IMPACT OF WEARING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

ON DUTY IN AIRWORKS AVIATION ACADEMY

A Thesis Proposal

Submitted to the Faculty of

CEBU AERONAUTICAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL

Salinas Drive Lahug Cebu City

In Partial Fulfilment for the

Academic Requirements for

Aviation Thesis

(Quantitative Research)

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE MAJOR IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE

TECHNOLOGY

Rosales,Francis

October 2022
 APPROVAL SHEET

The research entitled “IMPACT OF WEARING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE

EQUIPMENT ON DUTY IN AIRWORKS AVIATION ACADEMY” prepared and

submitted by Rosales,Francis, In partial fulfillment for the Academic requirements for

RMAM 415 Research Methods (Quantitative Research), it has been examined and it is

recommended for approval and acceptance.

ENGR. ORVEN D. DELIMA

Chairman

Accepted and approved in Partial Fulfillment for the Academic Requirements in B.S.

Aircraft Maintenance Technology, with a Course Number RMAM 415 and AMT 417

Course title of Research Method & Application for AMT.

Date of Title Defense:

Approved by:

Engr. Carl Vir V. Amabao

Registrar
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
TITLE PAGE

APPROVAL SHEET

ABSTRACT

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Rationale

1.2 Theoretical Background

1.3 Statement of the Problem

1.4 Null Hypothesis

1.5 Significance of the Study

1.6 Scope and Limitations

1.7 Definition of Terms

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design

3.2 Research Environment

3.3 Research Instrument

 3.4 Research Respondent

3.5 Research Flow

CHAPTER 4:

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary of Findings

5.2 Conclusions

5.3 Recommendations

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER 6: APPENDICES

6.1 Transmittal Letter

6.1 Consent Form

6.1 Sample Questionnaire

CHAPTER 7: CURRICULUM VITAE

 CHAPTER 1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

Introduction

The activities that students engage in while applying for on-the-job training (OJT) are

helping them promote safety; perhaps this is what aviation companies and general

aviation in Mactan exercises and teaches the employees working in the hangar, the on-

the-job training itself. The foremost priority is always safety. The goals, efficiency,

productivity, and objectives of aviation organizations and businesses should be

maintained while also making the most of their resources to improve safety. Although

promising safety is frequent in aviation and enticing, it is insufficient to enable safety.

Every promise or commitment should be backed up by evidence, such as the properly

trained maintenance department staff, upgraded technology and equipment, application

of rules and regulations, and other systems that support or permit aviation safety.

Younger employees are more susceptible to significant non-fatal accidents than their

more experienced counterparts due to their general lack of work experience, lack of

understanding of workplace risks, lack of safety and health training, as well as their

general lack of physical and emotional maturity. For instance, the risk of non-fatal

accidents involving young workers is 60% higher in the European Union than it is for

any other age group (Somavia, n.d). The study will especially focus on CATS Aero

College students who completed their on-the-job training at General Aviation Mactan
and who applied to each employer, as well as their experiences or observations made

while on duty.

Wearing PPE while on duty may have both beneficial and negative consequences.

Positively, PPE can act as a barrier between a worker and potentially harmful

substances or environments, lowering the likelihood of an accident or illness.

Additionally, it can stop the transmission of contagious diseases and support the

maintenance of a secure workplace. Wearing PPE, on the other hand, can be

uncomfortable and impede movement, which can cause physical strain or weariness.

Additionally, it might impair teamwork and collaboration by limiting communication and

erecting barriers between employees. Additionally, PPE can be costly, and for certain

organizations, the expense of supplying and maintaining it can be a major burden.

Depending on the sort of work being done and the particular PPE needed, the extent

of the impact of wearing PPE while on the job can change. PPE, for instance, is

essential in a healthcare setting to stop the transmission of infectious diseases, but it

can also pose problems for patient care, such as communication issues with patients

who are blind or deaf. PPE can be crucial for worker safety in a construction

environment, but it can also limit workers' mobility and dexterity, making it challenging to

complete some tasks. In conclusion, businesses must carefully weigh the advantages

and disadvantages when deciding whether to utilize PPE because the effects of wearing

PPE while doing work-related duties are extensive and complex.

Rationale

During the takeoff run, the pilot spotted a cyclist crossing. the tarmac. The takeoff

was aborted, and the aircraft's maximum braking was used to bring it to a stop. Despite

this, the aircraft swerved to the left of the runway. The airplane propeller made touch

with the ground as the pilot maneuvered the plane back to the middle of the runway.

When it hit the cemented end of the runway threshold, the nose landing gear also came

off. The terminal location of the airplane was at 14°0'58.99" N, 120°44'18.80" E, and it

was heading almost 200 degrees when it came to a complete halt and settled into an

upright position. Probable causes include failure of the aerodrome marshal to secure

the runway crossing zones during aircraft operations, which is a Contributory Cause

Factor, and the Pilot's Lack of Situational Awareness on Aerodrome Ground Movement

During Takeoff, which is a Primary Cause Factor. after a denied takeoff, the pilot must

maintain directional control of the off (Human Factor)

In the aviation sector, safety is the first priority. It is crucial because Every airplane

operation involves human life. Because of insufficient safety Aviation management

takes into account not just the financial costs of one plane disaster but also the loss of

numerous priceless lives. Accidents rarely occur as a direct result of one failing. Despite

having a great maintenance schedule and the right equipment, accidents still occur.

Employee is ultimately what matters. complacency and a disregard for protocol. Even

the best planning cannot avoid making an error. Make sure the mechanics are in good
shape and adhere to they will have a lot less risk of getting into an accident if they follow

safety precautions and don't cut corners.

OJT students were advised by each company to adhere to its safety procedures in

general aviation Mactan. We prepared the equipment but occasionally wearing gloves is

not required because our senior mechanic asked us to participate in a safety wiring

incident. After completing the assignment, we discovered that it is impossible to avoid

using dirty hands and suffering several cuts from sharp objects. Students should be

required to abide by all company safety regulations, facilitating safety procedures during

OJT. Students should be required to adhere to safety protocols to help with OJT. every

company's safety regulations Since trainees are exposed to unsafe surroundings, it is

essential that they use common sense and awareness while on duty. However, not all

trainees will obey the laws and regulations, which is mandatory. With the help of this

study, trainees will be provided better instructions on how to preserve or prevent deaths.
Statement of the Problem

How OJT students adhere to safety procedures while receiving on-the-job training at

General Aviation-Mactan is the main focus of the study. The researchers want to

address the following questions in order to gather all essential data:

1. What is the profile of CATS students in Cebu city in terms of the following:

a. Age

b. Sex

c. Course

d. Year

e. Name of the company

2. Factors impact of wearing personal protective equipment

2.1 Performance

2.2 Handling of equipment and proper wearing of PPE.

2.3 Workplace Awareness

Null Hypothesis

The results show that using actual data to predict future damage events is feasible,

and that there is a strategic requirement for safety slots as a result. The integrated

strategy was developed with the purpose of employing it in cases of unintentional injury,

whereas incidental harm may be seen as a stochastic process. The following elements

were considered pertinent in this investigation. Since we are presenting two

independent variables, a null hypothesis should indicate if there is no relationship

between safety behavior and the quantity of safety classes completed. Further

investigation will show that the more effort put into creating an efficient safety

management system, the better the operational management of the sector will be.

Maintenance occurrences do not occur simultaneously; however, safety protocols must

be implemented, so it is assumed that all aircraft undergo maintenance. The adopted

strategy allows delayed demand fulfilment, which, in concrete terms, means that an

unintentional inefficiency could result from a maintenance occurrence that is delayed.

Significance of the Study

The following will benefit by determining impact of wearing personal protective

equipment on duty in airworks aviation academy.

Students. This will give them the security they need to complete their OJT

requirements without endangering themselves or others, which might or might not

prevent them from succeeding in their future endeavors. Additionally, it will increase

their effectiveness because the students will feel certain that they are being protected at
all times by completing a study that addresses the unique safety precautions required

for OJT students.

School. This will assure the school that its kids are working in a field that prioritizes

their safety. If the company prioritized safety procedures, this will inspire them to

collaborate with that particular business.

Parents. As a result of knowing that their kids are in capable hands, the parents will feel

confident allowing them to participate in on-the-job training.

Company. This will safeguard the company's reputation by ensuring that its trainees

are in capable hands and won't experience any occupational hazards. The company is

offering a secure workplace for the kids who will participate in the OJT program, which

will ensure a positive relationship between the company and the partner school.

Industry. This will safeguard the sector because it provides student safety and the

partner company's assurance that there won't be any unforeseen problems with the job

or sector.
Scope and Limitations

This research is entitled “IMPACT OF WEARING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE

EQUIPMENT ON DUTY IN AIRWORKS AVIATION ACADEMY”. This study intends to

demonstrate to students who are receiving on-the-job training the benefits of safety

measures that can greatly aid in improvement and prevention. The consequences on

each on-the-job trainee's students will be the main focus of the researchers'

investigation because safety measures are frequently prioritized in every business. To

examine the relationships between the variables, the researchers will employ a

descriptive and correlational style of research design and instrument. The study will

continue till the day the authorization sheet is signed.

Definition of Terms

On Job Training (OJT) -OJT, or on-the-job training, is described as a

methodical manner to acquire the new knowledge and skills needed for a career in a

real or practically genuine working setting.

Workplace Safety - In order to prevent disruptions, accident prevention must be

incorporated into production planning, as well as into worker welfare, labor-saving

techniques, and workplace safety.

Accident - is described as an unexpected, harmful event that happens suddenly

and without warning, is brought on by an outside force, and occurs as a result of contact

between people and objects.

Bibliography:

1.) J, D. A. (2019, August 30). Workplace Attitude of Employees with Disabilities

towards Building Workplace Inclusiveness. International Journal of Research in

Arts and Science, 5(Special Issue), 102–106. From

https://doi.org/10.9756/bp2019.1002/09

2.) Safety Management - Hazard Prevention and Control | Occupational Safety and

Health Administration. (n.d.). Safety Management - Hazard Prevention and

Control | Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Retrieved February 7,

2023

3.) 4901906 Method for forming composite metal articles. (1990, January).

International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 30(4), ii. From

https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(90)90021-a

4.) Solomon, A., Michaelshvili, M., Bitton, R., Shapira, B., Rokach, L., Puzis, R., &

Shabtai, A. (2022, June). Contextual security awareness: A context-based

approach for assessing the security awareness of users. Knowledge-Based

Systems, 246, 108709. From https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108709

5.) Meyer, L., Vogel, M., & Fricke, H. (2010). Functional Hazard Analysis of Virtual

Control Towers. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 43(13), 146–151. From

https://doi.org/10.3182/20100831-4-fr-2021.00027
 CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

This chapter's goal is to provide comprehensive comprehension of the research's

debates and to deliver that material in a clear and concise manner. Numerous

publications and studies that enhance the researcher's case are included in this

chapter. Additionally, the researcher would discuss the outcomes of safety precautions

and the contributing elements.

Theme 1: Factors impact of wearing personal protective equipment

2.1 Performance

The effectiveness with which an employee performs activities that contribute to the

organization's technical core, either directly by implementing a part of its technological

process or indirectly by providing it with needed materials or services, is defined as task

performance (Borman and Motowidlo, 1993).

Education was discovered to be adversely related to task performance. It had no

discernible relationship with overall job performance. Surprisingly, higher education

levels did not guarantee higher job performance (Kahya, 2007). However, in a widely

cited work of Ng and Feldman (2009), Education was related to better task

performance. Their meta-analysis of the relationships between education level and job

behaviors revealed that education had a positive influence on core task performance

but had a negative impact on on-the-job performance.

Employee performance encompasses factors such as work quality, quantity, and

effectiveness, as well as workplace behaviors (Donohoe,2019).

Another factor that can influence employee job performance is organizational size,

which is also a common control variable in organizational research (Musbah et al.,

2016).

Musbah, A., Cowton, C.J. and Tyfa, D. (2016), “The role of individual variables,

organizational variables and moral intensity dimensions in Libyan management

accountants’ ethical decision making”, ”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 134 No. 3, pp.

1-24.

Ng, T.W. and Feldman, D.C. (2009), “How broadly does education contribute to job

performance?”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 89-134.

Kahya, E. (2007), “The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job

performance”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 515-

523.

Borman, W. C., and Motowidlo, S. (1993). “Expanding the criterion domain to include

elements of contextual performance,” in Personnel Selection in Organizations, eds N.

Schmitt and W. C. Borman (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass), 71–98.

2.2 Handling of equipment and proper wearing of PPE.

What is Personal Protective Equipment

 The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) advises PPE as a

last resort to prevent occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities, although some firms

combine it with other management measures to guarantee a safe and healthy

workplace for their employees.

Employees are required to use or wear specific types of equipment called personal

protective equipment (PPE) to safeguard themselves against risks at work. These kinds

of tools are essential since airports are full with risks. Employees who maintain airports

and those who work on the ramps should wear protective gear, including hearing

protection and hand and foot coverings (n.d).

Following are some advantages of utilizing PPEs:

prevent unnecessary workplace injuries;

protect against excessive chemical exposure for employees;

Help businesses comply with regulatory requirements

A safe work environment promotes productivity. More than only a mandated by law,

health and safety also presents an economic potential. By enhancing health and safety

performance, which reduces the costs of preventable losses and lost-time accidents

and boosts productivity WSPS (2021), you may improve your bottom line.

2.3 Workplace awareness

The aviation environment depends on the availability of a sizable pool of competent

people in enough numbers to fill the range of positions found within the sector. The
supply of a varied variety of services necessary for the day-to-day operation of the

aviation system around the world is ensured by this diverse workplace.

To make sure that the already increasing demand for aircraft movements can be

handled in a safe and secure manner. For many airport operators, the sudden shifts in

traffic brought on by the removal of restrictions and the swift recovery of demand have

caused an unprecedented personnel crisis. Concerns about a labor shortage and high

turnover rates have been raised in many parts of the world. Aircraft operations are

regularly impacted by crew shortages, major delays and flight cancellations damage

passenger experiences, and in some cases, airport capacity is constrained. (Montréal,

2022).

References:

https://aci.aero/2022/06/22/safety-and-security-awareness-and-monitoring-in-the-

context-of-aviation-worker-shortages/

Theme 2:The impact of wearing personal protective equipment

What is mean by Hazard Control?

Hazard control refers to workplace precautions taken to prevent injury, illness, and

damage to equipment or machinery. Hazard control procedures are standardized and

taught to management and safety personnel in many industries

(Safeopedia,2018).

https://www.safeopedia.com/definition/151/hazard-control
 The hazard control practices used vary from one company to the next and from one

job to the next. Nevertheless, some of the practices can be used to safeguard

employees' health in all workplaces. An employee is exposed to a number of hazards at

work. For instance, a worker in intense heat runs a higher risk of dehydration, whereas

a worker at a high place runs a higher risk of falling. The so-called hierarchy of hazard

control is frequently used to control risks. The following measures are listed in

decreasing order of effectiveness:

1.Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): When all other safeguards fall short, this is the

last line of defense for worker safety. While useful, helmets, eye protection, and safety

footwear are the least effective controls in the hierarchy of safety hazard control.

2. Elimination: This means getting rid of the danger. Although it is the most efficient

approach, it is not always practical. For instance, some jobs could need you to work at

heights.

3. Engineering controls: This means modifying the machinery or plant to lessen the

risks. A plant might get a ventilation system, for instance.

4. Administrative Control: This means altering the manner in which a particular sort of

task is carried out. This is achieved through modifying the work schedule and/or policies

and procedures.

Hazard Prevention and Control

Workplace hazards are avoided by workers with the use of effective controls, which also

help employers provide safe and healthy working conditions for their employees by
reducing or eliminating safety and health risks. Employers can prevent and manage the

risks listed in the preceding section Safety Management by following the methods

indicated in this part (n.d).

To effectively control and prevent hazards, employers should:

● Evaluate the effectiveness of existing controls to see if they are still effective or if

different controls are more effective. Examine new technologies for their potential

to be more protective, dependable, or less expensive.

● Using a "hierarchy of controls," identify and evaluate options for hazard control.

● Create plans that include safeguards for workers during emergencies and non-

routine activities.

● Involve workers, who often have the best understanding of the conditions that

cause hazards, as well as insights into how to control them.

● Use a hazard control plan to guide the selection and implementation of controls,

and stick to the plan.

Employers should choose the controls that are most practical, efficient, and long-lasting.

How to accomplish it:

● Interim controls should be used while longer-term solutions are being developed

and implemented.

● All serious hazards (hazards that cause or are likely to cause death or serious

physical harm) must be eliminated or controlled immediately.

 ● Control options should be reviewed and discussed with workers to ensure that

they are feasible and effective.

● Select controls that won't, either directly or indirectly, create any new hazards.

Another example is wearing hearing protection that makes it impossible to hear

backup alarms while releasing toxic air into inhabited work environments.

https://www.osha.gov/safety-management/hazard-prevention#ai2

Quality of Work

How safe the working environment, atmosphere, and culture are has a significant

impact on the quality of the work. The individual's impressions of the company's safety-

related rules, practices, and awards make up the safety atmosphere.(Griffin & Neal,

2000; Guldenmund, 2000). While safety culture refers to how a person adhered to the

organization's safety goals and policies (Guldenmund, 2000; Mearns & Flin, 1999).

Human errors contribute to major accidents and disasters. From this, we can trace it

back to organizational and managerial causes. Organizational and managerial factors

should be taken into account in understanding why there are human errors in the

workplace. The management would incorporate proper safety measures for their

workers to ensure safety and avoid the risk that may jeopardize the quality of work of

the workers (McDonald, Corrigan, Daly, & Cromie, 2000).

According to Park, Kang, & Son (2012), the quality of work is affected by different

factors such as occupational stress. Such stress may jeopardize the quality and ability

to react to an individual in doing their tasks or work. Common stress like burnout and
worries about their safety is caused by little to no action on making sure that workers

were given enough training for their safety.

Leiter and Robichaud in (1997) Burnout and the perception of risk at work were

connected by. According to their research, personnel who receive adequate training in

aircraft maintenance have a greater sense of control over workplace hazards and

adhere to safety regulations more strictly both individually and as a group. To the extent

that it affected adherence to stringent safety standards, training was seen as an

essential component of safety measures for airplane maintenance workers. Reduced

sentiments of risk from job hazards were thereby linked to both increased control and

perceptions of a safer workplace. Training gives employees the skills they need to

complete their responsibilities successfully, regardless of how risky they may become.

By adding these studies into our analysis of the ways in which particular corporate

policies have impacted the caliber of the students' OJT work, we are filling in the gaps in

the research. This provides an answer to the question of whether these safety

precautions are made available to all employees, whether they be corporate employees

or student trainees who have not yet experienced working in a genuine workplace

environment.

References:

Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking

safety climate to safety behavior, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational

Health Psychology, 5(3), 347-358.

Guldenmund, F. W. (2000). The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and

research. Safety Science, 34, 215-257.

Leiter, M. P., & Robichaud, L. (1997). Relationships of occupational hazards with

burnout: An assessment of measures and models. Journal of Occupational Health

Psychology, 2(1), 35–44. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.2.1.35

McDonald, N., Corrigan, S., Daly, C., & Cromie, S. (2000). Safety management

systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organizations. Safety Science, 34(1-

3), 151–176. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00011-4

Mearns, K. J., & Flin, R. (1999). Assessing the state of organizational safety--Culture or

climate?. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 18(1), 5-

17.
 CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

Research Design

This study used a quantitative descriptive research methodology that used

correlation. The researchers will conduct surveys utilizing online Google forms. Because

this form of design will concentrate on measuring variables in a methodical manner and

determining whether the variables are related to one another, researchers employ it.

Research Environment

This study will be conducted in Aéroport international de Mactan-Cebu, General

Aviation Area, Mactan International Airport, Lapu-Lapu City, Cebu 6015, Lapu-Lapu

City, Cebu (2) building and To measure the success of the study, the researcher finds a

setting where many students can provide data (On the Job Training.)

Fig 1.1 Map of Airworks Aviation.

 Fig. 1.2 Actual Picture of Airworks Aviation

Research Instrument

For this study, the researchers have chosen to employ a survey questionnaire as

the research tool, including questions relevant to the subject and designed to collect

useful data. The survey will be simple for responders to comprehend and complete

thanks to the Google Form's clear instructions. The questions are numbered, and the

answers are given by listing the performance they made during their OJT following the

question that the answer to relates to.

Questions about of wearing PPE performed by OJT students:

1.1When an aircraft returns from a flight, do you double-check the cockpit to make sure

the ignition or master switch is off?

1.2 Do you help in marshaling aircraft?

1.3 Is it acceptable to wear jewelry or a watch to work?

1.4 How frequently do you use your PPE while at work??

1.5 When refueling, do you use the ground wire??

1.6 Do you have permission to refuel within the hangar?

1.7 Do you practice Clean as You Go, after an inspection?

1.8 Do you assist aspiring pilots with their 360-degree preflight checks?

1.9 Do you observe proper waste disposal in your workplace?

1.1 In the hangar, do you smoke?

Research Flow
 Chapter 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This serves as a presentation that shows how the researcher analyzed and

interpreted the data gathered from the chosen study design, which is based on

questionnaires, observations, and interviews. It presents the data representation of

results with regards to impact of wearing personal protective equipment on duty in

airworks aviation academy.

Figure 1. Percentage of students wear personal protective equipment everytime you are at work

The 85% agreement can be considered a high level of compliance with wearing

personal protective equipment, which may suggest a strong culture of safety within the
workplace. On the other hand, the 15% non-compliance may indicate a need for further

training or reminders about the importance of personal protective equipment. It is also

important to note that this is a statistical summary and may not accurately represent the

experiences of each individual respondent. Further analysis, such as looking at specific

job roles or department, may provide additional insights.

Figure 2: Percentage of students that personal protective equipment is important.

This result indicates a strong consensus among the respondents about the

importance of personal protective equipment in the workplace. A 100% agreement is

rare in survey research, and suggests that there is a high level of awareness and

concern for safety among the respondents. It is also worth noting that this result is

based on self-reported data, and may not accurately reflect the actual practices and

behaviors of the respondents. Further analysis, such as observational studies or

workplace injury data, may provide additional insights into the effectiveness of personal

protective equipment in promoting workplace safety.

Figure 3. Percentage of students have seen clearly posted signage in areas that require the use

of specific personal protective equipment

The high level of agreement (95%) suggests that the workplace has effective

systems in place to communicate the requirements for personal protective equipment

use, which can promote compliance and safety. On the other hand, the 5%

disagreement may indicate areas of the workplace where signage is unclear or missing,

which could result in confusion or non-compliance.

It is important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of

respondents when interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the

survey was conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was

surveyed. Further analysis may provide additional insights into the effectiveness of the

workplace's communication systems for personal protective equipment requirements.

 Figure 4: Percentage of students PPE interferes with my ability to do the job.

The majority of respondents (66.7%) are neutral, which may suggest that they do not

feel strongly one way or the other about whether personal protective equipment

interferes with their ability to do their job. However, the 19% strong disagreement and

9.5% strong agreement suggest that there are differing opinions among the

respondents about the impact of personal protective equipment on job performance. It is

important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of respondents when

interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the survey was

conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was surveyed.

Further analysis may provide additional insights into specific challenges or benefits of

using personal protective equipment in the workplace.

Figure 5: Percentage of students has a confidence after wearing the proper personal protective

equipment when exposed to hazard at work is the proper equipment to protect.

The majority of the respondents (38.1%) strongly agree that they are confident that

the personal protective equipment they use protects them from hazards in the

workplace, while a smaller percentage (9.5%) strongly disagree. The remaining

respondents (47.6%) are neutral, which may suggest that they do not feel strongly one

way or the other about their confidence in the protective equipment.

It is important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of

respondents when interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the

survey was conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was

surveyed. Further analysis may provide additional insights into the effectiveness of the
personal protective equipment and the factors that contribute to employees' confidence

in their protection.

Figure 6: Percentage of students that will benefit by wearing personal protective equipment.

The results from the question "I benefit by wearing personal protective equipment"

show that 30% of the respondents are neutral, 5% strongly disagree, 55% strongly

agree, and 10% agree. The majority of the respondents (55%) strongly agree that they

benefit from wearing personal protective equipment, while a smaller percentage (5%)

strongly disagree. The remaining respondents (30%) are neutral, which may suggest

that they do not feel strongly one way or the other about the benefits of wearing

personal protective equipment.

It is important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of

respondents when interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the
survey was conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was

surveyed. Further analysis may provide additional insights into the specific benefits and

challenges of wearing personal protective equipment in the workplace.

Figure 7: Percentage of students who are wearing ppe when it is required.

The high percentage of agreement (95.2%) suggests that a large majority of the

respondents work in environments where personal protective equipment is required.

This highlights the importance of personal protective equipment in ensuring the safety of

employees in the workplace.

It is important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of

respondents when interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the

survey was conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was

surveyed. Further analysis may provide additional insights into the specific requirements

and regulations related to personal protective equipment in the workplace.

Figure 8: Percentage of students having personal protective equipment at the location of the

hazard is critical to making sure I wear it.

The majority of the respondents (47.6%) strongly disagree that having personal

protective equipment at the location of the hazard is critical to making sure they wear it,

while a smaller percentage (5.3%) strongly agree. The remaining respondents (33.3%)

are neutral, which may suggest that they do not feel strongly one way or the other about

the importance of having personal protective equipment at the hazard location.

 It is important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of

respondents when interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the

survey was conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was

surveyed. Further analysis may provide additional insights into the factors that influence

employees' decisions to wear personal protective equipment and the role of having

personal protective equipment readily available in promoting its use.

Figure 9: Percentage of students who is confident that their job performance will not be

impacted by wearing ppe.

A significant proportion of the respondents (52.4%) are neutral, which may suggest

that they do not feel strongly one way or the other about the impact of personal

protective equipment on their job performance. A smaller percentage (19%) of

respondents strongly agree that their job performance will not be impacted by wearing

personal protective equipment, while an even smaller percentage (4.8%) strongly

disagree.

It is important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of

respondents when interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the

survey was conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was

surveyed. Further analysis may provide additional insights into the specific challenges

and benefits of wearing personal protective equipment in relation to job performance.

Regenerate response

Figure 10: Percentage of students who smoke in hangar.

The high percentage of "no" responses (90.5%) suggests that a large majority of the

respondents do not smoke in the hangar. This highlights the importance of creating and
enforcing policies that promote healthy and safe working environments, especially in

locations where hazardous materials or processes are present.

It is important to consider the context of the workplace and the sample of

respondents when interpreting these results. For example, the results may differ if the

survey was conducted in a different workplace or if a different group of employees was

surveyed. Further analysis may provide additional insights into the specific policies and

regulations related to smoking in the workplace, and the factors that influence

employees' smoking behavior.

 Chapter 5

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents recommendations after summarizing the findings or outcomes of

the investigation.

Summary of Findings

Based on the presentation, analysis and interpretation, we have these findings:

In order to maximize the benefits of wearing PPE on learning, it is recommended that

the following be considered:

1. Provide clear explanations of the purpose of wearing PPE and how it relates to the

learning process.

2. Encourage active engagement and participation from students while wearing PPE.

3. Integrate hands-on learning activities that require the use of PPE to reinforce its

importance.

4. Provide opportunities for students to reflect on their learning experiences while

wearing PPE and make connections to their future careers.

5. Incorporate the use of PPE into assessments and evaluations to further reinforce its

importance. By considering these recommendations, educators can create a safe and

effective learning environment that supports students in developing effective learning

strategies and achieving their educational goals

Chapter 6

APPENDIX

Consent Letter Send to the Participants:

How many people will be asked to be in this study? Locally, 20 students will be asked to

take part in this study.

Why is this study being done? This study aims to investigate student perceptions on

online class participation tactics. Numerous individuals and quantitative methodologies

have previously been used in several studies. This study uses a qualitative approach to

record the specific experiences of each participant.

What Are the alternatives to being in this study? The alternative to participating in the

study is to decline.

Are there any risks to me? The hazards involved with what you'll be doing are no

greater than those you'd face in regular life. Your involvement in this study will be kept

completely confidential, and your privacy will be respected to the fullest extent feasible.
Although the researchers have attempted to avoid risks, you may feel that some of the

questions asked of you and the class will be emotional and require self-reflection. You

are not required to answer any questions you do not wish to. If necessary, you will be

given contact information for individuals and/or organizations on campus who may be

able to assist you with any additional issues.

Will there be any costs to me?Other than your time, there are no fees associated with

participating in the study.

Will Information From This Study Be Kept Private? Your identify will be kept secret, as

well as the study's records, if appropriate. Any report that may be released won't contain

any information that might be used to link you to this study. Only the principal and co-

investigator will have access to the research records, which will be securely preserved.

Both a password-protected flash drive and a secured file box will be used to keep

information about you, including the consent form and any interview data.

What if I change my mind about participating? You are free to participate or not in this

research study at your discretion. At any point, you are free to opt not to participate or to

stop. There will be no impact on your student status, medical care, work, evaluation, or

relationship if you decide not to participate in this study or discontinue

participating,relationship with Cebu Aeronautical Technical School, etc.

You will be informed of any updated findings regarding the study. Your decision to

continue participating in this activity may change in light of this information. You consent

to the researcher using your information for research by participating in and completing

the survey.
Thank you

Francis L. Rosales

CURRICULUM VITAE

Personal Data

Name: Rosales Francis

Date of Birth: December 3, 1999

Civil Status: Single

Address: Poblacion, Alegria, Cebu City

Email: [email protected]

Skills

Microsoft

● Critical thinking
 ● Communication skills

● Time management

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : CATS Aero College Inc.

Salinas Drive, Lahug, Cebu City,

Philippines

(2019 – Present)

Senior High School : University of Cebu

Cebu City

(2017 – 2019)

High School : Saint Peter Academy of Alegria Incorporated

Alegria,Cebu

(2013 – 2017)

Elementary : Alegria Central Elementary School

Alegria Cebu

(2007 – 2013)
Abstract

Wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on duty can have significant impacts on

both the individual and the organization. PPE can help prevent injury and illness by

shielding workers from hazards in the workplace. However, wearing PPE can also lead

to physical discomfort, such as heat stress and fatigue, and psychological stress, such

as feelings of isolation and decreased job satisfaction. Additionally, improper use or fit

of PPE can negatively affect worker performance and safety. It is important for

organizations to consider the impact of PPE on their workers and to provide proper

training, maintenance, and selection of PPE to ensure its effectiveness and comfort.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Engr. Orven D. Delima, for their

invaluable guidance, support, and encouragement throughout my research journey.

Their unwavering dedication to my growth as a researcher has been instrumental in

shaping my academic and professional journey.

I am grateful to my parents for their undying financial and also for respondents, for their

support and encouragement throughout my research process. Their positive influence

has been a source of inspiration for me.

Finally, I would like to extend my gratitude to all the participants who generously agreed

to take part in this research. Their cooperation and willingness to share their

experiences has been critical to the success of this study.

This research would not have been possible without the support of these individuals and

organizations, and I am deeply thankful for their contributions.

Conclusion

Wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on duty is an important aspect of

workplace safety. PPE can help prevent injury and illness by shielding workers from

hazards in the workplace. However, it is important to consider the impacts that PPE can

have on workers and to properly maintain, select, and train workers in its use to ensure

its effectiveness and comfort. By balancing the benefits and drawbacks of PPE,

organizations can create a safe and supportive work environment for their employees.
Based on the impacts of wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on duty, the

following recommendations are made:

1. Proper selection and maintenance of PPE: Organizations should select PPE that

is appropriate for the specific hazards present in the workplace and ensure that it

is properly maintained and in good condition.

2. Worker training: Workers should be trained on the proper use and care of PPE,

as well as the limitations and limitations of the equipment.

3. Comfort and fit: Organizations should consider the comfort and fit of PPE when

making purchasing decisions and provide workers with options to ensure the best

fit.

4. Ergonomics: Organizations should consider the ergonomic implications of

wearing PPE, such as heat stress and fatigue, and make adjustments to

minimize these effects.

5. Employee feedback:Organizations should regularly seek feedback from workers

on the impact of PPE on their job performance and well-being to identify areas

for improvement.

By following these recommendations, organizations can maximize the benefits of PPE

while minimizing its negative impacts, ensuring a safe and productive work environment

for all employees.