Bhagyashree-1
Bhagyashree-1
Bhagyashree-1
net/publication/360238286
CITATIONS READS
0 155
4 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Dinesh Rao on 30 April 2022.
The medical history was non-contributory; however, the silk suture material from one side of the lesion to the other
patient gave a positive history of lip biting since for year. and surgical knot was tied, leaving space between the knot
General examination did not reveal any abnormality. On and the lesion (Figure 2). The patient was advised to apply
intraoral examination, swelling was present on 2-3mm below 0.5% chlorhexidine gel for 7 days post-operatively to prevent
vermillion border of right lower lip region with a bluish any secondary infection. The patient was recalled after 7 days
translucent hue, which was approximately 1×1 cm in diameter for the suture removal. In the event of loss of the suture, the
with round to oval shape. (Figure 1) The swelling was non- patient was instructed to visit the operating pediatric dentist
tender, soft to the touch and non-compressible. No secondary immediately.
alterations such as ulceration, fistula formation, infection or In the present case, the sutures were maintained for 7 days, by
discharge were observed. Based upon the signs and which mucocele was compressed, epithelization was seen and
symptoms, a clinical diagnosis of oral mucocele of the lower complete healing had occurred. The patient was told to return
lip was made. The area was disinfected with a 0.1% povidone if there were any signs of recurrence. The patient was
iodine solution and a topical anesthetic gel was applied over followed up every 3 months. No recurrence has been reported
the entire surface of the lesion for approximately 3 minutes. in the six-month post-surgery (Figure 3).
Single interrupted suture was placed bypassing number 3.0
~ 144 ~
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences http://www.oraljournal.com
Conclusion
Micro-marsupialization might be a treatment option for
children as well as in adolescents with mucoceles. This
method is simple to execute, minimally invasive, requires no
local anesthesia, and has a less postoperative complications
rate, and is well tolerated by patients.
References
1. Chen YK, Lin LM, Huang HC, Lin CC, Yan YH. A
retrospective study of oral and maxillofacial biopsy
lesions in a pediatric population from southern
Taiwan. Pediatr Dent. 1998;20(7):404-410.
2. Delbem AC, Cunha RF, Vieira AE, Ribeiro LL.
Treatment of mucus retention phenomena in children by
the micro-marsupialization technique: case reports.
Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(2):155-158.
3. Baurmash HD. Mucoceles and ranulas. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2003;61(3):369-378.
4. Packiri S, Gurunathan D, Selvarasu K. Management of
Paediatric Oral Ranula: A Systematic Review. J Clin
Diagn Res. 2017;11(9):ZE06-ZE09.
5. Chung YS, Cho Y, Kim BH. Comparison of outcomes of
treatment for ranula: a proportion meta-analysis. Br J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57(7):620-626.
6. Morton RP, Bartley JR. Simple sublingual ranulas:
pathogenesis and management. J Otolaryngol.
1995;24(4):253-254.
7. More CB, Bhavsar K, Varma S, Tailor M. Oral
mucocele: A clinical and histopathological study. J Oral
Maxillofac Pathol. 2014;18(Suppl 1):S72-S77.
8. Amaral MB, de Freitas JB, Mesquita RA. Upgrading of
the micro-marsupialisation technique for the management
of mucus extravasation or retention phenomena. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(12):1527-1531.
9. Giraddi GB, Saifi AM. Micro-marsupialization versus
surgical excision for the treatment of mucoceles. Ann
Maxillofac Surg. 2016;6(2):204-209.
10. Gurgel CV, Neto NL, Geller-Palti D, Sakai VT, de
Oliveira TM, Machado MA. Surgical excision of
mucocele with local anesthesia in an 8-monthold baby.
Odontologia Clínico-Científica. 2012;11(1):81-86.
11. Nallasivam KU, Sudha BR. Oral mucocele: Review of
literature and a case report. J Pharm Bioallied Sci.
2015;7(Suppl 2):S731-S733.
12. Piazzetta CM, Torres-Pereira C, Amenábar JM. Micro-
marsupialization as an alternative treatment for mucocele
in pediatric dentistry. Int J Paediatr Dent.
2012;22(5):318-323.
~ 145 ~