j Seg 6886761643574600
j Seg 6886761643574600
j Seg 6886761643574600
QIAU
Abstract
Existing reinforced concrete (RC) columns may be structurally deficient due to variety of reasons such as improper transverse
reinforcement, flaws in structural design, insufficient load carrying capacity, etc. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) is a new
generation of materials which illustrates in order to enhance concrete compressive strength and ductility. Among the FRP
types, Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) is more common. CFRP can be effectively used for strengthening and
confinement the deficient RC columns. This research conducts to evaluate the behavior of this fiber in improvement of
aforementioned quantities. In this investigation, three categories of compressive strength of concrete were selected. The
samples were warped with 0, 1, 3, and 5 layers of CFRP were subjected under stress-strain tests. The results display that
carbon fiber is more effective in enhancing the compressive strength and ductility. Fiber performance is more effective on
low-strength concretes, and its effective role decreases with increasing the number of layers.
Keywords: CFRP; FRP Composite Wrapping; Compressive strength; Ductility
1.Introduction
Currently, repairing and retrofitting of defective reported as early as 1978 in Germany. Previous
structures is considered as one of the important research and field applications for FRP rehabilitation
issues of civil engineering all over the world. Fiber and strengthening are described in ACI 440.2R-17
Reinforced Polymer (FRP) systems can be used with (2017). In Europe, the International Federation for
the aim of rebuilding or maintaining strength of a Structural Concrete (FIB. 2001) published a bulletin
worn out structural member, repairing or retrofitting for design guidelines, entitled "externally bonded
of undamaged structural members in order to endure FRP reinforcement for reinforced concrete
the increased load due to changing of the structure structures"[1-17].
operation or compensating for design and
implementation mistakes. 1.2. The Performance of Confinement
63
S. A. Haj Seiyed Taghia, B. Saeedi Razavia, H. R. Darvishvand
experimental work has been conducted by Seible et Fiber type High Strength Carbon Fibers
al (1995), and numerical and analytical work by Fiber tensile strength (Mpa) 4900
Monti et al (2001), with the task of identifying Tensile elasticity modulus (Gpa) 230
suitable design equations that optimize the FRP Areal Weight (g/m2) 160
jacket thickness as a function of the desired Fabric Thickness (mm) 0.09
upgrading level [18-29]. Style Woven UD
Minafò et al. (2019) [30] presented a model to assess
Table 2
the confinement pressure for concrete elements Technical properties of Resin
bonded with CFRP. They confirmed this model by Property Specification
finite-element analyses and experimental procedures. Mixing ratio A: B = 100:34.5 by weight.
In the other research, Haj Seiyed Taghia et al. (2020) Tensile strength Curing 7 days, +23°C: 45 N/mm2
[31] applied a statistical method to investigate Flexural modulus Curing 7 days , +23°C: 3000 N/mm2
economically the influence of CFRP layers and the Tensile modulus Curing 7 days, +23°C: 3500 N/mm2
dosage of cement content on concert performance.
Moreover, Haj Seiyed Taghia et al. (2020) [32] 2.2.Sample Preparation
compared the performance of carbon and glass fibers
on concrete behavior. The results illustrated that the In this research, a number of 12 samples were
influence of both types of fibers is greater on considered for 3 classes of compressive strength of
enhancement of compressive strength and failure concrete (20, 35, and 50 MPa). The concrete was
strain for higher strength concrete. On the contrary, constructed in the beginning and it followed by
fibers were more effect on lower strength concrete inserting it into the pre-prepared molds and then
with reference to energy absorption and ductility. samples were set to harden at constant temperature
In this research, the effect of CFRP on compressive and humidity for 24 hours. Mold shape was used, a
strength and ductility are investigated. cylindrical with dimensions of 15×30 cm. After 24
hours, the specimens are removed from the molds
2.Experimental Program and are placed into a water pond with temperature of
20 2°C for curing. The curing time of the samples
In this section, the material properties, preparation was equal to 28 days in order to perform
and curing are described separately. compressive strength and stress-strain tests. After 28
days, the samples were taken out from the pond and
2.1. Material Properties
placed in the laboratory for drying the surface of the
The ordinary Portland type-II cement is used in the samples. Two days later, the samples were prepared
entire specimens. The specimens were made in four modes with 0 (control sample), 1, 3, and 5
according to ASTM C150 [33] and the gravel and layers of CFRP warps and after 7 days, they were
sand aggregates are of river type in accordance with subjected to stress-strain tests (see Figure 1).
ASTM C33 [34].The sand sizes ranged from 0 to The compression testing machine was used for
4.75 mm with apparent weight in Saturated Surface testing the compressive strength of concrete.
Dry (SSD) state of 2650 kg/m3, and its 24-hour The load shall be applied slowly without shock and
water absorption is 1.5% and also the super increased continuously until the resistance of
plasticizers are of type P10-3R based on ASTM specimen.
C494 [35]. CFRP is of type YC-N160 based on the In this research, Cs and followed by the number
properties presented in Table 1 and the consumed stand for value of classes of compressive strength
resin is of type epoxy DUR 300, in accordance with and Ls followed by the number stand for no. of
Table 2. CFRP layers.
64
Journal of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics,10(2),1-8, Summer & Autumn 2020
100
80
60
Stress (MPa)
40
L0 (Control Sample)
L1
20
L3
0 L5
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008
Strain (mm/mm)
80
3. Results and Discussion
60
Stress (MPa)
This section deals with the investigation of the 40 L0 (Control Sample)
influence of using CFRP with different layers on the L1
20
L3
compressive strength and ductility of concrete
L5
samples. 0
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008
Strain (mm/mm)
3.1. The Stress-strain Tests
Fig. 4. Stress-strain diagrams for C50 classes
The stress-strain tests were performed on the 15 cm
×30 cm cylindrical samples at the age of 28 days and Compressive strength and ductility of concrete
shown in Figures 2 through 4 for three classes of samples have been extracted from Figures 2-4.
concrete (i.e. C20, C35 and C50) and different layers
of CFRP sheets. The tests performed in compliance 3.1.1. Compressive Strength
with ASTM C469 [36].
The maximum values of stress in Figures 2 through
Since the concrete loses its integrity in a strain
4 have been obtained and considered as compressive
greater than 1% and the rebar reaches its ultimate
strength for different classes of concrete. The effect
endurable strain and also the cohesion between the
of CFRP layers on the compressive strength of the
concrete and the rebar decreases intensively, thus,
samples is shown in Figure 5.
the ultimate strain value is limited to 1% in all
As it can be seen in Figure 5, the compressive
diagrams 2 to 4 [34].
strength of the concrete samples increased with the
100 increase of the number of CFRP sheets due to the
80
effect of bonding and confinement.
The percentage of increase in compressive strength
Stress (MPa)
60
in the samples wrapped by carbon fiber is shown in
40
L0 (Control Sample)
L1
Figure 6. The effect of this fiber on increasing in
20 L3
L5
compressive strength decreases with increasing
0 concrete strength from 20 MPa to 50Mpa. Moreover,
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008
Strain (mm/mm) this diagram indicates that the effect of fibers on the
Fig. 2. Stress-strain diagrams for C20 classes rate of compressive strength growth would be less
with increasing the number of warped fibers. It can
attributed to the significant role of concrete integrity
for more FRP layers.
3.1.2. Ductility
65
S. A. Haj Seiyed Taghia, B. Saeedi Razavia, H. R. Darvishvand
13 [37].The yield strain was estimated by the Figure 7 indicates that concrete enclosed with carbon
following procedure: Using MATLAB software fiber is almost more ductile for less-strength
(2017b) [38] to make the stress-strain curve of the concrete.
sample an equivalent bilinear then the intersection of The percentage of ductility growth in concrete
the lines is referred as the yield strain. warped with carbon fibers is shown in Figure 8. The
role of fibers decreases in ductility improvement by
increasing the number of CFRP rounds. Again, it can attributed to the significant role of concrete integrity for
more FRP layers.
120
100
100 93
Compressive strength (MPa)
80 75
68 67
60 49 52
47
41
37
40 29
20
20
140
125
120
105
98
100 92
86
79
80
The Ratio (%)
60
40
40 34
29
20
Fig. 6. The ratio of the increase in the compressive strength of samples with increasing number of CFRP layers relative to samples
without CFRP
66
Journal of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics,10(2),1-8, Summer & Autumn 2020
12
10.6 11.5 10.8
10.4
9.9
10 9.0
8.1
8
6.5
6 5.4
Ductility
4
1.7 1.8 1.8
2
600 557
506 505
482 464
500
414
400 365
300 263
The Ratio (%)
210
200
100
Fig. 8. The ratio of the Ductility of CFRP strengthened samples regarding to non-strengthened samples (%)
4. Conclusion
References
According to experimental works, the result of this
research is finalized as followings: [1] Fleming, C. J., and King, G. E. M., “The
1- The results showed that the fibers are Development of Structural Adhesives for Three
effective in improving concrete compressive Original Uses in South Africa., RILEM
strength and ductility specially applying on International Symposium, Synthetic Resins in
Building Construction, Paris; 1967: 75-92.
low-strength concretes.
[2] Wolf, R., and Miessler, H. J., “HLV-Spannglieder in
2- By increasing the number of CFRP rounds, der Praxis. Erfahrungen Mit
the effective role of this fiber decreases in Glasfaserverbundstaben”, Beton, 1989 (2): 47-51.
improving concrete compressive strength [3] Meier, U., “Bridge Repair with High Performance
and ductility. Composite Materials”, Material und Technik; 1987
(4): 125-128.
5. Acknowledgments [4] Rostasy, F. S. (1987). Bonding of Steel and GFRP
Plates in the Area of Coupling Joints. Talbrucke
The authors would like to acknowledge the Kattenbusch, Research Report No. 3126/1429,
following people, Mr. Borjali Darvishvand for his Federal Institute for Materials Testing,
collaboration in editing the article. Braunschweig, Germany.
67
S. A. Haj Seiyed Taghia, B. Saeedi Razavia, H. R. Darvishvand
[5] Fardis, M. N., and Khalili, H., “Concrete Encased in [19] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R. and Li, M. W.,
Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic”, ACI JOURNAL, “Strength and ductility of concrete columns
Proceedings; 1981, 78 (6): 440-446. externally reinforced with fiber composite straps”,
ACI Structural Journal; 1994, 91(4): 434-447.
[6] Katsumata, H., Kobatake, Y., and Takeda, T., “A
[20] Nanni, A. and Bradford, N. M., “FRP jacketed
Study on the Strengthening with Carbon Fiber for
concrete under uniaxial compression”, Construction
Earthquake- Resistant Capacity of Existing Concrete
and Building Materials; 1995, 9(2): 115-124.
Columns. Proceedings from the Workshop on
[21] Seible, F., Priestley, M. J. N. and Innamorato, D.,
Repair and Retrofit of Existing Structures, U.S.-
“Earthquake retrofit of bridge columns with
Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, U.S.-
continuous fiber jackets. In Design guidelines”,
Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources,
Advanced composite technology transfer
Tsukuba, Japan; 1987: 1816-1823.
consortium, 2, Report No. ACTT-95/08, University
[7] Nanni, A., “Concrete Repair with Externally
of California, San Diego, USA; 1995.
Bonded FRP Reinforcement”, Concrete
[22] Picher, F., Rochette, P. and Labossière, P.,
International; 1995, 17 (6): 22-26.
“Confinement of concrete cylinders with CFRP”, In
[8] Neale, K. W., “FRPs for Structural Rehabilitation: A
Proceedings of 1st International Conference on
Survey of Recent Progress,” Progress in Structural
Composite Infrastructures, Tucson, Arizona, USA;
Engineering and Materials; 2000, 2(2): 133-138.
1996: 829-841.
[9] Dolan, C. W., Rizkalla, S. H., and Nanni, A.,
[23] Matthys, S., Taerwe, L. and Audenaert, K., “Tests
“Fourth International Symposium on Fiber
on axially loaded concrete columns confined by
Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced
FRP sheet wrapping”, In Proceedings of the 4th
Concrete Structures”, SP-188, American Concrete
International Symposium on FRP for Reinforced
Institute, Farmington Hills, MI; 1999.
Concrete Structures, Baltimore, USA; 1999: 217-
[10] Sheheta, E., Morphy, R., and Rizkalla, S., “Fourth
228.
International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced
[24] Mirmiran, A. and Shahawy, M., “Behavior of
Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures”,
concrete columns confined by fiber composites”,
1999, SP-188, C. W.
Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE; 1997,
[11] Saadatmanesh, H., and Ehsani, M. R., (1998).
123(5): 583-590.
Second International Conference on Composites in
[25] Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R., and Jin, L.,
Infrastructure”, ICCI; V. 1 and 2, Tucson, AZ, 1998,
“Seismic strengthening of circular bridge piers with
1506 pp.
fiber composites”, ACI Structural Journal; 1997,
[12] Benmokrane, B., and Rahman, H., “Durability of
93(6): 639-647.
Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for
[26] Spoelstra, M. R. and Monti, G., “FRP-confined
Construction”, University of Sherbrooke, Canada;
concrete model”, Journal of Composites for
1998.
Construction, ASCE; 1999, 3(3): 143-150.
[13] Neale, K. W., and Labossière, P., “State-of-the-Art
[27] Seible, F., Priestley, M. J. N. and Innamorato, D.,
Report on Retrofitting and Strengthening by
“Earthquake retrofit of bridge columns with
Continuous Fibre in Canada. Non-Metallic (FRP)
continuous fiber jackets. In Design guidelines”,
Reinforcement for Concrete Structures”, V. 1, Japan
Advanced composite technology transfer
Concrete Institute, Tokyo,Japan; 1997: 25-39.
consortium, 2, Report No. ACTT-95/08, University
[14] Hassan, T., and Rizkalla, S., “Flexural
of California, San Diego, USA; 1995a.
Strengthening of Prestressed Bridge Slabs with FRP
[28] Monti, G., Nisticò, N. and Santini, S., “Design of
Systems”, PCI Journal; 2002, 47 (1): 76-93.
FRP jackets for upgrade of circular bridge piers”,
[15] Shield, C. K., Busel, J. P., Walkup S. L., and
Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, in
Gremel, D. D., “Proceedings of the Seventh
print; 2001.
International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced
[29] Triantafillou, T. C., “Seismic retrofitting of
Polymer for Reinforced Concrete Structures
structures using FRPs”, Progress in Structural
(FRPRCS-7)”, SP-230, American Concrete
Engineering and Materials; 2001, 3(1), in print.
Institute, Farmington Hills, MI; 2005, 1708 pp.
[30] Minafò, G., Rezaee-Hajidehi, M., & Giambanco, G.,
[16] ACI 440.2R-17. Guide for the Design and
“A Mechanical Approach for Evaluating the
Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for
Distribution of Confinement Pressure in FRP-
Strengthening Concrete Structures; 2017.
Wrapped Rectangular Columns”, Journal of
[17] FIB. Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC
Engineering Mechanics, ASCE; 2019, 145(12).
Structures. FIB, Lausanne, 2001, 138 pp.
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001673.
[18] Chai, Y. H., Priestley, M. J. N. and Seible, F.,
[31] Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A., Darvishvand, H. R.,
“Seismic retrofit of circular bridge columns for
Ebrahimi, M., “Economic Analyses for Low-
enhanced flexural performance”, ACI Structural
Strength Concrete Wrapped with CFRP to Improve
Journal; 1991, 88(5): 572-584.
the Mechanical Properties and Seismic Parameters”,
68
Journal of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics,10(2),1-8, Summer & Autumn 2020
69