957 Wood
957 Wood
957 Wood
Courtenay Wood1
1 McGill University
ABSTRACT
Correspondence Shoulder pain is a common problem and the third most common
Courtenay Wood
musculoskeletal symptom for which patients seek medical care. Rotator
Email: [email protected]
cuff tendinosis is a frequent cause of this pain and can be diagnosed clin-
Publication Date
ically with a careful history and physical exam. Treatment consists of a
December 6, 2022
trial of pain management and physiotherapy and imaging modalities are
MJM 2022 (21) 10
often not required. However, imaging can be highly valuable for other
https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v21i1.957
pathologies. This article guides the reader through key elements to in-
clude in a history and physical exam of the shoulder, and how and when
www.mjmmed.com KEYWORDS
Rotator cuff tendinopathy, Shoulder pain, Imaging, Best practice
1
2 Wood
tests and the drop arm test. Mr. D does not demonstrate humerus, and acts to abduct the shoulder. The in-
weakness when performing these tests but reports that fraspinatus and teres minor originate from the in-
it is painful to perform resisted external rotation. fraspinous fossa and inferior lateral border of the
What is the next best step in managing this patient? scapula, respectively, and both insert on the greater tu-
A) Plain radiographs of the shoulder bercle of the humerus. These muscles act to externally
B) Ultrasound (US) rotate the shoulder. Finally, the subscapularis originates
C) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from the subscapular fossa and inserts on the lesser tu-
D) Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) bercle of the humerus, acting to internally rotate the
E) 6-week trial of pain management physiotherapy shoulder. See Figure 1 for the anatomy.(5)
The presentation of a RC tear differs in that there may active and passive range of motion.(12)
be weakness (e.g., with external rotation or abduction of Special orthopedic tests should then be employed
the shoulder) in the affected muscle.(1, 10) Other exam- to narrow down the diagnosis. Examples of these
ples of causes of non-traumatic shoulder pain include tests include the belly press test (sensitivity 28%, speci-
adhesive capsulitis, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, labral ficity 94%) and lift off test (sensitivity 19%, speci-
tears, biceps tendinopathy, avascular necrosis, and bone ficity 95%) for the subscapularis; Hornblower (sensi-
tumors.(8, 10) tivity 17%, specificity 96%) for the infraspinatus; and
Attention to risk factors for these shoulder patholo- Jobe’s test (sensitivity 88%, specificity 62%) and full
gies should also be investigated. Risk factors that in- can tests (sensitivity 7-% and sensitivity 81%), for the
crease the likelihood of RC disease include: age, tis- supraspinatus.(10, 12, 13) However, a combination of
sue over- or under-loading, an occupation or sport with special orthopedic tests must be used to increase diag-
overhead activity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, high nostic accuracy (17) as none of these tests alone reliably
body mass index, and smoking.(1, 6) isolate separate structures given their close proximity to
one another.(1) Normal strength in a series of tests may
point the physician toward a tendinosis whereas weak-
2.3 | Physical Examination ness may allow the physician to diagnose a RC tear.(1,
12, 14)
The physician should begin with observation of the pa-
tient.(12) They should note their posture, arm position,
and the use of compensating accessory muscles. The 2.4 | Treatment for RC Tendinosis
physician should then inspect for swelling, erythema, at-
2.4.1 | Pain management
rophy, deformities, and any asymmetries between the
shoulders and scapulae.(12) The physician should then Adequate pain management and a prompt return to
proceed to palpate for any pain or deformities in the work are important components of the recovery pro-
bony and muscular structures of the shoulder and sur- cess.(2, 15) Non-pharmacological measures such as
rounding joints. Next, they should assess the patient’s ice, heat, and massage as well as pharmacological
FLOWCHART 1 Decision tree for selecting an imaging modality for shoulder pain.
short scan times, and greater patient satisfaction. Fur- ten be diagnosed clinically with a history and physical
thermore, MRI and MRA have contraindications such exam.(1) In the case of traumatic full thickness tears,
as metal implants or claustrophobia, which ultrasound prompt surgery is recommended.(3) For tendinosis, if
avoids.(3, 9, 11, 19) If ultrasound imaging remains incon- symptoms do not improve after a 6-12 week (16) course
clusive, the patient should then undergo MRI or MRA.(3) of conservative treatment, imaging may be indicated.
Although ultrasound carries the above benefits, it The modality of choice should be carefully selected
does have some shortcomings. One major disadvantage based on the suspected etiology according to the pa-
of ultrasound is the necessity of personnel trained in ul- tient’s presentation. In general, plain radiographs are
trasound imaging of the RC.(19) When it comes to evalu- best used to assess bone and joint pathology, ultrasound
ating partial thickness tears, MRA may be the best imag- is best for RC or bursal pathology, and MRI or MRA are
ing modality for this pathology given its superior sen- best for labral pathology.(20)
3. Nazarian LN, Jacobson JA, Benson CB, Bancroft LW, Bedi A, Mc- der and elbow surgery. 2013 Oct 1;22(10):1371-9.
Shane JM, Miller TT, Parker L, Smith J, Steinbach LS, Teefey SA. 17. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management
Imaging algorithms for evaluating suspected rotator cuff disease: of Rotator Cuff Injuries Evidence- Based Clinical Practice
Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference state- Guideline. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic
ment. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):589-95. Available from: doi: Surgeons; 2019 Mar 11 [cited 2022 Jan 29]. Available
10.1148/radiol.13121947 from: https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-
4. Desmeules F, Braen C, Lamontagne M, Dionne CE, Roy JS. Deter- resources/rotator-cuff/rotator-cuff-cpg-final-12-20-19.pdf.
minants and predictors of absenteeism and return-to-work in work- 18. Krabak BJ, Sugar R, McFarland EG. Practical nonoperative man-
ers with shoulder disorders. Work. 2016 Jan 1;55(1):101-13. agement of rotator cuff injuries. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine.
5. Tortora, GJ, Derrickson, B. Principles of anatomy and physiology. 2003 Mar 1;13(2):102-5.
14th ed. Danvers, MA: Wiley; c2014 19. Anderson MW, Brennan C, Mittal A. Imaging evaluation of the
6. Weber S, Chahal J. Management of rotator cuff injuries. JAAOS- rotator cuff. Clinics in sports medicine. 2012 Oct 1;31(4):605-31.
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2020 Available from: doi:10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.010
Mar 1;28(5):e193-201. 20. Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine. Rec-
7. Thomopoulos S, Parks WC, Rifkin DB, Derwin KA. Mechanisms ommendations: Sport and Exercise Medicine. Choosing Wisely
of tendon injury and repair. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2015 Canada [internet]; 2021 Sep [cited 2022 Jan 29]. Available from
8. Ponnappan RK, Khan M, Matzon JL, Sheikh ES, Tucker BS, Pepe
MD, Tjoumakaris FP, Nassr AN. Clinical differentiation of upper ex-
tremity pain etiologies. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy
of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015 Aug 1;23(8):492-500.
9. Yablon CM, Jacobson JA. Rotator cuff and subacromial pathology.
Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology. 2015 Jul;19(03):231-242.
Available from: doi:10.1055/s-0035-1549317
10. Anderson BC. Office orthopedics for primary care: diagnosis.
Elsevier Health Sciences; 2005 Dec 7.
11. Roy JS, Braën C, Leblond J, Desmeules F, Dionne CE, MacDer-
mid JC, Bureau NJ, Frémont P. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonog-
raphy, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator
cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British jour-
nal of sports medicine. 2015 Oct 1;49(20):1316-28. Available from:
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094148
12. Reider B. The Orthopedic Physical Examination. 2nd ed,
Philadelphia PA: Elsevier Saunders; c2005.
13. Jain NB, Luz J, Higgins LD, Dong Y, Warner JJ, Matzkin E, Katz
JN. The diagnostic accuracy of special tests for rotator cuff tear: the
ROW cohort study. American journal of physical medicine rehabil-
itation. 2017 Mar;96(3):176.
14. Harrison AK, Flatow EL. Subacromial impingement syndrome.
JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
2011 Nov 1;19(11):701-8.
15. Hopman K, Krahe L, Lukersmith S, McColl AR,
Vine K. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Manage-
ment of Rotator Cuff Syndrome in the Workplace. The
University of New South Wales; c2013. Available at:
https://rcs.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/rcs/page/RotatorC
uffSyndromeGuidelines.pdf
16. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten KM, Bishop
JY, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Holloway BG, Jones GL, Ma CB. Effective-
ness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator
cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Journal of shoul-