The Title Should Summarize the Main Idea or Ideas of

Your Paper
Author’s Name1
Author’s Name2
Author’s Name2
1
Name of Department, Name of Faculty, Name of University, Name of City Post
Code, NAME OF COUNTRY
2
Name of Department, Name of Faculty, Name of University, Name of City Post
Code, NAME OF COUNTRY

Abstract
All articles must be written in English. The abstract should concisely
describe the content and scope of your paper and identify the
objective(s), its methodology and its findings, conclusions, and
implication of study. It should be about 200 words (minimum) and 250
words (maximum), followed by three to five keywords related to your
article.

Keywords: Keyword; keyword; keyword; keyword; keyword.

1. INTRODUCTION

Indent the first line of every paragraph by 1 cm. State the objectives of your
work and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a
summary of the results. Explicitly state the gap in the literature, which signifies the
significance of your research. Submissions should be between 4000-8000 (including
abstract, table(s), figure(s) and references).
Upon receipt of paper submission, the Editor sends an e-mail of confirmation to
the corresponding author within a week. If you fail to receive this confirmation, your
submission/email may be missed. No submission charge should be paid at this stage.
We use double-blind system for peer-review; both reviewers and authors’ identities
remain anonymous. The paper will be peer-reviewed by two experts. The review
process may take 3-4 months. Notification of the result of review is by e-mail.
You must revise paper according to the feedback and suggestions by reviewers.
Upon acceptance, a publication fee of Rp. 3.500.000, - (three million and five
hundred thousand rupiahs) for Indonesian author or 270 USD for international author
is to be paid to the journal. After publication, the corresponding author will receive


Corresponding author, email: [email protected]

Citation in APA style: Last Name, Initial of First Name. (Year). Title of article. Name of Journal,
Vol. Number(Issue Number), Beginning page-End page.

Received Month Date, Year; Revised Month Date, Year; Accepted Month Date, Year

DOI: xxxx.xxxx.xxxx
an email of notification on e-journal in PDF that is available on the journal’s
webpage, and free of charge for download.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

Include the current knowledge including substantive findings, as well as

theoretical and methodological contributions to your topic. A literature review
surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue,
area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and
critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being
investigated.

2.1. Sub Heading 1

The reference list should be arranged alphabetically following the guidelines of

the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). For
example:
● 1 author (Clarke, 2010)
● 2 authors (Lightbown & Spada, 1993)
● 3 and more authors (Reid et al., 1989)
Prior to copyediting after article acceptance, the references will be put into
Mendeley by the Editors.

2.1.1 Sub heading 2

Short quotations (less than 40 words):

Deterding (1997, p. 54) said that “connected speech represents somewhat more
natural data than the rather artificial vowels derived from specially articulated
citation speech”.

Long quotations (more than 40 words):

From the acoustic standpoint, even the sounds of words used by a speaker are
one of the forms of his or her identity. Accordingly, Jacobi (2009) explained that:

Along with communicating meaning, the acoustic signal is a product of

physical properties and changes, as well as of more generally all those factors
that form the identity of the speaker, such as social affiliation or family origin.
The choice of words but also the way they are realized differs from speaker to
speaker, as well as within a speaker. Even more, from an acoustic point of
view, each utterance is unique. (Jacobi, 2009, p. 2).

When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the
author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Even when
paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. When
directly quoting an author’s work, provide citation marks at the beginning till the end
of the citation, and page number is necessary to be noted besides the name of the
author and year of publication.
3. METHODS

Provide sufficient detail to allow your work to be reproduced. Methods already

published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be
described.

4. RESULTS (or, this section may be combined with DISCUSSION)

Present the results of your work. Use graphs and tables if appropriate, but also
summarize your main findings in the text. Do NOT discuss the results or speculate as
to why something happened; that goes in the Discussion.

4.1 Sub Heading 1

For Tables, the title size is 12 and the content size is 10. Number the tables
subsequently throughout your article and the title is written above the table (see
Table 1 for example).

Table 1. Results of the study.

Indicators Result A Result B Implication
Analysis 1 1 5 Valid
Analysis 2 2 6 Valid
Analysis 3 3 7 Valid
Analysis 4 4 8 Valid
Total 910

4.1.1 Sub heading 2

For Figures, the title size is 12 and the content size (if any) is 10. Number the
figures subsequently throughout your article and the title is written below the figure
(see Figure 1 for example).

90
2
85
80
Mean Score

75
1
70
65
60
Pre Test Post Test
Figure 1. The comparison of results.

5. DISCUSSION (this section may be combined with RESULTS)

 Highlight the most significant results, but do not repeat what has been written
in the Results section. The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the
significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the research
problem being investigated and to explain any new understanding or insights that
emerged as a result of your study of the problem. A combined Results and
Discussion section is often appropriate.
Please note that all names/references mentioned in the text/article, they should
be listed in the References section. Names that are not mentioned in the text/article,
they should be removed from the References section.

6. CONCLUSION

Provide the conclusion to your study, and final words on the value of your
analysis, research, or paper. Limitations of your study should be addressed.
Recommendations for future research related to your topic should also be mentioned.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (optional)

Give credit to funding bodies and departments that have been of help during
the project, for instance by supporting it financially.

REFERENCES (follow the APA 7th style)

Akmal, S. (2011, March 13). Nasib Bahasa Aceh di tengah euforia nasionalisme
Keacehan [The fate of the Acehnese language amidst the euphoria of
Acehnese nationalism]. Serambi Indonesia, p. 1. – printed newspaper
Amery, R. (2019). Language is more than communication: Why we should maintain
the mother tongue and promote linguistic diversity. Proceedings of the 2nd
English Education International Conference (pp. 1-5). Universitas Syiah
Kuala. – conference proceedings
Andrewes, S. (2003). Group work vs. whole-class activities.
http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/articles/group-work-v-whole-class-
activities – online text/reading
Baron, R. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Byrne, D. (2009). Social psychology, 12th ed.
Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. – book
Lee, E. M., & Lim, L. (2000). Diphthongs in Singaporean English: Their realizations
across different formality levels, and some attitudes of listeners towards
them. In A. Brown, D. Deterding & E. L. Low (Eds). The English language
in Singapore: Research on pronunciation (pp. 101-111). Singapore
Association for Applied Linguistics. – chapter book
Lightfoot, A. (2013, March 26). Mentors support children with limited English but
'gaps' in specialist skills remain. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/mar/26/english-language-
support-uk-schools– online newspaper
Muthalib, K. A. (2017). Dialect features of Leupueng children: a study of dialect in
post tsunami Aceh [Doctoral dissertation, Deakin University]. Victoria. –
dissertation
Yusuf, Y. Q., Pillai, S., & Mohd. Ali, N.T.A. (2013). Speaking Acehnese in
Malaysia. Language and Communication, 33(1), 50-60. – journal

APPENDICES (optional)

If there is more than one appendix, they should be identified as Appendix A,

Appendix B, etc. Formulae and equations in appendices should be given separate
numbering: Eq. (A.1), Eq. (A.2), etc.; in a subsequent appendix, Eq. (B.1) and so on.
Similarly for tables and figures: Table A.1; Fig. A.1, etc.