This is a presentation on the potential problems with the Red River Redevelopment Authority a.k.a. TexAmericas.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30
Red River Redevelopment
Authority a.k.a. Tex Americas
Issues and Concerns
RRRA Tex Americas Info • Created by the Texas Legislature as a municipality • NAFTA corridor location for highway and rail shipments • Foreign Trade Zone at the Red River Commerce Park • Texas Enterprise Zone Program Foreign Trade Zone • An FTZ is an area within the United States, in or near a U.S. Customs port of entry, where foreign and domestic merchandise is considered to be outside the country, or at least, outside of U.S. Customs territory. Certain types of merchandise can be imported into a Zone without going through formal Customs entry procedures or paying import duties. Customs duties and excise taxes are due only at the time of transfer from the FTZ for U.S. consumption. If the merchandise never enters the U.S. commerce, then no duties or taxes are paid on those items. NAFTA • The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January 1, 1994. It is designed to remove tariff barriers between the U.S., Canada and Mexico over the next fifteen years. NAFTA includes two important side agreements on environmental and labor issues that extend into cooperative efforts to reconcile policies, and procedures for dispute resolution between the member states. NAFTA cont. • NAFTA promoters - including many of the world’s largest corporations - promised it would create hundreds of thousands of new high-wage US Jobs, raise living standards in the U.S., Mexico and Canada, improve environmental conditions and transform Mexico from a poor developing country into a booming new market for U.S. exports NAFTA cont. • NAFTA opponents - including labor, environmental, consumer and religious groups - argued that NAFTA would launch a race-to-the-bottom in wages, destroy hundreds of thousands of good U.S. jobs, undermine democratic control of domestic policy-making and threaten health, environmental and food safety standards. NAFTA cont. • Twelve years later (2006), it is clear that the costs to workers outweighed the benefits in all three nations. The process differed from country to country, and given the greater size and wealth of the United States, the impact there has not been as great as it was in Mexico and Canada. But the overall pattern was similar. In each nation, workers' share of the gains from rising productivity fell and the proportion of income and wealth going to those at the very top of the economic pyramid grew. Source: epi.org -Economic Policy Institute The NAFTA Superhighway • By now many Texans have heard about the proposed “NAFTA Superhighway,” which is also referred to as the trans-Texas corridor. What you may not know is the extent to which plans for such a superhighway are moving forward without congressional oversight or media attention. This superhighway would connect Mexico, the United States, and Canada, cutting a wide swath through the middle of Texas and up through Kansas City. Offshoots would connect the main artery to the west coast, Florida, and northeast. Proponents envision a ten-lane colossus the width of several football fields, with freight and rail lines, fiber-optic cable lines, and oil and natural gas pipelines running alongside. Ron Paul 2006 NAFTA Superhighway cont. • The River of Trade Corridor Coalition (ROTCC) was created in 2004 to unite cities, counties, transportation authorities, freight movement entities, and businesses along this trade route to protect, maximize, and expand commerce and the economic vitality of the Corridor while, at the same time, identifying opportunities to relieve congestion from seaports, land ports, railroads and interstates, as well as addressing negative environmental impact concerns and safety and security matters. • The 3,300 mile high-volume goods movement Corridor follows existing rail and interstate routes. The Corridor follows the southwest-northeast trade route from Laredo, Texas to Detroit, Michigan/Windsor, Ontario via Dallas, Little Rock, Memphis, Nashville, Louisville, Cincinnati, Dayton, and Toledo. The Corridor also follows the Interstate 45 corridor moving goods to and from the Port of Houston and the Interstate 10 corridor and rail route from the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach through Phoenix, Tucson, Las Cruces, El Paso and Fort Worth into Dallas. NAFTA Superhighway and SPP • The proposed highway is part of a broader plan advanced by a quasi-government organization called the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” or SPP. • The SPP was first launched in 2005 by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco. NAFTA Superhighway and SPP cont. • The SPP was not created by a treaty between the nations involved, nor was Congress involved in any way. Instead, the SPP is an unholy alliance of foreign consortiums and officials from several governments. One principal player is a Spanish construction company, which plans to build the highway and operate it as a toll road. But don’t be fooled: the superhighway proposal is not the result of free market demand, but rather an extension of government- managed trade schemes like NAFTA that benefit politically-connected interests. Ron Paul NAFTA SH and SPP cont. • The real issue is national sovereignty. • The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union – complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel within the Union. Ron Paul NAFTA SH and SPP cont. • Like the European Union, a North American Union would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty altogether. • The SPP agreement, including the plan for a major transnational superhighway through Texas, is moving forward without congressional oversight – and that is an outrage. Ron Paul KC SmartPort • The Kansas City SmartPort is an “inland port” that is proposed to handle Mexican customs and inspections. It is to be the link between seaports in Mexico and major truck, air and rail lines in the United States, all the way to Manitoba, Canada. KC SmartPort cont. • After cargo arrives at Mexican seaports (mostly from Asia), it is to be shipped to Kansas City, and from there to the rest of the US and Canada. The cargo will be approved and screened for security in a Mexican port. Trucks and rail are to be inspected for safety in Mexico. According to press reports, there will be a US “border inspection" when the cargo reaches the Mexican border. Source: Naftasuperhighway.org KC SmartPort cont. • ...a very small percentage of cargo is inspected by Homeland Security. They will rely primarily on the port personnel in Mexico. The vast majority of cargo will pass through the border unimpeded and will not be inspected. We will be relying on other countries to keep us safe from terrorism, nuclear waste and semi-trucks full of illegal immigrants, guns, drugs or other illegal cargo. KC SmartPort cont. • U.S. Sovereignty. A Mexican customs office is planned for Kansas City (with the innocuous name of (Kansas City Customs). If the U.S. State Department approves it, this will be the first foreign customs operation on US soil, and there is a concern that Mexico will have sovereignty in their facilities (ie, Mexican customs office will not be subject to US laws). This is currently on hold by the US State Department. KC SmartPort cont. • U.S. jobs will permanently be lost. Good paying union jobs in the US for American truckers, railway workers, airline staff, warehouse personnel and dockworkers will permanently shift to non-Americans. For example, the Mexican Ports that are being developed are funded and run in part by a Hong-Kong shipper. Additionally, the Texas-Trans Corridor (a piece of the superhighway) is to be contracted out to a Spanish company to build and operate. We don't know how many TTC related jobs will go to US Citizens, and how many will go to foreigners. KC SmartPort cont. • Kansas City taxpayers are providing a loan (and the property) for the construction of the Mexican customs facility!
Eminent Domain. New highways like the
TTC, will take up millions of acres of land through the use of eminent domain. KC SmartPort cont. • PPP-Private Public Partnerships. This is how much of the superhighway system will be built. Private companies will lease the highway infrastructure, and they will recoup their investment plus profit with tolls and receipts from concessions (gas stations, restaurants, etc.) American highways will be effectively owned, controlled and maintained by foreign companies that will make a profit. For existing (not new) highways, taxpayers will literally pay for the same highway twice. KC SmartPort cont. • Phyllis Schlafly wrote in an article at www.worldviewweekend.com the following: • Joyce Mucci and Francis Semler forced the release of the emails from Kansas City to Mexico, including one admitting that "The space [in Kansas City] would need to be designated as Mexican sovereign territory." KC SmartPort cont. • As laid out on SmartPort’s web site, the plan is to enable cheap-labor products made in Communist China to travel in sealed "containers nonstop from the Far East by way of Mexico," through "a ships-to-rail terminal at the port of Lazaro Cardenas in Mexico," then up "the evolving trade corridor" to Kansas City, Missouri, where they would have their first inspection. KC SmartPort cont. • The Kansas City city council has already earmarked $2.5 million in loans and $600,000 in direct aid (of taxpayers' money) to SmartPort, which would build and own the facility and then sublet it to the Mexican government. KC SmartPort cont. • The last piece in finalizing this project is getting the U.S. State Department to approve the Mexican operation on U.S. soil by signing off on what is called the C-175 document. It has already been approved by U.S. Customs. Interesting Facts • In June (2006), a Spanish firm paid $1.3 billion for a 50- year lease to operate a 10-lane toll road through the heart of Texas. Also in June, an Australian-Spanish partnership paid $3.8 billion to lease the Indiana tollroad for 75 years. Last year, Chicago sold a 99-year lease on the eight-mile Chicago Skyway to the same buyer for $1.8 billion, and the tolls are expected to double. Almost weekly, we learn about other American properties that have been sold or leased- long-term to foreign companies. The tolls from the U.S. side of the tunnel between Detroit and Windsor, Canada, belong to an Australian company. More Interesting Facts • Why the rush to sell our transportation systems to foreigners? Like most actions that are hard to understand, "follow the money" explains all. State and local governments pocket the money up front and get to spend it here and now, so politicians can cover their runaway budget deficits and enjoy the political rewards of spending for new facilities. They ignore the fact that U.S. citizens must pay tolls to foreign landlords for the next two or three or even four generations. I 69 • Jobs: I-69 is estimated to spawn more than 40,000 new jobs by 2025, resulting in $12.8 billion in additional wages and $24 billion in added value. • Economic Development: I-69 is expected to increase economic activity throughout the eight state corridor, where 4.2 million residents live below poverty level. • Trade Efficiency: I-69 is the shortest route between the Northeast and South Texas. It will reduce travel time, fuel consumption and costs over the existing circuitous route and serve the largest segments of U.S. trade with Mexico and Canada. I 69 cont. • Because of geography, economic development and commerce on both sides of the border, Texas is the funnel through which the majority of land-based U.S.- Mexico trade must pass. For this reason, we must do all we can to strengthen Texas roads and their connections to our water ports, airports and rail lines.” • --U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas I 69 cont. • “Having a good land transportation system. . . good ports and airports is probably the most important element for the future of NAFTA . . . For many firms, a reduction in transportation costs would be more significant than reduced costs brought about by lowering or eliminating tariffs.” • --Luis Fernando de la Calle, Director, Mexican Embassy NAFTA Office Conclusion • Is RRRA/Tex Americas a part of NAFTA? • What kind of jobs will be created at RRRA/Tex Americas? • Will I 69 have toll sections? If so, who will build and own those sections? • How do we protect our sovereignty at RRRA/Tex Americas?