Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    In The Shawdo of City

    Uploaded by

    Anam Ali
    1) Jember was a nurse from Ethiopia who joined a hospital and later worked with the Red Cross. She became a project officer for IHAUDP, an organization working to rehabilitate and improve living conditions in poverty-stricken areas. 2) Alec was the chairman of an employment agency in the UK. In 1987, he donated £1 million to fund a development project led by IHAUDP in three neighborhoods in Addis Ababa. However, after 6 months more funding was needed. 3) The main problems with the project were a lack of sufficient funding. The initial £1 million budget was not enough to improve living conditions as much as needed. Disagreements arose between Jem

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    In The Shawdo of City

    Uploaded by

    Anam Ali
    19 views6 pages
    1) Jember was a nurse from Ethiopia who joined a hospital and later worked with the Red Cross. She became a project officer for IHAUDP, an organization working to rehabilitate and improve living conditions in poverty-stricken areas. 2) Alec was the chairman of an employment agency in the UK. In 1987, he donated £1 million to fund a development project led by IHAUDP in three neighborhoods in Addis Ababa. However, after 6 months more funding was needed. 3) The main problems with the project were a lack of sufficient funding. The initial £1 million budget was not enough to improve living conditions as much as needed. Disagreements arose between Jem

    Original Title

    In the Shawdo of City

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Jember was a nurse from Ethiopia who joined a hospital and later worked with the Red Cross. She became a project officer for IHAUDP, an organization working to rehabilitate and improve living conditions in poverty-stricken areas. 2) Alec was the chairman of an employment agency in the UK. In 1987, he donated £1 million to fund a development project led by IHAUDP in three neighborhoods in Addis Ababa. However, after 6 months more funding was needed. 3) The main problems with the project were a lack of sufficient funding. The initial £1 million budget was not enough to improve living conditions as much as needed. Disagreements arose between Jem

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    19 views6 pages

    In The Shawdo of City

    Uploaded by

    Anam Ali
    1) Jember was a nurse from Ethiopia who joined a hospital and later worked with the Red Cross. She became a project officer for IHAUDP, an organization working to rehabilitate and improve living conditions in poverty-stricken areas. 2) Alec was the chairman of an employment agency in the UK. In 1987, he donated £1 million to fund a development project led by IHAUDP in three neighborhoods in Addis Ababa. However, after 6 months more funding was needed. 3) The main problems with the project were a lack of sufficient funding. The initial £1 million budget was not enough to improve living conditions as much as needed. Disagreements arose between Jem

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    Case study: Shadow of The city

    FACTS AND FIGURES


    Intro            Jember born in Ethiopia in 1943. Training of a nurse then she joined a hospital. She continues her part time job with Red Cross. In 1974 revolutionary in Ethiopia Jember was in prison. She joined a organization of Redd Barna. In 1986 Jember went to England and done her M. Phil. He born in 1934 a middle class family. He left school in the age of 16, In 1960 Alec was executive of an employment agency. In 1989 Alec was the chairmen of the organization. Profit was 9 million pound in one year.

    Background of (IHAUDP):
     IHAUDP was the organization which works for the rehabilitating and improvement of poverty.  The head of organization was Redd Barna.  Jember was the project officer working in Addis Ababa Kebeles.  There was need a strong investment over there to improve the living standard of people of Kebeles.  Jember start take fund raising from different organization. So in this regard she met Alec in 1987.  Alec donate 1million pound to develop three area of Kebeles 30, 42 and 43 in this project.  6 month was passed away so there was a again a problem was of fund raising.  Jember demand was 5 million for five year plan.  Alec donates her only 1million to handle that problem.  Meeting was held between Alec and Jember in Addis.  Jember said that =1 million= is not enough for five year plan.  Jember said that I am fully confident that we will raise 5 million and we will succeed.  Meeting end with not good result and they depart.  Jember perceived that Alec not listened.

    Problems:
    1. Starting the ODA project. 2. The area in which they are going to invest. 3. People living area. 4. Cost of project. 5. Total budget was of just 1000000. 6. Peoples working on project were not co linked. 7. Decision making about risk taking. 8. Staffs work late. 9. Every one wants to go just reputation. 10. Not enough fund.

    Analysis of problems:
    1. Starting the ODA project:
    When they start project the ODA didnt help them as they promised with them. IHAUDP wait for six month but not even single pennies come from UK. 2. The area in which they are going to invest: The area in which they are going to invest was too poor and unemployed peoples were too much so in this regard they had to invest too much. 3. People living area: The people living in that area was just hand to mouth so to civilize and improve their life was difficult. 4. Cost of project: The cost of project was much higher as compare to the building built. 5. Total budget was of just 1000000: The total budget was of 1000000 but ODA ensure them to only give them 500000 so it was a challenge to collect amount in such short period of time. 6. Peoples working on project were not co linked: The peoples working on project were not co linked

    7. Decision making about risk taking: Donors were not in interest to take risk. 8. Staff work late: All staff was hired but work could not be start because of lake of the fund. 9. Every one want to go just reputation: Every one wants to get just reputation by contributing in that cause not for good work 10. Not enough fund: The main and most prominent problem was that they had not enough fund by which they proceed there project and there were become clashes between the donors and the coordinator regarding fund raising so the project stop at the spot

    Alternatives of problems:.
    1. Starting the ODA project: They must get full and final information from ODA and then start there project but they do not that so thats why it happened. They just depend on few organization and donors which become trouble for them at the spot. They didnt insist UK for fund so thats why the ODA didnt give them any importance 2. The area in which they are going to invest: It was necessary to give awareness people about project and the benefit of it. They should conduct seminar in that areas to aware people of it Because they were going to invest in backward area so they must be prepare before the time. 3. People living area: Because the peoples was need only food shelter so it was easy for them if they understand their feelings

    4. Cost of project: They should take control on what happening inside the box because of their laziness they bear loss. 5. Total budget was of just 1000000: There must be some plan B and C for which could be helpful in that type of situation They should find recourse before the time to start the project but they rely on the ODA and some donors which become too less at time. 6. Peoples working on project were not co linked: They peoples wasnt interlinked so that was the reason through which they not work for project but for ego. 7. Decision making about risk taking: They must take donors in full confidence because they are the recourse which was the blood of their project. They should ensure the donors that there money is for good cause not for and illegal activity so they dont become hesitate to invest in it. 8. Staffs work late: They should fund collect first then to start the project because it was a mega project so there was not any capacity to take such risk. 9. Every one want to go just reputation: They should motivate their employees and as well as all staff working for the project because all of people was just want to become familiar. 10. Not enough funds: The main problems of clashes were money which they were not enough so if they maintain it then it would be possible to resolve it. 2nd there donors want neither to make partner nor to become contributor like a NGO so In this regard some problem occurred. So if they give them importance like a partner then might be possible they become sincere with the project.

    RECOMANDATION:
    To run effectively their project they need to made dealing with the NGO and other fund raising company and collect funds as much as they can.

    You might also like