Emissions: From Production

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Emissions from Blue

Hydrogen
Production

Prepared by
Rudresh prajapati
CH123 (ID- 19CHUBS094)
Hydrogen & it’s Production Techniques
● Green Hydrogen- By electrolysis of water

● Brown / Black Hydrogen- By Gasification of coal

● Gray hydrogen- By Steam Methane Reforming (involves


bombardment of Natural Gas with high pressure steam to force
methane to split into carbon dioxide and water)

● Blue Hydrogen- Same as Gray Hydrogen production but it


includes carbon capture.
THE HYDROGEN HYPE

• Hydrogen has the potential to play a key role in decarbonizing energy


systems.

• This is too particularly in hard-to-abate sectors like heavy industry, shipping,


and aviation, where electrification may not be practical or feasible.
Why Blue Hydrogen?

• Low carbon fuel for generating electricity and storing energy, thereby
powering cars, trucks, trains, and residential heating in extremely cold
climates.

• CO2 is captured & stored permanently underground.

• Result: Low carbon hydrogen producing no CO2, instead it emits


methane.
● Existing infrastructure: Blue hydrogen can be produced using the existing natural
gas infrastructure, which makes it easier to scale up production quickly.

● Reliability: Blue hydrogen is a reliable source of energy because it can be


produced on demand, which is especially important for applications like industrial
processes and transportation.

● Cost: Blue hydrogen is generally less expensive to produce than green


hydrogen. The production process is well-established and can be scaled up
quickly.
SMR Process
• SMR is currently the most common method of producing hydrogen gas,
accounting for around 95% of global hydrogen production.

• It is not a completely sustainable process as it relies on natural gas, fossil fuels,


and produces greenhouse gas emissions during the process.

The process typically involves four stages:

1. heating the natural gas and steam to high temperatures,


2. reacting the natural gas and steam in the presence of a catalyst to produce
hydrogen gas,
3. cooling and purifying the resulting gas mixture, and
4. separating the hydrogen gas from the other gases.
Countries producing Blue Hydrogen
● USA
● CANADA
● NETHERLANDS
● AUSTRALIA
● NORWAY
● SOUTH KOREA
● JAPAN
● UK
Blue Hydrogen in India

• India is currently exploring the potential of blue hydrogen.

• Government has set a target of achieving 450 gigawatts of


renewable energy capacity by 2030.

• It will be important for any blue hydrogen projects in India to


prioritize sustainability, minimize GHG emissions, and address
potential environmental and social impacts.
HYDROGEN IN INDIA

● India is currently producing both grey and green hydrogen.

● Grey hydrogen is produced from natural gas through a process called


steam methane reforming, which produces carbon dioxide emissions as a
byproduct.

● Green hydrogen, on the other hand, is produced using renewable energy


sources such as solar and wind power to electrolyze water and produce
hydrogen without any carbon emissions.
Emissions
• These days majority of hydrogen which is produced today is Gray Hydrogen.

• Blue hydrogen produces more GHGs due to fugitive methane emissions from gas
extraction process.

• These emissions has an average emission rate of 3.5% (from a range of 1.54%-
4.3%) with a Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 20 years.

• Methane has a half life of 12 years but it is 100 times more potent as a GHG than
carbon dioxide.
• However, on a 100 years timescale methane seems to be 23 times more potent
as compared to carbon dioxide.

• Methane is also referred as CO2eq as it has a GWP number of 86, which


means it is 86 times more impactful than CO2.

• Notably, carbon dioxide equivalent (methane) emissions are only 9-12% lower
than gray hydrogen.

• The methane emissions from blue hydrogen production are higher than grey
hydrogen.
• This is because refinery plants tend to utilise readily available supply of
natural gas to provide power for carbon capture process.

• The GHG footprint of blue hydrogen is 20% greater than natural gas and
60% greater than diesel fuel.

• According to International Energy Agency, over 100 years, 1 ton of


methane can be considered to be equivalent to 28 to 36 tonnes of CO2.
EFFICIENCY OF CARBON CAPTURE TECH
● The efficiency of carbon capture technology in blue hydrogen production ranges
from 80% to 95%, depending on the specific technology used.

● The most common method of carbon capture in blue hydrogen production is


post-combustion capture.

● It includes capture of carbon dioxide from the exhaust gases using chemical
solvents or other absorption materials.
HOWARTH & JACOBSON ON BLUE
HYDROGEN
The research paper (citation) by Howarth and Jacobson published in 2021 on
blue hydrogen argues that blue hydrogen is not a clean energy source and may
be worse for the climate than natural gas because:

● Blue hydrogen still relies on natural gas as a feedstock, which contributes to


GHG emissions.

● Carbon capture and storage technology is not effective enough to capture all
the emissions generated during blue hydrogen production.

● Blue hydrogen may actually emit more GHGs than natural gas due to
methane leakage during natural gas extraction and transport.
Why NOT Green Hydrogen
● Because it currently faces some
challenges that make it more difficult to
scale up quickly.

● Primary challenges is the high cost of


producing green hydrogen using
renewable energy sources such as wind
and solar power.

● Electrolysis, the process used to produce


green hydrogen, requires a significant
amount of electricity, which can be
expensive to produce using renewable
sources.

You might also like