Design and In-Service Inspections: Guy Baylac Technical Advisor To EPERC

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways from the document are that in-service inspections of pressure vessels are important to consider in the design process and operate efficiently over the lifetime of the vessel. Proper dialogue between manufacturers and users as well as organized feedback can help improve both design and operation.

Some of the classical errors discussed are treating design and in-service inspection as separate domains when they are related, and lack of dialogue between purchasers who want lowest price and users who want to reduce inspection/maintenance costs without considering total lifecycle costs.

The considerations for fatigue critical areas in design discussed are that they need to be accessible for inspection and non-destructive testing. The operating instructions should include maintenance instructions and refer to Annex M which provides measures to adopt in service.

DESIGN AND IN-SERVICE INSPECTIONS

Guy BAYLAC
Technical Advisor to EPERC
[email protected]

TAIEX Workshop, Working Group 4


Bratislava – 12 April 2005
Layout
• Introduction: PED and National legislation
• Explicit reference to in-service inspection in
EN 13445:2002
– Fatigue (Clauses 18 and 17 of EN 13445-3)
– Annex M of EN 13445-3
– Creep, fast closures
• Experience feedback
• Conclusion

2
Classical error n°1
Legal texts
• PED applies to design, manufacture
and conformity assessment of PE
• National legislation to in-service
inspection
• Thus design and in-service inspection
would be two completely different
domains

3
Classical error n°2
Lack of dialogue
• The Purchaser of equipment wants the
lowest possible price
• The User wants to reduce inspection,
maintenance and download costs
• But it is the total cost (purchase +
inspection + maintenance + download)
which is to consider

4
Warnings
• PED, Annex 1
– "The manufacturer is under an obligation to
analyse the hazards …"
– Operating instructions: use, maintenance
• Requirements contained in product
standards: e.g. EN 13445:2002 "Unfired
pressure vessels"

5
Layout
• Introduction: PED and National legislations
• Explicit reference to in-service inspection in
EN 13445:2002
– Fatigue (Clauses 18 and 17 of EN 13445-3)
– Annex M of EN 13445-3
– Creep and fast closures
• Experience feedback
• Conclusion

6
Fatigue damage occurs
earlier with thickness
reduction!
• Higher nominal stresses f  min(
R p ,0, 2 Rm, 20
; )
1,5 3
– Yesterday R p ,0, 2 Rm, 20
– Today (DBF) f  min( ; )
1,5 2,4
– Today (DBA) R p ,0, 2 Rm, 20
f  min( ; )
• Fatigue analysis required 1,5 1,875
– Yesterday for neq  1000 pressure cycles
– Today (DBF) for neq  500 pressure cycles
– Today (DBA) for neq  500 pressure cycles

7
Design conditions for
fatigue critical areas
• Accessible for inspection and non-
destructive testing
• Instructions for appropriate
maintenance are included in the
operating instructions
• Valid procedures are given in Annex M
"Measures to be adopted in service"

8
Fatigue critical areas
are those for which

• The number neq of full range or


equivalent pressure cycles is greater
than 500
• And the design fatigue damage D >Dmax

9
Definition of critical
zones in formulae
neq  500
and
Dmax  0,8 for 500  neq  1000
Dmax  0,5 for 1000  neq  10000
Dmax  0,3 for neq  10000
10
Special case of testing
group 4 vessels

• Vessels produced in
large series, no NDT
except visual inspection
• 500 full pressure cycles
• Higher pressure test at fa emin
the end of fabrication to Pt  2,0  Ps  
f t emin  c
ensure safety
• Measured peaking
limited to
0,5  emin

11
Outward peaking

12
HYDFAT RESEARCH
PROGRAMME
(Institut de Soudure)
Typical small
scale pressure
vessels
(MBEL)

13
ANNEX M
"Tests during
operation"

• These tests shall be included in the


operating instructions of the
Manufacturer

14
Annex M
Tests during operation

• Internal and external inspection at 20 %


allowable lifetime
• Record of number of load cycles
• For vessels subject to cyclic loading internal
inspections to be supplemented by non-
destructive tests
• If operating conditions deviate from those
assumed in calculation, inspection intervals
should be shortened

15
Annex M
Measures at end of design
lifetime

• Vessels of testing groups 1, 2 and 3


– Complete NDT
• No cracks or crack-like defects:
– Continued operation may be allowed
• If cracks or crack-like defects:
– Removal of cracks by grinding …
– Change in mode of operation

16
Annex M
Measures at end of design
lifetime

• Vessels of testing group 4


– Complete visual inspection after 500 full or
equivalent pressure cycles
– Followed by a pressure test at a pressure equal to
that used for the initial pressure test.
– This sequence may be repeated as long as the
visual inspection reveals no evidence of fatigue
cracking and the pressure vessel passes the
pressure test.

17
Crack progression
a 500
Crack Cycles
No
depth hydrotest 1 cycle
in service per
Danger! week
~
10
years
Hydrotest in service
with crack blunting
Time 18
Similar considerations for
Creep (EN 13445-3 New
Clause 19)
• Two safety coefficients versus creep
rupture strength

– SF=1,5 without monitoring


– SF=1,25 with monitoring

• Operating instructions shall specify


monitoring if it is a design option
19
Fast closures : EN
13445-5, Annex C
Operating instructions shall deal with
• Service-maintenance intervals
• Conservation of records
• Checks of closing mechanism
• Tolerances for parts subject to wear and parts
to replace
• Other materials to be used with manufacturer
consultation
• Operating personnel adequate instructions
• Operating instructions available on the site
20
Layout
• Introduction: PED and National legislations
• Explicit reference to in-service inspection in
EN 13445:2002
– Fatigue (Clauses 18 and 17 of EN 13445-3)
– Annex M of EN 13445-3
– Creep, fast closures
• Experience feedback
• Conclusion

21
Experience feedback

Design Operation

Experience feedback

22
Experience feedback has
beneficial consequences

• Product improvement: life extension,


easiness of operation, recycling
• Improvement of inspectability
(possibility to inspect)
• Introduction of proven materials e.g.
– Composite materials
– Spheroidal graphite cast iron (low cost)

23
Experience feedback may
have negative aspects

• Old inspection rules may influence the


design without being justified by
integrity
– A design against time intervals of
inspection and not against design fatigue
curves may lead to unnecessary increase
in thickness

24
Layout
• Introduction: PED and National legislations
• Explicit reference to in-service inspection in
EN 13445-3:2002
– Fatigue (Clauses 18 and 17)
– Annex M
– Creep, fast closures
• Experience feedback
• Conclusion

25
Conclusion
• This presentation has covered
– Interaction between fatigue design and in-
service inspection
– Interaction between design and in-service
inspection for creep and fast closures
• This presentation is far from being
exhaustive

26
Conclusion (Continued)
• It has raised questions, such as:
– A better dialogue between involved parties,
e.g. the User and the Manufacturer, which
is a source of profits
– An organised feedback, e.g. a data base
on accidents at European scale, which
could improve design and operation
efficiency.

27

You might also like