4 Writing Task 2
4 Writing Task 2
4 Writing Task 2
Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can
study online. Is this a positive or negative development?
Out line:
- act as: Có tác dụng như
- alternative solution / measure / method / way
- Covid – 19 pandemic = epedemic
- deter/prevent/stop/discourage sb from + V-ing:
- help sb + (to) V:
- make sb + V0/adj
- V-ing brings sb st = V-ing brings st to sb
- remind sb of st = remind sb to + V
- raise one’s awareness of st:
- play an important role in + st/V-ing
It is true that online courses are becoming a common feature of university education.
Although there are some drawbacks of Internet-based learning, I would argue that there
are far more benefits.
The main drawback of the trend towards online university courses is that there is less direct
interaction. Students may not have the opportunity to engage face-to-face with their
teachers, and will instead have to rely on written forms of communication. Similarly,
students who study online do not come into direct contact with each other, and this could
have a negative impact on peer support, discussion and exchange of ideas. For example,
whereas students on traditional courses can attend seminars and even discuss their subjects
over coffee after lessons, online learners are restricted to chatting through website forum
areas. These learners may also lack the motivation and element of competition that face-
to-face group work brings.
Despite the negatives mentioned above, I believe that online university courses are a
positive development for various reasons. Firstly, they allow learners to study in a flexible
way, meaning that they can work whenever and wherever is convenient, and they can cover
the material at their own pace. Secondly, the cost of a university education can be greatly
reduced, while revenues for institutions may increase as more students can be taught.
Finally, online learning offers open access to anybody who is willing to study, regardless
of age, location, ability and background. For example, my uncle, who is 65 years old, has
recently enrolled on an online MBA course in a different country, which would have been
impossible in the days before Internet-based education.
In recent years it has become far more normal for people to live alone, particularly in
large cities in the developed world. In my opinion, this trend could have both positive
and negative consequences in equal measure.
The rise in one-person households can be seen as positive for both personal and broader
economic reasons. On an individual level, people who choose to live alone may become
more independent and self-reliant than those who live with family members. A young adult
who lives alone, for example, will need to learn to cook, clean, pay bills and manage his or
her budget, all of which are valuable life skills; an increase in the number of such
individuals can certainly be seen as a positive development. From an economic perspective,
the trend towards living alone will result in greater demand for housing. This is likely to
benefit the construction industry, estate agents and a whole host of other companies that
rely on homeowners to buy their products or services.
However, the personal and economic arguments given above can be considered from the
opposite angle. Firstly, rather than the positive feeling of increased independence, people
who live alone may experience feelings of loneliness, isolation and worry. They miss
out on the emotional support and daily conversation that family or flatmates can provide,
and they must bear the weight of (gánh vác) all household bills and responsibilities; in
this sense, perhaps the trend towards living alone is a negative one. Secondly, from the
financial point of view, a rise in demand for housing is likely to push up property prices
and rents. While this may benefit some businesses, the general population, including those
who live alone, will be faced with rising living costs.
In conclusion, the increase in one-person households will have both beneficial and
detrimental effects on individuals and on the economy.
Many people, and children in particular, enjoy playing computer games. While I accept that
these games can sometimes have a positive effect on the user, I believe that they are
more likely to have a harmful impact.
On the one hand, video games can be both entertaining and educational. Users, or gamers,
are transported into virtual worlds which are often more exciting and engaging than real-life
pastimes. From an educational perspective, these games encourage imagination and
creativity, as well as concentration, logical thinking and problem solving, all of which
are useful skills outside the gaming context. Furthermore, it has been shown that computer
simulation games can improve users’ motor skills and help to prepare them for real-world
tasks, such as flying a plane.
However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Gaming can
be highly addictive because users are constantly given scores, new targets and frequent
rewards to keep them playing. Many children now spend hours each day trying to progress
through the levels of a game or to get a higher score than their friends. This type of addiction
can have effects ranging from lack of sleep to problems at school, when homework is
sacrificed for a few more hours on the computer or console. The rise in obesity in recent
years has also been linked in part to the sedentary lifestyle and lack of exercise that often
accompany gaming addiction.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more
significant than the possible benefits.
It is no doubt true that the majority of people would like to be happy in their lives. While
the personal nature of happiness makes it difficult to describe, there do seem to be some
common needs that we all share with regard to experiencing or achieving happiness.
Although it seems almost impossible to give a precise definition of happiness, most people
would agree that there are some basic preconditions to achieving it. Firstly, it is hard for a
person to be happy if he or she does not have a safe place to live and enough food to eat.
Our basic survival needs must surely be met before we can lead a pleasant life.
Secondly, the greatest joy in life is usually found in shared experiences with family and
friends, and it is rare to find a person who is content to live in complete isolation. Other
key factors could be individual freedom and a sense of purpose in life.
The majority of Đa số
The personal nature of Bãn chất cá nhân của
Fully understand Hoàn toàn hieu
Take pleasure Có niềm vui
A sense of satisfaction Cảm giác hài lòng
Achieving/deriving/reaping success Đạt ĐƯợc thành công
Basic preconditions Đieu kiện tiên quyet cơ bản
Basic survival needs Nhu cầu sinh tồn cơ bãn
Lead a pleasant life Dẫn đen một cuộc sống hài lòng
Shared experiences with Chia sẻ kinh nghiệm với
Content to live in complete isolation Hài lòng sống trong sự cô lập
hoàn toàn
Individual freedom Tự do cá nhân
A sense of purpose in life Ý nghĩa của mục đích sống
Basic needs for shelter, food Nhu cầu cơ bản về nhà ở, thực phẩm