Leadership TM05
Leadership TM05
Leadership TM05
All rights
reserved.
Introduction to Leadership
1e.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
AFTER COMPLETING THIS CHAPTER, YOU SHOULD BE
ABLE TO:
Define leadership.
Explain how leadership differs from
management.
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Understand how leadership influences
organizational performance.
Explain the tri-axis model for
conceptualizing organizational leadership.
Discuss different approaches to studying
organizational leadership.
Describe the challenges of conducting
research on organizational leadership.
1–2
THE NATURE OF LEADERSHIP
Common Assumptions:
Leaders—through their personal qualities,
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
influence, and actions—profoundly shape
societal events (i.e., make a difference).
A leader affects and is affected by followers and
the environment within which he or she
operates.
Managerial leadership is a process of social
influence whereby an individual exerts influence
on others in an organizational context.
1–3
THE NATURE OF LEADERSHIP
Effects of Large-scale Industrialization
Thebureaucratic need (coordination) for
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
managers
Monitoring and controlling the productivity, quality,
and performance of subordinates.
The organizational need (direction) for leadership
Strategic management in building and deploying a
committed workforce of team members.
1–4
LEADERSHIP
Is a dialectical, proactive process wherein an
individual persuades others to do something
they would not otherwise do.
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Is socially constructed through the
interaction of leaders and followers within a
specific context and is equated with power.
1–5
THE SEARCH FOR LEADERSHIP
ALTERNATIVES
Command and control (traditional) leadership
model—Taylor and Weber
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Transformational leadership model—Tichy
and Devanna
Charismatic leadership model—Conger
Self-leadership model—Manz and Sims
“To lead without leading”
1–6
VIEW CD
If just to learn what is on it and how it all
fits together, it is worth taking a glance at
the Leadership in Organizations CD-ROM
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
right now, if you have not done so already.
Designed to draw out the intricacies of
leadership theory and practice, the case
studies, in particular, allow for a
surprisingly in-depth look at leadership as
it is exercised at a variety of organizations.
1–7
LEADERSHIP VERSUS MANAGEMENT
Management Approaches
The central process through which organizations
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
achieve the semblance of congruence and
direction.
A process designed to coordinate and control
productive activities.
Managerial Role
An expected set of activities or behaviors
stemming from a position held in an
organizational setting.
Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and
controlling 1–8
LEADERSHIP VERSUS MANAGEMENT
Dimensions of Modern Management
Managerial activities
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and
controlling
Managerial contingencies
Forces and events, both outside and inside the
organization, that affect management behavior
Managerial processes
The means by which managers communicate ideas,
gain acceptance of those ideas, and motivate others to
implement them
1–9
LEADERSHIP VERSUS MANAGEMENT
(CONT’D)
Management Leadership
Maintainthe Create vision
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
status quo Create
change or
Createorder and movement
consistency “Doing the right
“Doing things thing”
right” Transformational
Transactional relationships
(contractual) (psychological
relationships contract)
1–10
MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP
COMPARED
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
1–11
Source: Kotter, J. P. (1990). A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York:
Free Press; Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Table 1.1
LEADING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
Steps in the Change Process:
Step 1: Establish a sense of urgency.
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Step 2: Create the guiding coalition.
Step 3: Develop a vision and a strategy.
Step 4: Communicate the change vision.
Step 5: Empower broad-based action.
Step 6: Generate short-term wins.
Step7: Consolidate gains and produce more
change.
Step 8: Anchor new approaches in the culture.
1–12
REFLECTIVE QUESTION ▼
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
To what extent were you a leader?
To what extent were you a follower?
Did the managers exhibit managerial or
leadership behaviors? Explain.
Do you believe that managers and leaders
reflect fundamentally different personality
types?
1–13
MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Managerial
Management Leadership
Leadership
1–14
FACTORS USED TO MEASURE
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
1–15
Figure 1.1
METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES
Gaining management participation and
disclosure of commercially sensitive
information.
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Making subjective judgments about which
criteria to study, which measures to use and
the weight to be assigned each measure.
Negatively correlated multiple criteria.
Isolation of external variables to reduce their
influence.
Difficulties in identifying causal links.
1–16
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
1–17
Figure 1.2
reserved.
LEADERSHIP AS A
PROCESS
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
1–18
Figure 1.3
reserved.
PERSPECTIVES ON LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP THEORIES: AN
OVERVIEW
The Trait Perspective
“Great Man” theories focused on identifying
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
innate (universal) individual qualities or
attributes of leaders that distinguish them from
nonleaders or noneffective leaders.
The Behavior Perspective
Theories examining the people- and task-
oriented behaviors and organizational roles that
make leaders most effective.
1–19
LEADERSHIP THEORIES (CONT’D)
The Contingency Perspective
The idea that effective leadership (as a style) in
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
a particular case depends on interactions among
the leader, followers, and the situation.
The Power–Influence Perspective
A sociological viewpoint of the leadership
process in terms of social relations involving the
interplay of power, constraints, conflict, and
cooperation.
1–20
LEADERSHIP THEORIES (CONT’D)
The Gender–Influence Perspective
Analyses that consider how the leadership styles
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
of female leaders differ for those of male leaders.
The Integrative Perspective
Studies of charismatic leaders that attempt to
combine trait, behavior, and contingency
theories to explain leader–follower relationships.
The Exchange Perspective
Theories that focus on leader–follower
interactions— their nature and effects on
leaders, followers, and the organization.
1–21
ISSUES IN LEADERSHIP RESEARCH
What perspective should researchers and
scholars adopt when studying leadership?
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Mainstream approach
Rationality of organizations
Efficiency and achievement of organizational goals
Critical approach
Applying historical, contextual considerations of
sociological concepts—social structure, processes,
culture, and norms—to discover the in-process ways in
which power, control, conflict, and legitimacy affect
leader–follower dynamics.
1–22
ISSUES IN LEADERSHIP RESEARCH
To what extent can researchers construct a
truly objective account of the leadership
phenomenon?
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
Research methodologies
Research designs
Political characteristics of leader-follower
relations
The Constructivist Approach
Suggests that accounts and interpretations of
what the leader and the situation are perceived
to be result from the interaction of the examined
leader and the researcher in a shared context. 1–23
REFLECTIVE QUESTION ▼
reserved.
Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights
rather produces what we come to
regard as truth.
What are your views of the constructivist
model?
What are the implications of this view for
understanding leadership studies?
1–24