See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/313877264

Specification of Deep Beams Affect the Shear Strength Capacity

Article · January 2016

CITATIONS READS

16 3,990

1 author:

Yousif Lafta
University of Basrah
11 PUBLICATIONS 34 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Yousif Lafta on 04 September 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

Specification of Deep Beams Affect the Shear Strength Capacity

Yousif Jabbar Lafta1,2* Kun Ye1
1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, Wuhan,
1034 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430074, china
2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Basra, Basra, Iraq

Abstract
Reinforced Concrete Deep beams researches have attracted attentions of professionals and academics due to the
wider use of this type of structures in construction projects; because of characteristics in transferring significant
amount of load. Ultimate strength of deep beams has been a great challenge because of the complexity to
Evaluation for this structural member. However, code provisions for capacity of beam equations are
conservative. Essentially influencing parameters are Loading and Supporting Conditions, horizontal and vertical
web reinforcement, shear span-to-depth ratio, load and support bearing plates, distribution of the reinforcement
along depth of the deep beam‘s web, tension reinforcement and compressive strength. Least influencing
parameters are bottom cover, side cover, width of the beam, distribution of vertical stirrups in the web, and
aggregate size, presence the web openings. The effect of above factors on the shear capacity and behavior of RC
deep beams have been reviewed.
Keywords: Deep beams, D-region, Loading condition, Shear strength, Reinforcement distribution, Failure
mode.

1. Introduction
A major challenge in a tall building structure is to reach suitable column free space in the lowermost story
either for storing or parking . To achieve sufficient residence room size as a design for architectural in the upper
stories. Its terminal level rests on the transmission girder which acts as a point load. In concept of wide shear
strength, deep beam are recommended as transmission, deep horizontal girder supporter which is mostly fails in
shear rather than flexure. This member transfers load through loading face to supports in the diagonal direction.
It is categorized as member with small span-to-depth ratio. Reinforced concrete deep beams are commonly used
as load distributing structural element, Pile caps, foundation walls, corbel, shear wall structures that resist lateral
forces, floor diaphragms, supporting strip footings or raft slabs, and off-shore structure (Teng, Ma et al. 2000) .
RC deep beams essentially used in high rise structures and long span bridges due to their convenience and
economic efficiency Brackets.

2. Definition of RC Deep Beams

Reinforced concrete(RC) beams with shear span / depth ratio not exceeding 2.0 for simply supported to 2.5 for
continues beams may be classified as deep beams (Nawy 1985) . The ACI Building code 318-14(Committee,
Institute et al. 2014) defines deep beams as members loaded on one face and supported on the opposite face so
that compression struts can develop between the loads and the supports, and have either: (a) Clear spans, ln,
equal to or less than four times the overall member depth; or (b) Regions with concentrated loads within twice
the member depth from the face of the support. IS 456-2000 code (Standard 2000) defines deep beam as a beam
has ratio of effective span-to-overall depth (l/h) less than: 2.0, for simply supported beam; 2.5, for a continuous
beam. In RC beams, Regions where the shear span (distance from the support horizontally towered the load) is
less than twice the depth of the beams are defined as D-regions, D refers to disturbed or deep and it is Controlled
by arch action (ACI-318)(Committee, Institute et al. 2008) as shown in figure 1.

Figure1. D -Region in Deep Beams

56
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

3. Behavior of RC deep beams

The behavior of deep beams is different from that of common flexural members; the strength of deep beams is
mainly controlled by shear rather flexure when sufficient amounts of tension reinforcement are used (Oh and
Shin 2001), and they are classified as non-flexural members, in which the plane sections do not remain plane in
bending(Rao, Kunal et al. 2007). Elastic behavior is characterized of deep beams before cracking. After cracking
major redistribution of stresses and strains, significant effects of vertical normal stress and shear deformation
takes place therefor strength of the beams must be estimated using the nonlinear analysis (Nawy 1985), (Rao,
Kunal et al. 2007)and (Ramakrishnan and Ananthanarayana 1968). The high shear strength is an important
specific of such beams; that is because of internal arch action mechanism which is quite deferent from beams of
normal proportion (Kalyanaraman, Rayan et al. 1979, Nilson and Winter 1987). Tied arch as a characteristic of
deep beams will be formed after appears of diagonal cracking, even though diagonal tension failure mode occurs
in the slender beams, deep beams carry the additional loads after diagonal cracking due to the behavior of strut
and tie which transmissions the load directly to the support through concrete compression struts. The tension
reinforcement actions as a tie. Horizontal compression in concrete and the tension in the main reinforcement
have to equilibrate the load, adequately anchored of tension bars must be provided to prevent anchorage failure.
Also the deep beams are categorized as disturbed regions, in which the nonlinear distribution of strain. However,
the bending elementary concept for simple beams may not be appropriate for deep beams even under linear
elastic assumption. It is found that using ordinary bending theory of flexure will yield erroneous values of all the
stresses throughout the beam section because this theory does not account for vertical normal stresses induced by
the applied loads and supports nor for the deformations(Barry and Ainso 1983). A deep beam is actually a
vertical plate loaded in its own plane. The stress or strain distribution across the depth of the beam is not a
straight line, and the position of the neutral axis shifts downward after significant levels of straining, the
variation is chiefly dependent on the feature ratio of the beam Figure 2. (Kong 2006). Failures usually due to
crushing or splitting in diagonal compressive strut, which is close related to a splitting test of concrete cylinder.
It has been shown that the concept of the compressive force path can provide a realistic description of the causes
of failure in deep beams (Kotsovos 1983, Kotsovos 1988). The shear strength of deep beams is a function of
many factors such as concrete compressive strength, main and web reinforcement, slenderness (shear span/depth
ratio), End anchorage of the main bars, loading and supporting conditions. These are generally considered to
represent deep beam behavior. The ACI building Code 318-14(Committee, Institute et al. 2014) recommends
taking in to account the nonlinearity of strain distribution and lateral buckling in the design of deep beams. Also
it based on D-region behavior.

4. Loading and Supporting Conditions

Simply supported deep beams may be classified according to loading and supporting conditions into directly
loaded deep beams (forces are applied on the top or compression face of the beam and reactions are act under
side face of the beam) and indirectly loaded deep beams (loads are applied via shear on the sides of the
members) (Fereig and Smith 1977) in which the load other than direct load and include load applying away
from centroid of the member (Heywood, Pritchard et al. 2014) as shown in Figure 3-a. Indirectly loaded
rectangular and flanged deep beams have lower shear strength than directly loaded deep rectangular beams this
has been attributed to the lower effect of tied arch action in indirectly loaded R.C deep beams (Kalyanaraman,
Rayan et al. 1979) .Compartion the ultimat load capacity of concrete deep rectangular and T- beam
(Kalyanaraman, Rayan et al. 1979) and (Yousif and Kun 2015) concluded that the deep beam with T- section
exhipit high ultimate load capacity than rectangular. To improve the load-carrying capacity of indirectly loaded
deep beams, (Paul 1978) conclude that sufficient hanger or suspension reinforcement at the position of the load
and good anchoring in the compression zone should be provide as showed in figure 3-b. ACI building Code 318-
14(Committee, Institute et al. 2014) conclude that where the deep beam subjecting to the load through the
bottom or the sides of beam the strut – and- tie method should be applied to design the reinforcement to
internally transfer the load to the top of such beam and distribute them to adjacent support .

57
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

Figure2. Distribution of horizontal stress in beams with various spans to depth ratio

Figiure 3-a. Directly and Indirectly Loading Figiure 3-b. Hanger Reinforcement

5. Mechanisms of Shear Transfer

Shear is transmitted from one plane to another in various ways in reinforced concrete members. The behavior,
including the failure modes, depends on the method of shear transmission. According to the ACI-ASCE
committee 426 (426 1973)Report, the main types of shear transfer mechanisms as illustrated in Figure 4. are:

5.1 Shear transfer by concrete shear stress (Vc)

This occurs in uncracked members or in the uncracked portions of structural members. The interaction of shear
stresses with tensile and compressive stresses produces principal stresses which may cause inclined cracking or a
crushing failure of the concrete.

58
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

5.2 Interface shear transfer (Aggregate interlock) (Va)

The shear force must be transferred across a definite plane or surface where slip may occur. If the plane under
consideration is an existing crack or interface, failure usually involves slippage or relative movement along the
crack or plane. If the plane is located in monolithic concrete, a number of diagonal cracks occur across the
interface and failure involves a truss action along the plane. Physical explanation of this mechanism is that, in
normal density concrete, the aggregate protruding from the crack surface provides resistance against slip. In light
weight and high strength concrete, although the cracks go through the aggregate, it is still have the ability to
transfer shear, therefore, the term “Friction” or “Interface Shear” is more appropriate than aggregate interlock to
describe this mechanism of shear transfer.

5.3 Dowel action of longitudinal reinforcement (Vd)

If the reinforcing bars cross a crack, shearing displacements along the crack will be resisted, in part, by a
dowelling force in the bar. Normally, dowel action is not very significant in beams without stirrups, because the
maximum shear in a dowel is limited by the tensile strength of the concrete cover supporting the dowel. Dowel
action may be significant in beams with large amounts of longitudinal reinforcement distributed in more than
one layer(Ramirez, French et al. 1998).

5.4 Tied-Arch action

This is not a shear mechanism in the sense that it does not transmit a tangential force to a nearby parallel plane.
However, arch action does permit the transfer of a vertical concentrated force to a reaction in a deep member and
thereby reduces the contribution of the other types of shear transfer. Tie force of main reinforcement to develop a
horizontal reaction component at the base of the arch. Such manners is to result from the fact that the force
sustained by the tension reinforcement of a deep beam at its ultimate limit state is constant throughout the beam
span (De Paiva and Siess 1965). Arch action occurs not only outside the outermost cracks but also between
diagonal tension cracks. Part of the arch compression is resisted by dowel forces and therefore splitting cracks
may develop along the bars. It was found that stirrups close to the base of diagonal cracks can provide support to
the arches. Figure 5. illustrate the arch action.

5.5 Residual tensile stresses across cracks

The basic clarification of residual tensile stresses is that when cracks in concrete appear, the clean break does not
happen. Small parts of concrete bridge the crack and stay to transfer tensile force up to crack widths in the range
from 0.05 to 0.15 mm. there is an important descendent (softening) branch has been known when the peak
tensile stress is reached for some time (Evans and Marathe 1968).

5.6 Shear reinforcement (Vs)

In addition to the shear carried by the stirrup itself, when an inclined crack crosses shear reinforcement, the steel
may contribute significantly to the capacity of the member by increasing or maintaining the shear transferred by
interfaces shear transfer, dowel action, and arch action. Thus, shear reinforcement restricts the widening of
inclined cracks in beams and thus slows the decrease of interfaces shear transfer quite effectively.

Figure 4. Components of Shear Force Over Crack Plain Figure 5. Arch Action Details

6. Modes of failure
Failure modes of reinforced concrete deep beams can be summarized as follow:

59
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

6.1 Flexural failure:

Low percentage of tension steel and fails by yielding of reinforcement at a section of maximum moment as
shown in Figure 6. a.

6.2 Diagonal-Tension failure:

Always in the range of a/d above 2, and sometimes at lower a/d values, the diagonal crack starts from the last
flexural crack and turns gradually into a crack more and more inclined under the shear loading, as noted in
(Figure 6. b). Such a crack does not proceed immediately to failure, although in some of the longer shear spans
this either seems almost to be the case or an entirely new and flatter diagonal crack suddenly causes failure.
More typically, the diagonal crack encounters resistance as it moves up into the zone of compression, becomes
flatter, and stops at some point. Further load; the tension crack extends gradually at a very flat slope until finally
sudden failure occurs. The more inclined lower crack will open back, at least to the steel level, and the failure
will start at the crack nearer the a/2 (Ferguson, Breen et al. 1988)

6.3 Shear-Tension failure:

A curved tensile crack in a region of combined moment and shear may also one of two additional modes of
failure. A secondary crack may propagate backward along the longitudinal reinforcement from the inclined
crack, perhaps because of dowel action in the longitudinal reinforcement. This crack will cause a loss of bond, as
the main reinforcement begins to slip, the wedging action of the bar deformations contributes to a splitting of the
concrete and a further propagation of the crack, resulting in an anchorage failure of the longitudinal steel as
shown in Figure 6. C. (426 1973).

6.4. Shear-Compression failure:

The vertical compressive stress under the load reduce the possibility of further tension cracking, and the vertical
compressive stresses over the reaction likewise limit the bond splitting and diagonal cracking along the steel.
Alternatively, a large shear in short shear spans may initiate approximately a 45° crack (called a web-shear
crack) across the neutral axis before a flexural crack appears. Such a crack crowds the shear resistance into a
small depth and leads to increasing stresses, and then tends to be self-propagating until stopped by the load or
reaction. With either start, a compression failure finally occurs adjacent to the load. Such a failure can be
expected to occur when the shear span (a) is less than four times the beam depth, or possibly a little less for very
high strength concrete. When shear span is small, the increased shear strength may be significant, with the
ultimate shear over twice as much for a = 1.5d as for a = 3.0d. The width of the critical crack, if there is no crack
control steel, becomes large as the load increases, sometimes over 3 mm. The concrete above the upper end of
the inclined crack fails by crushing in this mode of failure as shown in Figure 6. D. (Ferguson, Breen et al.
1988). Other failure types such as anchorage failure and local crushing failure close to loads or supports are also
possible. Such premature failures prevent the development of the full capacity of the beam and can be eliminated
by appropriate detailing (Ferguson, Breen et al. 1988) .

60
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

Figure 6. Typical Failures in Slender and Short Beams

7. Factors affecting the bearing capacity of deep beams

7.1 Concrete Compressive Strength Effect
The concrete compressive strength plays a special role in structural behavior of RC deep beams. Figure 7. shows
the relation between the compressive strength of concrete and nominal shear strength, the nominal shear strength
increase when compressive strength of concrete is high(Mphonde and Frantz 1984). Vecchio et al.(Vecchio and
Collins 1993) noticed that the effect of Compression softening on cracked Compression zoon in reinforced
concrete showed lower strength and stiffness than uniaxial compressed concrete which influences the
ductility, element strength and load-deflection curve. Moreover, the coefficient of strength reduction for the main
strut decreases with the angle of inclination of the strut (Matamoros and Wong 2003).

61
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

Figure7. Concrete Compressive Strength Effect

7.2 Tension Reinforcement

Increase in ultimate load will obtained when the Tension Reinforcement amount will increase Figigure 8a. , and
increase in number of cracking. On the other hand obtain decreasing the ductility Figure 8b. , width and length
of the crack. The use of more tension reinforcement amount caused less deflection after elastic stage. If the
tension reinforcement percentage is less the code conditions demand the strut not formation. Otherwise the
compression failure achieved with providing high tension steel capacity (Mohammadhassani, Jumaat et al. 2012)

(a) (b)
Figure8. Effect of main reinforcement (a) shear capacity and (b) Ductility

7.3 Shear Reinforcement

7.3.1 Vertical Reinforcement
The use of Minimum reinforcement needs to avoid splitting in struts to failure. No perfect consent about the
character of transverse reinforcement in struts of bottle shaped in ACI code. (Tan, Kong et al. 1997) reported
that the most favorable pattern was the orthogonal web reinforcement; it was the most effective in increasing
the beam stiffness, restricting the diagonal crack width development and in increasing the ultimate shear
resistance. For deep beams with a/h= 1.0, the vertical web steel has greater effect on restraining the
diagonal crack width and increasing the ultimate shear resistance of HSC deep beams than the
horizontal web steel of the same steel ratio.
7.3.2 Horizontal Reinforcement
horizontal reinforcement in the web of deep beams used near bottom faces of beams have been saw by (Smith
and Vantsiotis 1982) to be more effective. The increase of percentage web reinforcement give rise to increase
in shear strength (Madan, Kumar et al. 2007) Both horizontal and vertical web reinforcement are effectiveness
in the shear capacity of deep beams. but the horizontal shear reinforcement observed by (Arabzadeh, Aghayari et
al. 2011) is the most effectual when aligned perpendicular to major axis of diagonal crack . providing of shear
reinforcement in the middle of the shear span can develop the ultimate capacity of shear strength in deep
beam(Aguilar, Matamoros et al. 2002). On the other hand ACI Committee 2008 (Committee, Institute et al.
2008) conclude that the vertical shear reinforcement is more effective in providing shear strength in deep
beams than the horizontal shear reinforcement. The Minimum percentage of shear reinforcement suggested by

62
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

(Birrcher, Tuchscherer et al. 2013) for serviceability and strength is 0.30%. In deep beams with opening in the
shear span vertical shear reinforcement showed by (Campione and Minafò 2012) is ineffective and only the
existence of horizontal shear reinforcement rises load carrying capacity by about 20%.

7.4 Effect of Aggregate Interlock

(Walravena and Lehwalter 1994) observed that the Shear strength resistance of deep beams is independent size
effect as the contribution of aggregate interlock is negligible in predict the shear capacity. Then no important
influence of the type of aggregate, maximum diameter of particle and grading curve on the shear strength.

7.5 Effect of Length of Bearing or Loading Plates

A CCT (Compression-Compression-Tension) node or CCC (Compression-Compression-Compression), tri-
axially confined by surrounding concrete, can be achieved bearing stresses much higher than that of concrete
compressive strength. (Tuchscherer, Birrcher et al. 2010) observed no proof of reduction in shear strength when
the length of support or load- bearing plate was reduction.

7.6 Effect of Effective Span-to-Depth Ratio and Effect of Shear Span-to-Depth Ratio
Normalized shear strength and reserve strength have been reduced when the a/d ratio increases. The same
behavior shown by (Andermatt and Lubell 2013) for concrete deep beams reinforced by fiber , where the fibers
used as a tension reinforcement and shear reinforcement shown by. (Madan, Kumar et al. 2007), In ratio of
shear span-to-depth greater than 1.0 and increasing the effective span-to-depth ratio the behavior of flexural was
dominated. (Tan, Kong et al. 1995). Even though the a/d ratio increases, shear failure mode appears to be
Accompany with flexure and with high l/d ratio the flexure failure mode was predominant. (Shin, Lee et al.
1999) conclude that the failure modes are shear tension or shear compression is determined by shear span-to-
depth ratio. Figure 4a, b. Shows that shear span -to-depth ratio is highly influencing factor of shear strength in
deep beams. In Figure 9 a. There is an asymptotic reduction in the shear strength when ratio of shear span-to-
depth is increase.
(a) (b)

Figure 9. (a) Effect of shear span-to-depth ratio and (b) influence of span-to-depth ratio on shear strength of deep
beams.

7.7 Influence of Concrete Cover

The steel reinforcement must be covered by minimum thickness of concrete for protect reinforcement bars from
environmental influences to prevent the corrosion; provide thermal isolation; to protect the reinforcement from
fire and to give reinforcement bars adequate embedding to enable the bars to stress without slipping. (Rahal
2006) reported the effect of side concrete cover thickness on shear strength of concrete beams as shown in
figure 10.

63
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

Figure. 10 Effect of side cover on the shear strength of beams

7.8 Size Effect of Reinforced concrete Deep Beams

Size effect observed by (Tan and Cheng 2006) have been governed by strut geometry and shear reinforcement
spacing and diameter. (Zhang and Tan 2007) postulated the geometry of Strut and boundary conditions as
influencing factors. Uncracked of concrete depth resist the shear stress on the other hand shear transfer in the
cracked portion is negligible. Haphazardness of material strength, interface shear transmission and unintentional
out of planes deflection are the numbers of reasons specified to size effect (Tan and Cheng 2006).
Incorporating size-effect, models are proposed (Rao and Sundaresan 2012) , (Zhang and Tan 2007) , (Tang
and Tan 2004) , (Rao and Injaganeri 2011), (Rao and Sundaresan 2014) . the Reducing of overall size of high
strength concrete deep beams with the same ratio results in a linear reduction in ultimate strength is observed by
(Doh, Yoo et al. 2012).

(a) Depth Effect on the Diagonal Cracking and Ultimate Shear Strength

64
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

(b) Breadth Effect on the Shear Capacity

Figure11. Effect of the Size on the Shear Strength of RC Deep Beam

8. Deep Beams with Opening

deep beams may need to be created the Web openings to hold for utilities such as air conditioning ducts or
electronic cables or pipe line However, existence of openings induce geometric discontinuity in the deep beams,
which only enhance the difficulty of nonlinear distribution of stress within the depth of deep beams (Guan and
Doh 2007). It was conclude that the ultimate shear strength depends on the opening size and opening location in
the web of deep beams compared with critical load pathway, due to the reduction of concrete mass acting in
compression strut along the critical load pathway and the opening acting as a centre of stresses for propagation
of shear crack around it (Kong and Sharp 1977). The design equations derived by (Kong, Robins et al. 1970),
(Kong, Sharp et al. 1978), (Kong and Sharp 1973)and (Kong and Sharp 1977) for lightweight and normal
reinforced concrete deep beams with and without web
openings to estimate the ultimate shear strength are:

For solid beam and

For beam with opening

(Yoo, Doh et al. 2013) Conducted that test on high strength reinforced concrete deep beams with varied web
openings. Using published data and test results and derives the design equations expressed as:

For opening situated with flexural zone; and

For opening situated with rigid zone

Notation of size and location information’s using by (Kong and Sharp 1977), (Yoo, Doh et al. 2013) showed in
figure 12. However, empirical design equations are derived using test results and further verification is demand
using additional tool such as FEM used by (Doh, Yoo et al. 2012). These include more comparative and
parametric trainings when changing of locations and web opening sizes. It was conclude by (Doh, Yoo et al.
2012), When only changed the web opening location the ultimate strength become higher when opening is

65
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

situated closer with the top of the deep beam. And ultimate strength becomes lower when a web opening is
situated closer to diagonal load pathway. When a web opening size is extended in the horizontal and, or vertical
direction the decrease of ultimate strength is less when the opening size is adjusted horizontally compared with
vertically.

Figure.12 Notation for location and size of opening

9. Conclusion
Shear strength capacity of deep beams is the important reason behind the growth of the use of deep beams. In
general the equations of code requirements for RC deep beam capability are conservative. Behavior and ultimate
shear capacity of RC deep beams influenced by several factors. load and support conditions, horizontal and
vertical web reinforcement, shear span-to-depth ratio, load and support bearing plates, distribution of the
reinforcement along depth of the deep beam‘s web, tension reinforcement and compressive strength. Least
influencing parameters are bottom cover, side cover, width of the beam, distribution of vertical stirrups in the
web, and aggregate size; existence the openings in the web the shear strength of deep beams has been change
with different geometric configurations. The main remarks of conclusion:
1. Deep beams with high compressive strength exhibit high shear strength capacity.
2. Increase the Tension Reinforcement amount will increase in number of cracking as well as ultimate
load. On the other hand decreasing the ductility and reduce the deflection.
3. Increase the vertical web Reinforcement amount will increase ultimate load capacity and restraining the
diagonal crack.
4. Horizontal web reinforcement less effect on ultimate capacity than vertical reinforcement. Existence of
horizontal shear reinforcement has significant effect on the capacity of deep beam with opening.
5. If the ratio of effective span to depth increases the ultimate shear strength of deep beam is decrease for
the same amount of longitudinal steel.
6. Reducing of overall size of high strength concrete deep beams with the same ratio results in a linear
reduction in ultimate strength.
7. Classical elastic theory of bending is not appropriate to problems including deep beams. The stress
pattern is nonlinear and deviates considerably from those derived by Bernaulli and Navier.
8. The existing of web opening inside the shear span caused the significant reduction in the shear strength
capacity of deep beams.
9. Very few studies were provided to investigate the behavior of indirectly loaded concrete deep beams.

References
426, A.-A. C. (1973). The shear strength of reinforced concrete members. ACI Journal Proceedings, ACI.
Aguilar, G., A. B. Matamoros, G. J. Parra-Montesinos, J. A. Ramirez and J. K. Wight (2002). "Experimental
evaluation of design procedures for shear strength of deep reinforced concrete beams." ACI Structural
Journal 99(4).
Andermatt, M. F. and A. S. Lubell (2013). "Behavior of Concrete Deep Beams Reinforced with Internal Fiber-
Reinforced Polymer—Experimental Study." ACI Structural Journal 110(4).
Arabzadeh, A., R. Aghayari and A. R. Rahai (2011). "Investigation of experimental and analytical shear strength
of reinforced concrete deep beams." International Journal of Civil Engineering 9(3): 207-214.
Barry, J. and H. Ainso (1983). "Single-span deep beams." Journal of Structural Engineering 109(3): 646-663.
Birrcher, D. B., R. G. Tuchscherer, M. Huizinga and O. Bayrak (2013). "Minimum web reinforcement in deep
beams." ACI Structural Journal 110(2).

66
Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

Campione, G. and G. Minafò (2012). "Behaviour of concrete deep beams with openings and low shear span-to-
depth ratio." Engineering Structures 41: 294-306.
Committee, A., A. C. Institute and I. O. f. Standardization (2008). Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute.
Committee, A., A. C. Institute and I. O. f. Standardization (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute.
De Paiva, H. and C. P. Siess (1965). "Strength and behavior of deep beams in shear." Journal of the Structural
Division 91(5): 19-41.
Doh, J.-H., T.-M. Yoo, D. Miller, H. Guan and S. Fragomeni (2012). "Investigation into the behaviour of deep
beam with web openings by finite element." Computers & concrete 10(6): 609-630.
Evans, R. and M. Marathe (1968). "Microcracking and stress-strain curves for concrete in tension." Materials
and Structures 1(1): 61-64.
Fereig, S. and K. Smith (1977). Indirect loading on beams with short shear spans. Journal Proceedings.
Ferguson, P. M., J. E. Breen and J. O. Jirsa (1988). "Reinforced concrete fundamentals."
Guan, H. and J.-H. Doh (2007). "Development of strut-and-tie models in deep beams with web openings."
Advances in Structural Engineering 10(6): 697-711.
Heywood, R., R. Pritchard and P. Shaw (2014). "Assessment OF Bridges–Challenging the Structural
Engineering Profession."
Kalyanaraman, V., M. A. Rayan and H.-Y. Pao (1979). "Shear tests of deep beams with flanges." Journal of the
Structural Division 105(12): 2760-2766.
Kong, F.-K., P. J. Robins and D. F. Cole (1970). Web reinforcement effects on deep beams. ACI Journal
Proceedings, ACI.
Kong, F. and G. Sharp (1973). "Shear strength of lightweight reinforced concrete deep beams with web
openings." Structural Engineer 51(R&D Rept.).
Kong, F. K. (2006). Reinforced concrete deep beams, CRC Press.
Kong, F. K. and G. R. Sharp (1977). "Structural idealization for deep beams with web openings." Magazine of
Concrete Research 29(99): 81-91.
Kong, F. K., G. R. Sharp, S. C. Appleton, C. J. Beaumont and L. A. Kubik (1978). "Structural idealization for
deep beams with web openings: further evidence." Magazine of Concrete Research 30(103): 89-95.
Kotsovos, M. (1983). "Effect of testing techniques on the post-ultimate behaviour of concrete in compression."
Materiaux et construction 16(1): 3-12.
Kotsovos, M. (1988). "Compressive force path concept: Basis for ultimate limit state reinforced concrete
design." ACI Structural Journal 85(1): 68-75.
Madan, S., G. R. Kumar and S. Singh (2007). "Steel fibers as replacement of web reinforcement for RCC deep
beams in shear." Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) 8(5): 479-489.
Matamoros, A. B. and K. H. Wong (2003). "Design of simply supported deep beams using strut-and-tie models."
ACI Structural Journal 100(6).
Mohammadhassani, M., M. Z. Jumaat, M. Jameel, H. Badiee and A. M. Arumugam (2012). "Ductility and
performance assessment of high strength self compacting concrete (HSSCC) deep beams: An
experimental investigation." Nuclear Engineering and Design 250: 116-124.
Mphonde, A. G. and G. C. Frantz (1984). Shear tests of high-and low-strength concrete beams without stirrups.
ACI Journal Proceedings, ACI.
Nawy, E. G. (1985). "Reinforced Concrete: A Fundamental Approach (Prentice-Hall International Series In Civil
Engineering And Engineering Mech."
Nilson, A. and G. Winter (1987). Design of Concrete Structures, McGrawHill, Inc.
Oh, J.-K. and S.-W. Shin (2001). "Shear strength of reinforced high-strength concrete deep beams." ACI
Structural Journal 98(2).
Paul, I. S. (1978). Behaviour of indirectly loaded reinforced concrete thin-wall ribbed panels, Concordia
University.
Rahal, K. N. (2006). "Shear behavior of reinforced concrete beams with variable thickness of concrete side
cover." ACI structural journal 103(2): 171.
Ramakrishnan, V. and Y. Ananthanarayana (1968). Ultimate strength of deep beams in shear. ACI Journal
Proceedings, ACI.
Ramirez, J. A., C. French, P. Adebar, J. Bonacci and M. Collins (1998). "Recent approaches to shear design of
structural concrete." Journal of Structural Engineering 124(12): 1374.
Rao, G. A. and S. Injaganeri (2011). "Evaluation of size dependent design shear strength of reinforced concrete
beams without web reinforcement." Sadhana 36(3): 393-410.
Rao, G. A., K. Kunal and R. Eligehausen (2007). Shear strength of RC deep beams. Proceedings of the 6th
International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures.

67
 Civil and Environmental Research www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)
Vol.8, No.2, 2016

Rao, G. A. and R. Sundaresan (2012). "Evaluation of size effect on shear strength of reinforced concrete deep
beams using refined strut-and-tie model." Sadhana 37(1): 89-105.
Rao, G. A. and R. Sundaresan (2014). "Size Dependent Shear Strength Of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams
Based On Refined Strut-And-Tie Model." Journal of Frontiers in Construction Engineering 3(1):
9-19.
Shin, S.-W., K.-S. Lee, J.-I. Moon and S. Ghosh (1999). "Shear strength of reinforced high-strength concrete
beams with shear span-to-depth ratios between 1.5 and 2.5." ACI Structural Journal 96(4).
Smith, K. and A. Vantsiotis (1982). Shear strength of deep beams. ACI Journal Proceedings, ACI.
Standard, I. (2000). "Plain and reinforced concrete–code of practice." New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
Tan, K.-H., F.-K. Kong, S. Teng and L. Guan (1995). "High-strength concrete deep beams with effective span
and shear span variations." ACI Structural Journal 92(4).
Tan, K.-H., F.-K. Kong, S. Teng and L.-W. Weng (1997). "Effect of web reinforcement on high-strength
concrete deep beams." ACI Structural Journal 94(5).
Tan, K. and G. Cheng (2006). "Size effect on shear strength of deep beams: Investigating with strut-and-tie
model." Journal of structural engineering 132(5): 673-685.
Tang, C. and K. Tan (2004). "Interactive mechanical model for shear strength of deep beams." Journal of
Structural Engineering 130(10): 1534-1544.
Teng, S., W. Ma and F. Wang (2000). "Shear strength of concrete deep beams under fatigue loading." ACI
Structural Journal 97(4).
Tuchscherer, R., D. Birrcher, M. Huizinga and O. Bayrak (2010). "Confinement of deep beam nodal regions."
ACI Structural Journal 107(6).
Vecchio, F. J. and M. P. Collins (1993). "Compression response of cracked reinforced concrete." Journal of
Structural Engineering 119(12): 3590-3610.
Walravena, J. and N. Lehwalter (1994). "Size effects in short beams loaded in shear." ACI Structural Journal
91(5).
Yoo, T. M., J. H. Doh, H. Guan and S. Fragomeni (2013). "Experimental behaviour of high‐strength concrete
deep beams with web openings." The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 22(8): 655-676.
Yousif, J. L. and Y. Kun (2015). "Structural Behavior of Deep Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Indirect
Loading Condition." International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and Infrastructure
Engineering Research and Development 5(4): 53-71.
Zhang, N. and K.-H. Tan (2007). "Size effect in RC deep beams: Experimental investigation and STM
verification." Engineering Structures 29(12): 3241-3254.

68

View publication stats