Strengthening of Damaged PSC Bridge Girders With Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer "CFRP" System

Strengthening of damaged PSC bridge
girders with Carbon Fibre Reinforced

Polymer “CFRP” System
S. N Agarwal, GM/SER
K. C Swami, CBE/WR
Avinash Kumar, Dy. CE/D/WR
BRIDGE No. 114 (4X18.3m) on Khan River
Salient Features of Bridge No. 114
 Span Configuration:- 4X18.3m
 Superstructure:-Twin PSC girders with RCC deck Slab
 Section –Godhra-Ratlam (Ratlam Division of WR)
 Year of Construction -1958-60
 Wt of one Span – 145 MT
 Depth of Girder – 2130 mm
 Loading Standard – BGML
 Height of bridge (bottom of girder – Bed Level) -14.0m
Defects identified and Action Taken
 Multiple vertical structural cracks found in girders
(mainly originating from bottom)
 Other deteriorations in slab and girders also noticed.
 Cracks were active (opening & closing)under traffic
 Speed reduced to 20 kmph in March-2014
 Tell tales were provided
Defect:-
Vertical Flexural Cracks
5
Visible Cracks in Web of PSC girder
Tests carried out before strengthening
(i) Rebound hammer test –
Compressive strength of concrete
Ultrasonic pulse velocity test –
homogeneity and quality of concrete, presence of voids, cracks etc.
(ii) Core test – Comp strength of concrete
(iii) Tension test – Tensile Strength of Prestressing wire
(iv) Concrete Scanning System – used for locating prestressing cables and
finding their size.
(v) Load tests for measurement of deflection using LVDT– to compare
pre and post strengthening results-
(vi) Test for measurement of natural frequency using accelerometer– to
compare pre and post strengthening results
7
Results of NDT tests
Span No. Average of UPV Average comp
readings (km/sec) strength
Rebound Hammer
test (Mpa)
Span -2 3.42 54.3
Span-4 3.40 51.6
Pulse Velocity Value Concrete Quality
(Km/sec)
Above 4.5 Excellent
3.5-4.5 Good
3.0-3.5 Medium
Below 3.0 Doubtful
Deflection Test Test For Natural Frequency
WAG 7 locomotive was

used for load testing
Method of Strengthening
Preparatory Work
(i) Repair of corrosion related deterioration
(ii) Patch Repair using Polymer Modified Mortar
(iii) Epoxy Grouting – Pressure injection of cracks
Installation of CFRP System

(i) Prestressed CFRP laminate - For enhancing Flexural stiffness
- 5 nos of 100 mm width and 2.4mm thick in each girder
(ii) CFRP sheet Wrapping
- For enhancing Shear Strength
- Provide additional bond strength to laminates
- 1 and 2 layers of 500 mm width 430GSM carbon fiber sheet 800mm c/c
Application of Protective Coating - to protect bonded CFRP from
environmental effects
10
Repair of Corrosion related deterioration
-Application of anticorrosive paint
Application of Polymer modified mortar
Injection in Cracks (Epoxy grouting)
Surface Preparation
Application of Putty ( Removing surface undulation)
Application of Primer (Bonding Coat)
Installation of CFRP System
Application of CFRP laminates
CFRP Laminate
Clamping Device
100x2.4 mm
Hydraulic Jack Cylinder

Anchor Plate Body
80
KN
Bottom Face of PSC Girder

RCC SLAB
PSC GIRDER
CFRP Laminate
CFRP Sheet 500 mm
wide
Cross Section RCC SLAB
PSC GIRDER
CFRP Laminate 800 mm c/c
100x2.4 mm
Elevation of PSC girder
Fixing of Hydraulic Jack and application of prestressing force
Pre stressing of laminate
Pre stressed carbon laminates in bottom of girder
Carbon Fiber Wrapping
Carbon Fiber Wrapping
(duly saturated with saturating resin)
Strengthened PSC Girder
25
Acceptance criteria
 Cracks: - No further progression of cracks after rehabilitation.
 Deflection:- Fifty to seventy percent of the excess deflection
as compared to uncracked girder will be reduced
 Natural frequency: - the excessive natural frequency will
come within 25% of the value of uncracked girder.
Note:- In case natural frequency is already near to or within 25% of the

natural frequency of uncracked girder, the respective above criteria
cannot be applicable.
Effectiveness of Strengthened deck
Deflection of girders at mid point for WAG-7 Loco
Span No. Deflection in mm % % recovery Remark
Before After reduction of excessive
Strengthening Strengthening deflection
1st,
Uncracked 2.79 --
Girder Excess
2nd, deflection
Cracked 3.84 3.07 20.05 73.33 reduced
Girder more than
4th, 50%
Cracked 4.06 3.16 22.16 70.86
Girder
Natural frequency of Girders (in Hertz)
Frequency in Hz % Increase
Span No.
Before After
Strengthening Strengthening
1st,
Uncracked Girder 9.58 --
2nd,
Cracked Girder 8.64 9.29 7.52
4th,
Cracked Girder 8.44 8.70 3.08
(i) Natural frequency of Cracked girders are already within 25% of the natural
frequency of uncrackd girder.
(ii) However natural frequencies of repaired girders are more, which indicate
that flexural stiffness has increased after repair.
Health Monitoring of Repaired Girders
Deflection of repaired girders in mm with time
Date of recordings
Span
07.07.15 10.08.15 26.10.15 29.01.16 23.08.16 22.10.16
2nd
-- 3.07* 3.13 3.11 3.10 3.07
4th
3.16* 3.11 3.17 3.12 3.14 3.12
*-values just after repair

Deflection of girder at mid point ( For WAG7 Load) in mm
Span No. Before After Strengthening
Strengthening
Load Test FE Analysis
2nd (distressed 3.84 3.07 3.10

girder)
4th (distressed 4.06 3.16 3.21

girder)
Deflection of girder at mid point ( For WAG7 Load) in mm
Span No. Before After Strengthening
Strengthening
Load Test FE Analysis
2nd (distressed 3.84 3.07 3.10

girder)
4th (distressed 4.06 3.16 3.21

girder)
Design Details (material properties)
Items Details
Grade of concrete, girder M35 (verified from NDT tests and
core sample)
Grade of concrete, deck slab M20 (verified by NDT tests)
No of cables in each girder 6
No of strands in a cable 12
Diameter of one strand 8 mm
Ultimate strength of cable 1600 N/mm² (from testing)
Material properties of CFRP system
CFRP Laminate CFRP Dry sheet
Width 100 mm Width 500 mm
Thickness 2.4 mm Thickness 0.25 mm

Modulus of 150 GPa Modulus of Elasticity 230 Gpa
Elasticity
Limiting Strain 0.012 Limiting Strain 0.014
Limiting Stress 1800 N/mm² Limiting Stress 3220 N/mm²

Design Consideration
(i) Design philosophy

-ACI 440.2R-08 has been followed
- Published by American Concrete Institute
Design was Proof checked by Prof K.M Bajoria of IIT/Mumbai
(ii) Design Flexural strength determined based on Strain compatibility,

Internal force equilibrium and Controlling mode of failure.
(iii) The Strengthened Girders have been designed to satisfy Ultimate

limit state as well as serviceability limit state.
34
Probable Failure mode
 Crushing of concrete in compression before yielding of
prestressing steel and rupture of laminates
 Yielding of prestressing steel in tension followed by rupture

of laminates
 Yielding of steel followed by concrete crushing
 Debonding of CFRP laminates from concrete substrate

Flexural strength – Ultimate limit state
Loading standard considered 25t-2008
Design Flexural strength = 18241 KN-m
Applied factored Moment = 17587 KN-m
< 18241 KN-m
( Less than Design Flexural moment, hence OK)
Stresses in Service condition
 Compressive stress in concrete should be less than 0.45fc
Comp stress = 6.4 Mpa < 7.2 Mpa
 Stress in prestressing wire should be less than 0.72fpu to

avoid yielding of steel in service
Stress in steel = 705 Mpa < 1140 Mpa
 Stress in CFRP laminates should be less than 0.55ffu to avoid

creep rupture under sustained load and fatigue due to cyclic
stress
Stress in laminate = 410 Mpa < 990 Mpa
Advantages of prestressing laminates
 Induce comp stresses in bottom of girder
 May close pre existing cracks and increase stiffness
 Laminate made active to participate to carry load due to

DL+SIDL – 0.22 % strain (more utilization)
 Improve serviceability and durability of girders
 Increase the ultimate moment of resistance by delaying failure

mode associated with delamination as the ends are anchored.
Conclusions
 The use of CFRP laminates increases the flexural stiffness and natural
frequency of the cracked prestressed girders.
 Proper CFRP repair scheme can be designed by following provisions of ACI-
440-2R for capacity enhancement and desired mode of failure of repaired
PSC girders.
 Results of load tests after strengthening are in good agreement with the results
obtained from FE analysis.
 The deflection of repaired girders are almost constant after passing more than
one year – thus proved an effective method of strengthening of cracked PSC
girders
 First time implemented in Indian Railway and proved very promising,
effective and economical for organization like Railway where work has to be
done under traffic or a traffic block of 2-3 hours –traffic can’t be stopped or
diverted
THANK YOU

Strengthening of Damaged PSC Bridge Girders With Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer "CFRP" System

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Strengthening of Damaged PSC Bridge Girders With Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer "CFRP" System

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Strengthening of Damaged PSC Bridge Girders With Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer "CFRP" System

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Strengthening of damaged PSC bridge

girders with Carbon Fibre Reinforced

WAG 7 locomotive was

Installation of CFRP System

Hydraulic Jack Cylinder

Bottom Face of PSC Girder

Note:- In case natural frequency is already near to or within 25% of the

*-values just after repair

2nd (distressed 3.84 3.07 3.10

4th (distressed 4.06 3.16 3.21

2nd (distressed 3.84 3.07 3.10

4th (distressed 4.06 3.16 3.21

Thickness 2.4 mm Thickness 0.25 mm

Limiting Strain 0.012 Limiting Strain 0.014

Limiting Stress 1800 N/mm² Limiting Stress 3220 N/mm²

(i) Design philosophy

(ii) Design Flexural strength determined based on Strain compatibility,

(iii) The Strengthened Girders have been designed to satisfy Ultimate

 Yielding of prestressing steel in tension followed by rupture

 Yielding of steel followed by concrete crushing

 Debonding of CFRP laminates from concrete substrate

 Stress in prestressing wire should be less than 0.72fpu to

 Stress in CFRP laminates should be less than 0.55ffu to avoid

 Induce comp stresses in bottom of girder

 May close pre existing cracks and increase stiffness

 Laminate made active to participate to carry load due to

 Improve serviceability and durability of girders

 Increase the ultimate moment of resistance by delaying failure

You might also like