Issue No: UGTL/GT/842 Date: 26.07.

2023

For the Location Reference: - Post Office, Netaji Bose Chakk,Puri

Report Issued To:

The chief pmg Bhubaneswar

Test Conducted By:

Unique Geo Test Laboratory
 Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary Report..................................................................................................... 4

2. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 5

3. Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 5

4. Scope of Works........................................................................................................................... 5

5. Description of Project Site ...................................................................................................... 6

6. Field Investigation ..................................................................................................................... 6

6.1. General.................................................................................................................................. 6

6.2. Methodology for Drilling ................................................................................................. 7

6.3. Field Testing ....................................................................................................................... 7

6.4. Corrections for SPT N Value ........................................................................................... 8

6.4.1. Overburden Correction ............................................................................................ 8

6.4.2. Dilatancy Correction ................................................................................................. 9

6.5. Sampling & its Identification .......................................................................................... 9

6.6. Ground Water Table……………………………………………………………………………………………………10

6.7. Summary of Bore Holes ................................................................................................. 10

7. Lab Investigation/Testing ..................................................................................................... 10

8. Soil Profile .................................................................................................................................. 11

9. Safe Bearing Capacity ............................................................................................................. 12

9.1. Safe Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation......................................................... 12

10. Conclusion & Recommendation .......................................................................................... 13

Table-01-Summary of Safe Bearing Capacity--------------------------04

Table-02-Bore Hole Details----------------------------------------10

Table-03-List of Lab tests-----------------------------------------10

Table-04-Soil Profile----------------------------------------------11

Appendix-A-Field Bore Hole Logs-----------------------------------15

Appendix-B-Lab. Result Sheet--------------------------------------17

Appendix-C-Detailed Calculations of SBC-----------------------------19

Appendix-D-Depth Vs Corrected N Value Graph-----------------------21

Appendix-E-Particle Size Distribution Curve--------------------------23

References------------------------------------------------------25
 1. Executive Summary Report

The Report Presents Geotechnical Investigation, Test Results, Interpretation, Calculation,

Estimation, Suggestion & Recommendation of Foundation based on the Sub Soil Properties of 02

no’s of Bore hole drilled

A Summary Report of Bearing Capacity for both Shear & Settlement criteria has been given under

at a Glance: -

TABLE-01 (Summary of SBC for Shallow Foundation)

BH Depth Soil NSBC for Total SBP for SBP for SBP for
No in m. Strata shear Settlement 25mm 50mm 75mm
criteria in mm permissible permissible permissible
in MTon/m2 settlement settlement settlement
in MTon/m2 in MTon/m2 in MTon/m2
1.50 SM 5 52 3 5 5
3.00 SM 15 61 6 12 15
4.50 SM 26 81 8 16 24
01 6.00 SM 64 101 16 32 48
7.50 SM 99 134 18 37 55
9.00 SM 161 195 21 41 62
1.50 SM 5 90 1 3 4
3.00 SM 11 90 3 6 9
02 4.50 SM 23 92 6 13 19
6.00 SM 53 99 13 27 40
7.50 SM 97 138 18 35 53
9.00 SM 144 181 20 40 60
 Detailed Description & Analysis are given in this Report (Appendix-C).

 Drilling of BH-01 & 02 were started from Existing Ground Level

2. Introduction
M/s Unique Geo Test laboratory, NABL. Approved Laboratory & ISO 9001:2015 Certified

Company was entrusted by The chief pmg, Bhubaneswar for the work Geo-Technical

Investigation at above said Locations up to desired drilling depths (See Table-2)

3. Purpose
The Object of the current geotechnical investigation was to explore and determine the existing

sub-strata conditions such as stratification, Denseness or hardness of the strata, position of

ground water table at Bore Holes etc. and to evaluate approximate range of safe bearing capacity

for the proposed structure using empirical formulas provided in the relevant IS codes. The goal

of our investigation was to identify the key geotechnical issues that could potentially impact the

proposed project and to develop geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of

the project.

4. Scope of Works
Scope of Work Included with the followings: -

4.1. Field Marking of Bore Holes.

4.2. Drilling of 02 No’s Bore Holes up to desired depths (Refer to Table No-02) as per IS 1892.

4.3. Collection of Undisturbed/Disturbed Samples & Conducting Standard Penetration Test as per

IS 2131 & 2132 respectively.

4.4. Recording of Bore Hole Water Table (If met within drilled Depth)

4.5. Sealing & Transporting of Samples from Site to Laboratory.

4.6. Laboratory testing of samples for various Engineering & Index Properties.

4.7. A comprehensive Geotechnical investigation report embodying all the above Information

along with tables of Field / Lab tests results and bearing capacity computations.

5. Description of Project Site

5.1. Construction of Holiday Homes Building at Puri.

6. Field Investigation
6.1. General

In an attempt for optimization in the design of foundation for these proposed structures to be

constructed at this site, Geotechnical Investigation was envisaged. The entire Investigation

programme had been divided mainly into

Two parts, I) Field works & II) Laboratory tests.

I) Field works unfold the sub-surface deposit types, their characteristics & Behaviour of

Ground Water Table.

II) Laboratory test’s part would help determining the relevant physical and Geotechnical

properties of the sub-surface deposits leading to finalization of foundation depths of the

structures and the bearing capacity with particular reference to the sub-surface types and

their strength parameters and settlement potentials at the site.

6.2. Methodology for Drilling
For Sub Soil Exploration Rotary drilling method using Mechanical Rig was adopted at site. In this

system, boring is affected by the cutting action of a rotating bit which was kept in firm contact

with the bottom of the Bore hole. The bit is carried at the end of hollow, jointed drill rods which

are rotated by a spindle Rod connected to Gear Box. A Bentonite fluid is pumped continuously

down the hole through the hollow drilling rods and the fluid returns to the surface in the annular

space between the rods and the side of the hole, and so the protective casing may not be

generally necessary. But when the inner Surface of the Bore Holes are susceptible to collapse, the

Casings are installed to stabilize the Bore Holes.

In the Rocky Strata, the core Barrel with Diamond bit is used in place of Drill Bit at the down end

of the Drilling/Connecting rod & the boring is continued in same manner as above. The Core

Samples of Rock are cut and Collected in the Core Barrel which is recovered after Removal of

Barrel at relevant Depth Intervals

6.3. Field Testing

Standard Penetration Test

Standard Penetration Test was performed in the Bore Hole. The Standard Split Spoon Sampler

attached to the string of drilling rod down End lowered to bottom of the Drilling Depth of Bore

Hole & allowed to rest under its self-weight. The Drill rods were connected to driving assembly

which consisted of a hoisting equipment’s, a drive weight (Hammer) of 63.5 kg, and a guide to

ensure 75 cm free fall of hammer on an anvil connected to upper end of drill rods. The No. of

hammer Blows that were required to penetrate the sampler through three runs of 150mm each

were recorded. Nos of Blows for initial driving of 150mm was disregarded & the no of blows
required to drive the sampler through the remaining 300mm is called Blow Count or Penetration

number, N. If the penetration was less than 30cm for 50 blows, it is considered as refusal & N

value is noted as 50. At the end of the test, the sampler was withdrawn & the soil extracted from

the split spoon sampler for subsequent testing in the laboratory.

6.4. Corrections for SPT N Value

At field, the measured SPT N values affected by overburden pressure and pore water pressure, so

this un-corrected N value cannot be used for calculation of Bearing Capacity. So we have to

correct these values as described in IS 2131. There are two types of Corrections for SPT N value

i.e., Overburden Correction & Dilatancy Correction.

6.4.1. Overburden Correction

The Field SPT N value is generally higher in Larger Depth & Lower at Shallow Depth Due to

effective overburden Pressure in Cohesion-less Soil. To equivalent all these SPT N values,

overburden correction is made based on its effective overburden pressure at test depths as per

IS 2131:1981 Reaffirmed 2021 Figure-01. The Correction is made only in Cohesion less Soil

strata.

Corrected N value for overburden, N1=OCF× N

N1= Corrected N Value for Overburden.

OCF = Correction Factor for Overburden.

N = Measured SPT N value at Field.

 6.4.2. Dilatancy Correction
This correction is generally made after overburden correction. This correction is made if,

Fine sand & Silts are present in submerge condition below the test depths because the

field test N value affected by the pore water pressure in above said conditions resulting

in higher N value. To neutralize this effect, we do this correction. Prior to apply this

correction make sure that N1>15, Otherwise N2=N1&N2 be final corrected Value to use

in calculations.

Corrected N value for Dilatancy, N2=15+ (N1-15)/2

6.5. Sampling & its Identification

Standard Penetration Test is conducted & Samples are collected from spoon sampler at

every change in strata or 1.5m intervals, whichever is earlier. Other Forms of samples

are UDS,DS, Wash and Rock Core & Rock Non-Coring. In Clayey Strata Undisturbed

Sample (UDS) is taken to know to the in-situ Density & Shear test Parameters of the Soil,

DS- Disturbed sample is collected at just below ground level & Where the SPT rebounds

the wash sample is collected to witness the strata.

Ground Water Table Determination of ground water table was measured using steel tape

and weight as per procedure laid in IS 6935:1973. At the time of Sub-soil investigation,

the encountered Water table depth is shown in Table-3 under clause no. 6.7 & in Bore-

hole log sheet under Annexure-I of present report.

6.6. Summary of Bore Holes
A Comprehensive Summary of Bore Holes with Coordinates, RL, Termination Depth & Ground
Water Table below EGL are Presented in Table-02 (Bore Hole Details)

Bore Hole No Drilling Depth in Meter Ground Water Table in meter

BH-01 10.0 1.50

BH-02 10.0 2.00

7. Lab Investigation/Testing
The sent Samples from Field are preliminarily inspected and then received at lab for

further investigation & Testing. Lab Testing Results are attached in Annexure-II.

Here is the Lists of Laboratory tests in brief &Latest Reference Standard set by BIS.

(For Soil & Rock)

TABLE-03 (List of Lab. tests with reference)

Sl Name of Tests Purpose Reference Standard

No.
01 Grain Size analysis Categorize the soils in IS 2720 (Part 4) : 1985

groups as per IS 1498: Reaffirmed In : 2020

1971 Reaffirmed In : 2021

02 Atterberg’s Limit Determination of IS 2720 (Part 5) : 1985

Plasticity Index of the Soil Reaffirmed In : 2020

03 Specific gravity To Determine Void Ratio IS 2720 : Part 3 : Sec 1 : 1980

of the soil strata Reaffirmed Year : 2021

 04 Moisture Content & IS 2720 (Part 2) : 1973

Density Reaffirmed In : 2020 & LAB SOP

05 Free swell Index To know the expansive IS 2720 (Part 40) : 1977

nature of the Soil Reaffirmed In : 2021

06 Tri-axial Shear Shear Strength Parameters IS 2720 (Part 11) : 1993

strength of Cohesive Soils Reaffirmed In : 2021

07 Direct Shear Test Shear Strength Parameters IS 2720 (Part 13) : 1986

of Granular Soils Reaffirmed In : 2021

08 UCS test for Rock To explore the IS 9143 : 1979

Compressive strength of Reaffirmed In : 2016

the Rock Sample

8. Soil Profile
Summary of Field & Lab Properties.

TABLE-04 (Soil Profile)

Description of Strtum Consistency of Denseness of
Stratum:- Depth From Range of SPT as per IS1498:1971 Stratum (For Stratum
BH Ref:- & to (Inm.) N Value Soil Group as per Nature of Soil
RA2021 Cohessive (For Granular
(Corrected) IS1498:1971
stratum) Stratum)
RA2021
BH-O1 Non-Expansive
I EGL–10.00 6.0-18.0 SM Silty Sands - Low to Medium
& Non-Plastic
 Range of SPT Soil Group Description of Denseness of
Consistency of
Stratum Depth From
N as per Strtum as per Stratum
BHRef:- Nature of Soil Stratum (For
:- & to(In m.)
Value(Corred) IS1498:1971 IS1498:1971 (For Granular
Cohessive
RA2021 RA2021 stratum) Stratum)

Non-Expansive Loose to Medium

BH-O2 I EGL–10.00 5.00-17.50 SM Silty Sands -
& Non-Plastic
9. Safe Bearing Capacity
9.1. Safe Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation

A foundation fails by two Conditions i.e.

i) Shear failure.

ii) Excessive settlement.

Shear failure being catastrophic, an adequate factor of safety is applied to ultimate

Bearing capacity that can resist this type of failure. BIS recommends a value of FOS= 2.5

to obtain the net safe bearing capacity Qdn. by using the physical characteristics of the

foundation and relevant Test parameters of soil as per IS 6403: 1981Reaffirmed 2021.

Settlement analysis as per IS 8009 (Part-I):1977 Reaffirmed 2017for net loading

Intensity Qds is obtained by using the physical Characteristics of the foundation, SPT N

Value with fig. 09 of IS 8009 (Part-I):1977 Reaffirmed in 2017 and the relevant

Compressibility characteristics of the Underlying soil. The value so obtained ensures that

the foundation shall not settle more than that which is permissible as per BIS
Recommendations. The permissible settlement depends upon the type of superstructure

and the nature of supporting strata. Table-01 of IS 1904: 2021 may be followed for this.

The lesser of these computed values i.e. Qdn or Qds is adopted as the allowable Bearing

Capacity for proportioning the foundation of super structures. Detailed Calculations

with said formulas are annexed in this Report.

Abstract of the Safe Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundation is given in Table-01 &

Detailed Calculation of Safe Bearing Capacity is attached in Appendix-C

10. Conclusion & Recommendation

Abstract of SBC for Shear and Settlement criteria is given in Table No-01 and the designer is at

liberty to decide the depth and the type of foundation intended basing on the sub-soil

characteristics made available in this report.

NOTES:

The following conclusions, suggestions and remarks are made based on the available test data

and sub-soil profiles as per bore logs contained in this report.

The selection of type of foundation is therefore governed primarily by the magnitude of the

maximum and permanent loading conditions, type of structure and allowable settlements.

The foundations typically must satisfy two independent design criteria. Firstly, there must be an
acceptable factor of safety against bearing capacity failure of the soil under the maximum

design load. Secondly, the total settlement of the foundation due to initial distortion and

consolidation of the soils under sustained loading during the lifetime of the structure should fall

within the limits that are structurally tolerable. (Refer IS 6403:1981-Clause-6.1 & 6.1.1 and IS:

1904:1986Table-1).

The safe bearing capacity of the sub-soil stratum has been calculated and has given in this report

(Table-01).

Authorized Signatory

M/s Unique Geo Test Laboratory

 Appendix-A

(Field Bore Hole Log)

BHNo-01 Orientation of BH Vertical

Dia of BH- 150 mm Water table from EGL 1.0m
Depth of BH- 10.0 m Start Date of Boring 21.07.2023
Location of BH- Post Office Netaji chakk, Puri End Date of Boring 21.07.2023
-

Symbolic Standard Penetration Test at site

Drilling CR in % RQD in% Remarks
Sl Classifica represent-
Depth in Type sample Nos of Nos of Nos of
No. Description of tion of at ion of Total N
Meter
Strata Strata strata Blows
st
for Blows for
nd
Blows for
values(2n
1 15cm 2 15 cm 3rd15 cm
d+3rd)
Penetration Penetration Penetration

1 0.50 DS SM --- --- --- --- --- ---

2 1.50 SPT SM 2 3 3 6 --- ---

3 3.00 SPT SM 4 4 5 9 --- ---

4 4.50 SPT SM 6 5 5 10 --- ---

5 6.00 SPT Silty Sand SM 8 8 9 17 --- ---

6 7.50 SPT SM 9 10 11 21 --- ---

7 9.00 SPT SM 11 12 14 26 --- ---

8 10.00 SPT SM 4 13 16 29 --- ---

BHNo-02 Orientation of BH Vertical
Dia of BH- 150 mm Water table from EGL 3.0m
Depth of BH- 10.0 m Start Date of Boring 22.07.2023
Location of BH- Post Office Netaji chakk, Puri End Date of Boring 22.07.2023
-

Symbolic Standard Penetration Test at site

Drilling CR in % RQD in% Remarks
Sl Classifica represent-
Depth in Type sample NosofBl NosofBl NosofBl
No. Description of tion of at ion of Total N
Meter
Strata Strata strata owsfor1s owsfor2n owsfor3rd values(2n
t15cm d15 cm 15 cm
d+3rd)
Penetration Penetration Penetration

1 0.50 DS SM --- --- --- --- --- ---

2 1.50 SPT SM 2 2 3 5 --- ---

3 3.00 SPT SM 3 3 3 6 --- ---

4 4.50 SPT SM 5 4 5 9 --- ---

5 6.00 SPT Silty Sand SM 6 7 7 14 --- ---

6 7.50 SPT SM 6 9 11 20 --- ---

7 9.00 SPT SM 8 11 13 24 --- ---

8 10.00 SPT SM 8 11 15 26 --- ---

 Appendix-B

(Laboratory Result Sheet)

LABORATORY TEST RESULT OF SOIL SAMPLE

Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Density and moisture Shear

Limit content Parameters

Angle of Internal Friction in

Natural Moisture Content%
>4.75mm (Fine Gravel in%)

Silt & Clayi n%<0.075mm

Free swelling Index in %

Corrected SPT N Values

Depth of Samples (m)

Dry Density in gm/cc

Classification of Soil
Bulk Density gm/cc

Cohesion In kg/cm2
(Medium Sand in%)
(Coarse Sand in%)

Plasticity Index(%)
Type of Samples

(Fine sand in %)

Specific Gravity
Plastic Limit(%)
Liquid Limit(%)
0.425-0.075mm

SPT N Values
2.00-0.425mm
4.75 -2.0mm

Void Ratio

Degrees
BH No.
Sl.No.

1 0.50 DS 0.00 0.00 12.63 51.42 34.84 Non Plastic - 2.67 - - - 0 SM - - - -

2 1.50 SPT 0.00 0.00 15.14 56.47 28.39 Non Plastic - 2.67 - - - 0 SM - - 6 6.00
3 3.00 SPT 0.00 0.00 18.42 55.14 26.44 Non Plastic - 2.66 - - - 0 SM - - 9 9.00
4 BHNo- 4.50 SPT 0.00 0.00 19.91 55.71 24.38 Non Plastic - 2.67 - - - 0 SM - - 10 10.00
01
5 6.00 SPT 0.00 1.12 27.95 53.21 17.72 Non Plastic - 2.66 - - - 0 SM - - 17 16.00
6 7.50 SPT 0.00 5.91 24.81 51.07 18.21 Non Plastic - 2.66 - - - 0 SM - - 21 18.00
7 9.00 SPT 0.00 11.46 23.66 54.10 10.78 Non Plastic - 2.68 - - - 0 SM - - 26 20.50
8 10.00 SPT 0.00 12.71 25.42 51.71 10.16 Non Plastic - 2.68 - - - 0 SM - - 29 22.00
 LABORATORY TEST RESULT OF SOIL SAMPLE
Atterberg
Grain Size Analysis Limit Density and moisture Shear
content Parameters

Angle of Internal Friction in

Natural Moisture Content%
>4.75mm( Fine Gravel in%)

Silt & Clay in %<0.075mm

Corrected SPT N Values

Free swelling Index in%
Depth of Samples (m)

Dry Density in gm/cc

Classification of Soil
Bulk Density gm/cc

Cohesion In kg/cm2
(Medium Sand in%)
(Coarse Sand in%)

Plasticity Index(%)
Type of Samples

Specific Gravity
Plastic Limit(%)
(Fine sand in%)

Liquid Limit(%)
0.425-0.075mm

SPT N Values
2.00-0.425mm
4.75-2.0mm

Void Ratio

Degrees
BH No.
Sl.No.

1 0.50 DS 0.00 0.00 14.22 61.20 24.58 Non Plastic - 2.67 - - - 0 SM - - - -

2 1.50 SPT 0.00 0.00 16.34 60.85 22.81 Non Plastic - 2.66 - - - 0 SM - - 5 5.00
3 3.00 SPT 0.00 0.00 15.47 61.37 23.16 Non Plastic - 2.67 - - - 0 SM - - 6 6.00
4 BHNo-02 4.50 SPT 0.00 0.00 16.12 59.67 24.21 Non Plastic - 2.66 - - - 0 SM - - 9 9.00
5 6.00 SPT 0.00 0.00 17.08 60.44 22.48 Non Plastic - 2.66 - - - 0 SM - - 14 14.00
6 7.50 SPT 0.00 0.00 17.66 61.24 21.10 Non Plastic - 2.65 - - - 0 SM - - 20 17.50
7 9.00 SPT 0.00 5.67 19.41 63.96 10.96 Non Plastic - 2.68 - - - 0 SM - - 24 19.50
8 10.00 SPT 0.00 6.01 20.67 62.11 11.21 Non Plastic - 2.68 - - - 0 SM - - 26 20.50
 Appendix-C

(Detailed Calculations for Safe Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation)

1.0 Calculation of Safe Bearing Capacity from Standard Penetration Test as per IS 6403
Data / Data / Data / Data / Data / Data /
Parameters Denotion calculations calculations calculations calculations calculations calculations
For Depth at For Depth at For Depth at For Depth at For Depth at For Depth at

Bore hole No. BH No. BH No-01 BH No-01 BH No-01 BH No-01 BH No-01 BH No-01
Depth in m Df 1.50 3.00 4.50 6.00 7.50 9.00
Length of Foundation in m L 2 2 2 2 2 2
width of Foundation in m B 2 2 2 2 2 2
Corected N Vale N'= Corrected for Overburden & Dilatancy as per IS 2131 6.00 9.00 10.00 16.00 18.00 20.50
Submeged Density of soil in kg/cm3 y' 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Surcharge Intensity in kg/cm2 q = y'× Df 0.15 0.3 0.45 0.6 0.75 0.9
Shape of Foundation Base Square
W'=0.50 (to face worst condition in future.) as per clause no
Effect of Water Table 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
5.1.2.4.b of IS 6403
Factor Of Safety FOS 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

Angle of Internal Friction ɸ=(Taken from Fig 1 of IS 6403 Based on Corrected N' Value) 28.4 29.6 30 31.8 32.4 33.2
Angle of Internal Friction ɸ'= TAN-1×(0.67×TAN ɸ ) as per Note of Table-1 of IS 6403 20 21 21 23 23 24
Nf Nf= 2.814 2.952 3 3.228 3.309 3.421
Bearing Capacity Factors for General Nq =(Taken from Table-1 of IS 6403 based on ɸ value ) 15.304 17.626 18.4 22.87 24.36 27.34
Shear Ng (Taken from Table-1 of IS 6403 based on ɸ value ) 17.792 21.248 22.4 30.089 32.652 37.778
Bearing Capacity Factors for Nq =(Taken from Table-1 of IS 6403 based on ɸ value ) 5.637 8.141 8.845 14.522 16.438 20.327
Intermediate Shear Ng =(Taken from Table-1 of IS 6403 based on ɸ value ) 4.327 7.753 8.761 17.246 20.326 26.58
Bearing Capacity Factors for Local Nq ' =(Taken from Table-1 of IS 6403 based on ɸ value ) 6.4 7.252 7.252 8.956 8.956 9.808
Shear Ng ' =(Taken from Table-1 of IS 6403 based on ɸ value ) 5.39 6.488 6.488 8.684 8.684 9.782
sq= (As per Table 2 of IS 6403) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Shape Factors
sg=(As per Table 2 of IS 6403) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
dq=(As per Table 2 of IS 6403) 1.126 1.258 1.39 1.539 1.682 1.832
Depth Factors
dg=(As per Table 2 of IS 6403) 1.126 1.258 1.39 1.539 1.682 1.832
Ultimate Net Bearing Capacity in kg/cm2 Qd =q (N q - 1) s q d q i q + ½ B g N g s g d g i g W' 1.3372 3.6241 6.3756 16.0451 24.7376 40.1874
Net Safe Bearing Capacity in MT/m2 (NSBC)=(Qd×10)/FOS 5 15 26 64 99 161
2.0 Calculation For Settlement For Cohessionless strata as per Clause no 9.1.4 of IS 8009(Part-1)
Influence zone from Foundation in m 2×B (As per Clause no. 5.2.2 os IS 6403) 4 4 4 3 3 3
Settelment from Fig No.9 of IS: 8009-1976
For Corrected N value for standard Intensity 10 MT/m2 (Su) 78.5 40 32 17 15 13.75
Corrected Settlement Due to WT Effect Su/W' (As per 9.1.4 & Fig 09 of IS 8009-Part 1) 157 80 64 34 30 27.5
Settlement for Imposed Load Si=( Su × NSBC)/10 83.995 116 163.2 218.212 296.85 442.0625
Correction Factor For Depth DF =(As per Table 12 of IS 8009 Part-1 ) 0.78 0.66 0.62 0.58 0.57 0.55
Correction Factor for Rigidity RF =(As per Clause No. 9.5.2 Of IS 8009 Part-1) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Corrected Final settlement Sf=Si × DF × RF 52 61 81 101 134 195
Safe Bearing Pressure for 25MM
SBP= (NSBC / Sf) × 25 or NSBC whichever is Less 3 6 8 16 18 21
Settlement
Safe Bearing Pressure for 50MM
SBP= (NSBC / Sf) × 50 or NSBC whichever is Less 5 12 16 32 37 41
Settlement
Safe Bearing Pressure for 75MM
SBP= (NSBC / Sf) × 75 or NSBC whichever is Less 5 15 24 48 55 62
Settlement
1.0Calculation of Safe Bearing Capacity from Standard Penetration Test as perIS6403
Data/ Data/ Data/ Data/ Data/ Data/
Calculation For Calculation For Calculation For Calculation For Calculation For Calculation For
Parameters Denotion Depth at Depth at Depth at Depth at Depth at Depth at
Bore hole No. BH No. BH No-02 BH No-02 BH No--02 BH No-02 BH No-02 BH No-02
Depth in m Df 1.50 3.00 4.50 6.00 7.50 9.00
Length of Foundation in m L 2 2 2 2 2 2
Width of Foundation in m B 2 2 2 2 2 2
Corected N Vale N'=Corrected for Overburden & Dilatancy as per 5.00 6.00 9.00 14.00 17.50 19.50
Submeged Density of soil in kg/cm3 IS2131 y' 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Surcharge Intensity in kg/cm2 q=y'×Df 0.15 0.3 0.45 0.6 0.75 0.9
Shape of Foundation Base Square
Effect of Water Table W'=0.50(to face worst condition in future.) as per clause no
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
5.1.2.4. of IS6403
Factor Of Safety FOS 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Angle of Internal Friction ɸ=(Taken from Fig
Fig1 of IS6403 Based on Corrected N' Value) 28 28.4 29.6 31.2 32.3 32.9
Angle of Internal Friction ɸ'=TAN-1×(0.67×TAN
×(0.67×TANɸ) as per Note of Table-1 of IS6403 20 20 21 22 23 23
Nf 2.77 2.814 2.952 3.15 3.295 3.378
Bearing Capacity Factors for Nq=(Taken from Table-1 of IS6403 based on ɸ value) 15.304 15.304 17.626 21.38 24.36 25.85
General Shear 17.792 17.792 21.248 27.526 32.652 35.215
Ng (Taken from Table
Table-1 of IS6403 based on ɸ value)
Bearing Capacity Factors Nq=(Taken from Table-1 of IS6403 based on ɸ value) 5.128 5.637 8.141 12.276 16.218 18.368
for Intermediate Shear Ng =(Taken from Table-1 of IS6403 based on ɸ value) 3.618 4.327 7.753 13.853 19.983 23.466
Bearing Capacity Factors for Nq'=(Taken from Table-1 of IS6403 based on ɸ value) 6.4 6.4 7.252 8.104 8.956 8.956
Local Shear Ng '=(Taken from Table-1 of IS6403 based on ɸ 5.39 5.39 6.488 7.586 8.684 8.684

Shape Factors
sq=(As per Table 2 of IS6403) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
sg=(As per Table 2 of IS6403) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
dq=(As per Table 2 of IS6403) 1.125 1.252 1.387 1.532 1.681 1.827
Depth Factors
dg=(As per Table 2 of IS6403) 1.125 1.252 1.387 1.532 1.681 1.827
Ultimate Net Bearing Capacity in kg/cm2 Qd =q(Nq-1)ssqd q i q+½Bg Ng sg d g i g W' 1.3361 2.7038 5.7786 13.2868 24.367 35.9847
Net Safe Bearing Capacity in MT/m2 (NSBC)=(Qd×10)/FOS 5 11 23 53 97 144
2.0 Calculation For Settlement For Cohessionless strata as per Clause no 9.1.4 of IS8009(Part-1)
Influence zone from Foundation in m 2×B(As per ClauseClauseno.5.2.2 of IS6403) 4 4 4 3 3 3
Settelment from FigNo. 9 of IS:8009-1976 For Corrected N value for standard Intensity 10MT/m2(Su) 140 78.5 40 20 15.5 14.25
Corrected Settlement Due to WT Su/W'(As per9.1.4
9.1.4 & Fig09 of IS8009-Part1) 280 157 80 40 31 28.5
Settlement for Imposed Load Si=(Su×NSBC)/10 149.52 169.874 184.88 212.6 302.157 410.229
Correction Factor For Depth DF=(As per Table 12 of IS8009Part-1) 0.78 0.66 0.62 0.58 0.57 0.55
Correction Factor for Rigidity RF=(As per ClauseNo.
ClauseNo.9.5.2 Of IS8009Part-1) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Corrected Final settlement Sf=Si×DF×RF 93 90 92 99 138 181
Safe Bearing Pressure for 25MM Settlement SBP=(NSBC/Sf)×25 or NSBC whichever is Less 1 3 6 13 18 20
Safe Bearing Pressure for 50MM Settlement SBP=(NSBC/Sf)×50 or NSBC whichever is Less 3 6 13 27 35 40

Safe Bearing Pressure for 75MM Settlement SBP=(NSBC/Sf)×75 or NSBC whichever is Less 4 9 19 40 53 60
 Appendix-D

(Depth Vs Corrected N Value Graph)

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST

BH - 01
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST

BH - 02
 Appendix-E

(Particle Size Distribution Curve)

BH NO-01
BH NO-02
 References
1. Bureau of Indian Standards (1970). ‘‘IS 1498: Classification and identification of

soils for general engineering purposes.’’

2. Bureau of Indian Standards (1973). ‘‘IS 2720, Part 2: Methods of test for soils:

Determination of moisture content.’’

3. Bureau of Indian Standards (1985a). ‘‘IS 2720, Part 3 (Sec-1 & 2): Methods of test

for soils: Specific gravity.’’

4. Bureau of Indian Standards (1985a). ‘‘IS 2720, Part 4: Methods of test for soils:

Grain size analysis.’’

5. Bureau of Indian Standards (1985a). ‘‘IS 2720, Part 5: Methods of test for soils:

Atterberg Limits.’’

6. Bureau of Indian Standards (1971). ‘‘IS 2720, Part 13: Methods of test for soils:

Tri-axial shear test.’’

7. Bureau of Indian Standards (1977). ‘‘IS 2720, Part 40: Methods of test for soils:

free swell index.’’

8. Bureau of Indian Standards (2010). ‘‘IS 2911(Part 1/Sec.2): Code of practice for

design & construction of pile foundation (Bored cast in-situ pile).’’

9. Text book by Dr. A. K .Arora. “.”Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering”.

10. Text book by Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain & Arun Kumar Jain.”Soil Mechanics

and Foundations”

11. Text book by Narayan V. Nayak. “Foundation Design Manual”.

12. Text book by Bowles, J.E, “Foundation Analysis and design”.

General Recommendation of foundation :-

 After analyzing all the engineering properties of the borehole, this is

indicative of poor graded silty sand strata is present up to 10.00 m depth

and therefore unsuitable for open foundation. Under the situation Pile

foundation is highly recommended for the structure.

 The Designer is at liberty to decide the depth, size and the type of

foundation intended basing on the sub-soil characteristics, Structure type &

Load for the design of foundation of the proposed structure.

 Pile shall be designed according to the structure load and conduct a load

test as per IS:2911 (P-4) on the initial pile to confirm the safe load carrying

capacity of pile before execution of the work.

Site Photograph

BH-1
BH-2
Sample photographs

END OF REPORT