International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

EVOLUTION OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB: FROM

WEB 1.0 TO 6.0

Ku. Chhaya A. Khanzode

Librarian
G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering & Management, Amravati (India)
Email: [email protected]

Dr. Ravindra D. Sarode

Assistant Proefssor
Department of Library & Information Science
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati (India)
Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The fast lane toward the development of web is coined to be as an outright

phenomenon in the today ‗s society with incorporated use of modern
innovative technology and redefining the way of organizing , communicating
and collaborating with individual which in terms lead us to mixture of
spectacular successes and failures. The purpose of this paper is to understand
and conceptualize the evolution of web from the scratch to the upcoming trends
in the field of Web Technology.

Keywords: Web 1.0, Web 2.0, Web 3.0, Web 4.0, Web 5.0, Web 6.0, Semantic Web

1. Introduction:

In today‘s era web technology can be easily defined by the user indifferent descriptive
way. But matter in fact many user are quite unknown to the information that from where
the WWW was coined first. As this paper state the evolution of web so it is important to
initiate the story from the beginning where it was stated first.

Largest transformable-information constructs i.e. Web introduce by Tim Burners-Lee in

1989 at first [9] [10]. Immense progress had been made about web and related
technologies. Web 1.0 referred as a web of information or percipience, Web 2.0 as web of
verbalization, web 3.0 as web of affiliation and web 4.0 as a web of integration and Web
5.0 as web of Decentralized smart communicator. This paper would attempt to build a
user centric view of the composition of features generation of web technology. In sum,
the paper presents a holistic view of the World Wide Web.

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 1

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

2. World Wide Web:

The World Wide Web is a system of interlinked hypertext document accessed via the
internet [21]. With a web browser, one can view web pages that may contain text, image,
videos, and other multimedia and navigate between them via hyperlinks. On March 12,
1989, Tim Berners-Lee, a British computer scientist and former CERN employee wrote a
proposal for what would eventually become the World Wide Web [1]. The 1989 proposal
was meant for a more effective CERN communication system but Berners-Lee eventually
realized the concept could be implemented throughout the world. Berners-Lee and
Belgian computer scientist Robert Cailliau proposed in 1990 to use hypertext ― to link and
access information of various kind as a web of nodes in which the user can browse at will
―[22]. In these ways the first web service was designed and tested and latterly confined as
Word Wide Web.

3. Web 1.0:

Web 1.0 was first implementation of the web and lasted from 1989 to 2005.It was define
as web of information connection. According to the innovator of World Wide Web, Tim
Berners-Lee considers the web as ―read-only‖ Web [1]. It provides very little interaction
where consumer can exchange the information together but it was not possible to interact
with the website. The role of the web was very passive in nature.

Web 1.0 was referred as the first generation of World Wide Web which was basically
defined as ―It is an information space in which the items of interest referred to as
resources are identified by global identifier called as Uniform Resources
Identifiers(URLs)‘‘

First generation web was era static pages and content delivery purpose only. In other
world, the early web allowed us to search for information and read it. There was very
little in the way of user interaction or content contribution.

3.1 Characteristics Web 1.0:

Web 1.0 Technologies includes core web protocols, HTML, HTTP, and URI. The major
characteristics of web 1.0 are as follow:

 They have read only content.

 Establish an online presence and make their information available to anyone at
any time.
 It includes static web pages and use basic Hypertext Mark-Up Language.

3.2 Limitation Web 1.0:

The major limitations of web 1.0 are as follow:

 The Web 1.0 pages can only be understood by humans (web readers) they do not
have machine compatible content.

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 2

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

 The Web master is solely responsible for updating user and managing the content
of website.
 Lack of Dynamic representation i.e., to acquire only static information , no web
console were available to performing dynamic events.
4. Web 2.0:

Web 2.0 is the second generation of web. It was defined by Dale Dougherty in 2004 as a
read-write web [1]. The concept began with a conference brainstorming session between
O‘ Reilly and Media live International. The technologies of web 2.0 allow assembling
and managing large global crowds with common interests in social interactions.

Tim O‘Reilly defines web 2.0 on his website as follows [8]

―Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the
internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new
platform. Chief among those rules is this. Build applications that harness network effects
to get better the more people use them.‘‘

Web 2.0 facilitates major properties like participatory, collaborative, and distributed
practices which enable formal and in formal spheres of daily activities on going on web.
In other terms it resemble major distinct characteristics of Web 2.0 include
―relationship‘‘ technologies, participatory media and a social digital technology which in
term can also defined as the wisdom web. People-centric web and participative web is
taken in to concern and which facilities reading and writing on the web which makes the
web transaction bi-directional.

Web 2.0 is a web as a

platform where users can
leave many of the controls
they have used in web 2.0 In
other words; the user of web
2.0 has more interaction with
less control. Web2.0 is not
only a new version of web 1.0
but it also implies to flexible
web design, creative reuse,
updates, collaborative content
creation and modification in
web 2.0 that should be
considered as one of the
outstanding feature of the web
2.0 is to support collaboration
and to help gather collective
intelligence rather web 1.0

(Source: http://taibumakumba.blogspot.in )

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 3

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

4.1 Characteristics of Web 2.0:

Web 2.0 is instead a label coined by Tim O‘ Reilly and associates to reference the
transition of World Wide Web to a new phase of use and service development [17]. The
categorization can be used to elaborate on the understanding of Web 2.0 achieved through
varied definitions.

 Technology Centric Characteristics:

Web has become a platform with software above the level of a single device.
Technology that is associated with blogs wikis, podcasts, RSS feeds etc.
 Business Centric Characteristics:
It is a way of architecting software and businesses. The business revolution in the
computer industry is caused by the move to internet as platform and an attempt to
understand the rules for success on that of new platform.
 User Centric Characteristics:
The Social Web is often used to characterize sites that consist of communities. It
is all about content management and new ways of communication and interaction
between users. Web application is facilitates collective knowledge production,
social networking and increases user to user information exchanges.

4.2 Limitation of Web 2.0:

Sometimes it may happen that if the new technology meets expectations of the mass user
at large, there may be a chance that these technologies may face lot of consequences from
external environment which may suppress or limit the flow of technology as a whole.

Constant Iteration Cycle of change and updates to services [11]

Ethical issues concerning build and usage of web 2.0
Interconnectivity and knowledge sharing between platforms across community
boundaries are still limited [12] [15]
5. Web 3.0:

Web 3.0 is one of modern and evolutionary topics associated with the following
initiatives of web 2.0. Web 3.0 was first coined by John Mark off of the New York Times
and he suggested web 3.0 as third generation of the web in 2006 [18]. Web 3.0 can be
also stated as ―Executable Web‘‘.

The Basic idea of 3.0 is to define structure data and link them in order to more effective
discovery, automation, integration, and reuse across various applications [6]. It is able to
improve data management, support accessibility of mobile internet, simulate creativity
and innovation, encourage factor of globalization phenomena, enhance customers‘
satisfaction and help to organize collaboration in social web.

Web 3.0 is also known as semantic web. Semantic web was thought up by Tim Berners-
Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web [1]. A dedicated team at the World Wide Web
consortium was working to improve, extend and standardize the system, languages
publications and tools have already been developed [3]. Web 3.0 is a web where the

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 4

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

concept of website or webpage disappears, where data isn‘t owned but instead shared,
where services show different views for the same web or the same data. Those services
can be applications devices or other, and have to be focused on context and
personalization, and both will be reached by using vertical search [13]. Web 3.0 supports
world wide database and web oriented architecture which in earlier stage was described
as a web of document. It deals mainly with static HTML documents. But dynamically
rendered pages and alternative formats should follow the same conceptual layout
standards whenever possible and links are between documents or part of them. The web
of document was designed for human consumption in which primary object are
documents and links are between documents. Semantics of content and links are implicit
and the degree of structure between objects is fairly low [19]. The Proponent of the web
of data envisions much of the world‘s data being interrelated and openly accessible to the
general public. This vision is analogous in many ways to the web of documents of
common knowledge, but instead of making document and media openly accessible, the
focus is on making data openly accessible, the web of data hosts a variety of data sets that
include encyclopedic facts, drug and protein data metadata on music, books and scholarly
articles, social network representations, geospatial information, and many other types of
information in some ways like a global database that most its features are included
Semantics of content and links are explicit and the degree of structure between objects is
high based on RDF model. In Figure the structure of web of data is shown simplicity [14]

(Source: Web of Data[20] )

5.1 Semantic Web:

The semantic web is a collaborative movement led by international standards body the
World Wide Web consortium. According to the W3C [4], ―The Semantic web provides a
common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application,
enterprise, and community boundaries‖

The main purpose of the Semantic web is driving the evolution of the current web by
enabling users to find .share and combine in formation more easily. The Semantic web, as
originally envisioned, is a system that enables machines to understand and respond to
complex human requests based on their meaning. Such an understanding requires that the
relevant information sources be semantically structured.

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 5

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

5.2 Layered Architecture for Semantic Web

Tim Berners-Lee originally expressed the Semantic web as [2] ―If HTML and the web
made all the online documents look like one huge book, RDF, schema and inference
languages will make all the data in the world look like one huge database‖. Tim Berners-
Lee proposed a layered architecture for semantic web that often represented using a
diagram, with many variations since.

(Source :Semantic Web Layered Architecture [5] )

The development of the semantic web proceeds in steps, each step building a layer on top
of another. Figure shows the ―layer cake‖ of the semantic web which describes the main
layers of the semantic web design and vision [5].

 Unicode and URI: Unicode is used to represent of any character uniquely whatever
this character was written by any language and uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is
unique identifiers for resources of all. The functionality of Unicode and URI could be
described as the provision of a unique identification mechanism within the language
stack for the semantic web [20]
 XML: It is a language that lets one write structured web documents with a user-
defined vocabulary XML is particularly suitable for sending documents across the
web. XML has no built-in mechanism to convey the meaning of the user‘s new tags to
other users.
 RDF: Resource Description Framework is a basic data model, like the entity-
relationship model, for writing simple statements about web object. A scheme for
defining Information on the web. RDF provides the technology for expressing the
meaning of terms and concepts in a form that computers can readily process.
 Logic Layer: It is used to enhance the ontology languages further and to allow the
writing of application-specific declarative knowledge
 Proof Layer: It involves the actual deductive process as well as the representation of
proofs in web languages and proof validation.
 Trust Layer: It will emerge through the use of digital signatures and other kinds of
knowledge based on recommendations by trusted agents or on rating and certification
agencies and consumer bodies. Semantic web is not limited to publish data on the
web. It is about making links to connect related data. Berners-Lee introduced a set of
rules have become known as the linked data principles to publish and connect data on
the web in 2007 [16]
IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 6
International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

 Use Uris as names for things.

 Use HTTP Uris to look up those names.
 Provide Useful information. Using the standards (RDF) by look up a URI.
 Include links to other URIs to discover more things.

Data providers can add data to a single global data space by publishing data on the web
according to the linked data principles.

5.3 Characteristics of Web 3.0:

The major characteristics of web 3.0 as marked by Nova Spivack are [18]

 Saas Business Model.

 Open source software platform.
 Distributed Database or what called as ―The World Wide Database‖.
 Web Personalization.
 Resource Pooling.
 Intelligent Web.

5.4 Challenges of Web 3.0:

Web 3.0 faces several challenging issue like-

 Vastness: The World Wide Web contains many billions of pages. Redundancy
in data may occur which has not yet been able to eliminate all semantically
duplicated terms.
 Vagueness: This arises from the vagueness of user queries, of concepts
represented by content providers, of matching query terms to provider terms
and of trying to combine different knowledge bases with overlapping but subtly
different concepts.
 Inconsistency: These are logical contradictions which will inevitably arise
during the development of large ontologism and when ontologism from
separate sources is combined.
 Deceit: This is when the producer of the information is intentionally misleading
the consumer of the information.

5.5 Comparison of Web1.0, 2.0 and Web 3.0:

The Main difference between Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 is that web 1.0 is consider
as read-only web targets on content creativity of producer web 2.0 targets on content
creativity of users and producers while web 3.0 targets on linked data sets. The very few
comparative difference between web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 are given below.

Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Web 3.0

1996-2004 2004-2016 2016
The Hypertext Web The Social Web The Semantic Web
Tim Berners Lee Tim O‘ Reilly, Dale Tim Berners Lee

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 7

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

Dougherty
Read Only Read & Write Web Executable Web
Millions of User Billions of User Trillions of Users
Echo System Participation & Interaction Understanding Self
One Directional Bi-Directional Multi-user virtual environment
People build application though
Companies Publish
People Publish Content which people interact & publish
Content
content.
Web 3.0 is curiously undefined.
Static Content Dynamic Content
AI& 3d, The Web learning
Personal Websites Blog & Social Profile Semi blog, Haystack
Message Board Community portals Semantic Forums
Buddy List, Address
Online Social Networks Semantic Social Information
Book

6. Web 4.0:

Web 4.0 can be considered as an Ultra-Intelligent Electronic Agent, Symbiotic web and
Ubiquitous web [25]. Interaction between humans and machines in symbiosis was motive
behind the symbiotic web. It is powerful as human brain. Progress in the development of
telecommunication, advancement on nanotechnology in the world and controlled
interfaces are using web 4.0. In simple words, machines would be clever on reading the
contents of the web, and react in the form of executing and deciding what to execute first
to load the websites fast with superior quality and performance and build more
commanding interfaces [24]. Web 4.0 will be read write concurrency web [23]. It ensures
global transparency governance, distribution, participation, collaboration in to key
communities such as industry, political, social and other communities. Web OS will be
such as a middleware in which will start functioning like an operating system [26]. Web
OS will be parallel to the human brain and implies a massive web of highly intelligent
interaction [27].

7. Web 5.0:

Web 5.0 is still an underground idea in progress and there is no exact definition of how it
would be. Web 5.0 can be considered as Symbiotic web, decentralized i.e. it is not
possible to have a Personal Server (PS) for any personal data or information stored on the
net, and people tries to get interconnected via Smart Communicator (SC), like Smart
phones, Tablets or Personal Robots i.e. is represented as its own avatar inside the SC, that
will be able to surf alone in the 3D Virtual world of the Symbiotic. The Symbiotic servers
will be able to use a part of "memory and calculation power" of each interconnected SC,
in order to calculate the billions and billions needed data to build the 3D world, and to
feed it's Artificial Intelligence surf alone [27]. Currently the Web is "emotionally"
neutral: do not feel the user perceives. The company Emotive Systems has created
neurotechnology through headphones that allow users to interact with content that meets
their emotions or change in real time facial expression an "avatar".

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 8

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

8. Web 6.0

A new node named web Service Extensions has been added to the Internet Information
Services Manager (ISM) in Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0. Web service
extensions are programs that extend the basic IIS functionality of serving static content.
Examples of Web service extensions are, Active Server Pages (ASP), ASP.NET,
FrontPage Server Extensions, Server-side includes (SSI), Internet Database Connector,
Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (Web DAV), Common Gateway Interface
(CGI), Internet Server API (ISAPI), Active Server Pages (ASP), ASP.NET, FrontPage
Server Extensions, Server-side includes (SSI), Database Connector, Web Distributed
Authoring and Versioning (Web DAV), Common Gateway Interface (CGI), and Internet
Server API (ISAPI).

About Configuring Servers for Applications (IIS 6.0)

Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 delivers Web hosting services through an
adjustable architecture that you can use to manage server resources with improved
stability, efficiency, and performance. IIS separates applications into isolated pools and
automatically detects memory leaks, defective processes, and over-utilized resources.
When problems occur, IIS manages them by shutting down and redeploying faulty
resources and connecting faulty processes to analytical tools.

8.1 IIS can run in either of two mutually exclusive modes of operation:

 Worker process isolation mode:

This is the default mode of IIS 6.0, isolates key components of the World Wide Web
Publishing Service (WWW service) from the effects of errant applications, and it protects
applications from each other by using the worker process component. Use worker process
isolation mode unless you have a specific compatibility issue that makes the use of IIS 5.0
isolation mode necessary. Web sites that serve static content or simple ASP applications
should be able to move to IIS 6.0 running in worker process isolation mode with little or
no modification.

 IIS 5.0 isolation mode:

With this mode, you can run applications that are incompatible with worker process
isolation mode because they were developed for earlier versions of IIS. Applications that
run correctly on IIS 5.0 should run correctly on IIS 6.0 in IIS 5.0 isolation mode.

IIS 6.0 worker process isolation mode delivers the following specific improvements over
earlier versions of IIS:

 Robust performance -Isolation prevents Web applications and Web sites from
affecting each other or the WWW service. Reboots of the operating system and
restarting of the WWW service are avoided.
 Self-healing -Automated management provides auto-restart of failed worker
processes and periodic restart of deteriorating worker processes.
IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 9
International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

 Scalability- Web gardens allow more than one worker process to serve the same
application pool.
 Process affinity - enables the connection of worker processes to specific
processors on multi-CPU servers.
 Automated debugging - The debugging feature enables the automatic assignment
of failing worker processes to debugging tools.
 CPU limiting - This monitoring feature enables controlling the amount of CPU
resources that an application pool consumes in a configured amount of time. [29]

9. Conclusion:

This paper provided an overview from the evolution of the Web, Web 1.0, Web 2.0 Web
3.0, web 4.0 web 5.0 and web 6.0 were described as four generations of the web. The
characteristics of the generations are introduced and compared. It is concluded web as an
information space has had much progress since 1989 and it is moving toward using
artificial intelligent techniques to be as a massive web of highly intelligent interaction in
close future.

10. References:

1) Tim Berners-Lee, ―The World Wide Web: A very short personal history‖.
http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/ShortHistory.html ,1998.
2) Berners-Lee, Tim; Fischetti, Mark,‖ Weaving the Web‖, Harper SanFrancisco,
chapter 12, ISBN 978-0-06-251587-2, 1999.
3) Sean B, Palmer, ―The Semantic Web: An Introduction‖,
http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/, 2001.
4) W3C Semantic Web Activity ―http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/‖, World Wide Web
Consortium, 2001.
5) Jane, Greenberg & Stuart, Sutton & D. Grant, Campbell , ―Metadata: A
Fundamental Component of the Semantic Web‖,
6) Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume 29, Issue 4, pages 16–18,2003. Ossi, Nykänen, ―Semantic Web:
Definition‖, http://www.w3c.tut.fi/talks/2003/0331umediaon/slide6-0.html, 2003.
7) Motta, E., & Sabou, M, ―Next Generation Semantic Web Applications‖,
Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag Berlin, pp. 24-29, 2006.
8) O‘Reilly, Definition of Web 2.0. http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/web-
20-compactdefinition- tryi.html, 2006
9) Brian, Getting, ―Basic Definitions: Web 1.0, Web 2.0, Web 3.0‖, 2007,
http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/464-Basic-Definitions-Web-1-0-
Web-2-0-Web-3-0
10) Maged, N. Kamel Boulos & Steve, Wheeler, ―The emerging Web 2.0 social
software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care
education‖, Health Information and Libraries Journal, pp: 2 -23, 2007.
11) Anderson, P. ―All That Glisters Is Not Gold' - Web 2.0 And The Librarian‖,
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 39 (4), pp. 195–198, 2007.
12) Abel, F., Frank, M., Henze, N., Krause, D., Plappert, D., & Siehndel, P., ―Group
Me! - Where Semantic Web meets Web 2.0‖, 2007

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 10

International Journal of Digital Library Services ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

Vol. 6, April - June 2016, Issue - 2 www.ijodls.in

13) Mind Booster, Noori, ―WhatisWeb3.0?‖

http://mindboosternoori.blogspot.com/2007/08/what-is-web-30.html, 2007.
14) Tim, Berners-Lee & Christian, Bizer & Tom, Heath & Kingsley, Idehen, ―Linked
Data on the Web‖, 17th International World Wide Web Conference, 2008.
15) Chan, C. K., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, V., ―Harnessing Web 2.0 for Collaborative
Learning‖, Springerlink, 2009.
16) Christian, Bizer & Tom, Heath & Tim, Berners-Lee, ―Linked Data - The Story So
Far‖, Journal Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2009.
17) Harrisom, T. M., & Barthel, B., ―Wielding new media in Web 2.0: exploring the
history of engagement with the collaborative construction of media products‖.
New media & Society, 11(1&2), pp. 155–178, 2009.
18) Nova Spivack, ―Web 3.0: The Third Generation Web is Coming‖
http://lifeboat.com/ex/web.3.0, 2011.
19) Sareh Aghaei, Mohammad Ali Nematbakhsh and Hadi Khosravi Farsani,
―Evolution of the World Wide Web: From Web 1.0 to Web 4.0‖,Computer
Engineering Department, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran, International
Journal of Web & Semantic Technology (IJWesT) Vol.3, No.1,pp. 1-10, 2012
20) Patel et al., International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and
Software Engineering 3(10), pp. 410-417, 2013.
21) W3C ―World Wide Web Consortium‖, http://www.w3.org.
22) World Wide Web: Proposal for a HyperText Project
(http://www.w3.org/Proposal.html).
23) ―Web 4.0 - A New Web Technology‖, http://websitequality.
blogspot.com/2010/01/web-40-new-webtechnology.html/, Hemnath (2010)
24) On2broker: Lessons Learned from Applying AI to the Web Dieter Fensel, Jürgen
Angele, Stefan Decker, Michael Erdmann, Hans-Peter Schnurr, Rudi Studer and
Andreas Witt Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, D -76128 Karlsruhe,
Germany [email protected],http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/~dfe.
25) Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd (2013) Web 4.0: The Ultra-Intelligent
Electronic Agent is http://bigthink.com/big-think-tv/web-40-the-ultra-
intelligentelectronic
26) Ron, Callari, ―Web 4.0. Trip Down the Rabbit Hole or Brave New World?‖
http://www.zmogo.com/web/web-40trip-down-therabbit-hole-or-brave-new-
world/.
27) Dan, Farber (2007), ―From semantic Web (3.0) to the Web OS (4.0)‖,
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/from-semantic-web-30-to-the-webos-40/4499/
28) Flat Word Business ―Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0 vs Web 4.0 – A bird‘s eye
on the evolution and definition‖
http://flatworldbusiness.wordpress.com/flateducation/ previously/web-1-0-vs-
web-2-0-vs-web-3-0-a-bird-eyeon- the-definition
29) Acerca de cómo configurar servidores para aplicaciones
http://www.Microsoft.com
/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/IIS/1c955b5b-000C-4d2e-8c5d-
5606fc11aoc1.mspx

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 11