Topics
Topics
Topics
Debate
Debate Topic: it’s worse to eat too much
than too little.
Age Group: 9-16 years
Subjects: Biology, Food & Nutrition, Health &
Social Care, PSHE (Personal, Social, Health &
Economic), Science
2. Team Presentations (4-5 minutes each)
Proposition Team (Affirmative Side):
Present arguments supporting the notion that overeating is worse.
Discuss health consequences (e.g., obesity, chronic diseases).
Address mental health impacts (e.g., anxiety, depression).
Highlight societal and economic factors contributing to overeating.
Mention cultural perspectives on body image and food.
Opposition Team (Negative Side):
Present arguments defending the idea that undereating is worse.
Discuss health consequences (e.g., malnutrition, developmental issues).
Address mental health impacts (e.g., eating disorders).
Highlight food insecurity and economic disparities affecting food
access.
Discuss the role of education and awareness in preventing malnutrition.
Animal Testing:
The Context
Testing cosmetic products on animals has been banned
for a number of years in the UK. It has also been illegal
to sell cosmetics tested on animals as of 2013 in the
UK and the EU.
Testing on animals for the purpose of medicinal
research, developing treatments and the creation and
breeding of genetically altered animals remains legal. In 2017, almost
3.8 million animals were tested upon in the UK for these purposes.
Animals such as cats, dogs, monkeys and horses are exempt from testing
without special reasoning and the most-commonly used animals are
mice, fish and rats.
Should testing on animals for medicinal and scientific purposes be
legal? Should the government look into alternatives?
What is your opinion on the matter? Is it important to test upon
animals for research purposes or are there alternatives?
Offer your own opinions on the matter: should testing upon animals
for scientific and medicinal purposes remain legal?