Irrigation Methods
Irrigation Methods
Irrigation Methods
IRRIGATION METHODS
b) Sprinkler Irrigation:Applyingwaterunderpressure.About5%
oftheirrigatedareasarebythismethod.
d)
Sub-Surface Irrigation: Flooding water underground and
allowingittocomeupbycapillaritytocroproots.
Waterisappliedtothefieldineitherthecontrolledor
uncontrolledmanner.
Controlled: Water is applied from the head ditch
and guided by corrugations, furrows, borders, or
ridges.
Uncontrolled:Wildflooding.
Surfaceirrigationisentirelypractisedwherewateris
abundant.Thelowinitialcostofdevelopmentislater
offsetbyhighlabourcostofapplyingwater.There
aredeeppercolation,runoffanddrainageproblems
FurrowIrrigationContd.
Therearedifferentwaysofapplyingwatertothefurrow.
AsshowninFig.3.1,siphonsareusedtodivertwaterfromthe
headditchtothefurrows.
Therecanalsobedirectgravityflowwherebywaterisdelivered
fromtheheadditchtothefurrowsbycuttingtheridgeorlevee
separating the head ditch and the furrows (see diagram from
Gumb'sbook).
Gated pipes can also be used. Large portable pipe(up to 450
mm)withgateopeningsspacedtodeliverwatertothefurrows
areused.
Waterispumpedfromthewatersourceinclosedconduits.
Theopeningsofthegatedpipecanberegulatedtocontrolthe
dischargerateintothefurrows.
FurrowIrrigationbyCutting
theRidge
FurrowIrrigationwithSiphons
Fig.3.1:AFurrowSystem
TheMajorDesignConsiderationsinSurfaceIrrigationInclude:
FurrowIrrigationContd.
The
DesignParametersofFurrow
IrrigationContd.
b)
DesignParametersofFurrow
IrrigationContd.
Theactualstreamsizeshouldbedeterminedbyfieldtests.
Itisdesirablethatthisinitialstreamsizereachestheendof
the furrow in T/4 time where T is the total time required to
applytherequiredirrigationdepth.
c) Cut-back Stream: Thisisthestreamsizetowhichthe
initialstreamisreducedsometimeafterithasreachedthe
lowerendofthefield.
Thisistoreducesoilerosion.
Oneortwocutbackscanbecarriedoutandremovingsome
siphonsorreducingthesizeattheheadofthefurrow
achievesthis.
DesignParametersofFurrow
IrrigationContd.
d)
Soil Type
Maximum slopes*
Sand0.25
Sandyloam 0.40
Finesandyloam
0.50
Clay2.50
Loam
6.25 Source:
Withers & Vipond (1974)
*Aminimumslopeofabout0.05%isrequired
toensuresurfacedrainage.
DesignParametersofFurrow
IrrigationContd.
e)
DesignParametersofFurrow
IrrigationContd.
e)
Equipment:EngineersLevelandStaff,
30mTape,
MarkerStakes,
SiphonsofVariousSizes,
TwoSmallMeasuringFlumes,
WatchwithSecondHandandSpade.
EvaluationofaFurrowIrrigation
SystemContd.
g) Recordthetimewhenflowstartsandpasseseachmarkerineachflow(advance
data).
h) Record the flow at each flume periodically until the flows become practically
constant.Thismaytakeseveralhoursonfinetexturedsoils(Infiltrationdata).
i)Checkforevidenceoferosionorovertopping.
j)Movetheflumesandmeasurethestreamsattheheadsonlyoftheotherfurrows.
Results:Tobepresentedinaformatshown:
............................................................................................................
WatchOpportunitytime(mins)
StationAStationBLosses
TimeABCDepthFlowDepthFlowDiffInfil.
(mm)(L/s)(mm)(L/s)(L/s)(mm/h)
..............................................................................................................
3.2.2.BorderIrrigationSystem
In a border irrigation, controlled surface flooding is
BorderIrrigationSystem
BorderIrrigation
BorderIrrigationContd.
Inborderirrigation,waterisappliedslowly.
The
DesignParametersofBorder
IrrigationSystemContd.
Theaimistovaryvariousparameterswiththeaimof
obtainingagoodirrigationprofile.
Steps
a) Measure the infiltration rate of soils and get the
cumulativeinfiltrationcurve.Measurementcanbeby
doubleringinfiltrometer.
Depth of Water,
D (mm)
D = KTn
Time, T (mins)
Fig 3.5: Cumulative Infiltration Curve
EvaluationofBorderStripContd.
TimeDistanceDiagramofthe
BorderSystem
EvaluationoftheBorderSystem
Contd.
Depth-DistanceDiagramofthe
BorderSystem
EvaluationoftheBorderSystem
Contd.
BasinIrrigationDiagram
I
rrigation time.
The size of basin is related to stream size and soil type(See Table 3.6
below).
Table 3.6: Suggested basin areas for different soil types and rates of water flow
Flow rate
Soil Type
Sand Sandy loam Clay loam
Clay
3
l/s m /hr
.................Hectares................................
30
108
0.02
0.06
0.12
0.20
60
216
0.04
0.12
0.24
0.40
90
324
0.06
0.18
0.36
0.60
120
432
0.08
0.24
0.48
0.80
150 540
0.10
0.30
0.60
1.00
180
648
0.12
0.36
0.72
1.20
210
756
0.14
0.42
0.84
1.40
240
864
0.16
0.48
0.96
1.60
300
1080
0.20
0.60
1.20
2.00
...........................................................................................
Note: The size of basin for clays is 10 times that of sand as the infiltration rateforclay is lowleading to
higherirrigationtime.Thesizeofbasinalsoincreasesastheflowrateincreases.Thetableisonlyaguide
andpracticalvaluesfromanareashouldbereliedupon.Thereistheneedforfieldevaluation.
a)Calculatethesoilmoisturedeficiencyandirrigationdepth.
.
I = c Tn
Infiltered
Depth (mm)
Time (mins)
EvaluationofaBasinSystem
Contd.
c)Gettheadvancecurvesusingstickstomonitorrate
ofwatermovement.Plotatimeversusdistancegraph
(advancecurve).Alsoplotrecessioncurveorassumeit
tobestraight
Itisensuredthatwaterreachestheendofthebasinat
T/4time and staysTtime before itdisappears.At any
point on the advance and recession curves, get the
contact or opportunity time and relate it to the depthtimegraphabovetoknowtheamountofwaterthathas
infiltratedatanydistance.
Depth-DistanceGraphsoftheBasin
IrrigationSystem
EvaluationofBasinIrrigation
Concluded.
Check
ComponentsofaSprinkler
IrrigationSystem
RaingunIrrigationSystem
LinearMove
CentrePivot
c)
CentrePivot
PivotofaCentrePivotSystem
and Procedures
Provide Sufficient Flow Capacity to meet
the Irrigation Demand
Ensure that the Least Irrigated Plant
receives adequate Water
Ensure Uniform Distribution of Water.
DesignSteps
Determine
ChoiceofSprinklerSystem
Consider:
Application
SprinklerApplicationRate
Must
Soil Texture
Coarse Sand
20 to 40
Fine Sand
12 to 25
Sandy Loam
12
Silt Loam
10
Clay Loam/Clay
5 to 8
EffectsofWind
In
case of Wind:
Reduce the spacing between Sprinklers:
See table 6 in Text.
Allign Sprinkler Laterals across prevailing
wind directions
Build Extra Capacity
Select Rotary Sprinklers with a low
trajectory angle.
SystemLayout
Layout
PipeworkDesign
This
DesignofLaterals
Laterals
LateralDischarge
The
SelectingLateralPipeSizes
Friction
SelectingLateralPipeSizes
Contd.
Lateral
ChangesinGroundElevation
Allowance
Pf
0.2 Pa PeL
F
0.2 Pa PeL
F
PressureatHeadofLateral
The
DiagramofPressureatHeadofLateral
SelectingPipeSizesof
SubmainsandMainLines
As
PumpingRequirements
Maximum
ComponentsofaDrip
IrrigationSystem
Control
Head
Unit
Wetting Pattern
Mainline
Or
Manifold
Emitter
Lateral
DripIrrigationSystem
The
thesprinklersystemexceptthatthespacingof
emittersismuchlessthanthatofsprinklers
andthatwatermustbefilteredandtreatedto
preventblockageofemitters.
Anothermajordifferenceisthatnotallareas
areirrigated.
Indesign,thewateruserateorthearea
irrigatedmaybedecreasedtoaccountforthis
reducedarea.
KarmeliandKeller(1975)suggestedthe
followingwateruseratefortrickleirrigationdesign
ETt=ETxP/85
Emitters
Consistoffixedtypeandvariablesizetypes.The
fixed size emitters do not have a mechanism to
compensate for the friction induced pressure drop
along the lateral while the variable size types have
it.
Emitterdischargemaybedescribedby:
q=Khx
Where:qistheemitterdischarge;Kisconstantfor
each emitter ; h is pressure head at which the
emitter operates and x is the exponent
characterizedbytheflowregime.
EmittersContd.
The
aboveequation.
3.4.4
3.4.5
TrickleSystemDesignContd.
Themaximumdifferenceinpressureis
theheadlossbetweenthecontrolpoint
attheinletandthepressureatthe
emitterfarthestfromtheinlet.
Theinletisusuallyatthemanifold
wherethepressureisregulated.
Themanifoldisalinetowhichthe
tricklelateralsareconnected.
TrickleSystemDesignContd.
Forminimumcost,onalevelarea55%oftheallowableheadloss
shouldbeallocatedtothelateraland45%tothemanifold.
TheFrictionLossforMainsandSub-mainscanbecomputedfrom
Darcy-Weisbach equation for smooth pipes in trickle systems
whencombinedwiththeBlasiusequationforfrictionfactor.
Theequationis:
Hf=KLQ1.75D4.75
Where:Hfisthefrictionlossinm;
Kisconstant=7.89x10 5forS.I.unitsforwaterat20C;
Listhepipelengthinm;
Qisthetotalpipeflowinl/s;and
Distheinternaldiameterofpipeinmm.
TrickleSystemDesignContd
As
Number of Outlets
F*
1
1.00
2
0.51
4
0.41
6
0.38
8
0.37
12
0.36
16
0.36
20
0.35
30ormore 0.35
*Values adapted from Jensen and Frantini (1957
Example
Design
LAYOUTOFTHETRICKLE
IRRIGATIONSYSTEM
Solution
(1)
ETt = ET x P/85
Where: Ett is the average ET for crops
under trickle irrigation (mm/day)
ET is nomal ET rate for the crop = 7
mm/day
P is the percentage of total ares shaded by
the crop = 70%
ETt = 7 mm/day x 70/85 = 5.8 mm/day.
SolutionContd.
(2) Discharge for each tree with a spacing of 4 m x 7 m
DischargeofEachLine
Line
No. of
Trees
No. of
Emitters
Required
Discharge
(L/s)
Half Lateral
12
48
0.0576
Half
Manifold
168
672
0.8060
Submain, A
to Section 1
336
1344
1.6130
Main, A to
Pump
672
2688
3.2260
SolutionContd.
(4)
x
0.63
SolutionContd.
(5)
SelectionofDiameters
Line
Q (L/s)
Pipe
Diameter
(mm)
L
(m)
Hf (m)
Half
Lateral
0.0576
12.70
46
0.36
0.51
Half
Manifold
0.8060
31.75
45.5
0.36
0.68
Sub-Main,
A to
Section 1
1.6130
44.45
243
6.59
Main, A to
Pump
3.2260
50.80
60
2.90
PressureHeadatManifold
Inlet
Like
SolutionConcluded
Total
3.5 SUB-SURFACE
IRRIGATION
Applied
SUB-SURFACE IRRIGATION
Contd.
The operation of the system involves a huge
3.6 CHOICE OF
IRRIGATION METHODS:
Thefollowingcriteriashouldbeconsidered:
(a)Watersupplyavailable
(b)Topographyofareatobeirrigated
c)Climateofthearea
(d)Soilsofthearea
(e)Cropstobegrown
f)Economics
(g)Localtraditionsandskills
(For
INFORMATION TO BE COLLECTED
d)
Topography e.g.slope:Thishelpstodetermine
the layout of the irrigation system and method of
irrigationwaterapplicationsuitedforthearea.
e) History of People and Irrigation in the area:
Check past exposure of people to irrigation and
land tenure and level of possible re-settlement or
otherwise.
f) Information about crops grown in the area:
Check preference by people, market potential,
adaptability to area, water demand, growth
schedulesandplantingperiods.