Property talk:P1571
Documentation
codomain of a function
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1571#Type Q370502, Q11348, Q1948412, Q130901, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1571#Value type Q36161, Q217594, Q719395, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1571#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1571#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1571#Entity types
|
See also
[edit]Widen scope of value-type constraint (Q21510865) constraint?
[edit]The statement linear functional (Q99239929)codomain (P1571)field of scalars (Q99240496) has a constraint violation because field of scalars (Q99240496) is a subclass of set (Q36161), not a instance of. In the case of a functional, this is correct because the particular field will depend on the choice of vector space.
Can we change codomain (P1571)property constraint (P2302)value-type constraint (Q21510865)
- I made the change to match the property constraints on Template:P1568. The-erinaceous-one (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Allow use as qualifier
[edit]There is a related discussion in Property talk:P31. 慈居 (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC)