Why Should We Study History?: Reading Passage 1
Why Should We Study History?: Reading Passage 1
Why Should We Study History?: Reading Passage 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on
Reading Passage 1.
According to some of the greatest historians, such as Arnold Toynbee, the essential
value of history is its ability to give us self-awareness, self-knowledge. This occurs
because historical figures are presented to us in detail. Studying Alexander the
Great, for instance, teaches us that a single person is capable of the whole range of
behaviour from cruelty to kindness.
Diane Ravitch, an education policy analyst, gives a practical reason for studying
history. Like many others before her, she claims that history doesn’t tell us the
answers to our questions, but it helps to inform us and thus to improve our judgment,
so that we make better choices in the future.
With a different focus, though, we can say that we know nothing about the future, and
the present is just a moment, so in fact all there is is history. As the philosopher of
education John Dewey suggested, the only tool we have for making sense of the
reality we experience is what has occurred in the past.
According to historian Mark M. Krug, the knowledge of how people acted in the past
may not always suggest clever solutions to present crises, but it makes the task of
finding them easier by giving us a starting point, a body of past experience which we
can and, if necessary, reject. Peter N. Stearns argues that the wisdom available from
history has a personal, everyday application. People need to have some sense of the
workings of societies, simply so that they can run their own lives without coming into
conflict with the community to which they belong.
The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche said people need models to imitate, and
historical models are particularly powerful because they actually existed. Through her
contribution to ending English rule over France, Joan of Arc demonstrates the power
of individual belief and action. Galileo’s opposition to the prevailing belief that the sun
and planets orbited the Earth symbolises the fight against authority for freedom of
thought. When studying history, we judge the actions of historical figures to be
admirable or despicable, good or bad, and choose who we want to emulate.
Some philosophers have identified a pattern in historical events. Both Georg Hegel
and Oswald Spengler saw history as a dynamic process, one in which nothing is
static, in contrast to the many other philosophers who have believed that history
consists of unique events. But there the resemblance ends. In Hegel’s view, history is
a process of conflict between opposite ideas, leading towards greater freedom, which
combines the best elements of the two original ideas.
Spengler, on the other hand, developed the organic view that historical cultures, like
plants and animals follow a process of growth, flowering and deterioration, a rise
inevitably leading to a fall. There are very many historical examples of both
individuals and empires that have conformed to this pattern.
Many historians argue that a society which has a shared cultural understanding of its
own history is more likely to function smoothly than a society that is ignorant of its
past. For example, Beverly Southgate claims that societies, like individuals, need to
know who they are, and where they belong. Individuals who lack this sense of
uniqueness are likely to feel that life has little meaning or purpose, and so too with
societies. A shared knowledge of its history provides a nation with meaning, purpose
and cohesion.
Southgate would agree with Conal Furay and Michael J. Salevouris, in whose view a
society that cannot recall its past is like an individual with amnesia, unaware of the
roots that have created it. As a consequence, it has no direction, and this impacts on
its further evolution.
These two historians identify another value of history. We tend to have a narrow view
of our own society, assuming that its ways are the only acceptable ones. By learning
how our own country used to be, we may realise that our present-day customs are
not the only ones which are acceptable. This clearly has implications for our attitude
towards other present-day countries and cultures, too.
Many historians and educators believe that the expert knowledge possessed by
historians includes not only the learning of factual information, but also the habit of
critically examining and evaluating evidence. These are abilities worth developing, as
they are very useful, both in other academic pursuits and in almost any career.
Questions 1 – 4
Look at the following people (Questions 1-4) and the list of theories of history below.
Write the correct letter, A-F, in boxes 1-4 on your answer sheet.
1. Arnold Toynbee
2. Diane Ravich
3. John Dewey
4. Friedrich Nietzsche
Questions 5 – 9
Write the correct letter, A-J, in boxes 5-9 on your answer sheet.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
10 Peter N Stearns believes that the study of history helps people to avoid ..............
with the society they live in.
12 Furay and Salevouris believe ignorance of history is like suffering from ............... .
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on
Reading Passage 2.
Questions 14 - 20
Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.
List of Headings
1. Paragraph A
2. Paragraph B
3. Paragraph C
4. Paragraph D
5. Paragraph E
6. Paragraph F
7. Paragraph G
Violins and very cold weather – a hypothesis
Lloyd Burckle and Henri D Grissino-Mayer suggest a link between the great Italian
violin-makers and a mini ice-age 300 years ago
A
There is considerable controversy surrounding reasons why instruments made by the
artisans of Cremona in Italy in the late 17th and early 18th centuries sound superior
compared to modern instruments. The famous violin-making families of Amati,
Stradivari, and Guarneri certainly included many highly accomplished craftsmen, and
the popular belief is that the skills of these Cremonese artisans, combined with either
a secret ingredient or undocumented process, gave their instruments the rich sound
so highly admired by professional musicians. The nature of that secret ingredient has
been the subject of conjecture for many years and is still fuelling discussion. Theories
have included the development and use of a specially formulated varnish applied to
the wood to protect it, drying the wood in ovens, the re-use of old wood taken from
castlets, and soaking the wood in water to get rid of supposedly harmful chemicals
before seasoning.
B
However, no basis has been found for these possible explanations. There is no
documented evidence of wood being artificially dried by violin-makers, and this
process was most likely unknown to these artisans. Nor can seasoning – the practice
of leaving wood for the moisture to evaporate naturally – be invoked as a possible
explanation, as considerable variability exists in the lengths of seasoning periods,
even among individual makers. Instruments made by the renowned of all violin-
makers, Antonio Stradivari (1644-1737), have seasoning periods as short as seven
years and as long as 31 years, with a varnish. A secret varnish has yet to be
demonstrated despite scientific analyses that include ultraviolet photography,
electron microscopy, ion backscattering, and x-ray investigations. Finally, some have
suggested that Stradivari used wood taken from castles. This theory has been
discounted because analyses on numerous instruments attributed to Stradivari
demonstrated ages for the wood that were contemporary with his lifetime.
C
Violin-makers have always known that the secret of a quality instrument lies in the
selection of the wood. Maple wood (Acer spp.) is preferred for the back, ribs, and
neck of the instrument while spruce (Picea spp.) is often used for the top. These
woods have superior acoustical and mechanical properties, having the least loss of
energy through internal friction compared to other woods. For example, spruce cells
are light, physiologically simple, hollow, and rigid-ideal properties for enhanced
acoustic quality. Only trees that have grown in thin, poor soils at higher elevations on
north-facing slopes have the dense wood grain that helps instill a superior tone in
violins. Long winters and cool summers produce wood that has the slow, even
growth ideal for producing quality sounding boards.
D
Stradivari and other eminent Italian violin-makers of the 17th and early 18th centuries
had neighbouring workshops in Cremona and would most probably have used the
nearby high forest slopes of the southern Italian Alps for their supplies of spruce
wood. A probable location is the famous “Forest of the Violins” in the Parco Naturale
Paneveggio in the eastern part of Trentino, long familiar to violin-makers for its ‘fir
trees of resonance’.
E
Wood with high density can, however, be found in trees growing in a variety of
habitats and environmental settings in numerous higher-elevation locations
throughout the world. Hence, an account of the Cremonese craftsmen’s superior
sound quality based solely on wood properties is insufficient. Instead, could the
superior sound quality be explained by a combination of wood properties,
environmental characteristics, and macroclimatic conditions? Could the wood used
by the Cremonese makers have had particular physical characteristics that were
perhaps time-specific? These were questions that required more thorough research.
F
The well-documented Maunder Minimum (1645-1715) was a period characterized by
a scarcity of sunspots and a reduction in overall solar activity. It coincided with a
sharp dip in temperatures and a period of extremely cold weather in western Europe.
Analyses of high-elevation forest areas of the European Alps reveal a long period of
reduced growth rates between approximately 1625 and 1720, identified by the
narrow rings visible in the cross-sections of tree samples from that era.
G
It seems likely that the narrow tree rings that identify the Maunder Minimum in
Europe played a significant role in the enhanced sound quality of instruments
produced by the Cremonese craftsmen. Narrow rings would not only strengthen the
violin, but lend the wood a high degree of density—the property so important for
acoustic resonance. It is surely significant that Stradivari’s working lifetime coincides
exactly with this climatic period, and that to fashion the most prized and valued
instruments of his ‘Golden Period’ (1700-1720), he would have used the only wood
available to him, i.e., from trees that grew during the Maunder Minimum. The onset of
the Maunder Minimum at a time when the skills of the Cremonese violin-makers
reached their peak perhaps made that crucial difference in the violin's tone and
brilliance. Furthermore, the conjunction of elevation, topography, soil properties and
a deterioration in climate was temporally unique—climate conditions with
temperatures such as those that occurred during the Maunder Minimum simply
cannot and do not occur today in areas where the Cremonese makers obtained their
wood.
Questions 21 - 24
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
There is no doubt that the superior quality of the late 17th-and early 18th-century
Cremonese violins is due in large part to the 21 ............... of the people who crafted
them. But it has long been felt that other factors were involved.
There has been extensive research into whether the composition of the varnish that
was put on the wood could account for the unique sound of the Cremonese violins.
Some people have also put forward the idea that Stradivari made his instruments
from wood which had already been used in old buildings such as 22 ............... .
Scientific analysis has proved this not to be the case.
Questions 25 and 26
Which TWO of these factors are mentioned in the passage as possibly having a
significant effect on the eventual quality of a violin?
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27–40, which are based on
Reading Passage 3.
B
A company is the sum of what its people understand and know how to do well. Value
lies increasingly in creative ideas and knowledge. But ideas have value only if people
share and develop them in ways that increase revenue; knowledge is useful only if
people can find what they need to know. Getting intelligent people to share what is in
their heads is vital, and takes more than mere money or clever software. Ideas must
flow in every direction through a company—not merely from the top down. And
knowledge is worth storing only if senior staff set careful rules to filter and structure it.
What goes into a database determines the value of what comes out. So setting
central rules and standards is key to good knowledge management.
C
Good judgement is a key skill. Managers constantly blitzed with new information
need to build in the data that matters and set aside the rest. Big-bang decisions are
generally best avoided—or implemented in small incremental moves that leave room
for flexibility and for altering course, if circumstances change.
D
Customers matter—but some matter more than others. Acquiring new customers
often costs more than making extra sales to existing ones. So companies must build
loyalty by providing reliability and good service. Given the welter of product
information reaching customers, memorable brands will grow more important.
Companies need not only to widen their reach by finding new markets, but also to
deepen existing relationships. They have more information than ever before about
their customers, and must use this to offer their most profitable customers special
deals and to make them feel part of an elite club. Some companies even seek to ‘fire’
unprofitable customers by charging them higher rates than others.
E
Like its customers, some of a company's people matter more than others, and not
just at the top: managing talent is also about capturing innovative ideas from middle
managers and those further down the line. At every level, managers must identify
where most value lies. In some cases, a few stars will encapsulate much of a
company’s value; in others, teams of employees will matter more. Some companies
will want to hire the talents of ‘free agents’ as and when they are required; others, to
employ directly their best brains.
F
Companies need to collaborate more, in alliances that allow them to outsource
production or to spread risk or to enter new markets. Effective collaboration calls for
trust and shared understanding, rather than the top-down, command-and-control
approach of hierarchical structures. Successful collaboration also requires excellent
communication, and incentives that reward sharing information and working for
common goals. As costs of handling information in a company decline, new
opportunities open for redefining corporate shape, and companies are becoming less
hierarchical, with more ways to arrange and rearrange structure. Managers must
think through from scratch which activities should be kept in-house and which
outsourced, and normally a company should keep those activities it does better than
its competitors.
G
Given the pace of change, bosses need more than ever to be able to communicate
persuasively through many channels, with their staff and the outside world. They
must also listen: the most valuable communications will frequently be bottom-up, and
the people nearest to the customer are best placed to explain what they see and
hear. Managers must listen to them.
H
Ironically, internet technologies, tools of freedom and decentralisation, call for
discipline and standard processes. Only by setting standards and insisting that
everyone abide by them will companies reap their potential savings. Companies
need to insist on common practices in areas such as purchasing and information
technology in order to harvest real productivity gains. As a result, some aspects of
centralisation will increase: a key task of top managers is to provide structures and
standards, and to insist that they are observed.
I
Once standards have been set, openness and freedom should reign. Centralisation
of standards makes possible decentralisation of decision making. In addition, internet
technologies increase the need for a culture of openness, to foster the sharing of
knowledge and effective collaboration. Increasingly, companies will allow their
suppliers and customers ‘inside the machine,’ as it were, by giving them
extraordinary access to their databases and inner workings in order to integrate their
operations and to make collaboration effective.
J
The key to success lies much less in technical know-how than in excellent leadership
to push through and build upon organisational change. At some points in a
company’s life, it will need a leader who can rally staff to push through the trauma of
disruptive change. At other times, the right style will be the manager-as-coach, a
selfless talent scout who specialises in assembling and motivating great teams.
Always, the people at the top will set the tone in a firm. Their skills will determine
whether it is a good company to work in and do business with.
Questions 27 - 34
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Questions 35 - 40
Write the correct letter, A-J, in boxes 35-40 on your answer sheet.