Mass Transfer Coefficient

Mass transfer Coefficient
Mass transfer by convection involves the transport of material between a

boundary surface (such as solid or liquid surface) and a moving fluid or between
two relatively immiscible, moving fluids.
There are two different cases of convective mass transfer:
1. Mass transfer takes place only in a single phase either to or from a phase
boundary, as in sublimation of naphthalene (solid form) into the moving air.
2. Mass transfer takes place in the two contacting phases as in extraction and
absorption.
Mass transfer coefficient

Rate of mass
transferred
= k
Interfacial
area
Concentration
difference
Mass per unit volume, or?

Local or average?
Real contact area is?
Partial pressure? Molar

concentration? Mass
concentration? Mole fraction?
Convective Mass Transfer Coefficient

In the study of convective heat transfer, the heat flux is connected to heat transfer
coefficient as
Q A q h t s t m
-------------------- (1)
The analogous situation in mass transfer is handled by an equation of the form
N A k c C As C A
-------------------- (2)
The molar flux N A is measured relative to a set of axes fixed in space. The driving
force is the difference between the concentration at the phase boundary, CAS (a
solid surface or a fluid interface) and the concentration at some arbitrarily defined
point in the fluid medium, C
. The convective mass transfer coefficient kC is a
function of geometry of the system and the velocity and properties of the fluid
similar to the heat transfer coefficient, h.
Significant Parameters in Convective Mass Transfer

Dimensionless parameters are often used to correlate convective transfer data. In
momentum transfer Reynolds number and friction factor play a major role. In the
correlation of convective heat transfer data, Prandtl and Nusselt numbers are
important. Some of the same parameters, along with some newly defined
dimensionless numbers, will be useful in the correlation of convective masstransfer data.
The molecular diffusivities of the three transport process (momentum, heat and
mass) have been defined as:
Momentum diffusivit y
Thermal diffusivit y
Mass diffusivit y D AB
k
Cp
The ratio of the molecular diffusivity of momentum to the molecular diffusivity

of heat (thermal diffusivity) is designated as the Prandtl Number
Cp
Pr
The analogous number in mass transfer is Schmidt number given as

Sc
Mass diffusivit y
D AB
D AB
The ratio of the molecular diffusivity of heat to the molecular diffusivity of mass is
designated the Lewis Number, and is given by
k
Le
Mass diffusivit y
D AB
C p D AB
Let us consider the mass transfer of solute A from a solid to a fluid flowing past the
surface of the solid. For such a case, the mass transfer between the solid surface
and the fluid may be written as
N A k c C As C A
Since the mass transfer at the surface is by molecular diffusion, the mass transfer may
also described by
N A D AB
dCA
dy
y 0
When the boundary concentration, CAs is constant, equation may be written as

N A D AB
d C A C As
dy
y 0
Above Equations may be equated, since they define the same flux of component A
leaving the surface and entering the fluid
k c C A s C A D AB
d
C A C As
dy
y 0
This relation may be rearranged into the following form:
kc
D AB
d C A C As d y
C A C A
y 0
Multiplying both sides of equation by a characteristic length, L we obtain the

following dimensionless expression:
kc L
D AB
d C A C As d y
C A S C A L
y 0
The right hand side of equation is the ratio of the concentration gradient at the
surface to an overall or reference concentration gradient; accordingly, it may be
considered as the ratio of molecular mass-transport resistance to the convective
mass-transport resistance of the fluid. This ratio is generally known as the
Sherwood number, Sh and analogous to the Nusselt number Nu, in heat transfer.
Analysis among Mass, Heat and Momentum Transfer

Analogies among mass, heat and momentum transfer have their origin either in the
mathematical description of the effects or in the physical parameters used for
quantitative description.
To explore those analogies, it could be understood that the diffusion of mass and
conduction of heat obey very similar equations. In particular, diffusion in one
dimension is described by the Ficks Law as
J A D AB
dCA
dz
Similarly, heat conduction is described by Fouriers law as

q k
dT
dz
The similar equation describing momentum transfer as given by Newtons law is

d
dz
Where is the momentum flux (or shear stress) and is the

viscosity of fluid
Several analogies among transfer phenomenon which has been proposed because of
the similarity in their mechanisms. The analogies are useful in understanding the transfer
phenomena and as a satisfactory means for predicting behaviour of systems for which
limited quantitative data are available.
The similarity among the transfer phenomena and accordingly the existence of the
analogies require that the following five conditions exist within the system
1. The physical properties are constant
2. There is no mass or energy produced within the system. This implies that there is no
chemical reaction within the system
3. There is no emission or absorption of radiant energy.
4. There is no viscous dissipation of energy.
5. The velocity profile is not affected by the mass transfer. This implies there should be
a low rate of mass transfer.
Reynolds
Analogy
The first recognition of the analogous behaviour of mass, heat and momentum
transfer was reported by Osborne Reynolds in 1874. Although his analogy is limited
in application, it served as the base for seeking better analogies.
Reynolds postulated that the mechanisms for transfer of momentum, energy and
mass are identical. Accordingly,
kc
Cp
f
2
Here h is heat transfer coefficient

f is friction factor
is velocity of free stream
The Reynolds analogy is interesting because it suggests a very simple relation between different transport
phenomena. This relation is found to be accurate when Prandtl and Schmidt numbers are equal to one.
This is applicable for mass transfer by means of turbulent eddies in gases. In this situation, we can
estimate mass transfer coefficients from heat transfer coefficients or from friction factors.
Chilton Colburn Analogy

Chilton and Colburn, using experimental data, sought modifications to the
Reynolds analogy that would not have the restrictions that Prandtl and Schmidt
numbers must be equal to one. They defined for the j factor for mass transfer as
jD
kc
Sc 2 3
The analogous j factor for heat transfer is

j H St Pr
where St is Stanton number =
23
Nu
h
Re Pr
C p
Based on data collected in both laminar and turbulent flow regimes, they found
jD jH
f
2
This analogy is valid for gases and liquids within the range of 0.6 < Sc < 2500 and 0.6 < Pr
< 100.
The Chilton-Colburn analogy has been observed to hold for many different geometries for
example, flow over flat plates, flow in pipes, and flow around cylinders.
A stream of air at 100 kPa pressure and 300 K is flowing on the top surface of a thin flat sheet
of solid naphthalene of length 0.2 m with a velocity of 20 m/sec. The other data are:
Mass diffusivity of naphthalene vapor in air = 6 * 10 6 m 2/sec
Kinematic viscosity of air = 1.5 * 10 5 m 2.sc
Concentration of naphthalene at the air-solid naphthalene interface = 1 * 10 5 kmol/m3
Calculate:
the overage mass transfer coefficient over the flat plate
the rate of loss of naphthalene from the surface per unit width
Note: For heat transfer over a flat plate, convective heat transfer coefficient for laminar flow
can be calculated by the equation.
Analogy between mass and heat transfer.
Nu 0.664 Re1L 2 Pr 1 3
Correlation for heat transfer

Nu 0.664 Re1L 2 Pr 1 3
The analogous relation for mass transfer is
Sh 0.664 Re1L 2 Sc 1 3
where
Sh = Sherwood number = kL/D AB
Re L = Reynolds number = L/
Sc = Schmidt number = / ( D AB)
k = overall mass transfer coefficient
L = length of sheet
D AB = diffusivity of A in B
k 0 .2
6 * 10
0.2 20
0.664
1.5 * 10
12
1.5 * 10 5
13
6 * 10 6
k = 0.014 m/sec
Rate of loss of naphthalene = k (C Ai C A)
= 0.014
(1 * 10
7
2
0) = 1.4024 * 10 kmol/m sec
Rate of loss per meter width = (1.4024 * 10 7)

= 0.101 gmol/m.hr.
0.2) = 2.8048 * 10 8 kmol/m.sec
verall mass transfer coefficient

Liquid
Gas
N1 K L (c1* c10 )
c1i
KL
p10
c10
p1i
N1 k p ( p10 p1i )
N1 k L (c1i c10 )
p1i Hc1i
N1
1
1 H
k p kL
( p10 Hc10 )
c1*
1
1 overall liquid-side
mass transfer
k L k p H coefficient
p10
H
N1 K p ( p10 p1* )
Kp
1
1 H
k p kL
p1* Hc10
overall gas-side
mass transfer
coefficient

Mass Transfer Coefficient

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mass Transfer Coefficient

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mass Transfer Coefficient

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the different cases of convective mass transfer?

What are the different cases of convective mass transfer?

What parameters are important in correlating convective mass transfer data?

What parameters are important in correlating convective mass transfer data?

Mass transfer Coefficient

Mass transfer by convection involves the transport of material between a

Mass transfer coefficient

Mass per unit volume, or?

Partial pressure? Molar

Convective Mass Transfer Coefficient

The analogous situation in mass transfer is handled by an equation of the form

. The convective mass transfer coefficient kC is a

Significant Parameters in Convective Mass Transfer

The ratio of the molecular diffusivity of momentum to the molecular diffusivity

The analogous number in mass transfer is Schmidt number given as

When the boundary concentration, CAs is constant, equation may be written as

This relation may be rearranged into the following form:

Multiplying both sides of equation by a characteristic length, L we obtain the

Analysis among Mass, Heat and Momentum Transfer

Similarly, heat conduction is described by Fouriers law as

The similar equation describing momentum transfer as given by Newtons law is

Where is the momentum flux (or shear stress) and is the

Here h is heat transfer coefficient

Chilton Colburn Analogy

The analogous j factor for heat transfer is

where St is Stanton number =

Correlation for heat transfer

Rate of loss per meter width = (1.4024 * 10 7)

0.2) = 2.8048 * 10 8 kmol/m.sec

verall mass transfer coefficient

You might also like