See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/368257495

THE RESEARCH DESIGN

Article · February 2023

CITATIONS READS

0 54,405

2 authors, including:

Sumbl Ahmad Khanday

Aligarh Muslim University
8 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Sumbl Ahmad Khanday on 04 February 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

THE RESEARCH DESIGN

Sumbl Ahmad Khanday

Research Scholar Department of Sociology, A.M.U-Aligarh
Email: [email protected]
Deeba Khanam
Research Scholar Department of Law, A.M.U-Aligarh
Email: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
A research is valid when a conclusion is accurate or true and research design is the
conceptual blueprint within which research is conducted. A scholar for his research, prepare
an action plan, it constitutes the outline of collection, measurement and analysis of data.
Research design is not associated to any particular technique of data collection or any
particular type of data. When designing research it is necessary that we recognize the type of
evidence required to answer the research question in a reasonable way.[1]

WHAT IS A RESEARCH DESIGN?

1.1
Say that you have already decided what you want to study. The next question you
should ask yourself is – how are you going to conduct your study? What are
thedoesanddon’tsintheprocessofundertakingtheresearch?Theanswertothis question
comprises the core of a researchdesign.

A research design is a procedural plan that is adopted by a researcher to answer questions

in a valid way. It is very objective and accurate. Normally, a research design will
determine the type of analysis you should carry out to get the desired results. To what
extent your design is good or bad will depend on whether you are able to get the answers
to your research questions. If your design is poor, the results of the research also will not
bepromising.[2]
Research design is defined as a framework of methods and techniques chosen by a
researcher to combine various components of research in a reasonably logical manner so
that the research problem is efficiently handled. It provides insights about “how” to
conduct research using a particular methodology. Every researcher has a list of research
questions which need to be assessed – this can be done with research design.The sketch of
how research should be conducted can be prepared using research design.[3]
Research design is a logical and systematic plan prepared for directing a research
study. It specifies the objectives of the study, the methodology and techniques to be adopted
for achieving the objectives. It constitutes the blue print for the collection, measurement and
analysis of data. It is the plan, structure and strategy of investigation conceived so as to

1https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308915548_Research_Design
2file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/2011-0021_22_research_methodology.pdf
3https://www.questionpro.com/blog/research-design/

367
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

obtain answer to research question. The plan is the overall scheme or program of research. A
research design is the program that guides the investigator in the process of collecting,
analyzing and interpreting observation. It provides a systematic plan of procedure for the
research to follow.[4]
Different textbooks place different meanings on research design. Some authors
consider research design as the choice between qualitative and quantitative research
methods. Others argue that research design refers to the choice of specific methods
of datacollection and analysis. In your dissertation you can define research design as a
general plan about what you will do to answer the research question. [5]

Unlike a research proposal, a research designis usually not a public document and may be
seen by only a few people close to the researcher. It is an integrated statement of and
justification for the more technical decisions involved in planning a research project. Ideally,
designing social research is the process of making all decisions related to the research project
before they are carried out. This involves anticipating all aspects of the research, then
planning for them to occur in an integrated manner. Designing a research project is the way
in which control is achieved (Blaikie 2000).

To design is to plan; that is, design is the process of making

decisions before the situation arises in which the decision has
to be carried out. It is a process of deliberate anticipation
directed toward bringing an expected situation under control.
... If, before we conduct an inquiry, we anticipate each
research problem and decide what to do before-hand, then
we increase our chances for controlling the research
procedure. (Ackoff,1953).

This process is analogous to the activities of an architect in designing a building: it involves

recording, relating and then evaluating the decisions that need to be made. Careful attention
to detail, and a concern with the overall workability ofthe design, is required. Designing
social research involves the same processes.In particular, it is necessary to make sure that
individual design decisions areconsistent and fit together. These decisions then need to be
evaluated critically,and, to do this, the design decisions need to be made explicit.

4http://mu.ac.in/portal/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Research-Methodology.pdf
5https://research-methodology.net/research-methodology/research-design/
368
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

1.2 Definitions of research design

1. According to Seltizdeutsch and cock, “A research design is

the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of
data in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the
research purpose which economy in procedure”.

7. According to Kerlinger, “research design is the plan,

structure and strategy and strategy of investigation conceived
so as to obtain answers to research questions and to control
variance” Research design is in fact the conceptual
framework within which the research is conducted.

6. According to Bernard Philips he research design “as a blue

print for the collection, measurement and analysis of data”.

5. According to Claire Seltiz, “a research design is the

arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data
in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the research
purpose with economy in procedure”.

2. According to S.L. Gupta and Hitesh, “a research design

provides a flow of activities from problem formulation to
hypothesis development to data collection to data analysis to
final results to implications”. A research design provides a
flow of activities from problem formulation to hypothesis
development to data collection to data analysis to final result
(kumar, 1999).
3.
4. ith economy in procedure”. 369
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

1.3 Components of research design

The components of a research design can be organized in many ways. Thefollowing

framework is presented as an example of what the structure of a research design might look
like.
 Title
 Statement of the topic/problem
 Motives and goals
 Research questions and objectives
 Review the literature
 Research strategies
 Concepts, theories, hypotheses and models
 Data sources, types and forms
 Selection of data sources
 Data collection and timing
 Data reduction and analysis
 Problems and limitations

Having proposed possible structures and content for research proposals and research designs,
the next task is to find out how to prepare them. This will be done by discussing the three
main components: the core elements, which follow closely the headings just used to structure
the research design; for each element, the range of alternatives from which choices are made;
and the context in which these choices are made, i.e. the factors that can influence the
choices (Blaikie 2000).
As a research student, you should have a good understanding of your
research\problem such as the method that you would like to use in your work, be clear
about your research questions and what is it that you intend to establish. Never select a
design and then try to fit the research questions to the design! It should be the other way
around. It is very important for you to see if the design could answer your research
questions. It is necessary for you to choose a design that will give you
theoptimizedresultoverfactorsthatexplaintheresearchresultsobtained.

1.4 NEED AND IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH DESIGN

A research without a pre-drawn plan is like an ocean voyage without Mariner’s compass.
The preposition of a research plan for a study aids in establishing direction to the study and
in knowing exactly what has to be done and how and when it has to be done at every stage. It
enables the researcher to consider beforehand the various decisions to be made. What are the
objectives of the study? What are the investigative questions? What are the sources of data?
What is the universe of the study? What sampling method is appropriate? And so on.

370
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

Without a plan, research work becomes unfocussed and aimless empirical wandering the
researcher would find it difficult. The use of a research design prevents such a blind search
and indiscriminate gathering of data and guides him to proceed in the right direction. A
research plan prescribes the boundaries of research activities and enables the researcher to
channel his energies in the right work with clear research objectives in view, the researcher
can proceed systematically focused their achievement the design also enable the research to
anticipate potential problems of data gathering operationalization of concepts, measurement,
etc.[6]

1.5 Types of Research Design

A researcher must have a clear understanding of the various types of research design to
select which type of research design to implement for a study. Research design can be
broadly classified into quantitative and qualitative research design.

1. Qualitative Research Design: Qualitative research is implemented in cases

where a relationship between collected data and observation is established on
the basis of mathematical calculations. Theories related to a naturally existing
phenomenon can be proved or disproved using mathematical calculations.
Researchers rely on qualitative research design where they are expected to
conclude “why” a particular theory exists along with “what” respondents
have to say about it.

2. Quantitative Research Design: Quantitative research is implemented in

cases where it is important for a researcher to have statistical conclusions to
collect actionable insights. Numbers provide a better perspective to make
important business decisions. Quantitative research design is important for
the growth of any organization because any conclusion drawn on the basis of
numbers and analysis will only prove to be effective for the business.

Further, research design can be divided into five types –

1. Descriptive Research Design: In a descriptive research design, a researcher is solely

interested in describing the situation or case under his/her research study. It is a theory-based
research design which is created by gather, analyses and presents collected data. By
implementing an in-depth research design such as this, a researcher can provide insights into
the why and how of research.

2. Experimental Research Design: Experimental research design is used to establish a

relationship between the cause and effect of a situation. It is a causal research design where

6http://mu.ac.in/portal/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Research-Methodology.pdf
371
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

the effect caused by the independent variable on the dependent variable is observed. For
example, the effect of an independent variable such as price on a dependent variable such as
customer satisfaction or brand loyalty is monitored. It is a highly practical research design
method as it contributes towards solving a problem at hand. The independent variables are
manipulated to monitor the change it has on the dependent variable. It is often used in social
sciences to observe human behavior by analysing two groups – effect of one group on the
other.

3. Correlational Research Design: Correlational research is a non-experimental research

design technique which helps researchers to establish a relationship between two closely
connected variables. Two different groups are required to conduct this research design
method. There is no assumption while evaluating a relationship between two different
variables and statistical analysis techniques are used to calculate the relationship between
them.

Correlation between two variables is concluded using a correlation coefficient, whose value
ranges between -1 and +1. If the correlation coefficient is towards +1, it indicates a positive
relationship between the variables and -1 indicates a negative relationship between the two
variables.

4. Diagnostic Research Design: In the diagnostic research design, a researcher is inclined

towards evaluating the root cause of a specific topic. Elements that contribute towards a
troublesome situation are evaluated in this research design method.There are three parts of
diagnostic research design:

 Inception of the issue

 Diagnosis of the issue
 Solution for the issue

5. Explanatory Research Design: In exploratory research design, the researcher’s ideas and
thoughts are key as it is primarily dependent on their personal inclination about a particular
topic. Explanation about unexplored aspects of a subject is provided along with details about
what, how and why related to the research questions.7

1.6 FUNCTIONS OF RESEARCH DESIGN

A research design relates to the identification of procedures and logistical arrangements to

start a study and also at the same time emphasizes the importance of quality in producing
optimized research results. It glues all the components and subcomponents in a research
project together. In typical experimental research design, there are a few symbols that a
researcher should know which have been widely used to show the design of a study. These

7https://www.questionpro.com/blog/research-design/
372
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

symbolsare:

R = Random assignment:subjects are assigned in random and into

various groupings

X = Means treatment, which maybe design and implementation,

performance evaluation, simulation study and so forth

O = Observation or Measurement
(e.g. data rate, baud rate, respond time, buffering period,etc.)

Generally, we can divide the functions of research design into two:

(a) Constructing an operational procedure:to execute the tasks required in
completing your researchwork.
(b) Ensuringtheseproceduresaresufficient:togetvalid,objectiveandanswers
which are accurate to the questions posed in the researchwork.

One of the most fundamental aspects of a research design is to specify everything in depth
and clear. This is to ensure that a reader will understand what method to follow and how to
follow it. A research design should have thefollowing:
(i) Naming the study design (e:g comparative, cross-sectional, or random
control)
(ii) How will the study population beidentified?
(iii) What are the sampling methods used?
(iv) What method of data collection will be used in the researchwork?
(v) How will ethical issues be considered?

1.7 RESEARCH DESIGN VS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research design is different from the method by which data are collected. Many
research methods texts confuse research designs with methods. It is not
uncommon to see research design treated as a mode of data collection rather than
as a logical structure of the inquiry. But there is nothing intrinsic about any
research design that requires a particular method of data collection. Although
cross-sectional surveys are frequently equated with questionnaires and case
studies are often equated with participant observation (e.g. Whyte's Street Corner
Society, 1943), data for any design can be collected with any data collection
method. How the data are collected is irrelevant to the logic of the design. Failing
to distinguish between design and method leads to poor evaluation of designs.
Equating cross-sectional designs with questionnaires or case studies with
373
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

participant observation, means that the designs are often evaluated against the
strengths and weaknesses of the method rather than their ability to draw relatively
unambiguous conclusions or to select between rival plausible hypotheses.

Research design
1. Focuses on the end-product: What kind of study is being planned and what
kind of results are aimed at. E.g. Historical - comparative study, interpretive
approach OR exploratory study, inductive and deductive etc.
2. Point of departure (driven by) = Research problem or question.
3.Focuses on the logic of research: What evidence is required to address the
question adequately?
Research methodology
1. Focuses on the research process and the kind of tools and procedures to be
used. E.g. Document analysis, survey methods, analysis of existing (secondary)
data/statistics etc.)
2. Point of departure (driven by) = Specific tasks (data collection or sampling) at
hand.
3. Focuses on the individual (not linear) steps in the research process and the
most ‘objective’ (unbiased) procedures to be employed.[8]

1.8 Nature of Good Research Design

A good research design is regularly characterized by adjectives like flexible, appropriate,

efficient, and economical and so on. Generally, the design which minimizes bias and
collected & analyses is considered a good design. The design which gives the smallest
experimental error in supposed to be the best design in many investigations similarly; a
design which yields maximal information many different aspects of a problem is considered
most appropriate and efficient design in respect of many research problems. Some of the
strategies of good research design are as follows:
Theory – Grounded
Good research reflects the theories which are being investigated where specific theoretical
expectations can be hypothesized these are incorporated into the design.
Situational
Good research designs make known the settings for the study; this was shown above where a
specific need of teacher and administrators was openly addressed in the design plan.
Similarly, demoralization, intergroup competition and competition might be accessed
throughout the use of the additional comparison group who are not in direct contact with the
original group.

8file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/Research_and_Design_I.pdf
374
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

Feasible
Good design can be implemented. The series and timing of events are cautiously throughout.
Possible problems in measurement, devotion to project database construction and the like,
are predictable.
Redundant
Good research designs have some flexibility built into them often this flexibility results
from the repetition of essential design features (Akhtar 2016).
Summary:

A research design consists of strategy and specific procedures in seeking answers to a

specific researchquestion.
 A weak research design does not allow controlling extraneous variables into
experiment.
 Some examples of weak designs are one-shot design and one-group pretest-
posttestdesign
 A true research design allows us to maintain control over a situation in terms
of variables assignment.
 A quasi-experimental design is a design that does not provide full control
overvariables.

Books
1. Christensen, L. (1988). Experimental methodology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
2. Mitchell, M., &Jolley, J. (1988). Research design explained. New York: Holt,
3. Blaikie, N. (2000) Designing social research: the logic of Anticipation. Cambridge:
Polity press.
4. Kumar, R. (1999). Research Methodology: A step-by-Step Guide for Beginners.
London: Sage Publications Ltd,
Research papers
5. Akhtar,I.Md. (2016). Research Design. Retrieved from [Electronic version]
http//wwwC:/Users/hp/Downloads/BookChapters%20(1).pdf.
6. Trochim, W. T. (2007). Research method tutorials [Electronic version]
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/tutorial/tutorial.htm
7. Vagner , T. W. (2007). Introduction to research methods [Electronic version]
http://psychology.about.com/od/researchmethods/ss/expdesintro.htm

375
 JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS

ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 06, ISSUE 03, 2019

Internet resources
8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308915548_Research_Design
9. file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/2011-0021_22_research_methodology.pdf
10. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/research-design/
11. http://mu.ac.in/portal/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Research-Methodology.pdf
12. https://research-methodology.net/research-methodology/research-design/
13. http://mu.ac.in/portal/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Research-Methodology.pdf
14. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/research-design/

376
View publication stats