This document provides guidance on art criticism and how to critique different art forms. It discusses balanced and objective review, and defines art criticism as responding to, interpreting meaning, and making critical judgments about specific works. It then outlines the key elements of art criticism: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. For interpretation, it suggests establishing broader context and considering how the artwork makes you feel and what the artist intended to convey. For judgment, it advises evaluating originality, success, and applying criteria and evidence to assess quality. The document concludes with an assignment to research art critique and write an essay describing an artwork to someone who has never seen it.
This document provides guidance on art criticism and how to critique different art forms. It discusses balanced and objective review, and defines art criticism as responding to, interpreting meaning, and making critical judgments about specific works. It then outlines the key elements of art criticism: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. For interpretation, it suggests establishing broader context and considering how the artwork makes you feel and what the artist intended to convey. For judgment, it advises evaluating originality, success, and applying criteria and evidence to assess quality. The document concludes with an assignment to research art critique and write an essay describing an artwork to someone who has never seen it.
This document provides guidance on art criticism and how to critique different art forms. It discusses balanced and objective review, and defines art criticism as responding to, interpreting meaning, and making critical judgments about specific works. It then outlines the key elements of art criticism: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. For interpretation, it suggests establishing broader context and considering how the artwork makes you feel and what the artist intended to convey. For judgment, it advises evaluating originality, success, and applying criteria and evidence to assess quality. The document concludes with an assignment to research art critique and write an essay describing an artwork to someone who has never seen it.
This document provides guidance on art criticism and how to critique different art forms. It discusses balanced and objective review, and defines art criticism as responding to, interpreting meaning, and making critical judgments about specific works. It then outlines the key elements of art criticism: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. For interpretation, it suggests establishing broader context and considering how the artwork makes you feel and what the artist intended to convey. For judgment, it advises evaluating originality, success, and applying criteria and evidence to assess quality. The document concludes with an assignment to research art critique and write an essay describing an artwork to someone who has never seen it.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18
Art
Criticism A.What is balanced/objective review or criticism?
• It is a system of interpreting, judging, and
assessing a person, thing, or any work of art not influenced by feelings or opinions in considering and presenting facts. • It is a systematic way of considering the truthfulness of a piece of work. B. Art Criticism
Art criticism is responding to, interpreting
meaning, and making critical judgments about specific works of art. Art critics’ help viewers perceive, interpret, and judge artworks. a. artwork - "Why did the artist create it and 3. Interpretation. Establishing the broader context for this type of art. It answers the questions: b. artwork - "Why did the artist create it and what does it mean? c. piece of writing - "Why did the write create it and what does it mean? Remember: You shouldn’t make your interpretation too arbitrary! Provide evidence and point out what exactly influenced your understanding of the artwork • Here are the elements that you can include in your interpretation: • How does this art object make you feel? • What do you think of when you’re looking at the artwork? • What did the artist want to tell you as a viewer? • What do you think about the title of the work? • Does it influence your interpretation?
If you can’t understand a painting or a sculpture,
don’t hurry to give a negative response to it. Think of other critics who have provided a positive evaluation of the examined artwork. It doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have your opinion! All you need is to find a good way to express it. 4. Judgment. Judging a piece of work means giving it rank in relation to other works and of course considering a very important aspect of the visual arts; its originality. It answers the questions “Is it a good artwork?” Is it a good composition? Here are some points that can help you write your judgment: • How do you think: is the work successful or not? • Does this art object seem original or not? • What do you feel when looking at this piece of artwork? • Go back to your first impression. Has anything changed? • What did you learn? If nothing changed, explain your first reaction to the work. • What have you learned from this work that you might apply to your own artwork or your thinking In judging the piece of work, there must be: (a)Criteria (What criteria do I think are most appropriate for judging the artwork or writing?) (b)Evidence (What evidence inside or outside the artwork or piece of writing relate to each criterion?) and (c) Judgment (Based on the criteria and evidence, what is my judgment about the quality of the artwork or piece of writing?). E.g., the artwork successfully conveys the atmosphere of a battle through its composition and color scheme. Learning about its back story helped me to appreciate the painting even ASSIGNMENT:
Research How to critique different Art forms
Create an essay that will answer the question, “How would you describe an artwork to someone who has never seen it?”