seem over-saturated. --Tagooty (talk) 05:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:30:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info The rugged, rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque, with the sun setting behind the steep walls, leaving the last rays of direct sunlight (penumbra, almost complete eclipse). Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the grey sky will mean that people struggle to warm up this one, but I like it. I appreciate how it breaks compositional rules by not really having much of a sky at all. The clear, bright reflections in the water are nice. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat light and dull colors, burnt sky with blown highlights and no wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Reluctantly Oppose per Basile Morin as there are some good characteristics here. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 22:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_Kingdom
- Info Detail of Big Ben on the newly restored Elizabeth tower. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info Existing FPs of the tower or Big Ben: Full tower, 2, 3, Clock face (all pre-restoration). — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail and sharpness, esp. when we consider that this was taken at 500mm focal length. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gutes Foto, kann man nüscht sagen --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 05:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Remnants of a water system in the Moselle at the Alter Krahn in Trier (Germany) (Silent witness like a still life from the past.)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great colours but I miss an outstanding composition. I wonder whether a more close up photo that more prominently features the textures on the rusted metal would be more interesting Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your comment. I have posted an alternative version.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Support --Llez (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: You write under this photo (nothing special). I think this is an assumption. It should be: (I find nothing special about this photo). Another voter may look at this photo very differently. When I look at the photo, I see an economically written-off object that has been embraced by nature over the years. It has become one with the environment. The earth colours merge seamlessly into each other. Art and nature have met each other by chance here. How beautiful can it be?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- All reviews are subjective -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with you. If a photo is clearly out of focus, then that is the case, because everyone can see that. If you find the photo (Nothing special), then that only applies to you and there may be other opinions about it. Then I think you should mention that it is (your opinion). Otherwise you are doing the photographer an injustice.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Out of focus" is a subjective opinion too. We all are individuals. Each person shares subjective reviews. Some people write "no wow", some people write "too ordinary", some people write "I miss something", etc. To help the photographers to face negative feelings, we usually write "sorry" as a courtesy formula. Here the subject looks like a standard pipe. These conventional objects are not rare in the countrysides of the world. The dead branches are not spectacular either. They make the composition cluttered. And I think the top-down view is not uncommon, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks everyone for the comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 00:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande hot spring, Caldeiras das Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 08:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment similar image already featured -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- I believe this is distinct enough in terms of subject and composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree, very different from existing FP Cmao20 (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not convinced about the compo. I've to say that I was there and couldn't either manage a great shot, Poco a poco (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Regretfully Oppose per George Chernilevsky. IMHO existing FP is better. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral: The patch of sunlight brings the necessary asymmetry to the photo --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC) changed to neutral after uploading new version --Superbass (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
- If one changes an image during the process of voting and the changes are very minor and uncontroversial (e.g., some dust spots have been fixed), we usually add a simple comment to the nomination saying that this or that has been fixed.
- If the changes are of intermediate importance, e.g. when the crop has been changed a little bit (like in this example) or when the exposure has been changed to a small degree, we usually add a comment and ping all previous voters to inform them about the change (the {{Ping}} template is useful for that purpose).
- If the changes are more important, e.g. when there has been a big change of the crop or a new development from the raw image file, or when one wants to propose a different exposure from the same photo session, it is advisable to upload that new version as a new file (under a new filename) and to add it to the nomination as an ‘Alternative’ image (see the “Formal things” box at the head of this page).
- If one wants to propose a completely different photo (even of the same subject), a separate nomination is necesssary.
- Hope this helps, – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. So I'd suggest, @Dirtsc uses the version he/she prefers and briefly notifies those who voted while another version was visible. So far, no one seems to be taking the change as an opportunity to vote pro instead of con or vice versa. Superbass (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
- CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sorry, my question about the possibility to improve the symmetry was not meant to spoil the nomination; it was just a question or suggestion. Personally I would still be happier about this photo of a very symmetric interior if the photo was completely symmetric, too (by the way, this is not my hobby horse, but a common idea often expressed on this page). But I agree that the photo is also attractive as it is, especially, as Moroder has rightly emphasized, the light spot brings some magic into the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ermell, the sun spot doesn't bring magic to this scene in my opinion. (and by the way, horizontal PC would be welcome, horizontal lines aren't parallel and I think they should in a symetric composition) --Benji 22:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful, but per Ermell. I think this one is okay because it's nearly sharp and quite high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not as sharp as I'd like everywhere, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
- Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Till Niermann -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks downsampled, but good nonetheless. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. Exceptional landscape that looks almost surreal. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning mix of desert of snow dunes & glaciers, and light & darkness -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it's rather small for a landscape and coming from a 5DII, and there's this other picture which is better IMO and at 45 Mpx: File:Before it rains.jpg --Kadellar (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Two pictures taken one day apart... Till (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The other picture Kadellar links is definitely better, but it's a v different composition from this one Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. IMHO we can (and should) feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info Potocki Palace in Tulchyn (Ukraine) in sunset. All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support White balance seems a little warm to me, but cool architecture and nice composition so deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty good now IMO Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)