QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW DASHBOARD

Name of the project Type of the Project Scope of the work Start Date Finish Date Duration (Days) Total Cost of the Project (In Cr)
NKM Avenue Residential + Commercial Civil + Finishing 01-01-2021 01-12-2022 699 1.2

Extra Cost of Poor Quality/Rework Quality Ratings Status of Conducted Group Wise NCR Stutus
71 Group Wise - Quality Observation 21 20
(Amount in Lakhs) Test 60 Status
0.41 78%
0.40 Pass
4%
0.15 5 10 7
0.20 0.08 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.02 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00
0.00
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e
N-2 B-2 R-2 R-2 Y-2 E-2 Y-2 ativ 22% 96%
JA FE MA AP MA JUN JUL mul
Cu

₹ ₹
% Extra cost against Total Cost of 41,00 42,50 Quality Observations Overall Status Overall NCR Status
0 0
Project 20 No of 1
3.44% No of NCR
Observations 9
1.25% Total Closed 3 Total Closed
0.67%0.58%0.17%0.58%0.19% 88 Observations 9 NCR
0.00% 68
Penalty Imposed by Client 2
Remaining Remaining
Total Amount Debited to Subcontrac... 0

Aging of Quality Observation  Aging of NCR

Total Savings on Testing and Calibration
>30 days 8 >30 days 1
9.0 ₹8,3
0 30 to 60 days 3 30 to 60 days 0
45 60 to 90 days 0
Total No of Quality Walks Conducted 60 to 90 days 1
₹- ₹2,000 ₹4,000 ₹6,000 ₹8,000 ₹10,000 <90 Days 1 <90 Days 0

Total Concrete Quantity vs S. No. Inspection of equipment Inspection authority

Customer complaints

Equipment Inspection
1136
Cum Achieved     Contractor PMC Client

Specifications
Report as per
M25 5000 1 Testing equipment Yes Yes Yes
T o t a l N o n C r i ti c a l S o . . . 14
M15 760
2 Batching equipments. Yes Yes Yes
5000 T o t a l N o n C r i ti c a l r a . . . 15 3 Weighing equipment. Yes Yes Yes
605.5 4 Measuring Equipment Yes Yes No
M10 1000 T o t a l C r i ti c a l S o . . . 8
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 5 Surveying equipments. Yes Yes Yes
T o t a l C r i ti c a l r a . . . 8 6 Ramming Equipment Yes Yes Yes
Total planned Cum. Achieved 7 Concrete Pouring Equipment Yes Yes No

Total Cum. Test Conducted SR. No Major Defect's Description Root Cause Corrective Action
1 Bulging : 2nd Floor- 10 columns Negligence & carelessness in Honeycomb area repairing as per approved methodology
compaction of fresh concrete
Honeycombing found : various Removing all loose particle and chipped off set portion. Repair
2 locations Improper supervision done as per methodology.
3 (Add Your Text Here)  (Add Your Text Here)   (Add Your Text Here)  
727
4  (Add Your Text Here)  (Add Your Text Here)   (Add Your Text Here)