Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 39 views

    Coverage Improvement: by Deepa.B

    Uploaded by

    deepa
    The document discusses improving coverage for an Intel project from 99.32% stuck-at coverage to over 95% at-speed coverage. This was achieved by addressing issues including feedback loops, blocking, abort limits, lack of observability, and tool version.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Coverage Improvement: by Deepa.B

    Uploaded by

    deepa
    39 views13 pages
    The document discusses improving coverage for an Intel project from 99.32% stuck-at coverage to over 95% at-speed coverage. This was achieved by addressing issues including feedback loops, blocking, abort limits, lack of observability, and tool version.

    Original Description:

    dft

    Original Title

    Presentation 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses improving coverage for an Intel project from 99.32% stuck-at coverage to over 95% at-speed coverage. This was achieved by addressing issues including feedback loops, blocking, abort limits, lack of observability, and tool version.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    39 views13 pages

    Coverage Improvement: by Deepa.B

    Uploaded by

    deepa
    The document discusses improving coverage for an Intel project from 99.32% stuck-at coverage to over 95% at-speed coverage. This was achieved by addressing issues including feedback loops, blocking, abort limits, lack of observability, and tool version.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 13

    Coverage improvement

    By Deepa.B
    Intel Project
    • Total number of blocks are 5.
    – par_iom
    – par_tbt_dp
    – par_tbt_dma
    – par_psftc_top
    – par_psftc4
    par_tbt_dma 

    • Stuck@ coverage was 99.32%


    • Whereas in At speed only 93.67% was
    achieved but requirement 95.00%.

     
    Coverage improvement
    • To increase 1.43% coverage in At speed.
    • By Analysis there was
    1. Feedback loop issue
    2. Blocking issue
    3. Abort issue
    4. Less Observabilty (cut point)
    5. Tool issue(old version)
    Feedback
    • There was more feedback circuit as show
    below
    • Where syn 34 output – syn 36 input – syn 34
    input .
    • It mean that syn 34 input was controlled by
    syn output
    Blocking (BL)
    • In a figure one of the AND gate input
    connected to ground.
    • Due to that another input of AND gate fault
    will not detect.
    • By observing below figure it contain 6 fault.
    Abort
    • But increasing abort limit we get coverage on
    UC and UO in between two scan flop.
    Loss observability
    • By adding cut point at memory output we are
    getting detect fault(DS) till syn 38 output.
    • From syn 38 to syn 39 we are getting UO.AAB
    fault at input of syn 39.
    • To get observabilty from Syn 39 we added cut
    point at output of syn 39.
    • This cut point are verified and added as test
    point by scan team.
    TOOL issue
    • Tool issue as show in below figure where syn
    21 output fault was detected but at syn 22
    input fault was showing as ( AU AAB/AU AAB)
    It mean its not detected.

    You might also like