Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Foundation
Bearing Capacity Of Shallow Foundation
deformation.
Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Analysis –
* Terzaghi (1943) analysed a shallow continuous
footing by making some assumptions –
• Depth of foundation is less than or equal to its
width
• No sliding occurs between foundation and soil
(rough foundation)
• Soil beneath foundation is homogeneous semi
infinite mass
• Mohr-Coulomb model for soil
• General shear failure mode is the governing
mode (but not the only mode)
• Soil above bottom of foundation has no shear
strength
• Applied load is compressive and applied vertically
to the centroid of the foundation
Terzaghi’s Bearing capacity equation for
determining ultimate bearing capacity of strip
footing.
qu =cNc + γ Df Nq + 0.5 γ B N γ
Thus, Nc’,Nq’ & Nr’ are B.C. factors for local shear failure
When, Dw =0
& when x = 0
Si = q B 1- μ2/Es I
where
q -uniformly distributed load.
B - characteristic length of loaded area,
Es - modulus of elasticity of the soil.
μ - poisson's ratio.
I - influence factor which dependent upon
elastic properties of base & shape at base.
Alternatively, the value of [1- μ2/Es] I can be
determined from the plate load test.
b) On Cohesionless Soils
According to Stuartmann & Hartman immediate
settlement on Cohesionless soils is given by -
ZB
Si C1C2 q q
I2
E
Z 0 S
Isolated
foundation
i) steel struct 50mm 0.0033L 1/300 50mm 0.0033L 1/300
ii) RCC struct 50mm 0.0015L 1/666 75mm 0.0015L 1/666
Raft
foundation
i) steel struct 75mm 0.0033L 1/300 100mm 0.0033L 1/300
ii) Rcc struct. 75mm 0.002L 1/500 100mm 0.002L 1/500
a) mv = -(e / 1+ eo)/
b) for one dimension, v = H
mv = - (H / Ho) /
also mv = av / (1+ eo )
in which, eo- initial void ratio.
e - change in void ratio.
Ho initial thickness.
H – change in thickness.
3) Compression index ( Cc) is equal to the slope
of the linear portion of the void ration versus log
plot.
Cc = - e/ log 10 ( 0 + ) / 0
in which, 0 = initial effective stress.
- change in effective stress.
if both mv & are cons tan t ,
SF mv Ho ........ ( 1)
alternatively
n -
Sf ( mv ) i ( ) i ( z ) i ........(2)
i 1
Final Settlement Using Void Ratio
H = Ho ( e / 1 + eo )
Cc σ0 + Δσ
Sf = Ho Log
1+e0 10 σ0
Cr σ 0 + Δσ
Sf = Ho Log
1+e0 10 σ0