Performance of P-Only, PI and PID Controllers

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Chapter 8

Performance of P-only, PI
and PID Controllers
Overall Course Objectives
• Develop the skills necessary to function as an
industrial process control engineer.
– Skills
• Tuning loops
• Control loop design
• Control loop troubleshooting
• Command of the terminology
– Fundamental understanding
• Process dynamics
• Feedback control
P-only Control
• For an open loop overdamped process as K c is
increased the process dynamics goes through the
following sequence of behavior
– overdamped
– critically damped
– oscillatory
– ringing
– sustained oscillations
– unstable oscillations
Dynamic Changes as Kc is
Increased for a FOPDT Process

Time Time Time

Time Time Time


Root Locus Diagram
(Kc increases a to g)
8 8
g
f
d
4 4
Imaginary Axis

0 0
a b c b a e
-4 -4
d
f g
-8 -8
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1
Real Axis
Effect of Kc on Closed-Loop 

1.5
overdamped
Damping Factor ( ')

0.5 underdamped

0
unstable
-0.5
0 2 4 6 8
Kc
Effect of Kc on Closed-Loop p

0.6
Time Constant ( 'p )

0.4

0.2

0
0 2 4 6 8
Kc
P-only Controller Applied to First-
Order Process without Deadtime
• Without deadtime, the system will not become
unstable regardless of how large Kc is.
• First-order process model does not consider
combined actuator/process/sensor system.
• Therefore, first-order process model without
deadtime is not a realistic model of a process
under feedback control.
PI Control
• As Kc is increased or I is decreased (i.e.,
more aggressive control), the closed loop
dynamics goes through the same sequence
of changes as the P-only controller:
overdamped, critically damped, oscillatory,
ringing, sustained oscillations, and unstable
oscillations.
Effect of Variations in Kc

Time Time Time

Effect of Variations in I

Time Time Time


Analysis of the Effect of Kc and
I

• When there is too little proportional action


or too little integral action, it is easy to
identify.
• But it is difficult to differentiate between
too much proportional action and too much
integral action because both lead to ringing.
Response of a Properly Tuned PI
Controller

Lag

ys

Time
Response of a PI Controller with
Too Much Proportional Action

Lag

ys

Time
Response of a PI Controller with
Too Much Integral Action
c

Lag

ys

Time
PID Control
• Kc and I have the same general effect as
observed for PI control.
• Derivative action tends to reduce the
oscillatory nature of the response and
results in faster settling for systems with
larger deadtime to time constant ratios.
Comparison between PI and PID
for a Low p/p Ratio

PI

PID
Time
Comparison between PI and PID
for a Higher p/p Ratio

PI

PID

Time
An Example of Too Much
Derivative Action
ys

Time
Effect of D on Closed-Loop 
1.5
Damping Factor ( )

overdamped

1
underdamped

0.5

0
0 0.25 0.5 0.75
D
Demonstration: Visual Basic
Simulator
Effect of Kc, I, and D
Overview
• As the controller aggressiveness is increased
(i.e., Kc is increased or I is decreased), the
response goes from overdamped to critically
damped to oscillatory to ringing to sustained
oscillations to unstable.
• Too little proportional or integral action are
easy to identify while too much proportional
or integral results in ringing. Differentiating
between too much integral or proportional
action requires comparing the lag between
the controller output and the CV.

You might also like