Topics

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Topics

Debate
Debate Topic: it’s worse to eat too much
than too little.
Age Group: 9-16 years
Subjects: Biology, Food & Nutrition, Health &
Social Care, PSHE (Personal, Social, Health &
Economic), Science
2. Team Presentations (4-5 minutes each)
Proposition Team (Affirmative Side):
Present arguments supporting the notion that overeating is worse.
Discuss health consequences (e.g., obesity, chronic diseases).
Address mental health impacts (e.g., anxiety, depression).
Highlight societal and economic factors contributing to overeating.
Mention cultural perspectives on body image and food.
Opposition Team (Negative Side):
Present arguments defending the idea that undereating is worse.
Discuss health consequences (e.g., malnutrition, developmental issues).
Address mental health impacts (e.g., eating disorders).
Highlight food insecurity and economic disparities affecting food
access.
Discuss the role of education and awareness in preventing malnutrition.

Debate Topic: Should Animal Testing for


Medicinal Research Be Banned?

Animal Testing:
The Context
Testing cosmetic products on animals has been banned
for a number of years in the UK. It has also been illegal
to sell cosmetics tested on animals as of 2013 in the
UK and the EU.
Testing on animals for the purpose of medicinal
research, developing treatments and the creation and
breeding of genetically altered animals remains legal. In 2017, almost
3.8 million animals were tested upon in the UK for these purposes.
Animals such as cats, dogs, monkeys and horses are exempt from testing
without special reasoning and the most-commonly used animals are
mice, fish and rats.
Should testing on animals for medicinal and scientific purposes be
legal? Should the government look into alternatives?
What is your opinion on the matter? Is it important to test upon
animals for research purposes or are there alternatives?
Offer your own opinions on the matter: should testing upon animals
for scientific and medicinal purposes remain legal?

Debate Topic: Is Fast Fashion Becoming a Big Problem?

2. Affirmative Side (Supporting the Motion)


 Argument 1: Environmental Impact
o Evidence of pollution, waste, and resource
depletion caused by fast fashion.
o Discuss the carbon footprint of clothing
production and disposal.
 Argument 2: Labor Exploitation
o Highlight poor working conditions, low wages, and exploitation of workers
in the fashion industry.
o Provide examples of companies known for unethical labor practices.
 Argument 3: Consumerism and Waste
o Discuss the culture of disposability promoted by fast fashion.
o Present statistics on textile waste and the short lifecycle of fast fashion
items.
3. Negative Side (Opposing the Motion)
 Argument 1: Economic Benefits
o Explain how fast fashion provides affordable clothing options and
stimulates economic growth.
o Discuss job creation in the retail and production sectors.
 Argument 2: Accessibility and Variety
o Emphasize the variety of styles and accessibility for consumers, allowing
for personal expression.
o Discuss how fast fashion enables people to keep up with trends without
breaking the bank.
 Argument 3: Evolving Practices
o Mention initiatives within the industry towards sustainability and ethical
practices.
o Discuss how some fast fashion brands are starting to adopt eco-friendly
practices.
Debate Topic: Will computers replace teachers in the future?
o Affirmative Side (Supporting the Motion)
o Argument 1: Advancements in Technology
o Discuss how AI and machine learning are
creating advanced educational software and
virtual classrooms.
o Provide examples of successful online learning
platforms that offer personalized learning
experiences.
o Argument 2: Accessibility and Scalability
o Highlight how computers can make education more accessible to students
in remote or underserved areas.
o Explain how technology can accommodate a large number of students
simultaneously.
o Argument 3: Efficiency and Resource Management
o Argue that computers can handle administrative tasks, freeing up resources
and allowing for more efficient learning environments.
o Discuss the potential for tailored learning experiences that adapt to
individual student needs.
o 3. Negative Side (Opposing the Motion)
o Argument 1: Importance of Human Interaction
o Emphasize the role of teachers in providing emotional support, motivation,
and mentorship that computers cannot replicate.
o Discuss how interpersonal skills and socialization in the classroom
contribute to student development.
o Argument 2: Limitations of Technology
o Address the potential drawbacks of relying solely on computers, including
technical issues and a lack of personal touch in education.
o Discuss the importance of critical thinking and creativity, which are often
fostered through human interaction.
o Argument 3: The Teacher's Role as Facilitator
o Explain how teachers serve as facilitators of learning, guiding discussions,
encouraging collaboration, and adapting to diverse learning styles.
o Argue that technology is a tool to enhance teaching, not a replacement for
teachers.
Debate Topic: Should kids be allowed to eat dessert before dinner?
Affirmative Side (Supporting the Motion)
Argument 1: Encouraging Positive Associations
with Food
Explain how allowing dessert can create a more
positive relationship with food, making
mealtime enjoyable and reducing stress around
eating.
Discuss how it can encourage kids to try new foods without fear of missing
out on dessert.
Argument 2: Moderation and Balance
Argue that allowing dessert in moderation teaches kids about balance and
moderation in their diets.
Emphasize that it’s not about eliminating dessert but integrating it into a
healthy eating pattern.
Argument 3: Reward System
Discuss how dessert can serve as a reward for good behavior or completing
tasks, making it a motivational tool for children.
Explain that this can foster a sense of accomplishment and encourage
responsibility.
3. Negative Side (Opposing the Motion)
Argument 1: Nutritional Concerns
Highlight the potential negative effects of eating dessert before dinner, such as
reduced appetite for healthier foods and imbalance in nutrition.
Discuss how excessive sugar intake can lead to health issues like obesity and
dental problems.
Argument 2: Establishing Healthy Habits
Argue that not allowing dessert before dinner helps establish healthy eating
habits and routines for children.
Emphasize the importance of prioritizing nutritious foods before treats.
Argument 3: Disruption of Mealtime Structure
Explain how allowing dessert first can disrupt the traditional mealtime
structure, leading to poor eating patterns and food preferences.
Discuss how it may lead children to view dessert as the primary focus of the
meal rather than a treat.
Dispute topics
Is online learning as effective as traditional classroom learning?
Should schools allow students to use laptops and tablets in class?
Are school sports programs more beneficial than academic programs?
Should students be allowed to choose their own subjects?
Is year-round schooling better than the traditional school calendar?
Should schools eliminate grades to reduce stress on students?
Is social media an important tool for communication among students?
Is technology making students lazier?
Should art and music education be prioritized in schools?
Is it ethical to genetically modify food to solve hunger issues?
Should schools implement mindfulness and meditation practices?
Is it necessary for students to learn about current events in school?
Should high schools teach students about personal finance management?
Discussion topics
What qualities do we need in a potential world leader that we've never had
before?
What alternate sources of energy might we need to turn to in the next 50 to 60
years, and how can we provide them?
How can we help people struggling in underprivileged regions of the world
lead better lives?
How can we make our school better using what resources we have available?
Does our technology connect us more, or isolate us more? Why do you feel
this way?
Is homeschooling better than traditional education? Why or why not?
Dogs make better companions than cats.
Smoking should be permitted in public places.
Females are better students than males.
A parent shouldn't pierce a baby's ears.
500 topics

You might also like