EUV Presentation

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Extreme Ultra-Violet

Lithography
Matt Smith
Penn State University
EE 518, Spring 2006
Instructor: Dr. J. Ruzyllo

Outline
Why do we need EUV lithography?
Brief overview of current technology
What exactly is EUV?
System diagram
Challenges associated with EUV
13.5nm source
Optics
Masks
Resists

Why EUV?
Minimum lithographic feature size =

k1*
NA

k1: Process complexity factor includes tricks like phase-shift masks

: Exposure wavelength
NA: Numerical aperture of the lens maximum of 1 in air, a little higher in
immersion lithography (Higher NA means smaller depth of focus, though)

Mask Makers
Holiday:
large k1

Mask Makers
Burden: small k1

There are only so


many tricks to
increase this gap, and
they are very
expensive we
MUST go to a shorter
wavelength!

ftp://download.intel.com/research/silicon/EUV_Press_Foils_080204.pdf

Why EUV? Why not the next excimer line?


Hg (G line) @ 436nm Hg (H line) @ 405nm Hg (I line) @ 365nm
KrF Excimer @ 248nm ArF Excimer @ 193nm ???
157nm lithography based on the fluorine excimer laser has been largely
shelved, which leaves 193nm with extensions for production
Below that, no laser line has the required output power
Excimer-based steppers expose 109 steps per 300mm wafer, and
produce >100 wafers per hour exposure times ~ 10-20ns
Additionally, fused silica and atmospheric oxygen become absorptive by
157nm so even incremental decreases in wavelength start to require a
major system overhaul

Mask Makers
Holiday:
large k1

Mask Makers
Burden: small k1

ftp://download.intel.com/research/silicon/EUV_Press_Foils_080204.pdf

Why EUV? Its all about the money.


By decreasing by a factor of 14, we take pressure off k1 this makes the
masks less complicated and expensive because we can skip the tricks
For example: a 90nm node mask set:
Pixels:
Number of pixels on 1 mask:
Defects:
Size that must be found and repaired:
Number of such defects allowed:
Data:
Total file size needed for all 22-25 layers:
Cost:
Cost for mask set (depreciation, labor, etc):

1012
100nm (25nm as projected on wafer)
0
200GB
~$800k-1.3M

ftp://download.intel.com/technology/silicon/Chuck Gwyn Photomask Japan 0503.pdf

Current Lithographic Technology


Lenses are very effective and perfectly
transparent for 193nm and above, so many are
used
A single lens may be up to 60 fused silica
surfaces
System maintained at atmospheric pressure

Reticle
(Mask)

Lens NA ~0.5-0.85
Up to 1.1 for immersion
Exposure field 26x32mm
Steppers capable of >100
300mm wafers per hour
at >100 exposures per
wafer

193 nm Excimer
Laser Source

Wafer
Computer
Console

Exposure
Column
(Lens)
www.tnlc.ncsu.edu/information/ceremony/lithography.ppt

Basic Technology for EUV


All solids, liquids, and
gasses absorb 13.5nm so
system is under vacuum
Mask must be reflective
and exceptionally defectfree
13.5nm photons generated
by plasma source

All-reflective optics
(all lens materials are
opaque)
ftp://download.intel.com/technology/silicon/EUV_Press_Foils_080204.pdf (both images)

13.5nm Plasma Radiation Source


The only viable source for 13.5nm photons is a plasma
Powerful plasma required temperature of up to
200,000oC, atoms ionized up to +20 state
Plasma must be pulsed pulse length in pico- to
nanosecond range
Argon
Pre-ionized plasma excited
by powerful IR laser or
electric arc of up to 60,000
A to cause emission

Tin

http://www.sematech.org/resources/litho/meetings/euvl/20021014/16-Spectro.pdf

Plasma Compositions for 13.5nm


Argon

Argon

Tin

Tin

13.5nm photons only generated


by one ion stage (Xe11+)

Optimum emission when tin is a


low-percentage impurity

Even this stage emits 10 times


more at 10.8nm than 13.5

All ion stages from Sn8+ to Sn13+


can contribute

Maximum population of this stage


is 45%

Tin tends to condense on optics

On the plus side, Argon is very


clean and easy to work with

Argon is horribly inefficient: to


produce 100W at 13.5nm, kilowatts
of other wavelengths would have to
be removed

Tin is great as a 13.5nm source,


if we can engineer a way to use it
without destroying our optics

http://www.sematech.org/resources/litho/meetings/euvl/20021014/16-Spectro.pdf

Where Plasma and Optics Meet


- Ions in the source plasma have enough energy to sputter material
off the lenses of the collector optics
- If the source uses tin, that will deposit on the lenses as well

At the power levels required for real exposures,


collector optics have a lifetime of about a month
This is VERY bad for Cost of Ownership (CoO)

ftp://download.intel.com/technology/silicon/EUV_Press_Foils_080204.pdf

All-Reflective Optics
All solids, liquids, and gasses absorb 13.5nm photons
- So fused silica lenses are OUT
- Indeed, all refracting lenses are OUT
Making EUV mirrors is no cakewalk, either
50 or more alternating Mo/Si layers give the mirror its
reflectivity
Each layer is 6.7nm thick and requires atomic
precision
Since the angle of incidence changes across the
mirror, so do the required Mo/Si layer thicknesses
Acceptable surface roughness: 0.2nm RMS
Aspheric
Net reflectance: ~70%

http://www.zeiss.com/C1256A770030BCE0/WebViewAllE/D6279194C2955B2EC12570CF0044E537

Optics System - Exposure Field


Full field: ~109
exposures per
300mm wafer

Development-size field:
> 500,000 exposures per
300mm wafer

-In July 2005, Carl Zeiss shipped the first 0.25NA full-field
optics system to ASML for integration in an EUV system
Press release: http://www.zeiss.com/C1256A770030BCE0/WebViewAllE/D6279194C2955B2EC12570CF0044E537
ftp://download.intel.com/research/library/IR-TR-2003-39-ChuckGwynPhotomaskJapan0503.pdf

EUV Masks

ftp://download.intel.com/research/library/IR-TR-2003-39-ChuckGwynPhotomaskJapan0503.pdf

EUV Masks
NO defects are ever allowed in a completed mask
Extremely flat and defect-free substrate, perfected by smoothing layer
All defects in multilayer reflecting stack must be completely repaired
No defects allowed in absorber layer
All defects in final absorber pattern must be completely repaired
(No wonder mask sets are so expensive!)

ftp://download.intel.com/research/library/IR-TR-2003-39-ChuckGwynPhotomaskJapan0503.pdf

EUV Resists
Best Positive Resist

2.3mJ/cm2 LER=7.2nm

Best Negative Resist

3.2mJ/cm2 LER=7.6nm

LER Line Edge


Roughness

39nm 3:1
(space:lin
ftp://download.intel.com/research/library/IR-TR-2003-39-ChuckGwynPhotomaskJapan0503.pdf
e)

Conclusion
Will 193nm ever die?
As recently as 2003, EUV was the only viable solution for the 45nm
node
Now Intel wants EUV for the 32nm node, but it may be pushed back
more:
In a nutshell, many believe that EUV will NOT be ready for the 32nm
node in 2009. Some say the technology will get pushed out at
the 22nm node in 2011. Some even speculate that EUV will never
work.
- EE Times, Jan 19, 2006
My opinion: never say never about this industry
A lot of work remains: increase output power of 13.5nm source,
increase NA of reflective lenses, increase lifetime of collector optics
(decrease cost of ownership)
But the potential payoff is sufficient that we will make it work

You might also like