Hi Fouryearsofshades! I have a question regarding your comment: "I would not say aoqun is a type of ruqun. Technically ru has to have a separate waist - and yes it is fine to wear ru outside the skirt - if it is a real ru. Anything that has a side vent is a shan (un-lined) or ao (lined)" - what do you mean by "ru has to have a separate waist"? Thanks!
H! The bottom part of these clothes were sewed on separately.
I don’t know what to called it in English.
They are called “腰襕” in Chinese.
I see - in that case, does that mean:
- Only cross-collar ru are “real” ru (if they have a separate waist)?
- Parallel-collar “ru” are really “shan”, because they don’t have a separate waist? In that case, why do people use the term “ruqun” interchangeably for parallel-collar shanqun?
- For something like the item below - does this still count as a “shan”, despite it not having side vents (as far as I can tell)?
Tears of the era, I guess. In the early days people called these that and the name just stuck. I think now ruqun are used for clothings that have tuck-in style.
For some people, the last item does not count as hanfu as it does not have historical evidence. The latest symmetrical cross-collar top I knew of was from Song dynasty (黄岩 南宋宗室趙伯澐墓). That have side vents. I would called it a ru as it has no side vents.