HW 4
HW 4
HW 4
e) Let 𝑇1 (𝑡) = 0.1 cos 𝜔𝑡, 𝑇2 (𝑡) = 0.5 cos 𝜔𝑡, 𝑇3 (𝑡) = −0.2. Assume damping ratio 𝜁 =
0.05 for every mode. Using impedance method, plot the frequency response function
Θ1 (ω), Θ2 (ω) 𝑎𝑛𝑑 Θ3 (ω) showing all three resonances.
A2) Consider the 2DoF model discussed with x and as the DoFs. Use x1 and x2 as the DoFs
instead of x and and derive the EoMs using Lagrange’s method. (5 marks)
Section B – Extra marks
B1) Consider a cantilever beam of length ‘l’, area moment of ‘I’, young’s modulus ‘E’, density
‘ρ’ and cross-section ‘A’. It can be ‘very crudely’ approximated as a discrete system with ‘n’
masses with connected springs as shown in the figure below. For the purpose of this problem we
can consider n=5. Here each of the discrete masses are M/n, where M (= ρAl) is the total weight
of the cantilever beam. Spring stiffness are given by kj = 3EI/(lej)3 where le is elemental length.
Let l= 0.5 m, b=20 mm, d = 50 mm, E = 210 GPa, ρ = 7800 kg/ m3.
a) Derive the EoMs for the 5 DoF system and calculate the natural frequencies and mode
shapes.
b) Compare the natural frequencies of the discrete model to with the actual values (from
µ2 𝐸𝐼
continuous system theory) given by 𝜔𝑛𝑖 = 𝐿2𝑖 √𝜌𝐴 , 𝑖 = 1,2,3 …
c) Compare the mode shapes of the discrete model to with the actual mode shapes by
plotting both on the same graph (from continuous system theory) given by
µ𝒊 𝒙 µ𝒊 𝒙 µ𝒊 𝒙 µ𝒊 𝒙
cosh ( ) − cos ( ) − 𝜎𝑖 (sinh ( ) − sin ( )) , 𝑖 = 1,2,3 …
𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿
i µ𝒊 𝜎𝑖
1 1.875 0.734
2 4.694 1.0184
3 7.854 0.9992
4 10.99 1.0000
5 14.13 1
d) Based on the comparison of natural frequencies and mode shapes comment on how crude
is the approximation made. How to improve the discrete model.
e) Find the response of the system to f(t) = 20 cos (ω t) using impendence method. Plot the
response amplitude of x5 vs ω. (25 marks)
Note on submitting the results: Please include the hand written formulations, plots and any other
answers that are to be written in your assignment. Please attach the all Matlab code at the end
as appendix.