LNT Grasim Case

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Introduction

Founded in 1938
Presence in multiple industries
Engineering & Construction
Cement
Information Technology
Financial Services
E&C contributes to 60% of revenue

Founded in 1947 as fabric company


Presence in multiple industries
Viscose Staple Fiber
Cement
Sponge Iron
Chemicals and Textile
Looking to expand through M&A

Cement Comparable
Parameters

Grasim

L&T

Revenue

46%

26%

Industry Position

3rd largest

Largest

Number of plants

12

10

Production capacity

13 MTPA

18 MTPA

The Scenario L&T Spin-off

Timeline of Events
The Grasim Board approved an
open offer for purchase of up to 20
per cent of the equity shares of
L&T, in accordance with the
provisions and guidelines issued
by the SEBI Regulations, 1997.
Grasim increased share up to
14.15%

Grasim became the 3rd


largest player in the
cement industry while
L&T was the 2nd largest
player in the cement
industry

2001

1998
2000
Grasim acquires Indian
Rayons
Cement,
Dharani
cement,
Sri
Digvijay cement

Completed the implementation


process to demerge the cement
business of L&T and completion
of open offer by Grasim, with the
latter acquiring controlling stake
in the newly formed company
Ultra-Tech

2003
2004

2002
Grasim acquired 10% percent
stake of Reliance Industries in
L&T at Rs. 306 per share at a
premium of 47% above market
price

The board of engineering


major Larsen & Toubro Ltd
(L&T) decides to demerge its
cement business into a
separate cement company
(CemCo).

The Scenario Various Cases


Final Deal Making

Open Offer
Role of Reliance

Case 1: Role of Reliance

Single Largest shareholder of company.


Supplier-Customer relationship.
Accused of using LnT for its finances.
Accused of unethical practices.
Capital Gains of 360 crores in a negotiated
deal with Grasim.

Case 2: Open offer @ 190


Stalled on the basis of petition by Investors
Grievance Forum (IGF).
Legal implications Letter of the law.
Minority shareholders- Spirit of the law.
Negatively on Grasims Brand equity.

Problems Highlighted
Insider Trading.
Open Offer Chaos.
Takeover code.

Beneficiaries of Deal
Shareholders.
L&T and Grasim.
Financial Institutions.

Case 3: Final deal making


Structural Demerger vs. Vertical Demerger.
Grasim may try to gain management
control with the support of financial
institution.

Core Competencies
Governance

Financial Prudence
Consistently
demonstrated
excellent financial prudence
Excellent debt - equity ratio of
0.57 as on 31 March 2004
Grasims interest burden has
always been low

Operational Excellence
Operational excellence is another
of its core strengths.
Limestone cost is the third lowest
in the industry.
Operating margin for the year
ending March13 was 21.15%.

Quality Emphasis

Followed VBM- the best


practices
in
Quality
management.
Made operating manager
more answerable to the
shareholder.

Board accountability to
the
Company
and
stakeholders
Strategic guidance and
effective monitoring by
the Board
Protection of minority
interests and rights

Process and Systems


Excellent processes and systems company culture is of a meritocracy
Grasim has always looked to
achieving international standards
It has taken several contemporary
initiatives TQM, BPR, IQRS

Alternative Solutions
Grasims Proposal

CDCs Proposal

With Convertible Debentures 6.8% CDC would get


complete control of the cement entity

A vertical demerger by L&T on a going concern


basis.

stiff penalties will be levied on L&T if any of the


conditions are breached

All equity shareholders of L&T will receive equity


shares of new CemCo in the same proportion as
their equity holding in L&T

Right to Veto

Second Public Offer for acquiring 20% stake

Offer Price was fixed at Rs. 130 per share

FIs announced their support to vertical demerger


plan

Drag-along conditions, if CDC were to divest its


holding, it would force L&T to divest up to 44.2 per cent
of its stake in the cement division
L&T would end up paying penal interest of 15 per cent
in dollar terms compounded annually on $ 60 million

Favourable to CDC, Not towards shareholders

Final Decision

Final Decision
80:20 division

Phase 1: Grasim by virtue of its ownership of 15.7 per cent


of L&T, will acquire 12.6 per cent in Cemco.

Phase 2: Grasim is to buy 8.5 per cent of L&T's stake in


Cemco at Rs.171.30 a share, aggregating about Rs.360
crores. L&T's stake in Cemco will fall to 11.5 per cent

Phase 3: Open offer at Rs. 346, for 30 per cent of the


equity of CemCo, to acquire the management control of
CemCo.

The company will get Rs360 crore in cash from the sale
of 8.5 percent stake to Grasim Industries

Grasim will sell 14.93% of its 15.73% of its holdings in


L&T to employees trust of L&T. Remaining 0.8% would
be sold when employee trust will dilute its holding by
1%

The de-merger of the cement division will also result in


reduction of debt by Rs1,868 crore and will reduce the
debt- equity ratio from 0.61:1 to nearly 0.5:1

Grasims stake in new CemCo.


Initial allotment: 12.5%
Sold by L&T: 8.5%
Open offer: 30%
Total: 51%

Win-Win-Win situation
GRASIM

L&T

Demerged L&T would come across as a


focused engineering and technology company

Grasim & UltraTech became the largest


producer in India and 8th largest in the
world

Post demerger company was able to reduce


debt sustainability

Grasim was strong in southern markets ,


L&T was strong in rest of India

Independence from Aditya Birla Group without


spending any money

L&Ts strong distribution network was


very vital to Grasim to push its own
brand

Cement generated immediate cash flows


for Grasim compared to any other
business

Shareholders
For 100 shares of L&T shareholders get
50 shares of new L&T & 40 shares of new
cement company

Thank You

You might also like