Political Advertising and Propaganda Within Spiral
Political Advertising and Propaganda Within Spiral
Political Advertising and Propaganda Within Spiral
1, 12-18
doi: 10.17265/2160-6579/2016.01.002
D DAVID PUBLISHING
Hakan ALP
Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
Political communication is an interactive process by which politicians transmit information and political discourse
to voters and receive feedback through media. This communication process is a two way process of communication
between politicians and voters by which, on the one hand, politicians transmit their thoughts and wills to voters,
and on the other hand voters communicate their opinions to politicians, after interpreting, in different ways, the
messages that they received. The key objective of political communication is to persuade or influence and cause
voters, who are the target audience, to vote for a particular party by convincing them. In order to ensure the smooth
operation of political communication processes it is essential that the parliament, government, political parties,
non-governmental organizations, environmentalist groups and pressure groups also actually take part in this process.
The decisive and transformative power of mass media and advertising phenomenon on the political systems has
grown to become more and more influential in the recent years. The use of information considerably increases in
line with the increase in the use of propaganda. No doubt, this information age has turned the world into “a
universal village”. On the one hand, the concentration in media and on the other hand rapid developments in
Internet technologies expose societies to the bombardment of messages. Being exposed to or bombarded by
numerous varieties of messages in their daily lives lead to the creation of variabilities and instabilities in
individual’s behaviors. Accordingly, political organizations while trying to convey messages to masses through
political communication and advertising have to deliver systematic, comprehensible and influential messages by
taking the advantage of visualization as much as possible.
Introduction
Political communication is a concept closely related to democracy. Political communication began with
the universal suffrage which means extension of the right to vote to masses and has come to have its present
meaning as a result of the development and progress of mass media. The concept and practice of political
communication was born and developed in the United States of America after the Second World War and
began to be widely used in Western European countries in 1960s (Topuz, 1991, p. 7).
Political communication is an effort of communication, either one or two-way, made by a political view or political organ
using the techniques of advertising, propaganda and public relations according to the requirements of the time and particular
state of affairs on a continuous basisin the political system, in which it operates and carries out political activities, in order to
build and maintain the trust, confidence and support of public opinion and accordingly to come to power. (Uslu, 1996, p. 790).
History of Propaganda
Propaganda is a means of political influence which seeks to influence opinions, or perspectives among a
targeted audience and that should be considered together with the concept of having the power to govern a state
or nation or community. It is a concept that is needed to be used for and considered together with the
relationships based on self-interests and that arise as a consequence of prevailing inequalities between human
societies.
It may also be regarded as an important tool for describing the power and demonstrating the exercise of
the power in a political context for all domains of power. Propaganda has been a tool in all potential
governmental environments and for all ruling bodies ranging from economic power relationships to political
power and to different forms of religious power, employed for promulgating their opinions and wills and for
persuading masses. We should note also note here that it is important that not to ignore the factstatues,
sculptures, monuments, temples and places of worship, which are regarded as a manifestation of belief of
polytheistic religions of ancient times, in which more than one god/goddess or force is worshipped, have a
dimension associated with propaganda. Magnificent palaces and/or mausoleums of kings, pharaoh pyramids,
divine temples of gods and goddesses, magnificent and gorgeous mosque and church buildings may, in a sense,
be regarded as tools and areas of propaganda. Propaganda is essentially a tool that promotes and advertises
power, however at the same time is also a demonstration or presentation of power. Consequently, buildings,
squares, works of art, towers, monuments, divine temples and places of worship symbolizing power function as
propaganda tool (Güngör, 2011, p. 295).
According to a different definition, propaganda is a communication activity aimed at influencing the
attitude of public opinion and community towards a particular cause or position and to persuade and lead them
to adopt a particular opinion or course of action and motivate and move them towards a particular direction
(Çankaya, 2008, p. 19). Therefore, it is a process which requires a long-time planning, strategy, effort, patience
and endeavors.
When we look at the concept of propaganda in terms of history, we can say that propaganda has a history
that dates back to human history and those propaganda activities are as old as human history.
One implication of the term propaganda, when it was first used in the sociological sense by the Roman
Catholic Church, “was to the spreading of ideas that would not occur naturally, but only via a cultivated or
artificial generation” (Çiçek, 2007, p. 95). The concept of propaganda was solely used at all time by the church
until the 18th century, when it had spread to general use. The term propaganda came to be widely used during
14 POLITICAL ADVERTISING AND PROPAGANDA
the French Revolution and first became associated with politics in a real sense during the French revolution.
Initial propaganda discourses and first propaganda officers emerged from revolutionary committees,
revolutionary clubs and revolutionary parliaments (Bektaş, 2000, p. 146).
Human history is full of numerous examples of propaganda and communication from Roman legions
marching battle to the sound of the drums to Egyptian pyramids reflecting the magnificence and glory of power
and from Mongol barbarism destroying almost all cities they conquered and paralyzing all societies with fear to
Christian cross which is seen as a representation of the crucifixion of Jesus and from magnificent palaces to
symbols of crowns and symbols of empire. As a matter of fact, Ibn Khaldun yet in 1300s was writing as
follows: “the sole purpose of using a large number of flags, increasing their colors and raising them so high is
to put in hearths and there is no other reason for doing so” (Çankaya, 2008, p. 19).
On the other hand, in today’s world we see that the term “propaganda” has acquired a strong negative
connotation and is frequently used to define negative attributes. In particular, after the end of the 2nd World
War, when it came to light that not only intelligence and propaganda agencies of the “opposite parties, enemies”
used and/or posted lies and misleading information but also “our respective agencies as well as our fellows”,
led the term to be perceived negatively strongly being associated with lies and misleading information and to
acquire a nasty and pejorative connotation.
Propaganda and Image
The creation of successful propaganda mainly depends on the creation of a successful image. There are
three key elements of image making: Benett identified these three key elements as follows:
(1) preparation of a simple theme or message for the targeted audience, in other words message
composition,
(2) dissemination of this message to all communication channels so that the message becomes salient and
dominant among competing images, in other words to increase its quality and feature of standing out strongly
and distinctly,
(3) surrounding the message with trappings of credibility in a manner to be accepted by the targeted
audience, in other words to ensure the credibility of the message.
Political Advertising and Propaganda
Political advertising, which is one of the most widely used instruments, in particular during electoral
periods, is a communication planned and implemented by a political party or candidate by purchasing
advertising time and space in communication media and in various forms of media content such as radio and
television to deliver political messages to influence the attitudes, behaviors and political beliefs of voters. An
important point to be taken into account in the definition of political advertising is the fact that political
advertisings are aired, broadcasted or published in any media in consideration of money or money’s worth
(Tokgöz, 2010, p. 172).
In the process of political advertising (campaign advertising) the direction of information flow is one way,
that is to say that all information is held by and all messages are delivered by the focal person or groups who
designed and created the advertising content or campaign. The power of political advertising to influence voters’
opinions is directly proportional to the total media coverage in terms of time and space in the mainstream media.
The capacity to purchase space in mass media including nationwide print media and radio and television
networks that broadcast on a nation scale with high audience shares, rating points and leading market positions
POLITICAL ADVERTISING AND PROPAGANDA 15
is directly proportional to the success of a political advertising. Accordingly, the process of political advertising
is a process which is directly associated with power and at the same in contradiction with power. It can be said
that political parties and politicians who are strong and powerful in economic sense design, develop and
implement this process in an easy manner.
At the present time, political advertising has become such an essential and important element that cannot
be ignored by political parties. In the first years in which it began to be used, political advertising was heavily
focused on the introduction and promotion of the ideologies and programmes of political parties, however in
the course of time has evolved into a trend in which the image of the leaders and candidates has come into
prominence (Özkan, 2007, p. 22).
Political advertising, which is an important propaganda tool, aims to reach the target audience in the
desired way and to influence them in the desired manner in accordance with political objectives by using
advertising techniques. While, on the one hand, commercial advertising is typically designed to make
consumers more aware of products, services or places seeking to increase interest in buying a product, visiting
a place or using a specific service on the other hand advertising used by political groups is typically designed to
deliver political discourses and messages to the target audience seeking their policies, programmes and
opinions to be accepted by the target audience (Göker & Alpman, 2010, p. 36).
Political parties use political advertising during electoral periods, and the presentation of the political party
and candidates to the society (voters) focusing on their personal properties and areas of competence and
specific talents and skills, and to stimulate voters’ attention and interests for the election and candidates and to
increase the support for the political party and/or candidates are the processes in which best efforts are used to
take actions that would help advertisers to achieve their objectives.
It can be said that political advertising has drastically changed and its importance and influence began to
highlighted as a means of gaining power and popularity in the United States of America after the Second World
War with Dwight D. Eisenhower who was the first presidential candidate to run a series of paid spot
commercials with political content on the television between 20 seconds and 60 seconds in the 1952
presidential elections of the United States of America (Tokgöz, 2010, p. 171).
Political groups generally prefer to implement political advertising during electoral periods in two
different ways, namely, positive advertising and negative advertising. Negative political advertising, also
known more colloquially as mudslinging involves an aggressive, one-sided assault designed to draw attention
to the opponent party’s and/or candidate’s weaknesses in either position or character. In this type of advertising,
in general, the elements of criticism remain in the forefront (Balci, 2006, p. 124). Negative political advertising
which contain messages with ironic or sarcastic content in an explicit or implied manner generally highlights
inconsistences in the promises made by the opponents or holds opponent candidates up to ridicule for
involuntary or uncontrollable movements such as tongue twisters and speech defects or criticizes personal lives
of opponents (Inal & Karabağ, 2010, p. 43). On the other hand, positive political advertising is a form of
communication by which the actions and performance of the political party or the candidate as well as their
promises are presented to voters by setting an optimistic theme for the future. This type of advertising is
designed and developed in a manner to highlight the candidate’s or the party’s good characteristic features
(Balci & Enes, 2007, p. 154). This type of positive advertising generally contains messages and and/or
statements mentioning helpful actions performed by the political party or the candidate for the benefit of elderly
people and/or disabled people, candidates’ good relationships and affiliation with their families, financial and
16 POLITICAL ADVERTISING AND PROPAGANDA
other assistance given to people in need by the candidates and other events occurred or contemplated and other
characteristic features of candidates that would create a positive impression on voters (Inal Karabağ, 2010, p. 43).
Agenda Setting in Political Propaganda Process and Spiral of Silence Theory
One of the general behavioral patterns of human beings is the instinct of being on the side of the powerful.
A number of various studies revealed that individuals, when developing an idea or thought, come together on
opinions which are generally accepted and agreed to by the society. In other words, the individual’s own
opinions are shaped according to the society’s general opinion.
Such behavioral pattern of adopting the opinion of the majority is typical for humans in many contexts and
we come across this type of behavioral pattern not only in the political decision making process of individuals
but also in many different contexts.
In the first place a world image is developed and created by means of mass media and subsequently mass
media imposes on masses of people what to think about the image so created. In other words, the world to be
considered and the issues to be thought about this world and ways of thinking are determined only by a handful
of people.
The spiral of silence theory developed by Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann focuses on the fundamental
socio-psychological thought arguing that the individualistic opinion depends on what others think. Neumann
explains the basic pillars of the theory as follows:
(1) Society threatens deviant- radical individuals with isolation;
(2) Individuals at all times live with the fear of isolation;
(3) This fear of isolation causes individuals to try to constantly assess the climate of opinion through their
personal relationships and through the media in order to maintain a high level of awareness concerning the
social consensus;
(4) The outcomes of their perception of the climate of opinion affect individuals’ behaviors and
individuals will be willing or reluctant to speak out (Mcquail, 1997, p. 135).
According to the determinations made by Neumann, an individual prefers to remain silence either because
of fear of isolation when the group or public realizes that the individual has a divergent opinion from the status
quo or because of feeling/herself insecure and unsafe or prefers to obtain some benefits by standing on the side
of the powerful. Apart from these individuals, there are also individuals who have not yet actually formed an
opinion about the matter, in question and they are called indecisive segment of the population. Politicians, in
particular, in electoral processes plan, design, develop and conduct their propaganda campaigns targeting this
segment of the population. These indecisive individuals form the majority of the population in many societies.
Accordingly, the primary target audience of political advertising and propaganda campaigns is these indecisive
individuals.
If the voter believes that his/her opinion is among less dominant opinions he/she shall be less inclined to
express his/her opinion. Eventually, opinions which are perceived to be dominant shall gain more importance
and become more dominant whereas alternative opinions even further decrease.
For example, in the examination made by Neumann on thetendency of voters in Germany in the federal
elections to be held in 1965, Neumann, in the first place found that the two major parties, namely, Christian
Democrats and Social Democrats were in dead heat, and that there were indecisive voters, however that in the
final weeks and days before the election, there had been “last-minute swing” whereby indecisive voters made
POLITICAL ADVERTISING AND PROPAGANDA 17
their decision to vote for Christian Democrats upon publication of opinion polls and surveys in favor of
Christian Democrats, and eventually Christian Democrats won the elections. This clearly shows the impact of
the snowball theory and that there is a concentration on the party which is expected to win.
Politicians, while developing their propaganda and persuasion strategies, try to find the reasons behind the
silence of individuals who prefer to remain silent and to reach them starting from this point of view based on
such reasons and also try to convince them to form their decision making process in line with the expectations
of politicians (Güngör, 2011, p. 299).
Conclusion
The histories of both public relations and advertising and propaganda date back to very old times. The
form and manner of these concepts in political communication field have changed, evolved and developed in
line with the development of means of mass communication and spreading of mass media.
The primary goal of the art and science of public relations is to develop mutual understanding and good
faith of organizations, enterprises and companies in social context. On the other hand, the primary goal of
propaganda is to shape the thoughts and opinions of individuals and to manage and guide their senses and
18 POLITICAL ADVERTISING AND PROPAGANDA
conscious thought process for the sake of achieving the desired results
One of the common goals of political communication efforts is to make analysis of the behavioral patterns
of voters and to provide political parties and candidates with the opportunity to review their strategies in
accordance with the feedbacks received and in case of necessity to provide either or both of them with the
opportunity to change their strategies. However, this process does not operate in the same manner as to the
form of use by political parties their propaganda strategies. Political parties do not change their strategies in
their propaganda processes based on feedbacks received. They insist on their tactics and strategies. Possibly,
this is the most important feature that differs propaganda from public relations.
In democratic societies, media is considered as an institution that has acquired a well-deserved reputation
as an impartial institution to allow public opinion to be freely formed and that audits the public administration.
Media relations step in the third stage to make the implantation in accordance with the strategy developed in the
planning stage following the stage of research conducted by public relations. The communication techniques an
tools should be used in a more effective way in order to reach a wider audience.
At the present time, the media has also undertaken the mission of training and socialization between
individuals apart from functioning as a mass media. Media plays a very crucial role as a determinant factor for
cultural communication processes of societies. The right to freedom of thought and expression is an integral
part of human rights and political election processes and when the right of society to information is taken into
consideration, it is seen that the function of media in this direction is of paramount importance. This function of
the media is adopted as a basic opinion by political parties and candidates who want to benefit from media in a
positive sense in political life.
References
Avci, N. (1990). Illiteracy of informatics. Rehber Puslishing.
Balci, Ş. (2006). Negative political advertising in convincing message as fear attractiveness strategy use (Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation, Institute of Social Sciences, Selçuk University).
Bektaş, A. (2000). Public, communication and democracy (2nd ed.). İstanbul: Bağlam Publishing.
Çankaya, E. (2008). The power is under the cover. Ankara: Boyut Publishing.
Çiçek, C. (2007). Persuasion structure process, with the objective and methods. Konya: Tablet Publishing.
Eroğlu, A. H., & Bayraktar, S. (2010). Voter preferences practices effects of political marketing—Izmir province example.
Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 12(2), 187-207.
Göker, G., & Alpman, S. P. (2010). Political advertising as a ideological instrument on reproduction of power. E-Journal of New
World Sciences Academy, I(5), 25-32.
Güngör, N. (2011). Communication theories, approaches. İstanbul: Politicial Publishing.
İnal, E. M., & Karabağ, Ö. (2010). A comparative analysis of advertisements of political parties published in nigde local
newspapers. IIBF Journal of Nigde University, 3(1), 41-56.
Mcquail, D. (1997). Mass communication models. İstanbul: İmge Publishing.
Özkan, N. (2007). Winning election campaigns (3rd ed.). İstanbul: MediaCat Publishing.
Özsoy, O. (1998). Methods and practices of propaganda and public opinion from the past to present. İstanbul: Alfa Publishing.
Tokgöz, O. (2010). Elections, political communication and political advertising. Ankara: İmge Publishing.
Topuz, H. (1991). Political advertising: Examples from around the world and in Turkey. İstanbul: Cem Publishing.
Uslu, Z. (1996). Political Communication and December 24th 1995 General Elections. Journal of New Turkey, 11, 790-804.