Crane-10

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

34 Cranes – Design, Practice, and Maintenance

this has led to. It must be kept in mind that it is a matter of torque
which has to be delivered by the motors to the crane or to the trolley.
N · 9550
MG Nm
n
where
MGtorque in Nm on the motorshaft
NGthe motor power in kilowatts
nGnumber of revolutions per minute of the motor

A note with regard to the standards


It has been decided that the European Standards will be replaced by
the CEN standards (CEN GComité Européen de Normalisation). These
CEN standards are now developed (see Sections 5.1–5.3).]

To be able to meet the wind force on the crane only it is necessary that
Σ(c · q · A) · D兾2
MG
i·η
where
MGtotal torque, needed on the motorshaft(s), to drive the crane
against the windforce
Σ(c · q · A)Gtotal windforce
D兾2Gradius of the driven wheel
iGreduction of the gearings between the driven wheel and the driving
motor
iGnmotor :nwheel
η Gtotal efficiency of the drive mechanism

The motors have to be able to deliver the necessary torque also at low
speeds during such a time that the crane driver can drive the crane
against the storm towards the storm pot, where the crane can be
anchored.
Considerations that must be borne in mind for a crane travelling
mechanism are (see also Chapter 3):
– the resistance due to nominal travelling;
– the resistances due to the influence of the wind;
– the resistances due to the acceleration of the linear moving masses;
and
– the resistances due to the acceleration of the rotating masses.
Introduction 35

The wind speeds and aerodynamic pressures become greater at greater


heights from the ground.
Table 1.5.2 Windspeeds etc., at greater heights
Aerodynamic pressure
Height above quay in Storm windspeed in
metres m兾sec q in N兾m2 (in lbs兾sq ft )
0–20 metres 36 800 (16)
20–100 metres 42 1100 (22)
H100 metres 46 1300 (26)

1.6 Hatchless container vessels


Container vessels with hatches are well known. The deck-containers are
then loaded on top of the hatches and must be very well lashed with
lashings and semi-automated twist locks (SATLs) to prevent containers
being lost during a storm etc.
Unlashing respective. Lashing the containers, handling the SATLs,
and opening and closing the hull of vessels with hatches takes a con-
siderable time.
In order to overcome these problems, naval architects designed the
so-called ‘hatchless vessels’. These vessels have no hatches and
reinforced cell-guides run from the bottom of the vessel, up to almost
the top of the highest deck-container. Lashing of these deck-containers
and handling the hatches is then no longer necessary. This hatchless
construction saves a lot of work and time during unloading or loading
the vessel; in addition, the danger of losing containers in a storm is
fully avoided.
Nedlloyd and other stevedores have built a number of these hatchless
vessels. Nedlloyd states that they achieved 10–15 percent greater pro-
ductivity, although now all containers have to be hoisted over the
higher cell-guides.
The well-known Dutch naval architect Ir. E. Vossnack has made
designs for a series of modernized hatchless vessels which show interest-
ing design details. Figures 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 show some of the design
sketches of Ir. E. Vossnack.
36 Cranes – Design, Practice, and Maintenance

Fig. 1.6.1 Hatchless vessel, 22 across


Introduction 37

Fig. 1.6.2 Capacity, width and draft, etc.


38 Cranes – Design, Practice, and Maintenance

Fig. 1.6.3 Hatchless vessel


Chapter 2

Wire Ropes

2.1 Wire rope reeving systems


The system of the wire rope reeving differs from one crane type to
another. Two of the main reeving systems are indicated in the following
figures. In container cranes, the safety of the wire rope against rupture

Fig. 2.1.1 Normal hoist wire rope scheme for a container crane

You might also like